Sunday, May 17, 2026

Battle rages over Israel’s plan for industrial zone in unique West Bank landscape

Jun 24, 2020

Peace activists and environmental groups are campaigning against an industrial zone to be established near the West Bank settlement town Beitar Ilit. They say that the project endangers water sources used by local Palestinians for traditional terraced agriculture.

The project was conceived some five years ago. The area is under direct IDF military control and considered diplomatically sensitive. Ultra-Orthodox settlers live there in the vicinity of several Palestinian villages. The plans for the industrial zone place it north of ultra-Orthodox Beitar Ilit and the Palestinian village of Wadi Fukin, and near two other Palestinian villages. And so, authorities were in no hurry to approve the project. It was ultra-Orthodox Interior Minister Aryeh Deri who pushed the plan forward. Anxious to offer the ultra-Orthodox residents of Beitar Ilit job prospects, Deri put the project on the top of his priority list.

But it was not until December 2018 that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu greenlit the plan. Deri had smartly combined the authorization of Beitar Ilit’s industrial zone with the authorization of another West Bank industrial zone Barkan. Netanyahu thus discovered that he could not approve the one without the other. Deri then got the Finance Ministry to allocate millions of shekels to the project, promising that the zone would generate thousands of high-level jobs.

This industrial park, to be established on an area known as the “English Forest,” will house industry, tech incubators and IT companies alongside shops, sports facilities and other public spaces including a cemetery.

With Netanyahu’s authorization, plans for the industrial zone were drafted and elaborated. These plans have already been submitted for the usual public inspection procedures, during which anyone can voice an objection. They are expected to be submitted soon to the civil administration planning committee for final approval.

For the mayor of Beitar Ilit, the project is practically a fait accompli, but Israeli and Palestinian activists continue to fight it. They explain that the project is located in West Bank’s Area C close to the Green Line, in an area with no separation fence. While authorities say that the industrial park will be constructed on state land, activists claim that some of it belongs to Palestinian villagers.

But there is more to the problem. The area near Wadi Fukin houses beautiful old terraces for traditional agriculture, used by generations of local Palestinian farmers. The same water sources are used to irrigate the terraces as the ones farmers used hundreds of years ago. The uniqueness of this area has attracted attention in recent years, with UNESCO including the site, Battir, to its World Heritage List.

“The Battir hill landscape comprises a series of farmed valleys, known as ‘widian,’ with characteristic stone terraces, some of which are irrigated for market garden production, while others are dry and planted with grapevines and olive trees. The development of terrace farming in such a mountainous region is supported by a network of irrigation channels fed by underground sources. A traditional system of distribution is then used to share the water collected through this network between families from the nearby village of Battir,” reads UNESCO’s description.

Environmentalists fear that the industrial zone will pollute and even destroy the underground water sources, damaging the site, which dates back to the rule of King Herod. They also fear that the construction and heavy machinery will destroy the ecological corridor that enables the movement of wild animals there on both sides of the green line.

EcoPeace Middle East has been championing the campaign against the project and for the preservation of the terrace landscape of Battir. Its Israeli director Gidon Bromberg told Al-Monitor, “Planning maps clearly show that the industrial estate would indeed cover much of the buffer zone of the World Heritage site as well as touch the core area itself.” Sources in UNESCO explained to Al-Monitor that the agency is not yet involved in the campaign, as the industrial zone is planned outside of the specific protected area.

Still, EcoPeace and local Palestinian residents argue that the town of Beitar Illit and the neighboring village of Tzur Hadasah have been advancing construction plans to enlarge the two localities. They say the plans place the aquifers in danger of damage and pollution.

Sources involved in the industrial zone say that steps will be taken to protect the underground water sources, that no chemical plants would be authorized there and that special efforts will be made to minimize damage to the environment. Still, EcoPeace fears that once permission is granted for the bulldozers to start digging, there will be no turning back.



Source link

Trump Notches His 200th Lifetime Federal Judge

0

WASHINGTON ― Senate Republicans on Wednesday confirmed President Donald Trump’s 200th lifetime federal judge, a number higher than any president has confirmed in a first term in decades.

Zero of his judges at the highest levels ― on the nation’s appeals courts and the Supreme Court ― have been Black. And it’s the first time in four decades that there isn’t a single appeals court vacancy left nationwide.

The president hit the milestone as Republicans voted to put Cory Wilson onto the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

Trump will almost definitely brag about this number ― he should! It’s a big part of his legacy. Broken down, he has confirmed two Supreme Court justices, 53 appeals court judges, 143 district court judges and two judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade. These are all Article III judges; they serve for life and can only be removed by impeachment.

Trump has gotten more judges confirmed by this point in his presidency than President Barack Obama (152), President George W. Bush (190) and President Bill Clinton (186). He falls short of President Jimmy Carter, though, who had confirmed 239 judges by this point.

But if you look at the percentage of court seats Trump has filled compared to the total number of judgeships that exist, he’s about in the middle of past presidents. That’s because the number of total judgeships has changed over the years.

“You know, 200 may be a snazzy number,” said Russell Wheeler, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Governance Studies Program and president of the Governance Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. “But if you’re trying to weigh Trump’s impact on jurisprudential change, by one measure, it’s obviously significant ― he’s ahead of most of his predecessors on the courts of appeals ― but on the district courts, he’s not ahead of them by any matter of means.”

Here’s a Brookings Institute chart that shows how Trump stacks up with past presidents in terms of the percentage of court seats they had filled by this point. Trump ranks fourth.

There’s more to this than sheer numbers, though.

The White House has worked closely with The Federalist Society, a conservative legal group, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to funnel members of the organization into appeals court seats. They’ve focused on appeals courts because, while most people pay attention to the Supreme Court, it generally refuses to hear appeals. That means that appeals courts have the final say in more than 99 percent of the cases they decide. So you can think of appeals courts as mini-Supreme Courts.

Wilson is Trump’s 53rd appeals court judge. For context on how many that is, Obama confirmed 55 appeals court judges in eight years. And what do Trump’s appeals court judges have in common? They are overwhelmingly young, conservative, white men with records of being hostile toward voting rights, women’s reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights.

Of Trump’s 53 appeals court judges, none are Black. Eleven are female. Seven are Asian Pacific American. One is Latino. Thirty-six are white men.

Wilson is the perfect embodiment of a Trump appeals court judge. He’s a 49-year-old white man who has described the Affordable Care Act as “illegitimate,” said he supports ”the complete and immediate reversal” of Roe v. Wade, and called same-sex marriage “a pander to liberal interest groups” and ”an attempt to cast Republicans as intolerant, uncaring and even bigoted.”

His record on voting rights is particularly relevant amid the national reckoning on racial justice. In a 2011 op-ed, Wilson dismissed the NAACP’s concerns about a proposed Mississippi voter ID law as “poppycock.” He ripped the Justice Department in 2013 for sending election observers to the state, which has a long history of voter suppression and intimidation, and instead suggested federal officials go after rare cases of “voter fraud.”

He similarly dismissed the Obama administration’s concerns about voter suppression in a 2012 op-ed: “The Rachel Maddows of the media world have joined the chorus of ‘voter suppression’ right on cue from Team Obama. This is as phony as the ‘war on women.’” He also directly attacked Obama, calling him “King Barack,” “petty and small” and “a fit-throwing teenager.”

Organizations including the NAACP strongly opposed Wilson, who will now oversee Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas on the 5th Circuit, which presides over the highest percentage of people of color in the country. But every Senate Republican except for one, Susan Collins of Maine, voted to confirm him. Every Democrat voted no.



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has made confirming judges his No. 1 priority with Donald Trump in the White House. It’s paid off on the nation’s appeals courts.

Progressive groups have increasingly made judicial nominations a central reason why they must flip the Senate back to Democratic control.

“Trump has prioritized ideological extremism over all else, and the result is the least diverse group of judges in decades, further undermining the legitimacy of our courts,” said Chris King, chief counsel of Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group. “To repair this damage, when Democrats are in power, they must not only prioritize our courts like never before, they must take affirmative steps, such as expanding the number of district and circuit court seats, to restore balance and legitimacy.”

Trump still has several months to fill more court vacancies, and McConnell will definitely make this a top priority ― especially in the lame duck, if Trump loses reelection in November. But at the moment, there are no more appeals court seats to fill. McConnell has responded by personally reaching out to Republican-appointed judges and encouraging them to retire so he and Trump can fill their seats this year.

Even if Trump doesn’t confirm any more judges, his 53 relatively young appeals court judges will have an impact on jurisprudence, though it will be modest, speculated Wheeler. They’ll be deciding cases on panels with other judges appointed by Obama, Bush, Clinton and others.

In the meantime, Democrat-appointed judges itching to retire may be hanging onto their seats until November to see if Joe Biden wins.

“If Trump somehow gets reelected ― boy, Katy bar the door ― I have to think there are a lot of Democratic court appointees who are eligible for senior status … who have been holding off in the hopes that Biden will appoint their successor, not Trump,” he said. “But you reach a point where you can’t go on.”

If Biden does win, Wheeler added, “The flood gates may open and [Democrats] would get a lot more vacancies.”



Source link

SA’s economy expected to contract by 7.2% in 2020

0

The economy is in a depressed state, and Finance Minister Tito Mboweni has called for cautious use of the country’s finances to avert plunging into a sovereign debt crisis

The post SA’s economy expected to contract by 7.2% in 2020 appeared first on The Mail & Guardian.

Source link

The Best Ideas for Living Right Now

0

Welcome. What does it mean now, to be “at home”? Not so long ago we nonessential people were quarantined, hiding out from an invisible foe, either circled tight with family or flying solo, peeking out the windows at the scary world without. We awoke at home, spent the day at home, went to bed at home. One newsroom wag declared time changed forever: coffee time, wine time, sleep time. Everything else was work, even if you weren’t working. We were all just stacking time, at home.

Now we’re eating outside of restaurants, some of us, or gearing up to go to drive-ins for films. We’re shopping in sneaker stores instead of making rare mad dashes into the market for flour and milk. We’re voting, considering elevators, planning road trips, getting onto boats to fish. The coronavirus pandemic continues to swirl, and we’re out there amid it, many of us masked, some of us not, and we’re considering our ways forward into the charged, changed future, with whatever it brings.

Still, it bears repeating: We’re safest at home. And it is important that our lives there be as full as possible, cultured and rich. At Home is devoted to that conviction.

[Like this newsletter? Sign up to receive it in your inbox.]

So we’ll tell you all about delicious things to make and eat (strawberry drop biscuits, please!), and we’ll point you toward performances worth your time (here’s Aretha Franklin, “Never Gonna Break My Faith,” featuring The Boys Choir of Harlem).

  • You can’t say people aren’t getting creative with the arts while the world is partially shut down. Recent innovations include opera by phone, and a series of plays you can listen to rather than watch.

  • If you’ve been stuck inside for a long time, you might feel a strange sense of familiarity when watching any of these films, each of which took place in a single location. Meanwhile, if you’re looking for something to watch, a good way to celebrate the life of Joel Schumacher, who died this week, is to watch “Batman Forever,” the movie in which he revived a franchise.

  • And if you have some time tonight, tune in for a live event where Tara Parker-Pope and Amber Coleman-Morty discuss how you can raise a socially conscious, anti-racist child.


You can always find much more to read, watch and do every day on At Home. And you can email us: athome@nytimes.com.

Source link

Nico Kurz believes there will be a German darts world champion one day

0

Last Updated: 24/06/20 5:42pm


Nico Kurz is one of the rising stars of German darts

Darts in Germany is clearly on the rise.

The country is becoming an increasingly-popular stop-off for PDC events. Berlin joined the Premier League circuit from 2018, the World Cup is frequently held in Hamburg and Frankfurt, while there are often Euro Tour and World Series events staged in the country.

The popularity of the sport is clear; thousands of Germans make the annual pilgrimage to Alexandra Palace.

But so far no German player has made a significant breakthrough at the very top level by winning a PDC major.

Max Hopp has featured in the Premier League as a 'Contender'

Max Hopp has featured in the Premier League as a ‘Contender’

Max Hopp, Martin Schindler and Gabriel Clemens are among those who have made a splash in recent years. And another rising star is Nico Kurz. The 23-year-old last week sealed his spot at the 2021 World Championship, as he looks to build on his two wins at Ally Pally in the 2020 event.

“It’s massive for me to be heading back to Ally Pally, the fairytale goes on,” Kurz said to the PDC, after he beat Dragutin Horvat 10-9 in the final of the German Darts Super League.

“Last year was an incredible experience at Ally Pally, especially for someone who isn’t a ‘full-time pro’ yet.

“Playing the best players in the world on the biggest stage in the world was very special, something I will always remember.

“Long-term, I’m not in a rush to win my Tour Card yet. I hope to qualify for more European Tour events once we get back playing to gain more experience in front of crowds.”

Kurz sealed his spot at Ally Pally in dramatic fashion

Kurz sealed his spot at Ally Pally in dramatic fashion

Kurz is confident German darts is on an upward trajectory.

“Being around players like Max [Hopp], Gaga (Gabriel Clemens) and Robbie (Robert Marijanovic) has made the start to my darts career really enjoyable, they are great examples to follow,” he said.

“I definitely believe that there will be a German world champion one day.

“German players have shown they can challenge the top 10 players in the world on occasions, though not regularly or consistently enough so far.

“If some of us can find consistency then it’s well possible for there to be a German world champion, we’ve definitely got enough talent in German darts, so I think it will happen one day.”



Source link

‘Covid-19 to deepen inequalities in education’ — report

0

A report from Unesco highlights a lack of access to online learning: only 12% of learners in sub-Saharan Africa can connect to the internet at home

The post ‘Covid-19 to deepen inequalities in education’ — report appeared first on The Mail & Guardian.

Source link

EU Could Bar U.S. Travelers Due To Ongoing Rise In COVID-19 Cases

A woman walks past a lifeguard on a beach in Lloret de Mar this week, as beaches in Spain reopen following a lockdown to stop the spread of the coronavirus. The EU is now considering which countries should be allowed to send tourists to its member nations.

Josep Lago/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Josep Lago/AFP via Getty Images

A woman walks past a lifeguard on a beach in Lloret de Mar this week, as beaches in Spain reopen following a lockdown to stop the spread of the coronavirus. The EU is now considering which countries should be allowed to send tourists to its member nations.

Josep Lago/AFP via Getty Images

The European Union is making a list of countries whose travelers will be allowed to visit this summer — and for now at least, the U.S. doesn’t seem likely to meet the criteria, based on its recent coronavirus numbers.

The U.S. has the most cases of any country in the world, and many states are reporting sharp rises in new cases as they ease shutdown orders.

The EU plans to begin lifting its travel restrictions on July 1, in a move that could salvage part of the summer tourist season. Its member nations are now discussing how to open the bloc to travelers without risking a new outbreak, and the list of preferred countries is a central part of those talks.

Chief among the criteria: “the epidemiological situation in a given country which should be as good as or better than in the EU,” a European Commission spokesperson told NPR.

As of last week, the notification rate for new coronavirus cases in the EU and the U.K. “was 82% lower than at the peak on 9 April 2020,” the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said in its most recent weekly report.

In contrast, the U.S. recently reported more than 32,000 new cases on two consecutive days – something that hadn’t happened since April 11, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The European Commission set the framework for a selective list of countries earlier this month, when it said all 27 member states should agree to one set of criteria to allow visitors from outside countries. The EU’s current goal is to finalize the list before it lifts restrictions in one week.

Once the EU travel list is final, the bloc would revise it on a regular basis, to reflect changing circumstances as countries grapple with the pandemic that has now left some 9.3 million people infected worldwide, including more than 2.3 million in the U.S.

French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne is one of the European officials negotiating the travel list — a process he described on French radio as “very intense work.”

Lemoyne said Europe had mostly gotten the epidemic under control and that France was ready to roll out the welcome mat to other Europeans. But he said the EU could not risk letting visitors in from countries where the virus is still rapidly spreading.

The EU checklist for deciding which nations should enjoy relaxed travel restrictions looks at several key factors, from the recent number of new infections to the overall trend in cases. It also takes into account a country’s response to the coronavirus through testing, surveillance, contact tracing, containment and treatment.

Details about what metrics the EU might use — such as timeframes or per capita rates of spread — are not yet known. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he believes the U.S. and its European allies will be able to work out an arrangement.

“We’ve been working with them for quite some time on this,” Pompeo said at a press briefing. “I am confident that we will find a set of conditions that create sufficient health and safety protections” and still allow travel.

Travel between the U.S. and Europe has been a source of contention during the pandemic. When President Trump abruptly announced a travel ban on 26 European countries (exempting the United Kingdom) about three months ago, the EU publicly registered its disapproval, saying it had not been warned. The U.S. ban also triggered chaos at airports, as people scrambled to make last-minute arrangements.

The coronavirus has been raging in many parts of the U.S., where several large states, including Texas, California and Florida, have reported record high numbers of new cases. Over the past 14 days, the U.S. has reported 367,172 new cases — second only to Brazil’s 406,403 cases, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

In addition to concerns about controlling the coronavirus, the checklist could also wind up barring the U.S. because it calls for a reciprocal relaxing of travel restrictions toward all EU countries. The U.S. currently bars most travelers from European countries.

“It’s important for the United States to get Europeans the capacity to travel back to the United States,” Pompeo said. “It’s very important for the Europeans to fully reconnect with the American economy, as well.”

The dearth of U.S. visitors to Europe is already dealing a financial blow to the travel and tourism industry. Last year, roughly 2 million or more Americans visited Europe in each month from May through September, according to the U.S. National Travel & Tourism Office.

NPR’s Michele Kelemen contributed to this report.



Source link

Tonight on: Skeem Saam the latest Episode (E254 S8 for Wednesday, 24 June 2020)

0

On tonight’s episode:

Marothi declares war on his sworn enemy. Josias calls Charity Ramabu regarding her mother’s situation. Alfred’s financial woes are far from forgotten.

Watch: Latest Skeem Saam Episode 254 S8 – 24 June 2020

The latest episode will appear here after it aired. You might need to refresh or restart your browser if you are on a mobile and do not see the episode. Episodes are available for seven days after they first aired. If you don’t see the latest episode or it is not working it might have been removed from the source and unfortunately it is out of our control.

If you missed some episodes find more Skeem Saam Episodes to watch here.

Thursday on Skeem Saam

Lehasa plays his ace card and shows Malebana something incriminating. Josias and Kat are frustrated by Granny’s refusal to see reason. Kwaito drops a bombshell on Glenda regarding their last sexual encounter.

Read all about what’s happening in Skeem Saam in June over here.

About Skeem Saam

Pretty crosses a potentially dangerous line with her brother’s best friend. Charles worries about the release of his nemesis from prison. Clement struggles to get through to Manaka.

The show first aired in October 2011. It has gone on to become one of South Africa’s most beloved dramas. By thrusting teens into adult scenarios, it’s become a hit with TV viewers of all generations. It’s ‘coming of age’ premise continues to set it apart from rival soapies, too.

When and where to watch Skeem Saam

It airs on SABC1 Mondays to Fridays at 18:30, DSTV Channel 191. If you’re unable to catch the latest episode when it airs, we’ll be publishing full episodes shared on SABC’s YouTube channel. Stick with us, and you’ll never miss a show again.

DMCA.com Protection Status



Source link

Google to auto-delete users’ records by default

0

Image copyright
Getty Images

Google is changing its default settings to automatically delete some of the data it collects about users.

Web and app activity, including a log of website searches and pages visited, as well as location data, will now be wiped after 18 months.

YouTube histories – including which clips were watched and for how long – will be erased after 36 months.

The changes apply to new accounts only but existing users will soon be shown new prompts to adjust their settings.

The announcement comes as Google and other big technology companies’ data-collection efforts and business practices face increased scrutiny.

The Wall Street Journal has reported the US Department of Justice is to meet with state attorneys general later this week to discuss plans to punish Google for anti-competitive behaviour, including an allegation it has abused its dominance in online search.

And, on Tuesday, a German court imposed curbs on the data Facebook collects about local users, over concerns it has been abusing its market-leading position among social networks.

Image copyright
Google

Image caption

Google will help existing users adjust their settings directly within its Search tool

Guided tips

Google introduced auto-delete controls in May 2019, to let users force the regular erasure of logs gathered about them by the company, but made this an opt-in option at the time.

The US technology company draws on this information to produce personalised recommendations and search results, as well as to target ads.

“We know that information makes our products helpful,” Google product manager David Monsees said.

“But data minimisation is one of our important privacy principles [and] Google will no longer keep activity indefinitely unless you ask us to.”

Google said it wanted to hold on to YouTube records for longer than other internet activities, as this would help it do things such as make music recommendations, for which a longer search history was beneficial.

And it added the auto-wipe policy would not apply to logs linked to Photos, Gmail and its Drive cloud-storage facility, which it said it did not draw on for advertising purposes.

The company has justified its decision not to apply the change to existing accounts on the basis it does not want to catch people out by wiping “curated” data without their express permission.

And it noted all users could choose to set the auto-wipe period to as little as three months.

However, it does mean the change will affect far fewer people than it might have.

Long-time users will be affected by other measures, though, including being shown new “guided tips” .

For example, if someone uses Google Search to ask if their account is secure, a box will appear showing their settings and providing a way to adjust them.

Image copyright
Google

Image caption

Google is introducing a new way to go into Incognito Mode within some of its apps

In addition, other related “dynamic cards” should be introduced shortly.

In one instance, if a user opts to share their handset’s location with a friend, they will later be reminded the permission is still active and asked if they want to turn it off.

Google said it had also made it “easier to access” Incognito Mode in its apps – a setting that suspends data-logging – by letting users turn on the facility by pressing and holding their profile picture.

“Many people are uncomfortable with the amount of information Google keeps,” said Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group.

“Prompts could mean a range of things people do their best to ignore.

“Google should ensure that everyone has made a clear indication about whether they want their histories stored and for how long, rather than whether they have swiped away some notice they half read.”

Source link

Inmates Received Coronavirus Stimulus Checks. The IRS Wants the Money Back

0

(BOISE, Idaho) — Hundreds of thousands of dollars in coronavirus relief payments have been sent to people incarcerated across the United States, and now the IRS is asking state officials to help claw back the cash that the federal tax agency says was mistakenly sent.

The legislation authorizing the payments during the pandemic doesn’t specifically exclude jail or prison inmates, and the IRS has refused to say exactly what legal authority it has to retrieve the money. On its website, it points to the unrelated Social Security Act, which bars incarcerated people from receiving some types of old-age and survivor insurance benefit payments.

“I can’t give you the legal basis. All I can tell you is this is the language the Treasury and ourselves have been using,” IRS spokesman Eric Smith said. “It’s just the same list as in the Social Security Act.”

Read more: ‘A Double Whammy.’ Those Who Most Need The $1,200 Stimulus Checks May Wait the Longest To Get Them

Tax attorney Kelly Erb, who’s written about the issue on her website, says there’s no legal basis for asking for the checks back.

“I think it’s really disingenuous of the IRS,” Erb said Tuesday. “It’s not a rule just because the IRS puts it on the website. In fact, the IRS actually says that stuff on its website isn’t legal authority. So there’s no actual rule — it’s just guidance — and that guidance can change at any time.”

After Congress passed the $2.2 trillion coronavirus rescue package in March, checks of up to $1,200 were automatically sent in most cases to people who filed income tax returns for 2018 or 2019, including some who are incarcerated. A couple of weeks later, the IRS directed state correction departments to intercept payments to prisoners and return them.

The IRS doesn’t yet have numbers on how many payments went to prisoners, Smith said. But initial data from some states suggest the numbers are huge: The Kansas Department of Correction alone intercepted more than $200,000 in checks by early June. Idaho and Montana combined had seized over $90,000.

Washington state, meanwhile, had only intercepted about $23,000 by early June. Some states, like Nevada, have refused to release the numbers, citing an IRS request for confidentiality.

Prison officials nationwide have been trying to intercept the checks, with varying results. Officials in Vermont, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Arizona and California estimated that they each had intercepted fewer than a dozen checks as of early June. Oregon prison officials had seized 25 payments, with 21 returned to the IRS and four others given to relatives or other joint tax filers.

Kaitlin Felsted, a spokeswoman for the Utah prison system, said the state had intercepted 28 checks so far but noted that any relief money sent to an inmate’s home address wouldn’t be touched by prison officials.

Some states, like Alaska and Wyoming, aren’t tracking the number of payments they intercept.

While the IRS says checks sent to jail inmates also should be returned, the sheer number of jails and detention centers across the U.S. makes it difficult to tell if many are following those instructions.

Related Stories

Read more: The Coronavirus Is Hitting Our Nation’s Prisons and Jails Hard. And It’s Exposing a Crisis That Existed Long Before the Outbreak

The IRS seems to have decided by itself to pull back the payments approved by Congress, said Wanda Bertram, a spokeswoman for the Prison Policy Initiative, a think tank focusing on the harm of mass incarceration. She says prison officials are accustomed to intercepting tax documents to screen for potential scams, priming them to follow this request.

“It appears that the IRS is just making this up,” Bertram said.

Inmates and their families need the money, she said, especially as prisons try to reduce the spread of the virus by instituting lockdown conditions or releasing thousands of inmates who are then trying to get back on their feet.

Lockdowns can increase expenses for inmates because they are often given lower-quality food or fewer meals and need to supplement by buying food from prison commissaries. Family and friends on the outside often cover those costs, and many have lost jobs during the economic downturn, Bertram said.

“Loved ones right now are also under a squeeze because of the pandemic and being out of a job, so when you send a stimulus check for someone, the person in prison is not the only one who benefits from that,” Bertram said.

Intercepting relief checks may also have a disproportionate impact on Black and Hispanic inmates, who are incarcerated at a higher rate than white Americans. Black people are imprisoned at roughly twice the rate of Hispanic residents, and more than five times the rate of whites as of last year, according to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics.

It’s not clear if inmates have any recourse, said Erb, the tax attorney.

Those who are released before year’s end can claim the missing money as a credit on their 2021 tax returns, but other inmates may be out of luck, Erb said.

“I think somebody has to sue, and you have to have the resources to be able to do that,” she said. “I don’t know that there’s anything most people can do besides complain and see if they can attract some attention. You have to have somebody who will step up and be an advocate for that segment of the population.”

___

Associated Press journalists Amy Beth Hanson Jonathan Mattise, Andrew Selsky, Emily Wagster Pettus, Rachel La Corte, Michelle L. Price, Mark Scolforo, Don Thompson, John Hanna, Mead Gruver, Jacques Billeaud, Lindsay Whitehurst, Mark Thiessen and Wilson Ring contributed.

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Source link