The Coronavirus Is Still Spreading, Trump And Congress Are Still Dithering

0

WASHINGTON ― Two months after Congress passed its last coronavirus response bill, and despite a number of approaching deadlines, Republicans and Democrats appear far apart on another round of economic relief.

House Democrats passed a bill in May totaling $3 trillion. White House aides are advising President Donald Trump on a relief package of at least $2 trillion. And Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has told Trump he doesn’t want the next measure to be more than $1 trillion.

But disagreement on the overall size of the next bill is far from the biggest hurdle. Perhaps the most contentious sticking point in the legislation is what Republicans don’t want: a continuation of extra unemployment benefits beyond their July 31 expiration.

McConnell told House Republicans in May that the Senate wouldn’t extend the additional $600 a week the federal government has been supplying to the unemployed since March ― and nothing seems to have changed since he made that promise. 

Republicans have been touting a better-than-expected jobs report in early June as proof that the next relief bill doesn’t need to be massive, and they seem to believe ending the extra $600 a week would force people back into the workforce. 

“I mean, we’re paying people not to work. It’s better than their salaries,” White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said Sunday, parroting a GOP talking point about the need to let the unemployment benefits expire.

Kudlow added that Trump would be looking to institute “some kind of bonus” for people returning to work ― likely similar to a proposal from the Ways and Means ranking Republican, Kevin Brady of Texas ― but it’s clear Trump and Republicans have no intention of renewing the extra $600 a week.

The added money was designed to help people maintain their spending while staying at home to avoid catching or spreading the coronavirus, which has killed more than 116,000 Americans so far and continues to kill 500 to 1,000 Americans per day.

Republicans have totally rejected the notion that the money had any public health purpose, and the administration has been encouraging states to cut off people’s benefits if they turn down job offers. Instead, the GOP view on the added unemployment benefits seems to be that it was solely an economic stimulus. And the complaint from some employers that workers don’t want to return for less than they would make on unemployment has led Republicans to believe the economy will be better off by forcing those people back to their jobs.

At least, it would help the unemployment rate.

That piece of economic data has been a huge cause of concern for Democrats and Republicans. The unemployment rate sits at 13.3% ― a mark higher than any point during the Great Recession. 

But the rate fell by 1.4 points in May, with 2.5 million people returning to work. For Republicans, that was evidence that Congress didn’t need to rush another round of stimulus.

“The jobs report pumped the brakes a little and put a lower ceiling on how aggressive the spending will be,” a senior White House aide told HuffPost, “but there will be one.”

The White House hasn’t wavered in their desire for some stimulus. And, with the presidential election less than 140 days away, that makes sense.

Luckily for Trump, Democrats also haven’t wavered in their desire for economic relief. And there’s general agreement from congressional Republicans that they ought to juice the economy ahead of the November elections.

The problem, however, is there’s less agreement on how much juice, how to juice, and when it will come.

A senior GOP aide told HuffPost on Monday that it was unlikely the Senate would move before July 4. And with Democrats still intent on extending at least some amount of extra money for unemployment ― the bill House Democrats passed in May would extend the $600 until the end of the year ― Republicans believe that July 31 deadline will bring Democrats to the negotiating table.

That’s certainly possible, but a deal would likely hinge on Republicans extending a portion of that $600, just as it would hinge on a number of other sticking points.

For one, McConnell has said a deal would require legal protections for businesses, schools and government agencies that reopen during the coronavirus pandemic. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) have thus far opposed those sorts of protections. And while McConnell has shifted his stance on no relief for state and local governments, Republicans and Democrats are still likely far apart on the exact number.

Pelosi’s bill included nearly $1 trillion alone for state and local governments.

There’s also a disagreement over broad-based stimulus. Trump himself has said he’d like to see a payroll tax cut, which would reduce or suspend the 6.2% that workers and employers both pay for income up to $137,700. Meanwhile, Democrats have signaled that they want another round of $1,200 payments for people making less than $75,000.

The one saving grace for a deal is this sad reality: The coronavirus isn’t leaving anytime soon. New cases are rising ― even spiking ― in a number of states. And the economic hangover is likely to continue for months to come.



Source link

Bristol City confirm positive coronavirus test

0

Robins yet to confirm if positive test was for player or staff member

Last Updated: 16/06/20 4:03pm


The club are yet to confirm if the positive test was for a player or staff member

Bristol City have confirmed one positive coronavirus test from the latest round of testing – four days before the Sky Bet Championship restart.

The English Football League (EFL) is set to publish the full latest round of testing on Tuesday – as they have been doing once a week – ahead of the Championship return on June 20 live on Sky Sports Football.

In the last round on June 10, the EFL confirmed six positive cases across four Championship clubs with two positive cases at Sky Bet League One club Portsmouth and none in Sky Bet League Two.

Bristol C vs Sheff Wed

June 28, 2020, 11:30am

Live on

The Robins find themselves just one point outside the play-offs ahead of the league restart with two upcoming home matches live on Sky Sports – against Sheffield Wednesday on June 28 and Cardiff City on July 4.

First, though, they face a trip to Blackburn on Saturday.

Championship restart: More live games on Sky

The Championship is back - with 30 matches live on Sky Sports plus exclusive coverage of all the play-offs

The Championship is back – with 30 matches live on Sky Sports plus exclusive coverage of all the play-offs

Sky Sports has announced another seven Championship games to be broadcast live when the league resumes – read the full list here.

Charlton’s London derby with Millwall on Friday July 3 will be shown live on Sky Sports Football, before the East Midlands derby between Derby and Nottingham Forest the next day at 12.30pm.

The race for promotion and a play-off spot continues as Bristol City host Cardiff on Saturday July 4 at 3pm, while Sheffield Wednesday go to Swansea the next day at midday.

Fulham go to Forest on Tuesday July 7 at 5pm, and at the top of the table West Brom host Derby at 5pm on Wednesday July 8, while leaders Leeds are also in action on Sky Sports, hosting Stoke at 5pm on Thursday July 9.

Watch the Championship live on Sky Sports

Sky Sports will show 30 Sky Bet Championship games as well as exclusive broadcasting of all 15 EFL play-off games, when the season restarts on June 20.

  • 30 live games will be broadcast on Sky Sports across the rest of the Sky Bet Championship season
  • Club season ticket holders will be given access to all Sky Sports live games involving their team through the iFollow online platform
  • Sky Sports will broadcast the 15 EFL play-off games across the Championship, League One and League Two

The Sky Bet Championship will provisionally restart on June 20 with Sky Sports showing 30 games.

Season ticket holders will be able to watch any live game involving their club via the EFL’s iFollow online platform. They will also be given access to their teams’ non-broadcast games, while non-season ticket holders will be able to purchase non-broadcast games for £10. Access to the games will be determined by the club where the supporter holds a season ticket and may be in lieu of a refund or part of a wider package as determined by each individual club.

Fans can also make sure they are across all the action by tuning into a new a Sky Sports’ ‘goals as they go in’ show for non-broadcast fixtures.

Sky Sports will also broadcast the 15 games from the semi-finals and finals of the EFL play-offs across the three divisions.

Domestic Super 6 IS BACK!

Do not miss your chance to land the £250,000 jackpot on Saturday. Play for free, entries by 12:30pm.



Source link

COVID-19 treatment a ‘major breakthrough’

0

A cheap and widely used steroid called dexamethasone has become the first drug shown to be able to save lives among COVID-19 patients.

Scientists have hailed the findings as a “major breakthrough” after trials showed dexamethasone reduced death rates by around a third among the most severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital.

Dexamethasone is used to reduce inflammation in other diseases.

The results, announced on Tuesday, suggest the drug should immediately become standard care in patients with severe cases of the pandemic disease, the researchers who led the trials said.

“This is a result that shows that if patients who have COVID-19 and are on ventilators or are on oxygen are given dexamethasone, it will save lives, and it will do so at a remarkably low cost,” said Martin Landray, an Oxford University professor co-leading the trial.

“It’s going to be very hard for any drug really to replace this, given that for less than £50 ($90) you can treat eight patients and save a life,” he told reporters in an online briefing.

Co-lead investigator Peter Horby said dexamethasone was “the only drug that’s so far shown to reduce mortality – and it reduces it significantly”.

“It is a major breakthrough,” he said.

“Dexamethasone is inexpensive, on the shelf, and can be used immediately to save lives worldwide.”

The RECOVERY trial compared outcomes of around 2100 patients who were randomly assigned to get the steroid, with those of around 4300 patients who did not get it.

The results suggest that one death would be prevented by treatment with dexamethasone among every eight ventilated COVID-19 patients, Landray said.

One death would be prevented among every 25 COVID-19 patients that received the drug and are on oxygen.

Among patients with COVID-19 who did not require respiratory support, there was no benefit from treatment with dexamethasone.

Many coronavirus patients need a ventilator to breathe. (Getty)

“The survival benefit is clear and large in those patients who are sick enough to require oxygen treatment, so dexamethasone should now become standard of care in these patients,” Horby said.

A COVID-19 expert at the Wellcome Trust global health charity said the findings would “transform the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lives and economies across the world”.

“Countless lives will be saved globally,” Nick Cammack said in a statement responding to the results.

The RECOVERY trial was launched in April as a randomised clinical trial to test a range of potential treatments for COVID-19, including low-dose dexamethasone and the malaria drug hydroxycholoroquine.

The hydroxychloroquine arm was halted earlier this month after Horby and Landray said results showed it was “useless” at treating COVID-19 patients.

Global cases of infection with the novel coronavirus have reached more than eight million, according to a Reuters tally, and more than 434,000 people have died after contracting the virus.

For breaking news alerts and livestreams straight to your smartphone sign up to the 9News app and set notifications to on at the App Store or Google Play.

Source by [author_name]

Vir Das’ advice to actors who give lectures on equality

Image Source : VIR DAS/ INSTAGRAM

Seeing Vir Das’ tweet, netizens lauded him for raising a valid point.

Comedian Vir Das has urged his fellow actors from the entertainment industry to treat everyone equally irrespective of their role and power status. “Before any actor starts giving lectures on equality, I would highly recommend they check the way they treat ADs, crew members, junior artists, writers and all the people with less power than them on a film. The notion that equality should only exist between actors, is bulls**t,” Vir Das tweeted.

Seeing Vir Das’ tweet, netizens lauded him for raising a valid point.

A user commented: “Quite idealistic. It is not really about film industry. It is life. Bosses in regular offices are the very same. Or even if us with people that work for us be it maids, drivers, bhaaji waala etc.”

Another one wrote: “Quite awaking voice you raised.”

Vir Das is quite vocal about his views on social media.

He recently called out media channels for inviting people on panel discussion to talk about deceased people they didn’t even know, indirectly referring to actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s demise.

On the work front, Vir Das was last seen in the web series “Hasmukh”.

Fight against Coronavirus: Full coverage



Source link

Zareen Khan talks about her upcoming film on homosexuality | Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele

0

Zareen Khan talks about her upcoming film on homosexuality | Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele

Source link

Our unrealistic expectations about VR are harming its development

0

Many viewed the coronavirus pandemic as the opportunity for the virtual reality industry to finally take off, perhaps even replace smartphones, as Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg had predicted not long ago. And to be fair, the coronavirus lockdown and social distancing measures that followed accelerated tech adoption, and some sectors “jumped ahead five years.”

For VR, the circumstances were exceptional; it could enable remote meetings and virtual presence and fill the void left by our lack of in-person interaction.

But that moment never came. Some even warned of a VR winter.

We had a VR-killer-app moment in 2019 when Valve released their long-anticipated VR-only game Half-Life: Alyx. The lack of a killer app is often touted as VR’s missing link; an app that would drive mass adoption of the technology, and Half-Life made it pretty far. However, while it demonstrated how far VR games could go, it still does not give us a clue of how VR could be used as the platform we consume daily, just like mobile phones.

But that is exactly where we are missing the point.

Read: [From start screens to coin counters — a guide to video game UI]

VR’s true strength

Virtual reality has the unique capability to engage with all our senses at once. For that reason, it can offer an immersive experience not found on other mediums.

Low-quality devices and heavy headsets have caused troubles—even nausea and sickness for some users—but when those problems are out of the way, the remaining experience is astonishing.

It is right there—VR’s greatest strength—that we miss the point.

As with augmented reality, the enterprise sector has had great success with VR. Aviation giant Lockheed Martin used VR to optimize training and reduced training time by 85 percent, a result “unheard of in the satellite industry.” Virtual reality is used to treat different mental health problems, particularly anxiety and phobias. And VR is used in education with great success. In fact, education is a great example of what we misunderstand about VR.

According to Dave Dolan, who has been teaching for 30 years and holds a Masters in TESOL, most schools “initially perceive VR for the wow-factor, but as they notice the distraction-free environment and judgment-free learning from their peers where students can control the learning pace, their reactions are almost identical: ‘Oh my God I did not realize this!’.”

According to Edgar Dale’s Cone of Learning, people tend to remember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear, 30% of what they see, and 90% of what they do or simulate. The latter part is exactly where VR excels because it offers an interactive environment. But in education, it goes even further.

Because each student can wear a headset, VR effectively creates a distraction-free learning environment, where students can retry a lesson over and over again without being judged by other students. “The student’s performance and how much they retried a lesson remains where it belongs – between the student and the teacher,” explained Dolan, who works as the Chief Product Officer at Veative Labs. “Because VR enables students to focus, it enables the higher-order learning where students go from knowledge to understanding. That is the eureka moment, the moment every teacher lives for. The moment you know they have absolutely understood.”

Perhaps more interesting is the fact that unlike games such as Half-Life: Alyx, these applications do not implement super-realistic graphics. In a way, they do not need to.

Veative’s strength comes from its large collection of STEM content, which is tied to schools’ curricula. They have aimed at VR’s content problem not from a graphical quality standpoint, but from one that would be useful through the entire semester.

Setting the record straight

VR may not become as widely adopted as smartphones. Clichés of Ready Player One experiences might never happen. But from a practical standpoint, VR is paving the way in many industries, as the cost savings and the training and education benefits become increasingly apparent. Having the wrong expectation of VR is what could actually lead to a VR winter. And unrealistic expectations have harmed many technologies, not just VR.

This article was originally published by Paul McNeil on TechTalks, a publication that examines trends in technology, how they affect the way we live and do business, and the problems they solve. But we also discuss the evil side of technology, the darker implications of new tech and what we need to look out for. You can read the original article here.

Read next:

Other colors I — art boy — believe the Sonos Move should come in

Celebrate Pride 2020 with us this month!

Why is queer representation so important? What’s it like being trans in tech? How do I participate virtually? You can find all our Pride 2020 coverage here.

Source link

President Donald Trump to sign police reform executive order

Embracing a new priority, President Donald Trump is set to announce executive actions on police procedures and Senate Republicans are preparing a package of policing changes as Republicans seek to respond to mass demonstrations over the deaths of George Floyd and other Black Americans.

It is a sudden shift for the Republican Party, one Democrats are watching warily as they advance broader police reform legislation in the US House of Representatives. The crush of activity shows how quickly the mass protests over police violence and racial prejudice are transforming politics in the United States.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared that Republicans are developing “a serious proposal to reform law enforcement”.

More:

The Senate Judiciary Committee will gavel in Tuesday afternoon for an extensive hearing on “Police Use of Force and Community Relations,” drawing testimony from the nation’s leading civil rights and law enforcement leaders.

“Now is the time to reimagine a more fair and just society in which all people are safe,” Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, will tell senators, according to advance testimony.

The nationwide outcry “is anything but a reaction to one isolated incident or the misconduct of a few ‘bad apples,'” Gupta says. “The outcry is a response to the other horrific killings of Black people by police.”

New systems

While the emerging GOP package is not as extensive as sweeping Democratic proposals, which are headed for a House vote next week, it includes perhaps the most far-reaching proposed changes to policing procedures from Republicans, a party long aligned with a “law and order” approach.

Trump’s executive order would include establishing a database that tracks police officers who garner complaints about excessive use of force in their records, according to two senior administration officials who briefed reporters in advance of Tuesday’s announcement.

It would establish a national credential system that would give police departments a financial incentive to adopt best practices. The two officials briefed reporters on the executive order on the condition that they not be identified.

Harsh police tactics across the US have spurred widespread calls for police reform, which the US President and congressional Republicans and Democrats are addressing [Ken Cedeno/Reuters]

Senator Tim Scott, the sole African American Republican in the Senate, has been crafting the Republican legislative package, which will include new restrictions on police choke-holds and greater use of police body cameras, among other provisions.

Scott, who said he spoke with Trump about the legislation during the weekend, warned Monday that pushing voting in Congress on police reform to a late date would be a “bad decision.”

In Atlanta, the weekend shooting death of Rayshard Brooks, an African American man, by a white officer led to a renewed public outcry, more street protests and the police chief’s resignation.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York is among those urging Republicans not to settle for minor changes.

“Now is the time to seek bold and broad-scale change,” Schumer said Monday.

With the political debate fluid, it is unclear whether the parties will be able to find common ground. The proposals emerging from Democrats and Republicans share many similar provisions but take different approaches to address some of the issues. Neither bill goes as far as some activists want in their push to “defund the police” by fully revamping departments.

Central to the Republican package would be the creation of the national database to improve transparency so officers cannot transfer from one department to another without public oversight of their records. The Democrats have a similar provision.

Yet the Republican bill does not go as far as the Democrats do on the issue of eliminating the legal protection for police of “qualified immunity,” which would enable those injured by law enforcement personnel to sue for damages. White House officials have said that goes too far. As an alternative, Scott has suggested a “decertification” process for officers involved in misconduct.

One large police union, the influential Fraternal Order of Police, said in a statement it is working with Congress and the White House on the proposals, having provided “feedback” on the Democratic bill and “substantial input” on the emerging GOP package.

Source link

Global mental health in the time of COVID-19 – Harvard Health Blog

0

Just months ago, who could have imagined that the world would be looking down the barrel of a spiraling health crisis and economic recession unlike any witnessed in our lifetime? Now, in a world gripped by the fear of a marauding virus, mental health is emerging as a key concern.

Diverse pathways to poorer mental health

The reaction of the media and governments to the epidemic served to fuel anxiety. The dramatic way the term “pandemic” was announced by the WHO after weeks of watching the epidemic unfolding around the world was a hair-raising moment. Apocalyptic messaging about millions of dead bodies littering our cities followed, even though experts had identified vulnerable populations — people who are elderly or chronically ill, and those who live in group facilities like nursing homes — early on.

The breathless questions mounted. When, if ever, would life return to a semblance of what we used to experience? Within the torrent of mixed messages about the science, what was real or fake? What might the post-lockdown scenario for containing the virus look like? All of this played on an endless daily newsreel, rounded out by rising figures on illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths around the world and close to home.

Not surprisingly, experiences of anxiety, fearfulness, sleep problems, irritability, and feelings of hopelessness are widespread. These are mostly the rational responses of our minds to the extraordinary realities that we are facing. But economic recession, widening inequalities, continuing uncertainty about waves of the epidemic still to come, and the emotional impact of physical distancing policies will continue to bite deeper into our mental health. A rise in clinically significant mental illnesses and suicides may well follow.

Unemployment, acute poverty, and indebtedness are strongly associated with poor mental health. A recent report documents “deaths of despair,” mostly through suicide and substance use, as the cause for increased mortality and reduced life expectancy in working-age Americans following the 2008 economic recession. The profound inequality in the US, coupled with its weak social security net, deeply polarized society, and fragmented health care system, are a toxic recipe for a similar surge of deaths of despair on this occasion.

Emerging evidence suggests that the lockdowns and the pivot of health care services to this one virus has seriously disrupted mental health care in many parts of the world. Access to mental health care — including vital continuing care — has not been available for many people experiencing new-onset episodes of depression and anxiety, or exacerbations of pre-existing mental health problems.

Transforming mental health globally

Fortunately, we know what needs to be done and how to achieve it. Further, we know the resources invested are excellent value-for-money. The pandemic presents a historic opportunity to reimagine mental health care.

The GlobalMentalHealth@Harvard initiative was launched in 2017 to marshal the rich, inter-disciplinary expertise within the university and to scale up this knowledge with a worldwide network of partners. In response to the pandemic, the initiative is prioritizing actions to transform and build resilient mental health care systems globally, using three strategies:

  • EMPOWER deploys a range of digital tools to build a mental health workforce. It enables front-line providers, such as community health workers and nurses, to learn, master, and deliver evidence-based brief psychosocial therapies. Two examples are behavioral activation for depression and psychological first-aid for acute mental health crises.
  • CHAMPIONS builds on time-tested executive leadership training, twinning it with hands-on mentoring by experienced faculty. It aims to build leadership capacity to scale up evidence-based mental health care. CHAMPIONS will create a global peer group of mental health leaders across the US and the world to take forward the critical work of building back — and improving — mental health services.
  • COUNTDOWN is developing a set of common core metrics, such as availability of skilled providers and quality of care, to evaluate the performance of these mental health care systems and make them more accountable. COUNTDOWN can perform many roles in the context of the pandemic. A few examples are tracking population-level mental health across and within countries, identifying where the unmet need for services is greatest, and evaluating the impact of investments.

Together, these three essential, interwoven strategies can achieve the transformation of mental health care systems that the global community so urgently needs.

Only with significant resources can we realize such ambitious projects. But here we need to anticipate the pandemic’s biggest threat to mental health: pushing back, once again, mental health from the global health agenda.

Back in the 1990s, it appeared that the world’s leading development agencies would finally recognize mental health as a priority. Yet the Millenium Development Goals of 2000 left it off the table. Fifteen years later, mental health found its rightful place in the Sustainable Development Goals. Now, once again, all funding and health care action is pivoting toward one disease, as mental health risks are being shoved back into the shadows.

Investing in mental health enables each individual to regain hope for the future. It will also contribute to making societies healthier, economically productive, and socially cohesive. There cannot be a more important investment in the face of the most serious crisis to test the global population in a century. Let’s work together to realize our shared mission.

Source link

Justice Isa reference: SC says case can be thrown out if ‘dishonesty’ found

0


The Supreme Court on Tuesday remarked that the reference filed against Justice Qazi Faez Isa has legal loopholes, adding that if such a mistake was found in a normal case than it can be disposed off and this case can be thrown out as well if dishonesty is found.

The remarks were passed by a ten-member larger bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial hearing the case filed against Justice Qazi Faez Isa.

During today’s hearing, Justice Bandial remarked that they agreed on the accountability of judges, adding that the applicant has contended that the evidence was collected illegally and dishonestly.

“Reference has legal loopholes and generally such cases are disposed off on such a mistake, therefore if dishonesty is found in the reference then the case can be disposed off,” said the judge. He added that there were multiple problems in the reference.

“Ownership of properties in London has been admitted. The question in the case is of the purchase of the property and the petitioner has refused to share the details of the purchase, adding that the applicant wants the probe to be done legally,” said Justice Bandial.

Justice Bandial remarked that the FBR took action against Justice Isa under Article 116, 114, adding that the case can go to the judicial counsel if dishonesty is not found. He directed Naseem to present his arguments on dishonesty and evidence gathered.

Justice Faisal Arab remarked that the only the judicial council can take action against a judge and advised Naseem to think about launching the investigation in FBR.

To this, Naseem responded by saying that this can be a better way in the eyes of the court, adding that in the judicial council action against the judges is taken under the rules.

Following which, Justice Mansoor said that the action against the rules will impact someone else, adding that it will impact independent action.

“In this situation violation of rules is also not beneficial,” remarked the judge. While Justice Bandial remarked that they had full faith in the judicial council and what needed to be investigated was whether the property was bought legally or not.

To this, the government lawyer asked the court for time to take advice from the prime minister and president, but the bench asked him to present his arguments.

“Under the Services of Pakistan Act no one can refuse to not provide details regarding their spouse’s property,” said Naseem. To this, justice Mansoor asked the lawyer what will happen if the government official’s wife refuses to share the details.

Naseem responded to the question by saying that if the wife of a government servant makes such a claim then he may be sent to jail. He added that if details of assets are demanded from the public servant then the income tax cannot be used as an excuse.

The government lawyer told the court that the tax record was not sought from the spouse by the government, but it was the judicial council which had summoned it through the FBR.

He added that if he as a parliamentarian does not provide the asset details of his spouse then he can be disqualified.

To this, Justice Bandial interjected and told the lawyer that there was a shortage of time and asked him to read Section 216 of the income tax law.

Meanwhile, Justice Mansoor asked the counsel if a husband could seek the tax record of his wife. To this, Naseem responded saying that he thinks that a husband can seek the record. The judge after hearing this told the lawyer not to tell them what he thinks but what the law states, adding that if the wife refuses to share details then how can the husband get the tax record.

“What is the Asset Recovery Unit? How was the information obtained? You should seek direction from the president or prime minister on the matter related to FBR,” asked Justice Bandial during the hearing.

Meanwhile, Justice Faisal Arab intervened and told the lawyer that the dishonesty case has not been filed against the president and neither does he have the right to order an inquiry. He added that there was no evidence related to corruption in the reference, adding that if the president forms an opinion then it has to be constitutional.

Justice Arab also gave the example of the reference filed against former chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in which the reference was formed in a single day and a council was also formed in a day.

To this, Naseem responded saying that the information they had obtained was that the properties were not bought, adding that the information has been given to the judicial council. He said that is was incorrect that the president did not have any record in front of him, clarifying that the showcause notice was issued after the review of the reference.

To this, Justice Mansoor said that it was not mandatory for the court to issue the showcause notice and once again reminded the lawyer that the question was that the details of assets were asked by the judge before his wife. He also asked him to show the law which states that a judge is responsible for the assets of his wife. 

Source link