Frontex neglected evidence of potential migrant pushbacks, says Parliament report

The EU’s border agency overlooked evidence that migrants were being illegally turned away at the bloc’s borders — a failure that left migrants exposed to future violations of their basic rights, a European Parliament report concluded.

The report says that a four-month fact-finding mission by a group of MEPs “did not find conclusive evidence on the direct performance of pushbacks and/or collective expulsions” by the border agency, Frontex, “in the serious incident cases that could be examined.”

However, it concluded that “the agency found evidence in support of allegations of fundamental rights violations in [EU] member states with which it had a joint operation, but failed to address and follow-up on these violations promptly, vigilantly and effectively,” according to an advance copy of the report seen by POLITICO.

“As a result, Frontex did not prevent these violations, nor reduce the risk of future fundamental rights violations,” says the report, which will be officially presented on Thursday.

Multiple media outlets reported last year on allegations that Frontex was involved in illegal pushbacks of asylum seekers at the EU’s borders, and the agency has also been plagued by accusations of mismanagement and internal chaos in its recruitment process. Earlier this year, the EU’s anti-fraud watchdog OLAF opened an investigation into the agency over allegations of harassment, misconduct and migrant pushbacks.

Frontex Executive Director Fabrice Leggeri, however, has denied that Frontex participated in pushbacks and said there was no evidence the agency’s staff took part in illegal activities.

In February, the Parliament set up a Frontex Scrutiny Working Group, chaired by Maltese center-right MEP Roberta Metsola, to investigate the accusations. The report, which also includes recommendations to Frontex, was written by Dutch Green MEP Tineke Strik following the group’s investigation over the past four months.

The report criticizes how “several reliable actors, such as national and international human rights bodies and organizations, consistently reported about fundamental rights violations at the border in a number of member states with which Frontex is carrying out a joint operation,” yet “Frontex generally disregarded these reports.”

It also expresses concern about what it calls a “lack of cooperation” from Leggeri “to ensure compliance” with the agency’s governing regulation, “which led to significant delays in the implementation of the regulation.” Notably, the report “strongly disapproves of the delay in the recruitment of the fundamental rights monitors, which sharply contrasts with the proposal of the Executive Director to expand the Cabinet of the Executive Management of Frontex to 63 staff members.”

Frontex is currently undergoing a dramatic expansion — including a program to create a 10,000-strong standing corps of border guards in the coming years. But its regulation says it should also recruit at least 40 “fundamental rights monitors” to oversee the agency’s compliance with human and EU rights — a process that should have been completed by December 5 last year, according to the regulation.

In February, EU Home Affairs Commissioner Ylva Johansson lambasted Leggeri for the delays in hiring these monitors.

Strik, the author of the report, criticized how only 20 of the 40 fundamental rights monitors had been hired so far, but also that “the director said we must also differentiate and make some of them assistants.”

“This results now in the fact that out of the 40 that are supposed to be there, only five are true monitors who can independently visit places, and 15 are just assistants,” Strik added.

She said Frontex’s management board must now address these shortcomings, and she also called on the European Commission to intervene more actively if the border forces of EU countries, which cooperate with Frontex, are suspected of being involved in pushbacks.

EU countries and the Commission “should step up their involvement and actions to ensure that Frontex’s support of border surveillance goes hand in hand with adequately preventing and combating fundamental rights violations,” the report says.

Frontex could not be reached for immediate comment on the criticism voiced in the report.



Source by [author_name]

Latest

Catalytic converter theft ring busted in Oregon; how to prevent theft

If your vehicle’s catalytic converter was one of 44,000...

Rival Shia groups square off over Iraq leadership vacuum

Rival Iraqi factions took to the streets of Baghdad...

EU proposes lifting pressure on Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to revive nuclear deal

Press play to listen to this article BERLIN — Europe’s...

NASA satellite captures Sahara Desert dust plume over the Atlantic Ocean

Dust clouds have never looked this good.July was a...

EU proposes lifting pressure on Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to revive nuclear deal

Press play to listen to this article BERLIN — Europe’s proposal to resuscitate Tehran’s nuclear deal with world powers would blunt American sanctions against Iran’s...

Author Salman Rushdie attacked on stage in New York

LONDON — Novelist Salman Rushdie has been violently attacked while delivering a lecture in New York. Police said Rushdie was airlifted to hospital after...

UK not buying AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 antibody drug over lack of data

The U.K. has no plans to buy doses of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 antibody therapy Evusheld that is designed to protect vulnerable people, arguing that the...