Your Thursday Briefing

0

India is now producing more new daily coronavirus infections, around 10,000, than all but two countries, the United States and Brazil.

But, ready or not, much of India’s coronavirus lockdown has ended, as have those in other countries struggling to balance economic damage with coronavirus risk.

As the pandemic surges in New Delhi, a public health care system that was already strained might be reaching its breaking point. People can’t get tested. And government officials, desperate for more beds, have proposed turning the city’s fanciest hotels into hospitals.

Our correspondents looked at the reopening in India and four other countries with rising cases that have decided to restart their economies: Iran, Pakistan, Mexico and Russia.

Iran: A center of the pandemic early on, Iran thought it had seen the worst. It reopened in early May, and it is seeing a second surge, experts say. On June 4, Iran reported 3,574 new infections in one day, the highest number of new cases since the pandemic began.

Pakistan: Outside the cities, almost no one is wearing a mask or making attempts to socially distance. Infections have nearly doubled in the past week, but there’s no way to gauge how prevalent the virus really is because testing has been so scarce.

The Times is providing free access to much of our coronavirus coverage, and our Coronavirus Briefing newsletter — like all of our newsletters — is free. Please consider supporting our journalism with a subscription.


It’s unclear what form that message will take, but players have been vocal about what they say is their duty to speak out on an issue that affects them and their fans.

The league, which is the top level of the English football system, has traditionally shied away from gestures that might be considered political, but it is not expected to stand in the players’ way. And FIFA, football’s global governing body, advised national federations that players should not be punished for such shows of support.

Public opinion: In the last two weeks, U.S. voters’ support for the Black Lives Matter movement has increased almost as much as it had in the preceding two years, according to data from an online survey firm.


Only the worst disasters completely upend normal patterns of death, overshadowing, if only briefly, everyday causes like cancer, heart disease and car accidents.

Our reporters looked at how the devastation brought by the pandemic in 25 cities and regions compares with other deadly events.

Once deaths soar to five times the normal levels, that city is in territory that few places have ever seen outside of famine or war. Here are a few takeaways:

  • The 1918 flu killed at least 50 million people worldwide, and its toll in New York City in Oct. 1918 raised the city’s deaths to 3.97 times the normal amount. The city’s coronavirus toll could be seen as more severe: Deaths in April grew to almost six times the usual number.

  • Latin America’s outbreak is growing worse. Ecuador has one of the world’s worst death tolls. In Guayas, a coastal province, deaths surged more than five times. The death toll in Lima, Peru, spiked to more than 11,000 in May — raising its mortality rate nearly four times.

  • Bergamo, in northern Italy, saw deaths in March, at the peak of its outbreak, grow to 6.67 times the normal amount. In comparison, a tsunami in northern Japan in 2011 that killed 11,000 people in Miyagi increased its mortality by 6.85 times.

In April, as people across Indonesia stayed home during the coronavirus outbreak, about 10 million married couples stopped using contraception, according to official data. A month later, government officials turned up in towns and cities on trucks, equipped with loudspeakers blaring: “You can have sex. You can get married. But don’t get pregnant.” Above, newborns in Jakarta in April.

A baby boom would be a setback for Indonesia’s huge efforts to promote smaller families and fight child malnutrition, write our correspondents. They looked at how the government is trying to get family planning back on track.

Brazil: As the country reels from one of the world’s worst coronavirus outbreaks, President Jair Bolsonaro is threatening to resort to a military intervention to protect his grip on power. Political leaders and analysts say that military action remains unlikely, but the possibility is hanging over Brazil’s democratic institutions.

Sweden: The country’s judiciary has finally named a man who they believe gunned down Prime Minister Olof Palme in a quiet Stockholm street in 1986. A prosecutor cited “reasonable evidence” that the assailant was Stig Engstrom, a graphic designer, who took his own life in 2000.

‘Gone With the Wind’: The streaming service HBO Max has removed the 1939 movie from its catalog, pledging to eventually bring the film back “with a discussion of its historical context.” It was long considered a cinematic triumph, but has come under scrutiny for romanticizing the Civil War-era South and glossing over the horrors of slavery.

Snapshot: Above, members the Sikh Center of New York feeding protesters in Queens. The center has served more than 145,000 free meals in the last two months. It’s part of a Sikh tradition of feeding anyone in need, which has found new purpose during the pandemic and the protests.

What we’re looking at: This drone footage of green turtles migrating to Raine Island, the world’s largest sea turtle rookery, courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald.

Cook: These crispy kimchi pancakes are both satisfyingly chewy and shatteringly crisp. Use the most flavorful traditionally prepared kimchi you can find — it’ll make all the difference in this simple recipe.

Watch: Our TV critic has some suggestions on what to watch if you’re looking for a foreign spy thriller or simply, something light. And, these movies showcase L.G.B.T.Q. characters in all their wonderful complexity.

Behold: We asked 11 illustrators of Asian descent to create a self-portrait, reflecting on their heritage, their stories of immigration and how they identify as an Asian-American.

Read: Here’s a look at down-and-out graphic novels including “The Complete Works of Fante Bukowski,” which our reviewer says is both gleefully malicious and unrepentantly stupid — a winning combination, for the most part.

We may be venturing outside, but with the virus still raging we’re still safest inside. At Home can help make that tolerable, even fun, with ideas on what to read, cook, watch and do.

Hosam al-Ali is a pharmacist in Idlib who volunteered to be the main virus-response coordinator in his region. He keeps an audio diary, which he shared day by day with our Istanbul bureau chief. Here are some of his entries on fighting a pandemic in a war zone.

APRIL 5

A Day of Pain

Today I conducted training for the White Helmets [a Syrian civil defense group].

There were two teams, each with 10 people. We did two sessions to avoid crowding.

The next morning, I woke at 5 a.m., and we modified slides for the lecture. The slides outline the criteria for sending people to health facilities. They also tell people how to handle dead bodies.

The trainees from the White Helmets are very interested. Their motto, I learned, is from the Quran: “Whoever saves the life of one, it is as if he saves the life of all mankind.”

The whole day my mood was very bad, because my tooth infection had moved from my mouth to my eye, and it was very painful. I started to look like a teddy bear.

APRIL 12

The Search for a Ventilator

Yesterday a friend called me. He was looking for a ventilator for his newborn baby. All the hospital ventilators were busy — and still we don’t have a single coronavirus case.

If that is happening, it means the medical capacity is very poor.

Today I felt depressed: I heard the baby died.

MAY 5

Pressure on All Fronts

There is something very important going on these days. It is not about coronavirus.

It is about the people. They are in a very difficult situation. Everything is super-expensive now. The dollar is rising and the Syrian pound is on the floor. The rate of one dollar is 1,500 Syrian pounds. People are going crazy. God help the people with Ramadan, coronavirus and high prices. God help the people.


That’s it for this briefing. See you next time.

— Melina


Thank you
Carole Landry helped write this briefing. Samin Nosrat provided the recipe, and Theodore Kim and Jahaan Singh provided the rest of the break from the news. You can reach the team at briefing@nytimes.com.

P.S.
• We’re listening to “The Daily.” Our latest episode is about remembering George Floyd.
• Here’s our Mini Crossword, and a clue: Fruit with green skin and pink flesh (five letters). You can find all our puzzles here.
• Times journalists explained how they decide if scientific research is reliable for Times Insider.

Source link

Yousaf Raza Gillani sends Cynthia Ritchie Rs100 million defamation notice

0

Former prime minister and PPP stalwart Yousaf Raza Gillani (left) and American blogger currently based in Pakistan Cynthia D Ritchie. — Geo.tv/Files/Facebook

Former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gillani  has sent a defamation notice to Pakistan-based American blogger Cynthia Ritchie, who has accused him of “manhandling” her while he was “staying at the President’s House”.

The notice, sent through his lawyer on Wednesday, says she will be liable to pay Rs100 million for her defamatory allegations.

Ritchie had made the explosive claims on June 5, in a video broadcast live on Facebook.

She had then also accused former interior minister Rehman Malik of raping her and of the then health minister Makhdoom Shahabuddin of also “manhandling” her, saying that the incidents occurred in 2011 when the PPP was in power.

Furthermore, she has claimed she, as well as her sisters, have been harassed online by various PPP members and supporters.

Gillani responds

Responding to the allegations against him, former premier Gillani asked: “Can a prime minister ever commit such an act at the Aiwan-e-Sadr?”

“What was the lady levelling such accusations doing at the Aiwan-e-Sadr?” he continued, adding: “Who gave her the right to accuse politicians like this?”

He said responding to such statements would be “disgraceful”.

Gillani said that he may have gone to the Aiwan-e-Sadr to meet the president or a delegation.

The former prime minister said that Ritchie “should be ashamed of herself for saying such things”.

He noted that Ritchie had recently levelled several accusations at former Pakistani prime minister and late party leader Benazir Bhutto and “no one can tolerate such accusations”.

“I am not worried about what was said about me. I am more concerned about the baseless accusations levelled at Shaheed Benazir.”

“Ali Haider Gillani and Ali Qasim have approached the court in this regard,” he said.

Later, in a conversation with Geo News, the former premier said that he had met Ritchie a while back at a diplomat’s residence and had met her subsequently on various occasions in large gatherings.

“I am not aware of her background. She contacted my son Ali Qadir Gillani a while back. She told my son his father is an honourable man and he should inquire after me on her behalf.”

Online spat turns dark

The feud seemed to have begun with Ritchie’s “slanderous” remarks on Twitter against late PPP leader Benazir Bhutto, but what the blogger claims likely stem from “dirt” she has on the party.

PPP has filed a complaint with the FIA for Ritchie’s tweet and claims Ritchie’s accusations against party leaders are in response to that.

Ritchie, in a Geo News interview with “Naya Pakistan” host Shahzad Iqbal claimed a PPP leader provided her information on Benazir Bhutto based on which she had posted the tweet.

She said that she would prove her allegations against senior PPP leaders in court and would present whatever evidence she had to authorities in Pakistan.

Ritchie said that she was “going nowhere” and was ready to face the consequences if her allegations were proven false.

Source link

PSO reveals facts behind artificial fuel crisis

0

KARACHI: Pakistan State Oil (PSO), the state-owned petroleum company, on Wednesday revealed the facts behind the ongoing artificial fuel crisis, ARY News reported.

According to the PSO, most of the oil marketing companies, operating in the country, did not have 21 days reserves of the petroleum products in April despite the companies were bound by licensing requirements to ensure a minimum of 21 days of consumption cover of all petroleum products at all times.

The state-owned petroleum company said that when the demand for petroleum products increased in May, the companies had only two to three days of fuel stock and all the burden had shifted to the PSO.

During the period, the oil companies were reluctant to buy the petroleum products, PSO said and urged the government to take stern action against the oil companies.

Read More: Govt forms committee to probe petrol crisis

Earlier today, the federal government had formed an investigation committee to probe the ‘artificial’ petroleum shortage in the country.

According to details, the investigation team would look into the causes of hoarding and black market behind the petroleum crisis.

In this regard, the probe committee had directed CEO’s of three oil companies to appear before the investigation team on Thursday. The three companies include Hascol Petroleum Limited, Shell and GO Oil Company. The inquiry committee would examine the existing reserves of the three oil companies.

 

 

 

Comments

comments



Source link

Researchers Are Looking Into Alternatives To Remdesivir In The Coronavirus Treatment

0

There is only one drug that researchers say has been scientifically shown to help COVID-19: remdesivir. But it is not proven to reduce mortality. So, researchers keep looking for other treatments.



Source link

Myanmar Cautioned About Costly Borrowing From China

0

Myanmar’s auditor general has cautioned government officials about continued reliance on high-interest Chinese loans, as the Southeast Asian country begins to pay off debt taken on during decades of military rule and accept new loans under China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative.

As Myanmar’s largest lender, China holds considerable leverage over the underdeveloped and largely impoverished country. China also is the nation’s biggest trading partner and one of its largest sources of inward investment in its southwestern neighbor.

Myanmar’s current national debt stands at about U.S. $10 billion, of which U.S. $4 billion is owed to China, Auditor General Maw Than told a news conference in Naypyidaw on Monday.

State and regional governments now must repay a total of 3 billion kyats (U.S. $2.1 million) on loans used for regional development during the administration of former president Thein Sein (2011-2016). The Office of the Auditor General ordered the money to be repaid on June 8.

“The truth is the loans from China come at higher interest rates compared to loans from financial institutions like the World Bank or the IMF [International Monetary Fund],” he said. “So, I would like to remind the government ministries to be more restrained in using Chinese loans.”

Myanmar lawmakers and analysts said Tuesday that China’s loans to Myanmar have become burdensome because the country has had to repay as much as U.S. $500 annually in both principal and interest.

Most of the loans are 30-year debt dating from 1988-2010, when a military junta ruled the country, and have been coming due since 2018.

“Most of these loans are to be paid back after 30 years,” said Than Soe, an economic analyst and lawmaker from the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) party. “Now we are paying around U.S. $500 million a year, including principal and four percent interest.”

The interest rate is high relative to the other international loans, making the loans a burden for the ruling government, he said.

In January, lawmakers urged the government to quickly repay Chinese loans issued in past decades, which carry a 4.5 percent interest rate that is the highest among other countries that have lent to Myanmar.

No choice

The current civilian-led NLD government which came into power in 2016 also has borrowed money from international organizations to which it will eventually owe repayments, Than Soe said.

Ye Htut, who served as information minister during Thein Sein’s administration said Myanmar had to take out Chinese loans with high interest rates in the past because it had no other choice.

At the time, Myanmar was subject to harsh economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. in 1997 to isolate the military junta then ruling the country. The Obama administration oversaw a gradual easing of sanctions and lifted remaining ones in 2016 in light of Myanmar’s political reforms.

“During the military government’s tenure, countries like the U.S., Japan, and the United Kingdom, and groupings like EU, were forbidden from giving loans to us,” Ye Htut said.

“Organizations like World Bank or the Asian Development Bank also don’t lend us due to the U.S.’s pressure, so only China was left,” he said.

Without the ability to shop around for loans, Myanmar had to accept the terms and high interest rates set by China, Ye Htut said, adding that some of the borrowed funds were used to finance failed national projects implemented without proper feasibility assessments.

Economists now suggest that the government should negotiate with China for loan forgiveness because of the coronavirus pandemic, which has also dented the nation’s economy.

China has said it will suspend debt repayment for impoverished countries, though it is unknown whether it will do so for Myanmar’s outstanding loans.

“We have seen China forgive the debts of some countries,” said economist Zaw Oo. “It has relaxed the repayment conditions. The ruling government should negotiate with China for loan forgiveness. It would settle many issues that are holding us up.”

Myanmar’s risk of external debt distress is low as is the overall risk of debt distress, according to the International Monetary Fund in a country report issued in March.

The country’s external debt accounts for just over 38 percent of its gross domestic product, according to the IMF.

“While the overall debt outlook remains positive, it remains vulnerable to slowdown in FDI [foreign direct investment], exports, and natural disasters,” the report said.

BRI projects

Myanmar’s involvement in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) means that it is continuing to take on new debt to finance huge infrastructure projects, analysts said.

In January, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi agreed to speed up key infrastructure under the BRI, resulting in 33 exchange letters, protocols and memorandums of understanding on mega-project development, railways, industrial and power projects, and trade and investment.

“Chinese loans often have higher interest rates than those from other international lenders so scrutiny of the costs of BRI projects, their financial viability, and their sources of financing will be particularly critical to ensure that the Myanmar government avoids a disproportionately high debt burden,” said a November 2019 report by the Transnational Institute on BRI projects in Myanmar.

Aung Thu Nyein, director of communications at the Institute for Strategy and Policy–Myanmar, said the loans issued by China under the BRI are making the situation worse.

“Chinese loans are now widely called a debt trap, especially with China now implementing the BRI projects,” he said. “The funding for these projects has turned into loans.”

As with the loans issued to the previous military juntas, there is growing concern in Myanmar that the BRI debt also will accumulate over time, Aung Thu Nyein added.

“We need to be cautious about not falling into the debt trap,” he said.

Reported by Thiha Tun and Thet Su Aung for RFA’s Myanmar Service. Translated by Ye Kaung Myint Maung. Written in English by Roseanne Gerin.



Source link

Senate Panel Asks: When Can K-12 Schools Safely Reopen?

On Wednesday the U.S. Senate’s education committee heard testimony on reopening schools. (Top row from left: Sen. Lamar Alexander, Denver Public Schools Superintendent Susana Cordova, Sen. Bob Casey. Middle: former education secretary John B. King Jr., Sen. Patty Murray, Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Bottom: Penny Schwinn, Matthew Blomstedt, Sen. Tammy Baldwin.)

Senate.gov/Screenshots by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Senate.gov/Screenshots by NPR

On Wednesday the U.S. Senate’s education committee heard testimony on reopening schools. (Top row from left: Sen. Lamar Alexander, Denver Public Schools Superintendent Susana Cordova, Sen. Bob Casey. Middle: former education secretary John B. King Jr., Sen. Patty Murray, Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Bottom: Penny Schwinn, Matthew Blomstedt, Sen. Tammy Baldwin.)

Senate.gov/Screenshots by NPR

Safely reopening the nation’s public schools will be an expensive and Herculean task without additional help from the federal government. And, until schools do reopen, the nation’s most vulnerable children will continue to be hardest hit — losing consistent access to meals, valuable learning time, and vital social-emotional support. Those were just some of the takeaways Wednesday from a hearing of the U.S. Senate’s education committee.

A handful of school leaders and a former U.S. secretary of education told senators that many districts will struggle to put in place recommendations for protecting students from COVID-19. Those include providing masks, gloves and sanitizer, hiring cleaning staff and nurses, conducting testing and contact tracing, as well as planning for socially distant classrooms. One big challenge is that these efforts are happening as states slash education budgets.

“I am concerned that the economic impact of the pandemic will result in necessary and sustained cuts in PK-12 education funding, perhaps to exceed 20% in Nebraska,” said Matthew Blomstedt, that state’s Commissioner of Education.

The high cost to reopen schools was thrown into sharp relief by a recent analysis from the School Superintendents Association and the Association of School Business Officials International. According to the report, the average district would incur nearly $1.8 million in additional expenses, with the bulk of the spending going toward hiring additional custodial staff, nurses and aides to take students’ temperatures before they board school buses.

In many places, budget cuts — and this pandemic — are hitting schools that serve many low-income families the hardest. These districts often depend more on state dollars than their wealthier neighbors, who may rely more heavily on local property tax revenue, and have struggled to provide students with tools necessary to learn remotely, including digital devices and access to Wi-fi.

In fact, much of the hearing focused not on the specific safety challenges of reopening school but on the continued logistical and financial challenges of educating students remotely — especially already vulnerable students.

Districts need “access to devices, access to broadband, access to professional development for educators,” said Penny Schwinn, Tennessee’s education commissioner. “Our own governor often references not having internet on his farm. And that’s a reality that’s all too true for many of our students and their teachers.”

This may reveal school leaders’ embrace of a hard truth that many parents and policymakers don’t want to hear: Many children won’t be returning to school full-time in the fall.

Susana Cordova, the superintendent of Denver’s public schools, said Denver students will likely see a mix of remote and in-person learning. While all students will do at least 40% of their learning in-person, Cordova said, vulnerable students will receive additional in-person instruction.

Whether schools are able to open physically in the fall, the committee’s ranking Democrat, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wa, said “we have to address the ways this virus has further exacerbated inequities that have long existed within our education system … we have to do better. Because if we don’t, the achievement gap—that we strive to close—will undoubtedly widen. We can’t let that happen.”

And John B. King, Jr., a former education secretary under President Barack Obama, made clear that the ongoing protests over police violence should compel school leaders and policymakers to think even harder about what more they can do to support their students of color.

“The murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery have once again sent the message to black students that their lives are devalued,” King said. “As schools reopen, our nation’s students of color and their families also find themselves enduring a pandemic that disproportionately impacts their health and safety, mired in an economic crisis that disproportionately affects their financial well-being, and living in a country that too often still struggles to recognize their humanity.”

The committee’s Republican chairman, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, himself a former U.S. Secretary of Education, made clear he believed Congress had already done a great deal, through the CARES Act, to help schools, but he did leave open the possibility of doing more.

Alexander closed the hearing by asking the panelists for details — specifically, a price tag — “about exactly what it would take, in terms of financial support, to open our schools safely.”

Source link

Charges say man in missing kids case hid remains

Prosecutors charged an Idaho man Wednesday with destroying or concealing two sets of human remains after police said they uncovered bodies at his home while searching for evidence in the case of his wife’s two missing children. (June 10)

       

Source link

Why Twitter Didn’t Label Trump’s Tweet on Martin Gugino

0

OAKLAND, Calif. — President Trump aimed his Twitter feed on Tuesday toward a 75-year-old man who had been shoved to the sidewalk and badly injured by the police in Buffalo.

Mr. Trump speculated that the man, Martin Gugino, could be a provocateur affiliated with an anti-fascist movement. The president also wondered if the man had been trying to sabotage police equipment, or fell intentionally to generate outcry over police brutality.

The president’s tweet, which was not factual, provoked instant outrage. Many users wondered why Twitter, which last month said it had added labels to a handful of Mr. Trump’s tweets because they contained election misinformation and glorified violence, did not intervene.

The simple answer: The tweet did not violate the company’s rules, a spokesman said. What Mr. Trump posted about Mr. Gugino, a peace activist who was still in the hospital recovering from a serious head wound, did not cross into narrow areas of content that the company has staked out for closer scrutiny.

Twitter adds fact-checking labels to tweets that contain misinformation about civic integrity or the coronavirus, and tweets that contain “manipulated media,” like photos or videos that have been doctored to mislead viewers. It also places warnings on tweets from world leaders that violate its policy against promoting violence. Similar tweets from regular users are often removed.

No other content — even offensive or inaccurate claims like the ones Mr. Trump posted about Mr. Gugino — gets a label.

The disconnect between putting labels on some of Mr. Trump’s posts and ignoring arguably more offensive content is indicative of how difficult — and confusing — it will be for the company to more closely moderate what the president and other political figures post.

“This case absolutely illustrates the challenges Twitter is facing right now: How can, and how should, a platform moderate a president who regularly pumps polluted information into the ecosystem?” said Whitney Phillips, an assistant professor at Syracuse University. “No decision, whether it’s to respond or not to respond, will be consequence-free.”

Last month, Twitter began adding labels to Mr. Trump’s tweets. The company fact-checked comments he made about elections and placed a warning label over a tweet in which, it said, Mr. Trump glorified violence.

It was the first time that Twitter had taken any action against Mr. Trump, who has long enjoyed free rein on the platform and used it as his preferred method of lobbing insults against rivals and revving up his supporters.

Twitter’s move was met with anger from Mr. Trump and prominent conservatives, who said the company was censoring their voices. Mr. Trump signed an executive order intended to chip away at legal protections for Twitter and other social media companies. That order is already facing a lawsuit challenging its legality.

Twitter’s recent moderation of the president’s comments has brought heightened scrutiny to the social media company, with conservatives and liberals alike unearthing tweets they find offensive and questioning why Twitter has not acted on them.

Twitter has a number of rules governing content, and the company often tinkers with them, adding new rules or adjusting old ones. The frequent changes can generate confusion and show the challenges facing Twitter as it scrambles to keep up with high-profile users like Mr. Trump who frequently skirt its rules.

But Twitter is also on the hook for enforcing copyright and trademark. Last week, Twitter deleted a video posted by the Trump 2020 campaign because it had received a complaint from the copyright holder of a song used in the video.



Source link

Outsider Tapped in Flynn Case Calls Justice Dept. Reversal a ‘Gross Abuse’ of Power

0

WASHINGTON — Accusing the Justice Department of a “gross abuse of prosecutorial power,” a former mafia prosecutor and retired federal judge urged a court on Wednesday to reject the Trump administration’s attempt to drop the criminal case against Michael T. Flynn, President Trump’s former national security adviser.

“The government has engaged in highly irregular conduct to benefit a political ally of the president,” wrote John Gleeson, who was appointed to a special role to argue against the Justice Department’s unusual effort to drop the Flynn case. He added: “Leave of court should not be granted when the explanations the government puts forth are not credible as the real reasons for its dismissal of a criminal charge.”

But Mr. Gleeson also argued in a 73-page brief that Mr. Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt of court for lying under oath when he gave conflicting statements about his actions. Instead, he wrote, the federal judge overseeing Mr. Flynn’s case, Emmet G. Sullivan, should take that behavior into account when imposing a sentence on Mr. Flynn.

The Justice Department “has treated the case like no other, and in doing so has undermined the public’s confidence in the rule of law,” Mr. Gleeson wrote. “I respectfully suggest that the best response to Flynn’s perjury is not to respond in kind. Ordering a defendant to show cause why he should not be held in contempt based on a perjurious effort to withdraw a guilty plea is not what judges typically do.”

The brief was the first response in the case from Mr. Gleeson, whom Judge Sullivan appointed last month to help him analyze Attorney General William P. Barr’s request to dismiss the case against Mr. Flynn, who had twice pleaded guilty to a charge of lying to the F.B.I. The move was highly unusual and prompted an outcry among former law enforcement officials that the administration was further politicizing the department.

The Justice Department argued that Mr. Flynn’s lies were not “material” to any legitimate investigation — rejecting the department’s previous position that his lies were relevant to the counterintelligence inquiry into the scope of Russia’s covert operation to tilt the 2016 election in Mr. Trump’s favor and the nature of links to Trump campaign associates.

Mr. Gleeson, who had co-written an Op-Ed article calling into question the legitimacy of Mr. Barr’s intervention before Judge Sullivan appointed him, offered a blistering critique of that rationale, saying “no federal prosecutor worth her salt” would adopt the “legally unsound” conclusion the Justice Department put forward.

“Pursuant to an active investigation into whether President Trump’s campaign officials coordinated activities with the government of Russia, one of those officials lied to the F.B.I. about coordinating activities with the government of Russia,” Mr. Gleeson wrote. “It is hard to conceive of a more material false statement than this one.”

The government’s ostensible grounds for seeking dismissal are conclusively disproven by its own briefs filed earlier in this very proceeding,” Mr. Gleeson wrote. “They contradict and ignore this court’s prior orders, which constitute law of the case. They are riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact. And they depart from positions that the government has taken in other cases.”

Mr. Flynn’s defense team and the Justice Department have sought to bypass Judge Sullivan altogether, asking the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to order him to dismiss the case against Mr. Flynn without any further review. The accused Judge Sullivan of abusing his power by appointing Mr. Gleeson to offer counterarguments.

In a filing last week in that proceeding, a lawyer for Judge Sullivan argued that he should be permitted to complete his review, and said he would not necessarily adopt the findings of Mr. Gleeson. A three-judge panel is scheduled to hear arguments in that request on Friday.

Mr. Flynn had pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I. in December 2017 about his conversations with the Russian ambassador the previous month, during the transition period after Mr. Trump won the 2016 election. The Obama administration was taking actions to punish Russia for its interference in the American democratic process, including imposing sanctions on Russian intelligence agencies and expelling Russian officials from the United States. Newly declassified transcripts showed that the sanctions were the main point of the conversations that Mr. Flynn lied about.

American officials intercepted those calls because they were wiretapping the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, and heard Mr. Flynn disparage the punishments and urge Moscow not to escalate the dispute — holding out the prospect of working together after Mr. Trump’s inauguration on issues like fighting the Islamic State. The ambassador later told Mr. Flynn that he had conveyed the “proposal” and that Russia’s government had decided to not retaliate as a result.

But when word of Mr. Flynn’s communications began to emerge, Mr. Flynn lied about what the two had discussed to several incoming members of the administration, including Vice President Mike Pence. F.B.I. agents working on the Russia investigation had previously decided to close an investigation into Mr. Flynn, having not found evidence he was a Russian agent, but decided to question him.

The Justice Department, in seeking to drop Mr. Flynn’s case, have portrayed that interview as baseless because the F.B.I. was moving to close the investigation into Mr. Flynn before the issue of the calls — and Mr. Flynn’s pattern of lying about them to his colleagues — arose. But Mr. Gleeson argued that the calls and lies gave the F.B.I. good reason to question Mr. Flynn.

“These developments added new dimensions, as well as newfound urgency, to the F.B.I.’s ongoing investigations and the intelligence community’s counterintelligence concerns,” Mr. Gleeson wrote. “Flynn had lied to multiple incoming White House officials and concealed the true nature of his contacts with the Russian government.”

Mr. Trump soon fired Mr. Flynn, citing his lies to other members of the administration about his calls with the ambassador, Mr. Flynn eventually twice pleaded guilty to a criminal charge of making false statements. His plea was part of a deal to cooperate with prosecutors, which also resolved Mr. Flynn’s liability for failing to register as a paid foreign agent of Turkey in 2016 and then signing forms where he lied about that work, another potential criminal charge.

But Mr. Flynn’s case became a political cause for Mr. Trump’s supporters as he attacked the legitimacy of the overall investigation that sought to understand Russia’s election interference and was eventually led by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III. And in January, after changing defense lawyers, Mr. Flynn sought to withdraw his guilty plea.

Although he had previously told the court that he did lie to the F.B.I. agents, he now said that he simply did not remember what he had spoken about with the Russian ambassador and that he did not lie.

After more than two years of asserting that Mr. Flynn’s lies were material to the F.B.I.’s Russian interference investigation, the Justice Department in a sharp reversal said they were not in its motion to drop the case.

“That is about as straightforward a case of materiality as a prosecutor, court, or jury will ever see,” Mr. Gleeson wrote.

Source link

Bill Gates lauds Pakistan Army’s efforts in country’s anti-polio campaign

0

Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates (left) and Chief of Army Staff Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa. — Geo.tv/File

RAWALPINDI: Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa held a telephonic conversation  with Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) co-chairman Bill Gates, who appreciated Pakistan Army’s role in the country’s anti-polio campaign, the military’s media wing said Wednesday.

The Inter-Services Public Relations, in a statement, said: “The call was in the backdrop of polio eradication drive in Pakistan. Gates appreciated the Pakistan Army’s help in enabling the campaign through the provision of security, monitoring, and bridging of capacity gaps.”

The COAS responding to the appreciation said that it was a national duty and Army played a part in the “significant initiatives undertaken by the Pakistani government”.

“The healthcare workers who played the most important part in polio drive also acted as the frontline defence against COVID-19,” he said, adding: “[Despite] COVID-19, Pakistan Army in support of [government’s] efforts has already made preparations to restart anti-polio campaign in coming weeks.”

According to ISPR, Gates and Bajwa discussed the challenges that have surfaced in the wake of coronavirus and future pandemic threats and efforts to enhance the resilience of population through education, flexible healthcare management, and the use of technology.

The Army chief “thanked Bill Gates for his foundation’s efforts towards the noble cause and said that every initiative aimed at [the] betterment of Pakistan and its people will be fully supported and appreciated,” the statement added.

Source link