“Balikatan 2026” is meant to reassure allies and deter adversaries. But the military exercise hosted by the Philippines also reveals a harsher truth: the Indo-Pacific is drifting into a security logic in which deterrence no longer contains risk but multiplies it. Every move taken in the name of stability now invites a countermove. Every display of resolve is answered by another. The result is not equilibrium, but a trap.
That is why diplomacy has to return to the centre of regional strategy before military signalling becomes the region’s default language.
The scale of the exercise is itself a message. More than 17,000 personnel from the Philippines, United States, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand are involved. Japan is participating as an active combat partner for the first time, and its Type 88 anti-ship missile is part of a live-fire drill. Philippine and US forces are also conducting maritime strike drills on Itbayat, the country’s northernmost island, close to Taiwan.
Manila frames Balikatan as a sovereign exercise in defence modernisation and “minimum credible deterrence”. An army spokesman said the Philippines was “unfazed” by Beijing’s warnings and had contingency plans for any escalation around the drills. That stance captures the moment. Even a defensively framed exercise is now paired with explicit readiness for a response – capability, geography, timing and symbolism all matter here, and all sides now speak in those terms. No country embodies that shift more sharply than Japan.
For years, Tokyo expanded its regional security role cautiously, wrapping change in the language of partnership and constitutional restraint. That caution is thinning. The clearest recent example is the April 17 transit of the destroyer JS Ikazuchi through the Taiwan Strait, shadowed by China’s Eastern Theatre Command for 14 hours. The date was politically explosive: the anniversary of the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, which forced Qing China to cede Taiwan to Japanese colonial rule.
That historically freighted date made the transit inflammatory. A PLA Daily commentary accused Tokyo of “harming the feelings of the Chinese people” and warned of Japan’s “new militarism”. Official Chinese channels circulated drone footage of the encounter to underline the point. Whatever Tokyo intended, Beijing did not read the passage as routine navigation – and answered immediately in operational terms.
Japan’s new arms export rules trigger Chinese warning against ‘moves towards militarism’
Japan’s new arms export rules trigger Chinese warning against ‘moves towards militarism’
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.