In urging the justices to deny a stay of execution, Ken Paxton, Texasâ€™ attorney general, a Republican, said Mr. Ramirez had engaged in litigation gamesmanship. For instance, Mr. Paxton wrote, Mr. Ramirez had at one point asked only that his pastor be present and need not touch him.
The Supreme Court has taken a variety of approaches to suits in which death row inmates asked that their spiritual advisers be present to comfort them during their executions,
In 2019, for instance, the court allowed by a 5-to-4 vote the execution of an Alabama inmate, Domineque Ray, a Muslim whose request that his imam be present had been denied. At the time, Alabama allowed only a Christian chaplain employed by the prison system to offer spiritual guidance to condemned inmates during their last moments.
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the dissenters in 2019, said the majority was â€œprofoundly wrong.â€ Under Alabamaâ€™s policy, she wrote, â€œa Christian prisoner may have a minister of his own faith accompany him into the execution chamber to say his last rites.â€
â€œBut if an inmate practices a different religion â€” whether Islam, Judaism or any other â€” he may not die with a minister of his own faith by his side,â€ Justice Kagan wrote.
A few weeks later, the court confronted a similar case from Texas and came to a different conclusion, staying the execution of a Buddhist inmate whose request that his spiritual adviser be present in the execution chamber had been denied.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court said that Texas could not execute the inmate, Patrick H. Murphy, â€œunless the state permits Murphyâ€™s Buddhist spiritual adviser or another Buddhist reverend of the stateâ€™s choosing to accompany Murphy in the execution chamber during the execution.â€