Lead Plaintiff In Case That Legalized Same-Sex Marriage ‘Disgusted’ With Supreme Court

Jim Obergefell, the main plaintiff in the 2015 Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States, said Sunday he was appalled with the nation’s highest court after its decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade last week.

“My immediate reaction was anger and also disgust that the highest court in our land, the court that is supposed to protect equal justice under law, the court that is supposed to interpret the Constitution to support every person in this country, that a justice on that court would put in writing a clarion call to opponents of marriage equality and LGBTQ+ equality, not to mention the right to contraception in that concurring decision?” Obergefell told MSNBC’s Symone Sanders on Sunday. “That is nothing more than a call for people who are opposed to those, opposed to us.”

“It is appalling that a Supreme Court justice would do that. It is appalling that a Supreme Court would take away a right that people in America, that women in America, have enjoyed and come to rely on for almost 50 years,” Obergefell, who is running for the Ohio House of Representatives as a Democrat, added.

Civil rights advocates have pointed to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, which protected abortion rights nationwide. In his opinion, Thomas argued the court should also reconsider cases like Obergefell v. Hodges, as well as rulings that legalized same-sex sexual activity (Lawrence v. Texas) and granted Americans access to contraception (Griswold v. Connecticut). Doing so, he said, would “correct the error” the court established with those precedents.

Thomas was the lone justice to sign his opinion.

Thomas also noted that he agreed with Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion, which said the decision “should not be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” But many civil rights advocates said they fear the heavily conservative court could take aim at other liberties.

The liberal members of the court echoed those fears in their dissenting opinion. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan stated that “no one should be confident that this majority is done with its work.”



Source by [author_name]

Latest

Subscribe and support independent journalism

The deputy president has been declared the winner of...

Gas station system error sells gas for only 46 cents per gallon

While gas prices across the U.S. continue to plunge,...

First A Heatwave, Now Floods – What’s Going On With The UK’s Climate?

British weather has definitely taken a more terrifying turn...

Watergate Lawyer John Dean Says Trump Media Loyalists Will Be Embarrassed

John Dean ― President Richard Nixon’s White House counsel who testified against his boss and served four months in prison for the Watergate coverup...

This Kid’s Reaction To Dropping His Hot Dog Is The Play Of The Day

A young fan enjoying a glizzy at the Tigers-White Sox game in Chicago had an unfortunate turn of events. Source by

Jury Selection In R. Kelly Federal Trial To Begin In Chicago

CHICAGO (AP) — Jury selection begins Monday at R. Kelly’s federal trial in his hometown of Chicago, where the R&B singer faces charges that...