It was the mid-1980s, at a meeting in Switzerland, when Wally Broeckerâ€™s ears perked up. Scientist Hans Oeschger was describing an ice core drilled at a military radar station in southern Greenland. Layer by layer, the 2-kilometer-long core revealed what the climate there was like thousands of years ago. Climate shifts, inferred from the amounts of carbon dioxide and of a form of oxygen in the core, played out surprisingly quickly â€” within just a few decades. It seemed almost too fast to be true.Â Â Â Â Â
Broecker returned home, to Columbia Universityâ€™s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, and began wondering what could cause such dramatic shifts. Some of Oeschgerâ€™s data turned out to be incorrect, but the seed they planted in Broeckerâ€™s mind flowered â€”Â and ultimately changed the way scientists think about past and future climate.
A geochemist who studied the oceans, Broecker proposed that the shutdown of a major ocean circulation pattern, which he named the great ocean conveyor, could cause the North Atlantic climate to change abruptly. In the past, he argued, melting ice sheets released huge pulses of water into the North Atlantic, turning the water fresher and halting circulation patterns that rely on salty water. The result: a sudden atmospheric cooling that plunged the region, including Greenland, into a big chill. (In the 2004 movie The Day After Tomorrow, an overly dramatized oceanic shutdown coats the Statue of Liberty in ice.)
It was a leap of insight unprecedented for the time, when most researchers had yet to accept that climate could shift abruptly, much less ponder what might cause such shifts.
Broecker not only explained the changes seen in the Greenland ice core, he also went on to found a new field. He prodded, cajoled and brought together other scientists to study the entire climate system and how it could shift on a dime. â€œHe was a really big thinker,â€ says Dorothy Peteet, a paleoclimatologist at NASAâ€™s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City who worked with Broecker for decades. â€œIt was just his genuine curiosity about how the world worked.â€
Broecker was born in 1931 into a fundamentalist family who believed the Earth was 6,000 years old, so he was not an obvious candidate to become a pathbreaking geoscientist. Because of his dyslexia, he relied on conversations and visual aids to soak up information. Throughout his life, he did not use computers, a linchpin of modern science, yet became an expert in radiocarbon dating. And, contrary to the siloing common in the sciences, he worked expansively to understand the oceans, the atmosphere, the land, and thus the entire Earth system.
By the 1970s, scientists knew that humans were pouring excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, through burning fossil fuels and cutting down carbon-storing forests, and that those changes were tinkering with Earthâ€™s natural thermostat. Scientists knew that climate had changed in the past; geologic evidence over billions of years revealed hot or dry, cold or wet periods. But many scientists focused on long-term climate changes, paced by shifts in the way Earth rotates on its axis and circles the sun â€” both of which change the amount of sunlight the planet receives. A highly influential 1976 paper referred to these orbital shifts as the â€œpacemaker of the ice ages.â€
Ice cores from Antarctica and Greenland changed the game. In 1969, Willi Dansgaard of the University of Copenhagen and colleagues reported results from a Greenland ice core covering the last 100,000 years. They found large, rapid fluctuations in oxygen-18 that suggested wild temperature swings. Climate could oscillate quickly, it seemed â€” but it took another Greenland ice core and more than a decade before Broecker had the idea that the shutdown of the great ocean conveyor system could be to blame.
Broecker proposed that such a shutdown was responsible for a known cold snap that started around 12,900 years ago. As the Earth began to emerge from its orbitally influenced ice age, water melted off the northern ice sheets and washed into the North Atlantic. Ocean circulation halted, plunging Europe into a sudden chill, he said. The period, which lasted just over a millennium, is known as the Younger Dryas after an Arctic flower that thrived during the cold snap. It was the last hurrah of the last ice age.
Evidence that an ocean conveyor shutdown could cause dramatic climate shifts soon piled up in Broeckerâ€™s favor. For instance, Peteet found evidence of rapid Younger Dryas cooling in bogs near New York City â€” thus establishing that the cooling was not just a European phenomenon but also extended to the other side of the Atlantic. Changes were real, widespread and fast.
By the late 1980s and early â€™90s, there was enough evidence supporting abrupt climate change that two major projects â€” one European, one American â€” began to drill a pair of fresh cores into the Greenland ice sheet. Richard Alley, a geoscientist at Penn State, remembers working through the layers and documenting small climatic changes over thousands of years. â€œThen we hit the end of the Younger Dryas and it was like falling off a cliff,â€ he says. It was â€œa huge change after many small changes,â€ he says. â€œBreathtaking.â€
The new Greenland cores cemented scientific recognition of abrupt climate change. Though the shutdown of the ocean conveyor could not explain all abrupt climate changes that had ever occurred, it showed how a single physical mechanism could trigger major planet-wide disruptions. It also opened discussions about how rapidly climate might change in the future.
Broecker, who died in 2019, spent his last decades exploring abrupt shifts that are already happening. He worked, for example, with billionaire Gary Comer, who during a yacht trip in 2001 was shocked by the shrinking of Arctic sea ice, to brainstorm new directions for climate research and climate solutions.
Broecker knew more than almost anyone about what might be coming. He often described Earthâ€™s climate system as an angry beast that humans are poking with sticks. And one of his most famous papers was titled â€œClimatic change: Are we on the brink of a pronounced global warming?â€
It was published in 1975.