But when confronted by a CNN reporter, Lindell claimed he couldnâ€™t show the evidence, as heâ€™d promised, because of something-something, the media.Â Â
â€œI have that proof with my people that weâ€™re bringing to the Supreme Court,â€ Lindell told CNNâ€™s Donie Oâ€™Sullivan. â€œI donâ€™t need the media driving the narrative before my case to the Supreme Court.â€Â
Lindell swore his evidence would be so strong that the Supreme Court would unanimouslyÂ ruleÂ in his favor, that President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris would resignÂ and that Trump would be reinstated on Aug. 13. Instead, the evidence he discussed was described by one of his own experts as a â€œturd.â€Â Â
Oâ€™Sullivan brought election security expert Harri Hursti to Lindellâ€™s event to analyze any supposed evidence.Â
â€œWe expected a huge pile of data which we wouldnâ€™t be able to understand and how it can be evidence,â€ Hursti said. â€œWe didnâ€™t expect thereâ€™s no pile of anything.â€Â
See Oâ€™Sullivanâ€™s full segment, including a very defensive Lindell, below:Â
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost’s next chapter