Poor optics, lacklustre results and sparse details describe the recent visit of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr to the United States. The outcome of the trip – the first by a Southeast Asian head of state under the second Trump administration – raises questions about whether Manila is able to fully leverage its long-standing alliance with the US.
The terms of the trade deal – of 19 per cent tariffs being imposed on Philippine goods entering the US market, compared to no tariffs for US goods bound for the Philippines – were seen as lopsided. Financial services firms Nomura and Fitch initially anticipated that Manila could bring down the rate to the baseline 10 per cent given its strong alliance with the US and the fact it is not a known hub for goods transshipment.
Beyond the disappointment, the trade agreement is estimated to cost Manila 27 to 32 billion pesos (US$472.7 to US$560.2 million) in revenue losses during the next five years. According to Nomura’s forecast, direct trade losses on account of higher US duties will reduce the Philippines GDP growth this year from 5.3 per cent to 4.9 per cent.
Manila’s commitments to buy more US soybeans and wheat will benefit American farmers. Last year, the Philippines was the second-largest buyer of US wheat, and this volume is likely to surge further with the new agreement. The exact details of the deal – such as whether Washington will ask Manila to buy more US aircraft and energy products, as it did in the agreement with Indonesia – are still taking shape.
The potential influx of more US pork, poultry and beef could give Filipino farmers reason for concern. US suppliers, which face no tariffs, are in a better position than their competitors from Australia, Brazil, Canada and the EU. Meanwhile, Philippine exporters have to compete with producers from Latin America and other Southeast Asian countries while dealing with 19 per cent levies.
03:00
Philippines’ Marcos secures trade deal with Trump, but tariffs only drop 1 percentage point
Philippines’ Marcos secures trade deal with Trump, but tariffs only drop 1 percentage point
Those levies neutralise whatever edge the Philippines might have had over its neighbours when US President Donald Trump launched his “Liberation Day” tariffs in April. Back then, at a lower 17 per cent rate, the Philippines received inquiries from firms eyeing to relocate to the country, given its tariff advantage. However, with the tariff schedules now equalising, it is uncertain whether these leads will still exist.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.