Priti Patel criticised over comments on Leicester’s sweatshops

Priti Patel, the home secretary, has come under fire over claims that “cultural sensitivities” prevented a robust response to alleged worker exploitation in Leicester, with critics arguing cuts to regulators, the decision to limit inspections and an absence of unions were the biggest causes.

Ten days after the Guardian reported fears that conditions in sweatshops were a factor in Leicester’s spike in coronavirus cases, resulting in an extended lockdown, reports emerged on Sunday that Patel was considering new laws to curb modern slavery.

Patel had “privately raised concerns” that police and government agencies were turning a blind eye to the problem because they might be labelled racist, the Sunday Times said.

Patel was reported to have compared the issues in Leicester, where south Asian factory owners run an industry that largely relies on immigrant and BAME labour, to the Rotherham grooming scandal.

But critics said her reported views failed to account for the fact that in contrast to the Rotherham scandal, parliamentary reports, regulators and media coverage had raised concerns publicly about Leicester for years.

“It’s outrageous,” said Claudia Webbe, Labour MP for Leicester East, where many of the factories are based, who raised the issue in her maiden speech to the Commons in February. “It’s not about the fear of being labelled racist, it’s not about cultural sensitivity, it’s about the failure of government to protect mainly women from migrant communities who have been seriously exploited by unscrupulous employers.”

“The government has been in power for 10 years,” she added. “It needs to properly fund the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and local authorities if it’s serious about making a change.”

Andrew Bridgen, Conservative MP for North West Leicestershire – who raised the issue in the Commons in January and said he will provide evidence to the National Crime Agency on Monday – did not reply explicitly to a question on LBC radio about Patel’s reported views but said: “I told Matt Hancock [the health secretary] and Priti Patel when the figures for Leicester came out, I said you will not sort out the virus flare-up in Leicester until we close these slave sweatshops.”

The HSE, which like many other regulators has faced cuts since the coalition government took charge in 2010, was told to cut proactive workplace inspections by a third in 2011.

A 2018 Financial Times report noted that then employment minister Chris Grayling said in 2012: “If we try to legislate out all risk, we will lose jobs to other places.”

While sectors including stoneworking and furniture manufacture are subjected to “targeted proactive intervention” by the HSE, the textiles industry is in Category D, the group deemed to be lowest risk, and therefore faces a “principally reactive” approach.

The office of the director of Labour Market Enforcement said in its 2018 strategy that the average employer could expect an inspection by the HMRC’s minimum wage team about once every 500 years.

While bodies including the HSE and the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority made a number of visits to factories in Leicester last week, those interventions were made with the consent of business owners, raising concerns that serious offenders will simply not allow the bodies access.

Amid ongoing concerns that whistleblowers in Leicester are afraid to come forward because of the risk of retribution, it is understood that a new strategy from interim Labour Market Enforcement director Matthew Taylor will propose strengthening powers for regulators in circumstances where widespread reports of abuse are not followed by actionable intelligence.

Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said: “The extent of government cuts to enforcement agencies and inspectorates over the years is scandalous.”

She also argued the fact that Leicester’s garment factories are largely without union representation was a more significant factor than cultural sensitivity in abuses there. “There is no better way to support workers on a sustainable basis than a union,” she said. “If workers in exploited conditions just had the right to speak to someone, that would be important. Rights aren’t worth the paper they’re written on unless you can enforce them.”

Leicester GMB representative Mark Mizzen said that barriers to recruitment were raised by the nature of Leicester’s factories and workshops. “The great fear is that if we’re outside these factories, anybody seen talking to us could be victimised,” he said. “You’re talking about many small units with 20 workers, so it’s much harder to get involved with trying to organise.”



Source link

Latest

Australia’s latest Covid wave may be passing but the crisis in hospitals has only just begun | Aaron Bloch

Is it strange to feel nostalgic for 2020?Yes, there was fear. Fear of the unknown, infection, death. Perhaps worst of all, there was fear...

Covid outbreak in Tibet leaves thousands of Chinese tourists stranded

Thousands of Chinese tourists have been left stranded in Tibet as authorities in the region struggle to contain a fresh Covid outbreak.In recent months,...

Government will fund endangered bus routes in England

Regional bus services in England that were facing the axe have been given a reprieve after the government announced £130m of funding to keep...