A Queensland man accused of killing his former partner before dumping her body in the Brisbane River has made a third bid for freedom.
Jesse Wahlen Beale allegedly murdered mother-of-two Crystal Beale after they went out to dinner in Sunnybank in Brisbane’s south in 2025.
She was said to have been dropped off by Mr Beale on Ryan Street in West End about 9.30pm. She was allegedly murdered that evening, and her body taken to the river near Orleigh Park in West End.
Mr Beale allegedly killed the 49-year-old after she threatened him over alleged images he had kept of Ms Beale being sexually assaulted while unconscious.
Mr Beale has so far made two unsuccessful bail applications and hired top barrister Saul Holt KC to represent him for an appeal relating to his most recent refusal, which related to a report by defence expert witness Professor John Duflou.
Holt relied on the report, which found drowning could not be excluded as a cause of death, for the second application for bail. This was also combined with claims of her self-harm, substance abuse and threats of suicide, which had significantly weakened the allegations.
He said the new evidence “dramatically changes the picture” for the prosecution case.
The bail application was ultimately refused by Justice Patrick McAfferty.
“That contested issue opens up questions of causation, opens up questions of time, and especially in circumstances where the evidence is that … [Mr Beale] was in company with [Ms Beale] about 9.55pm, and the body of the deceased is found … around 5.30am,” Holt told the Court of Appeal on Monday.
Holt said the only reason Beale was refused bail was because of his flight risk.
Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Caroline Marco said the report did not detract from the conclusion that Mr Beale allegedly caused Ms Beale’s neck injuries, and put her body in the water.
She said the judge who ruled on Mr Beale’s bail application was not compelled by the report to find that there had been a material change of circumstances.
Marco said the allegation Mr Beale caused the significant neck injuries to Ms Beale had always been a fundamental premise of the prosecution case.
“Those neck injuries may not be able to be proved irrefutably to have caused death, but notwithstanding, it cannot be denied they were seriously life-threatening,” she said.
She said a pathologist’s report before the court did not provide any explanation to suggest the injuries could have been self-inflicted.
Marco said the judge found in the second bail application that the Duflou report simply added to an evidentiary foundation that had already been considered in the first application.
“That is, that the death could have resulted from drowning. But it didn’t detract from the possibility that [Mr Beale] may have caused the life-threatening injuries, and that was, with respect, correct.”
She said the report would not have altered the court to grant bail, given the first judge concluded that the prosecution case was reasonably strong.
Marco said the two judges, and the Court of Appeal judges, would have evidence before them that included that Mr Beale was the last person in Ms Beale’s company, the CCTV did not show any person leaving the vehicle at the time Mr Beale claimed Ms Beale left, and searches on Mr Beale’s device relating to tide times, VPN hiding search history, and CCTV cameras.
Beale’s appeal remains before the Court of Appeal.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
From our partners
Discover more from PressNewsAgency
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.