Sunday, May 24, 2026

Students in NSW and Queensland are back in classes this morning.

Students in NSW and Queensland are back in classes this morning.

Roads were busier than they have been for months, after students were told to try and avoid public transport.

Hundreds of extra transport staff, including security and marshalling officers, were on duty in Sydney this morning as some people also returned to work.

Under the new rules, a maximum of 12 passengers are allowed on a NSW bus at any one time, while trains are limited to 32 people per carriage and up to 45 people are allowed on ferries.

Marshalls on buses in Sydney this morning. (Nine)

NSW Transport Minister Andrew Constance said staff will be monitoring social distancing on public transport and warned stations could be closed if they become too busy.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 900,000 school students used the transport network to get to school and 110,000 of those caught public transport.

School students and the vulnerable were to be given priority.

However, there were no delays reported by Transport NSW.

Annandale Public school students arriving at school in Sydney. (Louise Kennerley/ SMH)

Returning to the classroom full-time in NSW comes two months after COVID-19 restrictions forced around 800,000 children in the state to study remotely.

It is compulsory for NSW children to be back in classes.

Some schools were taking children’s temperatures at the gate and offering hand sanitiser.

Some independent and Catholic schools also went back today, while others are working towards a June 1 return date.

Some schools took children’s temperatures on arrival. (Nine)

Mr Constance urged commuters not to become complacent when using public transport.

“I think that the risk at the moment is because everything’s going back to normal, I think there’s a lost complacency that could start to creep in here and we’re still in the middle of a global pandemic,” he told Today.

“We don’t want people sick and dying and transport networks are risky given the number of people.”

Traffic built up as students as workers returned to normal schedules in Sydney. (AAP)

“Roads will be busy so please be patient, particularly in and around school zones.

“The 40km/h limit applies. But people will need to be extra vigilant because there’s going to be that many kids that will be driven to school.”

Meanwhile, students in grades two to 10 are also back at school in Queensland.

Parents were also urged to drive their children to school or accompany them by foot as they walk to the school gates.

Start times were staggered slightly to avoid too many parents and students lingering at the front fence.

And once the kids are inside, they will be asked to wash their hands several times throughout the day.

Buses have limited capacity, due to social distancing rules. (Nine)

It is expected that some Queensland parents may choose to keep their children at home because of medical concerns, but they are warned they then need to take responsibility for their learning.

Help from the school will be provided if they need to stay home due to medical reasons.

Activities like assemblies, concerts, excursions and camps remain on hold across the nation.

OTHER STATES AND TERRITORIES

Tasmanian kindergarten to Year Six students, along with Year 11 and 12 students, also went back today, before students in Years 7 to 10 join them on June 9.

The ACT is continuing its staged return with students in Years 3, 4 and 10 getting back to school today, leaving only Years 5, 6, 8 and 9 to return on June 2.

Victorian kids are bracing for their return, with children in prep to Year 2 and Years 11 and 12 returning tomorrow, before the remaining cohort goes back from June 9.

Students are already back in school full time in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory.

For breaking news alerts and livestreams straight to your smartphone sign up to the 9News app and set notifications to on at the App Store or Google Play.

Source by [author_name]

Trump’s tough choices over Hong Kong

0

China’s latest move to introduce national security legislation in Hong Kong — a semi-autonomous city that was guaranteed its own legal system and certain democratic freedoms until 2047 under the “one country, two systems” framework — has sent shockwaves across the world. The draft legislation would ban sedition, secession and subversion of the central government in Beijing as well as “foreign interference.” — all codewords that the Chinese Communist Party uses to quash political dissent. The legislation would also allow for mainland security forces to be deployed in Hong Kong, among other measures that would erode the territory’s autonomy.

While China feels increasingly empowered lately, its training wheels came off a long time ago when it comes to achieving its territorial ambitions. In the last few years, it has continued efforts to erode Hong Kong’s special status.

After Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014, Trump inaccurately claimed former President Barack Obama “allowed a very large part of Ukraine to be taken.” Now Trump is likely to have his own Crimea moment, as China plans to assert its control over Hong Kong.
When the history books detail the Trump administration’s posture on China, they will tell a tale of two policies. The State Department and the Commerce Department, for example, have taken an increasingly punitive stance against China while the intelligence community has laid out the threats that China poses to US elections, arms control, cyberspace, and more. Trump, on the other hand, clung to China as he worked to iron out a trade deal, often parroting the ruling Communist Party’s (CCP) propaganda on issues like Hong Kong and, at times, praising China on crises like the coronavirus.
During a violent crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong last year, President Trump called the protests “riots” and continued to praise Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump also wavered in his support for bipartisan legislation that authorized US sanctions on those responsible for human rights abuses in Hong Kong and prohibited the sale of tear gas and other items to Hong Kong police. In a November 2019 interview with “Fox & Friends,” Trump said, “I stand with Hong Kong…but we’re also in the process of making the largest trade deal in history.”
Human rights in Hong Kong took a back seat until the trade deal wrapped up and Congress passed bipartisan legislation to support human rights in Hong Kong with veto-proof majorities.

Now, with politics in play, the President is singing a different tune.

In addition to now criticizing China’s response to Covid-19, Trump has threatened to “address that issue very strongly” if China moves ahead with the national security legislation. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has also publicly put Hong Kong’s status — a special administrative region as enshrined in the 1992 Hong Kong Policy Act — on the line. In a statement Friday, Pompeo said that Washington “strongly urges Beijing to reconsider its disastrous proposal, abide by its international obligations, and respect Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy, democratic institutions, and civil liberties, which are key to preserving its special status under US law.”

But the President’s credibility gap on China undercuts the idea that Trump will follow through on this threat. If the legislation passes, sounding what Pompeo called the “death knell” of autonomy in Hong Kong, the question is: can anyone convince Trump to try to do something about it?

In certain respects, Trump’s track record on territorial integrity is catching up with him. He has not been a cheerleader for sovereignty, including here at home. He has failed to condemn Russia’s interference in US democracy, for starters, and he’s been meeker than milquetoast when it comes to confronting Russia over its annexation of Crimea. And while the CCP has eroded the special status of Hong Kong over the last few years, he’s been mostly quiet, except for when he praises Xi. Trump’s track record gives the CCP little reason to fear that he’ll draw a line in the sand over further encroachments on Hong Kong’s autonomy, especially given the economic implications of doing so.
The administration has already floated some response options. National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien said on Sunday that the administration is likely to impose sanctions if China moves ahead with this legislation and outlined the economic costs, including to Beijing, if the national security law moves ahead. A more significant action would be revisiting the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 and revoking special treatment that Hong Kong currently gets under that legislation on matters like trade.
The other Hong Kong: Will China's democratic enclave become just like the mainland?

Hong Kong is not currently subject to the tariffs the US imposes on Chinese goods, for example. Aside from trade,Hong Kong’s status as a financial hub could change too if Beijing’s law causes changes to the operating environment and it’s no longer seen as as a safe transparent and stable place for business. The CCP would suffer some economic costs if there is mass capital flight and market impacts, but that’s a risk they appear prepared to take.

In addition to potential action by the administration, Congress is already stepping in.

A bipartisan bill introduced by Sens. Pat Toomey and Chris Van Hollen would impose mandatory sanctions on “entities that violate China’s obligations to Hong Kong under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law.” The legislation would also impose mandatory secondary sanctions on banks that do business with those entities in violation of the Basic Law. While it is unlikely to deter the CCP from moving ahead, Congress is trying to step in and take immediate action.
All options come with costs. If Congress or President Trump do decide to take direct action against the CCP for its efforts to do away with the “one country, two systems” framework, it could prompt China to retaliate and push the global economy in a downward spiral at a time when Covid-19 is already threatening to send the world into a deep recession. But the costs of inaction are significant too. Not only would lack of action undermine democratic freedoms and human rights for the people of Hong Kong, it would set a precedent that China can act with impunity. In the days ahead, Trump’s team should be working overtime to try to convince global partners in Europe and around the world — and the President himself — to lay out the costs for China if it destroys Hong Kong’s autonomy. One of the team’s biggest battles may be convincing the President himself. He’s prioritized trade with China over all else to date, and human rights haven’t been top of his agenda. Right now, however, politics may persuade him to act. His campaign has tried to rewrite his own history praising Xi, inaccurately painting Trump’s likely 2020 opponent Joe Biden as “China’s puppet.”

There are no good choices here. But, absent decisive action, the people of Hong Kong will suffer for generations to come. While Trump has been reluctant to stand up to Beijing in many cases, the political ramifications of clinging to China in the midst of his re-election campaign could motivate him to take a stronger stance on Hong Kong.

Source link

The New York Times Fills Entire Cover With Names Of Coronavirus Victims In The US

When readers across the country pick up a copy of the New York Times on Sunday, they will be confronted with an extraordinarily grim sight.

They will see the names and a peek into the lives of the people who died in the US as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. The nearly one thousand obituaries, which fill the entire front page, represent only an estimated 1% of the death toll.

As of Saturday, more than 97,000 people in the US had died from complications with COVID-19.

The victims’ stories were pulled from obituaries published in newspapers across the country. 

Simone Landon, the Times’ graphics desk assistant editor, came up with the idea to honour the victims in a way that would allow readers to see the gravity of the pandemic’s impact in the country, according to the paper.

Landon told the Times that there was “a little bit of a fatigue with the data” on deaths in the US, which is being tracked daily by Johns Hopkins University and followed closely by the media.

“We knew we were approaching this milestone,” Landon told the Times. “We knew that there should be some way to try to reckon with that number.”

The shortened obituaries are displayed one after the other and fill six tall columns that stretch across a majority of the Times’ front page. 

In a preview of the paper published Saturday, viewers can zoom in on each name to read about the victims’ lives:

“Lila Fenwick, 87, New York City, first black woman to graduate from Harvard Law School.”

“Mike Field, 59, Valley Stream, NY, first responder during the 9/11 attacks.”

“Jessica Beatriz Cortez, 32, Los Angeles, immigrated to the United States three years ago.”

With the obituaries, the Times reminds readers who these people are.

“They were not simply names on a list. They were us.”



Source by [author_name]

The world’s most followed stock index is set for a drastic makeover

An equal-weight basket made up of companies that were booted from the S&P 500 over the past three years (for reasons other than acquisitions) is down 47 per cent this year, almost five times more than the benchmark’s 2020 decline, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Just five of the ousted firms have posted positive returns, while half have plunged 40 per cent or more. Oil and gas companies including Chesapeake Energy and Transocean are still off by 80 per cent or more. Bed Bath & Beyond and Macy’s are down roughly 70 per cent.

That will create more distortion in a lot of these indices. As we see a lot more market concentration, it’ll be harder to read what’s going on in the market.

Megan Greene, senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School

Of course, these companies were already in some form of trouble before the coronavirus struck, hence their removal. But the fact that they belong to industries directly in the cross-hairs of the fallout, where demand is waning, has been lucky for anyone with passive exposure to the market in, say, an S&P 500 ETF.

“It was more happenstance than actual foresight that those companies would end up getting worse,” said Keith Gangl, portfolio manager for Gradient Investments. Still, “just by the nature of having less energy and less consumer, that certainly has benefited the index.”

Shifts in index composition are made as needed and “changes in response to corporate actions and market developments can be made at any time,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices. Human judgment is part of the process, too: the committee aims to minimise turnover and doesn’t view crossing below thresholds governing, say, market capitalisation, as a reason unto itself to boot a stock out.

“The addition criteria are for addition to an index, not for continued membership,” says the 41-page S&P US Indices Methodology rule book. “As a result, an index constituent that appears to violate criteria for addition to that index is not deleted unless ongoing conditions warrant an index change.”

Removal of 30 companies would surpass the annual average over the last three decades and rank with some of the busiest years. It’s a reminder that even passive structures have active elements, a fact on display last month when an oil exchange-traded fund reshuffled the mix of its futures time and again. In equity indexes, companies are booted when they fall below standards tied to market-cap or profitability. But deciding which firms to add requires a bit more finesse.

Pizza giant Domino’s was added to the S&P 500 earlier this month. Credit:AP

As it stands, a company must have a market-cap of at least $US8.2 billion ($12.6 billion) for S&P 500 consideration. Liquidity measures must also be sufficient, and the sum of total earnings over the past four quarters must be positive, along with profits in the most recent quarter.

Most recently, Capri Holdings – the company behind retail brands including Versace and Jimmy Choo – was removed from the S&P 500 on May 12 after it lost roughly $US5 billion in market value this year. As Capri was transferred to the S&P Small Cap 600 Index, medical device company DexCom and Domino’s Pizza were added to the large cap gauge. Both companies have posted double digit gains in 2020.

While market-cap standards “are reviewed from time to time to assure consistency with market conditions,” according to S&P methodology, consider what’s passed for small in the S&P 500 over the last 15 months. Market-cap guidelines for the large-cap gauge were raised to $US8.2 billion on February 20, 2019. After the latest stock rout, about a fifth of companies in the index no longer meet that standard.

The types of companies that can post consecutive profits in a post-COVID world are likely different from those that might have done it before, according to DataTrek’s Colas. Travel or leisure firms “don’t have much of a chance,” he wrote to clients, highlighting Uber and Lyft as examples of companies that may remain unprofitable for longer.

Loading

Plus, the index committee is probably hesitant to add more technology firms to a benchmark that’s already concentrated, he said. The S&P 500 Information Technology sector makes up 26 per cent of the index, the highest share since the dot-com burst.

Much of the stock rebound that reached 30 per cent from the March 23 bottom can be attributed to such consolidation. Resilience in megacaps, technology and health care was the salvation of bulls, but a growing schism ruled by automation between stock market “haves” and “have-nots” has provoked some concern worker rights and wealth inequality.

The strong equity performance also left many questioning how the stock market could become so unhinged from the real economy, where measures of unemployment are the worst in nine decades. At least part of the answer lies in the strength of megacap firms, with every member of the FAANG complex (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google) positive in 2020.

Going forward, it’s likely that market concentration will only increase off the back of the COVID crisis, according to Megan Greene, senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School.

“That will create more distortion in a lot of these indices,” Greene said by phone. “As we see a lot more market concentration, it’ll be harder to read what’s going on in the market.”

Bloomberg

Most Viewed in Business

Loading

Source by [author_name]

Michigan Gov. Whitmer Says She Censors Herself On Trump To Keep Federal Aid

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said that she feels the need to censor herself when it comes to public comments about President Donald Trump, fearing it could jeopardize her state’s receiving federal assistance.

Whitmer told Axios in an interview scheduled to air on Monday about the difficulty of juggling Trump’s emotions with ensuring that Michigan residents receive adequate help amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“The worst night’s sleep that I’ve got in the last 10 weeks is when he has attacked me on Twitter,” Whitmer, a Democrat, said in an interview clip released Sunday.

Whitmer was asked if she feels that she has to censor herself when discussing Trump “for the sake of continuing to receive federal assistance.”

“Yes,” Whitmer readily replied.

Trump has publicly labeled Whitmer a “big problem” after she expressed concern that the federal government may be blocking her state’s requests for personal protective equipment and other needed resources for health care workers. Similar allegations have been made by hospitals across the country.

Trump blasted the first-term governor as being “way in over her” head and said she “doesn’t have a clue.” Whitmer and Trump were later able to smooth out their differences behind the scenes.

Whitmer’s full interview with Axios is scheduled to air Monday at 11 p.m. on HBO.

A HuffPost Guide To Coronavirus



Source by [author_name]

White House announces new travel restrictions on Brazil

0

The proclamation reads in part, “I have determined that it is in the interests of the United States to take action to restrict and suspend the entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the Federative Republic of Brazil during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States.”

The proclamation is aimed at limiting the spread of coronavirus coming into the United States from Brazil, the country with the second most cases worldwide, according to Johns Hopkins University. As of Sunday evening, Brazil had more than 347,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus.

“Today’s action will help ensure foreign nationals who have been in Brazil do not become a source of additional infections in our country,” White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Sunday. “These new restrictions do not apply to the flow of commerce between the United States and Brazil.”

Earlier on Sunday, national security adviser Robert O’Brien said that the Trump administration was likely to announce new restrictions on travel to Brazil.

O’Brien, during an interview with CBS’ “Face the Nation,” said White House officials “hope that will be temporary.” He said the White House would “take a look at the other countries on a country by country basis” in that region.

Asked about reporting that the European travel restrictions from mid-March came too late to stop the virus from spreading throughout the US, O’Brien highlighted Trump’s decision to restrict some travel to China but suggested US officials were unaware that people traveling through Europe from China could bring Covid-19 to America in the weeks before the European travel restrictions were implemented.

“We didn’t know at the time but we later learned that the Chinese continued to allow people to travel from Wuhan to Europe,” he said.

Coronavirus has yet to peak in Sao Paulo, Brazil’s largest and worst-infected city, but the health care system is already beginning to break down. As the crisis deepens and the number of deaths continues to rise, President Jair Bolsonaro is urging businesses to reopen. He opposes many governors who are stressing social distancing measures to slow the spread.
Far from hospitals, Brazil’s indigenous people are dying at an alarming rate. The death toll is double that of the rest of Brazil’s population, according to the advocacy group Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil.

APIB has recorded more than 980 officially confirmed cases of coronavirus and at least 125 deaths, which suggests a mortality rate of 12.6% — compared to the national rate of 6.4%.

Source link

Magnitude 5.9 earthquake strikes near Wellington

A magnitude 5.9 earthquake has struck near New Zealand’s capital Wellington.

The earthquake was 46 kilometres deep and 25km northwest of Levin, according to government seismic monitor Geonet.

According to the Geonet app tens of thousands of people felt the strong quake, most of those reports came from Wellington.

Tens of thousands of people felt the strong quake, which struck near Wellington. (Geonet)

Emergency officials said there were no immediate reports of damage.

According to the Geonet app tens of thousands of people felt the strong quake.

Emergency officials said there were no immediate reports of damage.

The earthquake also interrupted Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern mid-interview, which was caught on camera.

JAcinda Ardern is interviewed as an earthquake takes place
Jacinda Ardern was being interviewed when the earthquake struck. (Supplied)

“We’re having a bit of an earthquake here,” Ms Ardern said in an early morning interview with Newshub’s AM Show from Parliament.

“Quite a decent shake here…if you see things moving behind here.”

Once the earthquake stopped, Ms Ardern calmly carried on with the interview saying she was in a “structurally sound place”.

New Zealand lies on the seismically active “Ring of Fire”, a 40,000km arc of volcanoes and ocean trenches girdling much of the Pacific Ocean.

For breaking news alerts and livestreams straight to your smartphone sign up to the 9News app and set notifications to on at the App Store or Google Play.

Source by [author_name]

Video shows crowded pool party in Missouri – CNN Video

0

Hundreds attended a Memorial Day weekend pool party at the Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri despite the state’s social distancing policies.



Source link

Boris Johnson bets big on top aide Cummings

0

LONDON — Boris Johnson is standing by his man — but it’s a political gamble that might yet cost him.

After lengthy face-to-face discussions with Dominic Cummings on Sunday afternoon, the British prime minister told the country he was confident that his chief adviser “acted responsibly and legally, and with integrity” despite alleged breaches of the U.K.’s coronavirus lockdown rules.

The revelation that Cummings traveled 260 miles from London to Durham to stay at a property close to family, after his wife developed coronavirus symptoms in late March, has led to calls for his resignation from opposition parties and a handful of Conservative MPs.

But Johnson, speaking at the government’s daily coronavirus press conference on Sunday evening, stood four-square behind Cummings — the strategic guru who masterminded the Brexit campaign and Johnson’s path to a thumping election victory.

The prime minister said he fully accepted the adviser’s explanation that he had “no alternative” but to travel to guarantee childcare for his four-year-old son should he and his wife become too ill.

Its a fault-line for Johnson’s government that the opposition Labour Party, under new leader Keir Starmer, is determined to exploit.

“I think he followed the instincts of every father and every parent,” Johnson said.

The U.K.’s guidance is that those who develop symptoms, as Cummings’ wife did, “must stay at home for at least seven days.” Other members of the household must stay put for 14 days.

But Johnson said the advice was also “absolutely clear that if you have childcare issues, that is a factor that has to be taken into account.” The official guidance advises parents who develop symptoms to “keep following” general advice “the best of your ability,” but acknowledges “not all these measures will be possible.” In short, discretion is limited.

Citizens who have made severe sacrifices and compromises in their own daily lives, though — including not being able to say goodbye in person to dying relatives — may feel that traveling hundreds of miles to stay near family stretches the parental allowances.

In truth, the precise interpretation of the rules now matters less than public perception — and initial polling looks bad for Cummings. According to a YouGov snap poll published Saturday evening, 68 percent of respondents said they thought Cummings had broken the lockdown rules, and several MPs reported having inboxes full of complaints from the public — many of whom have experienced similar situations to Cummings, but stayed put despite the difficulties.

Its a fault-line for Johnson’s government that the opposition Labour Party, under new leader Keir Starmer, is determined to exploit. “This was a test of the prime minister and he has failed it,” Starmer said. “It is an insult to sacrifices made by the British people that Boris Johnson has chosen to take no action against Dominic Cummings.”

Downing Street and senior ministers had rallied to Cummings’ defense on Saturday and the adviser himself insists that he acted “reasonably and legally” because he was acting in the interests of his four-year-old son.

But former Tory Immigration Minister Caroline Nokes tweeted on Sunday there could not be “wriggle room” for some people when it comes to lockdown restrictions, and that she had made her views clear to her whip.

Two days after the Guardian and Mirror first reported the story, it was still dominating front pages and the morning political shows on Sunday. These included new claims that Cummings had been spotted 30 miles from his parents’ house on Easter day and in Durham on April 19, allegedly on a separate trip up from London.

The latter was branded untrue by Cabinet minister Grant Shapps earlier on Sunday. When asked about the former, Johnson said he was “content that in all periods … he behaved responsibly and correctly,” although the prime minister pointedly avoided a specific denial.

But it is the first allegation that has lodged in the public memory — and Tory backbenchers are highly attuned to constituent anger over any suggestion that there is one rule for those in power and another for everyone else. In backing Cummings to the hilt, Johnson is risking a confrontation with his own MPs, many of whom have never been all that fond of Cummings’ radical, iconoclastic instincts.

Boris Johnson is confident that Cummings “acted responsibly and legally, and with integrity” | Glyn Kirk/AFP via Getty Images

“Cummings must go before he does any more harm,” prominent Brexiteer MP Steve Baker told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge on Sunday. “If he doesn’t resign, we’ll just keep burning through Boris’ political capital at a rate we can ill afford in the midst of this crisis.”

Other Conservative MPs have publicly joined Baker’s call, including Simon Hoare, Roger Gale, Craig Whittaker, Peter Bone and Damian Collins, with the latter saying Cummings has a “track record of believing that the rules don’t apply to him and treating the scrutiny that should come to anyone in a position of authority with contempt.”

The YouGov poll also found that 52 percent said they thought Cummings should resign. Meanwhile, an online petition calling for Cummings to be sacked had collected more than 140,000 signatures by Sunday evening.

Cummings is widely acknowledged, even by his critics, as a brilliant reader of public opinion. Under him, Johnson’s Downing Street has been assiduously monitoring and responding to what the public thinks.

Now, the question that decides how this saga ends could well be — what do they think of Cummings?



Source by [author_name]

Trump Spreads Baseless Conspiracy Theory Accusing MSNBC Host Of Murder

President Donald Trump over the weekend used his massive platform on Twitter to again spread the outrageous and unsupported insinuation that Joe Scarborough — one his most vocal critics on TV —murdered someone.

Trump fired off multiple tweets suggesting Scarborough, a co-host of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” might have killed Lori Klausutis, who died in 2001 while working as an intern in Scarbrough’s congressional office. Scarborough served as a U.S. congressman from Florida between January 1995 and September 2001.

Authorities determined Klausutis, 28, died after suddenly collapsing due to a previously undiagnosed heart condition, hitting her head on a desk as she fell. No foul play was suspected and her death was ultimately ruled an accident by the medical examiner.

But that hasn’t stopped Trump from fueling baseless conspiracy theories claiming otherwise.

″A blow to her head? Body found under his desk? Left Congress suddenly? Big topic of discussion in Florida…and, he’s a Nut Job (with bad ratings),” the president tweeted Saturday. “Keep digging, use forensic geniuses!”

Trump on Sunday shared with his 80 million Twitter followers a story from a notorious misinformation website that claimed to have evidence of “foul play” in Klausutis’s death. 

“A lot of interest in this story about Psycho Joe Scarborough,” the president tweeted. “So a young marathon runner just happened to faint in his office, hit her head on his desk, & die? I would think there is a lot more to this story than that? An affair? What about the so-called investigator? Read story!”

Earlier this month, Trump questioned whether Scarborough got “away with murder,” suggesting he left Congress “quietly and quickly” because of it. He also called on Comcast, which owns MSNBC, to look into the matter.

Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, his wife and co-host on “Morning Joe,” have denounced Trump’s suggestions, calling the president “unwell” and sick.”

During previous administrations, a president insinuating, without evidence, that someone had committed murder would undoubtedly dominate cable news programs and garner condemnation from both Republicans and Democrats.

But for a president who routinely peddles misinformation, mocks women’s appearances and downplays the threat of a global pandemic, it’s possible the claim failed to garner much more than an eye roll from most Americans.

Trump’s claim was reminiscent of the Seth Rich conspiracy theories pushed by some Fox News hosts and Trump allies, which falsely suggested a Democratic National Committee staffer was murdered in 2016 as part of an effort to cover up alleged crimes committed by Hillary Clinton.

But a Yahoo News investigation determined Russian intelligence agents secretly planted the fake report that alleged Rich was gunned down by assassins working for Clinton. In reality, authorities believe Rich was fatally shot during a suspected robbery in Washington.

Rich’s family has been harassed by right-wing activists for years over the baseless conspiracy theory. CNN’s Brian Stelter said Saturday that conspiracy theorists are now going after Klausutis’ family because of Trump’s tweets.

Brzezinski scolded Twitter last week for failing to remove Trump’s reckless tweets or suspend his account. She announced Wednesday that the “wheels are in motion” for a meeting between her and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.

In response to a tweet suggesting Twitter wouldn’t take action against Trump, Brzezinski said she agreed but felt it was worth trying anyway.

“It’s just crazy that Trump, the chief law enforcement officer of the US is using the power of the presidency to harass someone who is a critic,” Brzezinski wrote. “Nuts that this is accepted. Nuts.”

Twitter did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.



Source by [author_name]