Facebook will start labelling ‘state-controlled media’ pages

Facebook will now let you know when governments are controlling news (Facebook)

Facebook has said it will begin labelling state-run media pages in its latest effort to improve transparency across the platform.

At least 18 news outlets, including Russia’s RT and China’s government-owned People’s Daily, will be subject to the new measure in a bid to ‘help people better understand who’s behind the news they see’ on the social network, said Nathaniel Gleicher, head of cybersecurity policy.

‘We’re providing greater transparency into these publishers because they combine the influence of a media organisation with the strategic backing of a state,’ he explained.

The tech giant considers a number of factors that indicate editorial control by a government, such as the ownership structure, funding, accountability mechanisms and editorial guidelines.

In the lead up to the presidential election, the US will get additional protections, blocking state-controlled media outlets from advertising to users in the country later this summer.

The initial list of confirmed publishers that fall under Facebook’s new labelling policy include: Press TV, Tasnim News Agency, Algerie Presse Service, Journal ech-chaab, Russia Today, Sputnik, RIA Novosti, CCTV, Xinhua News, People’s Daily, 2M.ma, Al Aoula (Morocco), Agence Tunis Afrique Presse, La Presse (Tunisia), DPRK Today, TV 5 Thailand, Philippine News Agency and People’s Television Network.

Lots of us get our news from social media – and it’s not always clear where it comes from (Credits: Getty Images)

It comes at a tense time for Facebook, with employees past and present openly expressing discontent over chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to leave up posts by Donald Trump that suggested protesters in the US could be shot.

Rival Twitter opted to demote a tweet about the protests that read, in part, that ‘when the looting starts the shooting starts’, as well as placing a warning on it.

Meanwhile, Facebook has let it remain on its platform, with Mr Zuckerberg laying out his reasoning in a Facebook post on Friday.

‘I know many people are upset that we’ve left the President’s posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers spelled out in clear policies,’ he wrote.

Source link


Stokes’ power play: WA billionaire eyes second historic Perth power station

The state promised Synergy would announce the successful bidder...

Assam Flood Situation Improves; 2 More Die, 9.68 Lakh Affected

The flood situation in Assam continued to improve on...

The Department Of Transportation Has Cracked Down On Airlines Before. Why Not Now?

For years, airline carriers sometimes made passengers wait in...

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle’s top polo outfits side-by-side

Over the course of their married lives, both Meghan...

One-of-a-kind carbon crystals may have formed in meteor explosion

Almost a decade ago, a meteor caused chaos in the Ural mountains region of Russia. Exploding in the skies above the city of Chelyabinsk,...

In a big potential breach, a hacker offers to sell a Chinese police database.

In what may be one of the largest known breaches of Chinese personal data, a hacker has offered to sell a Shanghai police database...

Twitter challenges India order to take down tweets

Twitter has petitioned a court challenging "several" orders to take down content on its platform. Source link