As the U.S. Lashes Out at China, Beijing Hardens Its Resolve

0

BEIJING — Step by step, the United States under President Trump has sought to intensify pressure on Beijing in hopes of making China change its ways. Each move has instead hardened the resolve of China’s leadership to resist, plunging relations to their current nadir.

On Wednesday, the United States won an initial victory in a Canadian court in its long effort to bring criminal charges against a senior executive of Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications giant. On Thursday, China vowed to retaliate against both countries, having already blocked some Canadian exports and held two Canadian citizens for more than 500 days.

Trump administration officials argue that they have brought China to the table on trade by imposing tariffs. But they have failed so far to achieve their goal of fundamentally shifting China’s behavior — on trade or any other issue.

From Beijing’s perspective, the punitive measures have simply revealed the core of American hostility toward China.

“When China was rising as an economic power, the United States tolerated it,” Shen Dingli, an expert on relations with the United States at Fudan University in Shanghai, said in a telephone interview. “Now that China is strong, it cannot tolerate it anymore.”

China does not want to incinerate the relationship with the United States, given the economic benefits. Nor is it willing to back down, creating a constant push and pull in Beijing between the hawks and the more moderating forces.

China’s premier, Li Keqiang, struck a conciliatory tone on Thursday at the close of the legislative session, the National People’s Congress. He called for close trade relations without offering any concessions. He said the two countries “could and should cooperate in many ways in facing both conventional and unconventional challenges,” while pointedly refraining from accusing the United States of any interference in Hong Kong affairs.

Yet, even as Mr. Li was speaking, the Hong Kong office of China’s foreign ministry issued a strong denunciation of the United States. “It is utterly imperious, unreasonable and shameless for American politicians to obstruct the national security legislation for Hong Kong with threats of sanctions based on United States domestic law,” the ministry declared.

With both countries blaming each other, the result has been a downward spiral of tit-for-tat actions that may not let up before Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign ends in November.

When the Trump administration announced new restrictions to block companies around the world from using American-made machinery and software to help Huawei, Beijing promised to target American tech companies operating in China. When the administration capped the number of Chinese journalists in the United States, China kicked out most of the American correspondents from three major news organizations in the United States, including The New York Times.

Both leaders, Mr. Trump and Xi Jinping, feel compelled to appear strong. The American president views blaming China for the coronavirus crisis in the United States as a path to re-election. The Chinese leader faces enormous economic and diplomatic challenges that could stir domestic opposition to his grip on power.

“Anything the U.S. says or does or will do, China will refuse,” Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing, said in a telephone interview.

What the American moves have not done is chasten Mr. Xi’s government, which appears to feel simultaneously embattled and defiant.

Hu Xijin, the outspoken editor of The Global Times, a nationalistic tabloid controlled by the Communist Party, all but dared the Trump administration to carry out its threat to end Hong Kong’s favored trade status. He noted that there were 85,000 Americans there and scores of companies that would reap “the bitter fruits” of the American decision.

“Washington is too narcissistic,” he wrote in Chinese on Weibo on Thursday. “American politicians like Pompeo arrogantly think that the fate of Hong Kong is in their hands.”

The National People’s Congress, the top legislative body, on Thursday dutifully adopted the government’s proposals to impose new laws on Hong Kong to suppress subversion, secession, terrorism and other acts that might threaten China’s national security — as the authorities in Beijing define it. The vote was nearly unanimous, with only one delegate voting against and six abstaining.

China’s authoritarian system and a pliant state news media apparatus give Mr. Xi a far greater advantage in controlling the message in the face of American hostility — exploiting it to rally popular outrage and tempering it to play the role of magnanimous global partner.

At his ritual news conference wrapping up the National People’s Congress on Thursday, Mr. Li, the premier, singled out for praise an American company, Honeywell, that on Tuesday announced an investment in Wuhan — the city from which the pandemic spread. A month before, the Pentagon had awarded Honeywell a contract to supply protective masks.

Mr. Li twice called for “peaceful” relations with Taiwan, after conspicuously dropping the word when he discussed Taiwan at the start of the weeklong legislative session. And he underlined China’s willingness to look further for the origins of the new coronavirus.

China, though, has shown little inclination for compromise.

Beijing’s reacted harshly to a Canadian court’s ruling clearing an initial hurdle for the extradition of Meng Wanzhou, a senior executive of Huawei charged by the United States with bank fraud related to American sanctions against Iran.

The Chinese Embassy in Ottawa accused the United States and Canada of abusing their bilateral extradition treaty and “arbitrarily taking forceful measures” against Ms. Meng.

“The purpose of the United States is to bring down Huawei and other Chinese high-tech companies, and Canada has been acting in the process as an accomplice of the United States,” the embassy said on Twitter, which is banned inside China. “The whole case is entirely a grave political incident.”

China has already retaliated against Canadian exports of pork, canola oil and other products, and in recent days it has hinted that it will target still more. It has also held two Canadians, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, in secret detention on state security charges widely viewed as retaliatory.

Neither has appeared in a public court hearing or been afforded the access to lawyers during court proceedings. That has hardened anti-Chinese sentiment in Canada, which had not historically been as suspicious as, say, the United States.

The International Crisis Group, where Mr. Kovrig, a former diplomat, worked, posted a message on Twitter noting that Thursday was his 535th day in detention. “Each passing day is a stain on China’s reputation,” the group said.

He has described the pandemic and its still-unfolding economic challenge as a crucible that will forge a stronger government and a stronger party. China has also showed it will not be distracted from its defense of territorial claims along its land and sea borders — from the South China Sea to the Himalayas. The commander of the People’s Liberation Army’s garrison in Hong Kong delivered a pointed reminder of its duty to keep the peace there on the sidelines of the congress in Beijing this week.

The bravado has weakened what leverage the United States might once have wielded: the threat of international condemnation, restrictions on trade, even the prospect of decoupling the world’s two largest economies. Beijing now seems willing to bear any cost.

Lau Siu-kai, a former senior Hong Kong government official who advises Beijing, said that American pressure had failed to prompt a reconsideration in the Hong Kong issue, in part because China’s leadership has anticipated American opposition on many fronts.

“Beijing will stick with its new policy toward Hong Kong regardless of U.S. reactions and is prepared to take countermeasures in a tit-for-tat manner,” he said.

Keith Bradsher reported from Beijing, and Steven Lee Myers from Seoul. Research was contributed by Claire Fu, Wang Yiwei, Amber Wang and Liu Yi from Beijing.



Source link

Tell Us Your Questions About Moving During the Pandemic

0

In normal times, the weeks when spring turns to summer are prime time for people looking for new homes and apartments. And while the coronavirus pandemic is not stopping leases from ending, it is prompting many to reconsider their housing situation.

I am right there with you.

In the coming weeks, I will be relocating from New York City to Kansas City to be better positioned to manage my Crohn’s disease and have support from family. As an immune-suppressed person, I am at particular risk of infections — and even more so now, especially in a dense city.

Moving is complicated. Moving during a pandemic prompts even more logistical questions. That’s why I’m taking your questions about how to safely move to the experts. Whether you’re thinking about moving down the block, across state lines or internationally, I want to hear from you.

Answers to your most frequently asked questions and my own will be included in a future article about how to relocate during a pandemic while staying safe and healthy.

Source link

Coronavirus live updates: NYC to begin reopening in June; jobless claims surpass 40M; Texas bar bans masks

CLOSE

America hit a somber benchmark in the coronavirus pandemic, with the U.S. death toll reaching 100,000.

USA TODAY

A day after the U.S. recorded 100,000 deaths from COVID-19, the Labor Department reported an additional 2.1 million unemployment claims last week, meaning more than 40 million Americans have applied for unemployment in just 10 weeks.

A rebellious Texas bar is banning masks in Texas, and gyms in multiple states are suing for the right to open as frustrations mount at the pace of the nation’s economic awakening.

There are more than 5.7 million confirmed cases around the world, with nearly 1.7 million in the United States, according to the Johns Hopkins University data dashboard. More than 356,000 people have died worldwide. 

Our live blog is being updated throughout the day. Refresh for the latest news, and get updates in your inbox with The Daily Briefing. Scroll down for more details.

Here are a few major developments:

  • The U.S. reached a grim milestone, with more than 100,000 coronavirus deaths over a span of less than four months. That’s more than the number of Americans killed in the Vietnam and Korean wars combined. These are some of them.
  • Depleted sales and income tax revenue is hurting state budgets, and it may cost 300,000 teachers their jobs, according to preliminary estimates.
  • Disney is reopening in July, the company announced. Visitors will be required to wear a face mask and will undergo a temperature check. 

Your daily dose of good news: A doctor and nurse on the front lines of the coronavirus got married in a hospital. And after the ceremony, the couple held a virtual reception — and sent a bottle of champagne to all of their guests.

What we’re talking about: In 100 days, more than 100,000 people in the U.S. have died. We reached out to experts in various fields to get an assessment of what the new normal may look like in the next 100 days. The consensus: It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

Post card that featured Trump’s name cost $28 million

A post card mailed to every American household that included coronavirus social distancing guidelines and also prominently featured President Donald Trump’s name cost the U.S. Postal Service $28 million, USA TODAY has learned.

The coronavirus card, which began appearing in U.S. mailboxes in March, drew fire from good-government groups that said it applied a political veneer to the administration’s effort to inform Americans about the pandemic. The cost comes as the U.S. mail service – which Trump has described as “a joke” – is struggling financially.

– John Fritze

Sen. Tim Kaine tests positive for coronavirus antibodies 

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., and his wife, Anne Holton, tested positive for coronavirus antibodies after experiencing flu-like symptoms in March and April, meaning they could have contracted the novel coronavirus. 

Kaine said he had tested positive for the flu earlier in the year and received treatment from his doctors, but at the end of March he experienced new symptoms he thought were flu remnants and a pollen reaction. Holton, the interim president of George Mason University, then “experienced a short bout of fever and chills, followed by congestion and eventually a cough.”

Their doctors thought it was possible they had mild cases of coronavirus, so they stayed home and self-isolated at their home in Richmond, Virginia, until they were symptom-free in mid-April. Neither was tested for coronavirus at the time because of a shortage of tests.

– Nicholas Wu 

New York City could begin reopening in early June

Up to 400,000 people could return to work in early June under Phase One of the plan to reopen New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio said Thursday. Construction, manufacturing, wholesale, and retail grab-and-go are included in the first phase, he said.

“I believe all indicators suggest it will be announced in the first or second week of June,” de Blasio said at a news conference. Businesses will be required to follow social distancing guidelines and to reduce occupancy to under 50%. He also warned that, without a federal stimulus package, virtually all city agencies will face “massive cuts.” 

New York has been the hardest-hit state in the nation, with almost 30,000 deaths. But deaths and hospitalizations have been declining steadily, and the rest of the state already has begun to ease restrictions.

More discounts, fewer lounging areas: Mall shopping in the era of COVID-19

Malls that have been off-limits for shoppers due to stay-at-home orders are opening the door to a brand-new shopping experience vastly different from mid-March. Shopping in the era of COVID-19 means fewer places to lounge for a break or a bite. Trying on clothes gets complicated, and a strategy is required before entering the vast indoor expanses where families spent their Saturdays, teens experienced first dates and friends roamed for hours on end.

Shoppers will find some good news, experts say. “In apparel, the price for consumers will actually fall,” said Neil Saunders, managing director of the retail consultancy GlobalData. “They will have a lot more discounts and a lot more bargains.”

– Dalvin Brown and Kelly Tyko

300,000 teachers could lose jobs due to tax revenue drop

The country’s unprecedented economic pause to slow the spread of the coronavirus has depleted sales and income tax revenue for states, and, in turn, for schools. Preliminary estimates predict jaw-dropping state budget holes that some education funding experts warn could cost in the range of 300,000 teaching jobs. Districts are scrambling to respond to a double whammy: a reduction in money from states and an increase in costs to operate safely as the pandemic wears on.

“It’s a major challenge,” said Gerald Hill, superintendent of schools in West Bloomfield, Michigan. “If we’re cut by 20%, but it’s costing us 20% more to operate, we’re at a 40% cost difference.”

– Erin Richards

More coronavirus news and information from USA TODAY

More than 40 million people file for unemployment in 10 weeks

About 2.1 million Americans filed initial unemployment benefit claims last week, the Labor Department said Thursday. In just ten weeks, 40.7 million have sought jobless benefits that represent the nation’s most reliable gauge of layoffs.A record 20.5 million jobs were lost in April, according to the Labor Department, spiking the unemployment rate to 14.7%, the highest since the Great Depression and four times the 3.5% unemployment rate reported in February, which represented a 50-year low.

– Charisse Jones

CLOSE

Where does the U.S. stimulus money come from? Here’s how the Federal Reserve is saving the economy from the COVID-19 crisis.

USA TODAY

COVID reignites debate over ‘couch caucus’ lawmakers who sleep in offices

The coronavirus has reignited a years-old debate over the “couch caucus,” with some lawmakers arguing that their colleagues sleeping in their offices is improper and increases the chances of spreading COVID-19 to colleagues and staff at the U.S. Capitol. 

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-California, authored a letter to Congress’ attending physician and the Architect of the Capitol, the agency tasked with maintaining and operating the building, asking that the practice be banned in light of the pandemic. 

Rep. Ted Budd defends the practice, however: “I wanted my focus to be back here in North Carolina, where I represent the 13th district. I didn’t want it to be a Washington lifestyle.”

– Christal Hayes

Texas bar bans masks

A bar in Elgin, Texas, is banning masks in defiance of COVID-19 guidance set by county, state and federal leaders. “Due to our concern for our customers, if they FEEL (not think) that they need to wear a mask, they should stay at home until they FEEL that it’s safe to be in public without one. Sorry, no masks allowed,” a sign at the Liberty Tree Tavern reads. 

The sign then advised that it would adhere to Gov. Greg Abbott’s requirements limiting occupancy of bars to 25% and 6 feet of social distancing between parties. Elgin has recorded more than 50 confirmed COVID-19 cases and one death. “Sorry for the inconveniences please bear with us thru (sic) the ridiculous fearful times,” the sign reads.

– Brandon Mulder, Austin American-Statesman

CDC: Antibody tests can be wrong half the time

COVID-19 antibody tests can be wrong half the time and should not be used to determine who can be grouped together in such settings as schools and dorms, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says in its latest guidelines. The guidance could have a major impact as schools and universities build program plans for the coming school year. Office workers also could be affected.

“Serologic test results should not be used to make decisions about returning persons to the workplace,” the CDC says.

Antibody tests: Here’s why they may provide a false sense of security

California reopening draws criticism

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s bold plan to reopen California has some public health experts wondering if it’s too much too soon. Sara Cody, the Santa Clara County health officer at the forefront of shutting down the San Francisco Bay Area in mid-March, told her county board the state is moving forward “without a real understanding of the consequences.”

Dr. David Relman, a microbiologist and immunologist at Stanford Medicine, says he questions whether counties are really able to implement the rules and respond to potential outbreaks. Mark Ghaly, secretary of California’s Health and Human Services Agency, countered that the plans provides guidance but that counties are not being pressured to “open sooner or stay closed longer than they themselves feel they should.”

Dems blast ‘pitiful’ COVID-19 report on race

House Democrats are dismissing a federal report on the racial breakdown of cases and deaths from the coronavirus as “pitiful,” saying it hurts efforts to target resources to communities of color. Early data shows communities of color, including African Americans, Native Americans and Latinos, are dying at a disproportionately higher rate compared with whites. The lawmakers complained that a recently released four-page report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fails to reflect the national impact.

The agency said Wednesday it is “leveraging all our available surveillance systems to … protect vulnerable communities.” 

“We deserve to know the facts and have quality analysis,’’ said U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, a Democrat from Illinois and chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus Health Braintrust. “Once again, they are showing us they just don’t care.”

– Deborah Barfield Berry

North Carolina, Michigan, New Jersey gym owners file lawsuits to reopen

Gym owners in North Carolina, Michigan and New Jersey have filed lawsuits against state officials in the last two weeks for not allowing them to reopen meanwhile other businesses have started to reopen. The owners argue that it’s unconstitutional and a violation of their rights.

“If reopening businesses safely is the goal, then all businesses — including gyms — should be afforded the same opportunity to do so,” attorney Scott M. Erskine, who is representing a coalition of 120 gyms in Michigan, said in a press release

In North Carolina, a Facebook page was created to raise money for owners to retain an attorney, reports The News & Observer. A group of nine plaintiffs filed the lawsuit Wednesday, asking for a temporary restraining order that would prevent Gov. Roy Cooper from keeping gyms closed.

A gym in New Jersey that reopened last week in defiance of state orders also filed a lawsuit for similar reasons. The lawsuit says the owners took “extraordinary precautions” to implement “health protocols … sufficiently similar to those businesses that were allowed to remain open” when it reopened. 

Wyoming cancels Cheyenne Frontier Days, other major rodeos this summer

Wyoming, the self-proclaimed Cowboy State, canceled six major rodeos this summer because of the coronavirus — including Cheyenne Frontier Days, Gov. Mark Gordon announced Wednesday.

“This reality is not an easy one,” Gordon said in a news conference. “In my soul, I know how important those events are to our communities and our citizens.”

It’s the first time Frontier Days has been canceled in its 124-year history. The world’s largest outdoor rodeo draws more than 140,000 people annually. The other canceled rodeos are the Thermopolis Rendezvous, Cody Stampede, Central Wyoming Fair & Rodeo in Casper, Sheridan WYO Rodeo and Laramie Jubilee Days.

Tom Hanks donates plasma in California to help fight coronavirus 

Tom Hanks is “plasmatic.” The “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood” actor, 63, kept his spirits high while donating plasma at the University of California in Los Angeles to help fight against the coronavirus following his own recovery. 

He documented his experience on Instagram Wednesday, sharing several photos of his left arm hooked up to a machine and a picture of the end result: Two bags full of plasma.

“Plasmatic on 3! 1,2,3 PLASMATIC!” he captioned the series of pictures. 

In March, Hanks and his wife, Rita Wilson, were hospitalized in Queensland, Australia after being diagnosed with coronavirus, becoming the first major celebrities to test positive. Hanks told NPR in April that he hopes the plasma will be beneficial toward vaccine research.

– Cydney Henderson

Disney World plans July 11 reopening for Magic Kingdom, Animal Kingdom

Walt Disney World plans to reopen July 11, according to a presentation the company made to an economic recovery task force Wednesday. The theme park has been closed since March 15 because of the coronavirus pandemic, and its reopening will follow its Florida rival, Universal Orlando, which is set to reopen June 5.

Disney is planning a phased reopening, with the Magic Kingdom and Animal Kingdom opening July 11. Epcot and Disney’s Hollywood Studios are set to reopen July 15.

Disney World visitors will undergo a temperature check and be required to wear a face mask. The park will provide masks to people who do not bring their own.

Social distancing markers will be visible throughout the park. Disney’s “cast members” will enforce the rules, including the mask requirement, as part of a social-distancing squad. Park capacity will also be limited and not all attractions will reopen right away.

– Curtis Tate

Contributing: The Associated Press

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/05/28/coronavirus-updates-jobless-claims-us-deaths-reopening-lawsuits/5270911002/



Source link

Kellyanne Conway Thinks You Should Wait In Line To Vote, But She Voted By Mail

WASHINGTON — White House aide Kellyanne Conway — who, like her boss, the president, is falsely attacking voting by mail as prone to fraud — cast her own ballot by mail to vote in Bergen County, New Jersey, in the 2018 midterm election.

On Wednesday, Conway said voters should vote in person and compared it to the sacrifice involved in buying designer cupcakes.

“I mean, they wait in line for a Georgetown Cupcake for an hour, to get a cupcake,” she told reporters at the White House. “So, I think they can probably wait in line to do something as consequential and critical and constitutionally significant as cast their ballot.”

Yet Conway was apparently unwilling to make that time commitment herself on Nov. 6, 2018, when she voted by mail, according to the Bergen County supervisor of elections.

Conway, who with her husband continues to own a home in northern New Jersey, tried to draw a distinction between an absentee ballot and a mail ballot, although many states — including New Jersey ― have no such distinction and allow voters to cast ballots by mail without having to assert that they will be out of town.

“That’s called an absentee ballot. One completes it and posts it by U.S. Mail,” Conway wrote in response to a HuffPost query. “Don’t confuse it with a (non-absentee) ‘mail-in ballot’ to serve your purposes.”

Records from the New Jersey Division of Elections show that the 2018 midterm was the first election in which Conway voted by mail rather than in person. The records also indicate she failed to vote at all in the 2017 election, in which Democrat Phil Murphy defeated Republican Kim Guadagno to become governor.

White House officials generally have been repeating President Donald Trump’s claims that mail balloting is rife with fraud. “There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent,” Trump wrote in a post this week that earned a first-ever fact check warning from Twitter. “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed.”

But Trump himself voted by mail in the Florida presidential primary election in March, even though he drove right past an early voting location on March 7 and 8 on his way to and from playing golf. Instead, an RNC operative picked up his ballot for him on March 9 — an action that Trump and many Republicans have argued is an invitation to fraud.

The White House has refused to explain how Trump’s ballot got from Florida to the White House and then back to West Palm Beach on March 16, the day it was hand-delivered to the elections office.

The RNC has also declined to comment.

Trump’s claims notwithstanding, elections experts have found that voting by mail does not lead to significant voter fraud.

Trump, though, likely revealed his true reason for opposing mail voting in an interview with Fox News on March 30, when he explained why he opposed Democratic efforts to include an expansion of mail voting in the coronavirus relief legislation. “They had levels of voting, that if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again,” Trump said.

“This all comes from fear by Trump and like Republicans that more people voting means more non-white voters,” said Stuart Stevens, a GOP consultant who worked on the campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney. “Data doesn’t support that, but data doesn’t support hydroxychloroquine, either.”

Conway’s colleague in the White House, press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, also voted by mail in Florida — and, in fact, has only voted by mail since she began voting at age 20 in 2008, according to Hillsborough County records.

“Trump, Kayleigh, and now Kellyanne. What a bunch of elitists,” said Joe Walsh, the former GOP congressman who unsuccessfully challenged Trump for the 2020 presidential nomination. “They get to vote by mail but they don’t want their voters to? Further proof that Trump et al can’t stand their supporters.”



Source by [author_name]

Coronavirus live updates: Dominic Cummings won’t face police action over ‘minor’ lockdown breach

The Federal Government’s JobKeeper scheme may need to be extended beyond its initial six-month period, the head of the Reserve Bank of Australia has said.

RBA governor Phillip Lowe fronted the inquiry into the government’s response to COVID-19 this morning and said while it’s too early to tell, an extension may need to be considered.

“Well, it’s clearly going to be a critical point when that scheme comes to an end and also when the deferral for six months of mortgage payments and other payments that the banks are offering … so that’s a critical point for the economy,” Mr Lowe said.

“I note the JobKeeper program, it’s six months, but a three-month review was built into that program and I think that was very sensible of the government to do that.

“It will be important to review the parameters of that scheme. It may be in six months’ time we bounce back well, and the economy is doing reasonably well and these schemes, which were temporary in nature, can be withdrawn without problems.

“But if the economy is not recovered reasonably well by then, as part of that review we should be looking at, perhaps, the extension of that scheme or the modification in some way.

“But I think at this point I think it’s too hard to say because the outlook remains very uncertain but it’s going to be a very critical point in the economy.”

Source by [author_name]

NYC officials call for police probe of white woman’s 911 call on black man in Central Park

Some New York City officials are calling on police to launch a criminal probe into a white woman’s calling 911 on a black man in Central Park and falsely reporting that he threatened her.

“We could arrest someone for pulling a fire alarm,” Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams said at a news conference Wednesday. “We could surely arrest someone for attempting to destroy and burn down the life of an innocent person.”

The news conference was held in the Ramble, a secluded section of Central Park popular with birdwatchers and the site of the confrontation between Amy Cooper and Christian Cooper, who are not related.

The dispute Monday morning began when Christian Cooper noticed Amy Cooper had let her cocker spaniel off its leash against the rules in the Ramble, he has recounted. He said he asked her to put her dog on a leash. When she did not, he pulled out his phone and began recording.

What he captured would be witnessed by tens of millions of people: Amy Cooper called police to report she was being threatened by “an African American man.”

The video was posted on Facebook by Christian Cooper and on Twitter by his sister. It sparked accusations of racism and led to Amy Cooper’s getting fired from her finance job. She also surrendered her dog to the shelter where she had gotten it.

Amy Cooper is shown in the video telling Christian Cooper to stop recording her or she will call the cops and tell them, “There’s an African American man threatening my life.” She repeated the statement several times.

Christian Cooper does not appear to move any closer to her in the video. When he refused to stop recording her, Amy Cooper grabs her dog’s collar and moves away from him to call the police, the video shows.

“Please call the cops,” Christian Cooper responded.

“There is an African American man. I am in Central Park. He is recording me and threatening myself and my dog,” she said on the call. “Please send the cops immediately!”

Christian Cooper said he stopped recording once Amy Cooper put a leash on her dog.

Police said by the time they responded, both Amy Cooper and Christian Cooper were gone.

Adams, a retired New York Police Department captain, said he believes there should be “zero tolerance” when someone makes a racially motivated 911 call with false accusations.

“I am calling on the [NYPD] commissioner to send detectives to the victim’s house to look at the tape,” Adams said.

“Then the next stop is to send those detectives to Amy’s house and put her in handcuffs to send a strong message that you will not use the police department to go after individuals,” he continued.

Adams and other officials took issue with NYPD First Deputy Commissioner Benjamin Tucker’s telling WPIX 11 on Tuesday that the department had “bigger fish to fry” and would not pursue criminal charges against Amy Cooper for making a false report. Tucker said, “The DA would never prosecute that,” referring to the district attorney.

The city’s public advocate, Jumaane Williams, said at Wednesday’s news conference: “There is no bigger fish to fry than the institution of racism and bigotry that is pervasive in every damn institution across this city, state and this country.”

Mayor Bill de Blasio described the video footage as “racism, plain and simple.”

“She called the police BECAUSE he was a Black man. Even though she was the one breaking the rules,” the mayor tweeted Tuesday. “She decided he was the criminal and we know why. This kind of hatred has no place in our city.”

The mayor said at a news conference Thursday that, “There’s a very valid question about calling the police for any false claim of a crime. And I don’t know the law, but that’s the direction I would look at. Did she commit an offense by falsely accusing someone?”

He added that if laws do not cover such incidents, “then I think the notion of creating a new category would make sense.”

On Wednesday morning, the city’s Commission on Human Rights said it was launching an investigation, which could lead to fines, compensatory damages and community service orders.

“At a time when the devastating impacts of racism in Black communities have been made so painfully clear — from racial disparities in COVID-19 outcomes to harassment of essential workers on the frontlines — it is appalling to see these types of ugly threats directed at one New Yorker by another,” Sapna V. Raj, deputy commissioner of the law enforcement bureau at the commission said in a statement.

“Efforts to intimidate Black people by threatening to call law enforcement draw on a long, violent and painful history, and they are unacceptable,” the statement said. “We encourage Ms. Cooper to cooperate with the Commission and meaningfully engage in a process to address the harm that she has caused.”

Public Advocate Williams released a statement praising the commission’s action.

“Before anyone dismisses the risks of calling law enforcement on a black man, they should look to Minneapolis on Monday, to Staten Island six years ago, to the many incidents that we see on video and the countless that we don’t,” he said.

Amy Cooper apologized for her behavior on Monday, saying she reacted “emotionally and made false assumptions” about Christian Cooper’s intentions.

“I sincerely and humbly apologize to everyone, especially to that man, his family,” she told NBC New York. “It was unacceptable and I humbly and fully apologize to everyone who’s seen that video, everyone that’s been offended … everyone who thinks of me in a lower light and I understand why they do.

“When I think about the police, I’m such a blessed person. I’ve come to realize especially today that I think of [the police] as a protection agency, and unfortunately, this has caused me to realize that there are so many people in this country that don’t have that luxury,” she said.

Christian Cooper in an interview with The New York Times showed empathy for Amy Cooper.

“It’s a little bit of a frenzy, and I am uncomfortable with that,” he said of the response to the video. “If our goal is to change the underlying factors, I am not sure that this young woman having her life completely torn apart serves that goal.”



Source link

UK coronavirus live: groups of six people can meet outside in England from Monday; No 10 backs Cummings



















Updated
































































Changes need to be cautious as rate of infection still ‘significant’, says Vallance










R number remains close to 1 and not coming down fast, Vallance says










Measures will be reimposed if necessary for local flare-ups, Johnson says

Updated

Source link

House Pulls Surveillance Measure After Trump Tells Republicans to Vote No

House Democratic leaders on Thursday withdrew legislation that would revive expired F.B.I. tools to investigate terrorism and espionage and add privacy protections for Americans subjected to wiretapping for national security purposes, after a fragile bipartisan compromise collapsed following an abrupt repudiation by President Trump.

The retreat left uncertain the fate of efforts to overhaul national security surveillance while extending three partly expired tools that federal law enforcement officials use in such cases. Just days ago, the bill had appeared poised to become law, after initial approval by both the House and Senate.

But support for the measure among Republicans cratered after Mr. Trump intervened to urge them to reject it, and some progressives said they could not support the bill without greater privacy protections. With votes bleeding from both flanks, House leaders delayed a vote late Wednesday and then called if off altogether on Thursday rather than let it fail.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had spent much of the last 24 hours trying to salvage the measure, said the House would instead initiate negotiations with the Senate to bridge their differences before trying to clear it for Mr. Trump’s signature.

“Clearly, because House Republicans have prioritized politics over our national security, we will no longer have a bipartisan veto-proof majority,” she said in a letter to colleagues on Thursday morning. “It will be our intention to go to conference in order to ensure that all of the views of all members of our caucus are represented in the final product.”

It is far from clear what the Trump administration wants. Mr. Trump himself has demonstrated little understanding of the complex details of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, and appears to be largely interested in keeping alive his grievances about the F.B.I. investigation into whether his campaign was involved with Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

He tweeted on Tuesday that Republicans should oppose the legislation “until such time as our Country is able to determine how and why the greatest political, criminal, and subversive scandal in USA history took place!” On Thursday, he praised Republicans for following through with an “incredibly important blockage” of legislation that would “perpetuate the abuse.”

A small part of the Russia investigation included surveillance authorized by FISA that targeted Carter Page, a former campaign adviser with close ties to Moscow. An inspector general report later uncovered myriad errors and omissions in the applications for that wiretap, and Mr. Trump has sought to undercut the legitimacy of the broader inquiry by citing the problematic wiretapping of his former aide.

That kind of FISA surveillance, however, is unrelated to the trio of partly expired F.B.I. tools whose proposed extension is driving the legislation. They do things like permit court orders to gather business records deemed to be relevant to a terrorism or espionage investigation.

Still, the bill before Congress to extend them has become a vehicle for broader FISA reforms, including in response to the problems with the Page applications. For example, it would add new layers of oversight to FISA wiretap applications by instructing judges — who normally hear from only the Justice Department when weighing such requests — to appoint outsiders to critique the government’s arguments in more types of cases, including those involving political campaigns or religious organizations.

But even as Mr. Trump vents his skepticism of the government surveillance powers, Attorney General William P. Barr has been pushing Republicans in the opposite direction. He warned on Wednesday that he would tell Mr. Trump to veto the bill because he thought it would impose too many restrictions on law enforcement and national security authorities.

The result is a complicated spectacle of political and policy dysfunction. Traditionally, Democrats have tended to be somewhat more reluctant than Republicans to grant broad national security powers to the government; but here, Democrats appear to be the ones more eager to see the legislation passed.

That is in part because some Republicans, like Mr. Barr, would apparently rather see the tools remain expired than accept the new limits included in the bill. The operational effect of the expiration is limited, because it only matters for potential investigations into new threats that may emerge. The F.B.I. can still use the authority to obtain court orders for ongoing cases, and it has open-ended investigations into major adversaries like the Islamic State, Russia and China.

But it is also because Mr. Trump is now suggesting that the reforms on FISA wiretaps do not go far enough, although he has not put forward any alternative. That has left it unclear what congressional Republicans actually want for the bill, other than to avoid getting crosswise with Mr. Trump.

Unlike most other legislation that becomes law in Washington, surveillance bills in recent years have tended to pass with unusual bipartisan coalitions that must balance the interests of civil libertarians in both parties with those of more pro-law enforcement lawmakers in both parties. When the House passed an earlier version of the bill in March, for example, 152 Democrats and 126 Republicans supported it.

“The two-thirds of the Republican Party that voted for this bill in March have indicated they are going to vote against it now,” Representative Steny H. Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland and the majority leader, said on Thursday morning. “I am told they are doing so at the request of the president. I believe this to be against the security interest of the United States and the safety of the American people.”

Republican leaders in the House, many of whom have publicly praised the measure in recent days, quickly stepped into line behind the president and urged their colleagues to vote “no” so that lawmakers and the White House could reopen negotiations. They offered vague statements about the bill’s inadequacies, even though several had urged the president to sign it as recently as this month.

“In moving forward today, it won’t be signed into law,” Representative Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California and the minority leader, said on Wednesday. “The president has questions, and the attorney general has questions. Let’s take a deep breath and go back and work together.”

Democrats faced their own defections from the left, with the leaders of the influential progressive caucus warning that the bill before them was “far too narrow in scope and would still leave the public vulnerable to invasive online spying and data collection.”

The setback was the latest obstacle in what has proved to be a tortuous effort to overhaul federal surveillance powers. The House initially approved the bill in March, but the Senate modified it this month, sending it back to be passed again before it could go to Mr. Trump to be signed into law.

House Democrats had planned to further revise it this week by tightening limits on when the F.B.I. might collect Americans’ internet browsing and search records. But Ms. Pelosi canceled those plans after civil libertarian-oriented lawmakers and privacy advocates expressed disillusionment with the scope of the changes.

Before passing its version of the bill this month, the Senate fell just short of banning the use of one part of FISA — the partly lapsed provision that permits the F.B.I. to obtain business records without a full warrant — for gathering internet search histories and browsing records. While a majority of the Senate supported the move, it failed to reach the three-fifths majority needed to advance.

Ms. Pelosi came under pressure to permit a vote on the same idea in the House, but first she had to overcome divisions within her own party between a faction of progressives who were primarily focused on protecting civil liberties and a centrist group that was more focused on security. They agreed on ambiguous language that would limit the protections to data of Americans but disagreed about how expansively the FISA court should interpret it.

Some liberal civil-liberties advocates balked at the potential limits of the compromise and withdrew their support from the bill, compounding the collapse in support by Mr. Trump’s allies.

Ms. Pelosi on Thursday pinned the demise of the measure on the White House while also saying the Trump administration wanted unfettered surveillance powers that Democrats were unwilling to endorse.

“The administration, especially those in the Justice Department, really don’t want any bill that provides protections for American people,” she said at a news conference in the Capitol. “They want all the leeway in the world to do what they do. It is most unfortunate.”



Source link

Basketball Hall Of Fame Postpones Enshrinement Because Of Coronavirus

The late Kobe Bryant, shown in 2016, headlines the star-studded Basketball Hall of Fame Class of 2020.

Joe Robbins/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Joe Robbins/Getty Images

The late Kobe Bryant, shown in 2016, headlines the star-studded Basketball Hall of Fame Class of 2020.

Joe Robbins/Getty Images

Updated 4:13 p.m. ET

The Basketball Hall of Fame’s upcoming enshrinement weekend may be scratched from this year’s calendar because of the coronavirus, President and CEO John Doleva confirmed Thursday.

“Given the unprecedented challenge of planning in the COVID-19 era, we are exploring several scenarios to accommodate the Class of 2020 ceremony, including postponing the festivities until October or early 2021,” Doleva said in a statement.

He added the Hall of Fame is reviewing all options with a final decision to be made the week of June 15.

“We congratulate the highly anticipated Class of 2020 and look forward to gathering to celebrate their tremendous careers and impact on the game when it’s determined safe to do so,” he said.

The delay is particularly notable because the incoming Class of 2020, considered one of the best ever, will be headlined by the late Kobe Bryant.

Keeping the option to hold the festivities in October seems to be at odds with what another high-ranking official at the Hall of Fame told ESPN on Wednesday.

“We’re definitely canceling,” Jerry Colangelo, chairman of the Naismith Memorial Hall of Fame’s board of governors, told the sports network. “It’s going to have to be the first quarter of next year. We’ll meet in a couple of weeks and look at the options of how and when and where.”

The original dates for the enshrinement weekend were in late August, with alternate dates in October. However, Colangelo also told ESPN that the dates are “just not feasible” because of the pandemic, which has killed more than 100,000 people in the United States alone.

Other notable members of the class include Kevin Garnett, Tim Duncan, WNBA legend Tamika Catchings and coaches Rudy Tomjanovich and Kim Mulkey.

Kobe Bryant, seen in 2016, played 20 seasons, all with the Los Angeles Lakers, where he won five NBA Championships.

Nick Cammett/Diamond Images/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Nick Cammett/Diamond Images/Getty Images

Kobe Bryant, seen in 2016, played 20 seasons, all with the Los Angeles Lakers, where he won five NBA Championships.

Nick Cammett/Diamond Images/Getty Images

Three members of the 2020 class will be inducted posthumously.

Bryant died four months ago when his helicopter crashed in Calabasas, Calif. Eight others died in the crash, including his daughter Gianna. He was 41. Bryant played 20 seasons, all with the Los Angeles Lakers, where he won five NBA Championships.

His public funeral held at Staples Centers drew thousands and was broadcast live on television.

Also set to be honored is Eddie Sutton, the longtime college coach who amassed more than 800 victories. He died earlier this month at 84.

Another 2020 honoree is Patrick Baumann, the long-serving secretary general for the International Basketball Federation, who died in October 2018 at 51.

Colangelo said that even though the 2020 and 2021 classes will be enshrined in the same year, there will be separate events for each.

“We won’t be combining them,” he said to ESPN. “The Class of 2020 is a very special class and deserves its own celebration.”

Source link

‘You can gather with 49 people but can’t smoke a cigarette?’ – Steenhuisen

Democratic Alliance (DA) Leader John Steenhuisen, finds the lockdown Level 3 regulations announced by Cogta minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma bizarre. He cannot seem to understand why the sale of cigarettes and other things like getting a haircut is still prohibited while gathering with 49 people for religious purposes is allowed.

Steenhuisen took to Twitter to air his frustration moments after Dlamini-Zuma took to the podium on Thursday 28 May. 

Dlamini-Zuma announced the details on Level 3 regulations during a National coronavirus Command Council (NCCC) meeting on Thursday. 

STEENHUISEN: NO CIGARETTES UNDER LEVEL 3?

Steenhuisen couldn’t quite understand why some things are permitted and other prohibited. On Thursday afternoon, he took to Twitter and said: 

“So you can gather in a confined space with 49 other people but you cannot have your haircut, go to the beach, or go to a park or smoke a cigarette? Bizarre….”

Dlamini-Zuma, in her speech on Thursday, covered the sale of alcohol, touched on religious gatherings and addressed exercise but did not mention anything about cigarettes. 

The reopening of hair salons — a topic which has become quite controversial during the lockdown — was also not permitted. 

Another concern making the rounds on social media is that a citizen may gather with 49 people in places of worship but may not have any social gatherings, even with five people. 

Bheki Cele, on Thursday, also confirmed that no gatherings for social reasons are permitted under Level 3. He said that churches may operate under Level 3 but no hugging and kissing is allowed.

ALCOHOL SALES PERMITTED BUT UNDER THESE CONDITIONS 

Although the cigarette ban is still ongoing, the sale of alcohol is now permitted come 1 June. 

Based on what took place a week ago, one wouldn’t necessarily picture the alcohol ban being lifted. Just a few days ago, there were reports that Dlamini-Zuma was allegedly advocating for the alcohol and cigarette bans to remain until Level 1. It caused quite the uproar at the time but nevertheless, the alcohol ban will be lifted come Monday. 

 There are, however, a few rules to abide by.

  • Home consumption allowed only;
  • This means bottle stores, supermarkets and liquor traders can sell alcohol over the counter;
  • Bars and tavern remain banned;
  • The sale of alcohol will be allowed for four days a week: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday;
  • The stores selling booze will be allowed to operate from 9:00 – 17:00; and
  • Drinking on the premises is banned, and no ‘special events’ will be granted one-off liquor licenses.



Source link