Biden’s European tilt is nothing to be happy about

In her recent World View column “Europe’s anxieties about Biden are really anxieties about itself” (September 6), Harvard’s Nathalie Tocci tried to cheer up Europeans who are let down by U.S. President Joe Biden’s hasty and unilateral withdrawal from Afghanistan. The U.S. president’s emphasis on human rights, to be promoted not “through endless military deployments, but through diplomacy, economic tools and rallying the rest of the world for support,” she argues, is “as European as it gets.”

Precisely. However, far from comforting Europeans, this observation summarizes everything that is wrong about the current administration’s approach.

Europe’s reliance on multilateralism and moralizing, instead of hard power, is possible only insofar as it has been propped up by America’s role as a global policeman. A United States that becomes more Europe-like does not help narrow the gap between Americans who come “from Mars” and Europeans who are “from Venus,” as Robert Kagan quipped.

Instead, such a shift in Washington risks making the European outlook unsustainable. Similarly, the prospect of a U.S. that becomes more “European” in its economic policies would make Europe’s own social model less workable. This would be due to the slowing down of global innovation and technological change, as economists Daron Acemoglu, James Robinson and Thierry Verdier explained.

Multilateralism and “new policy instruments and methods, blending principles and pragmatism” are no substitute for adequate defense budgets, a willingness to use hard power when necessary and the ability to inflict costs on adversaries even when it means inflicting some costs on oneself.

Existing economic ties with China, for example, generate gains to Western consumers and businesses. Decoupling, reshoring or just keeping companies such as Huawei out of our 5G networks inherently destroys some of those real gains — arguably with the benefit of reducing the vulnerability of Western economies to Chinese intellectual property theft, economic manipulation and attacks on critical infrastructure.

Likewise, there are unpleasant trade-offs involved in Europe’s propensity toward cooperation and multilateralism, including in its efforts to keep China at the negotiating table to address the problem of climate change.

In short, the competition of democracies against the world’s autocrats requires making hard choices that do not come naturally to European policymakers. To see a U.S. administration adopt the same habits of mind should be a cause for alarm, not comfort, in European capitals.

Dalibor Rohac
Senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute
Washington DC, USA



Source by [author_name]

Latest

James Cleverly Picks A Row With Nicola Sturgeon Over Abuse Of BBC Journalist

Education secretary James Cleverly has just picked a fight...

Republican party branch that shared KKK imagery apologizes

The Lawrence County Republican Party in Alabama has apologized...

How has a year of Taliban rule changed Afghanistan?

On Wednesday, August 17 at 19:30 GMT:It’s now a...

Giuliani Bemoans ‘Fascist State’ Ahead Of Georgia Grand Jury Testimony

Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, decried what...

Wish you weren’t here: Pink Floyd goes to war over Ukraine

The members of Pink Floyd didn’t need another reason to hate one another — but Russia’s invasion of Ukraine gave them one anyway. David Gilmour and...

Olaf Scholz slammed over (non)reaction to Palestinian leader’s Holocaust remarks

BERLIN — German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has come under fire for his sluggish condemnation of remarks by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that downplayed the Holocaust. Asked...

UK inflation hits 10.1 percent, highest in 40 years

U.K. consumer price inflation hit 10.1 percent in the 12 months to July, jumping from 9.4 percent in June to its highest point since...