Michael Caine to narrate gripping six-part audio series called Heist  : Bollywood News – Bollywood Hungama

0

A new audio series called Heist With Michael Caine is set to premiere on Audible soon. Hosted by Academy Award winner Michael Caine (The Italian Job, The Quiet American, Batman Begins) this gripping, richly detailed, six-part series tells the stories of remarkable heists and extraordinary robberies from around the world – as remembered by the masterminds, detectives, victims, journalists, and witnesses that lived through them.

From the largest bank burglary in American history to the world’s most audacious book heist, Heist With Michael Caine travels to America, Australia, Stockholm, Antwerp, and everywhere in-between to tell true stories that have inspired some of Hollywood’s most-famous heist films.

Sir Michael Caine CBE (Order of the British Empire) has been Oscar-nominated six times, winning his first Academy Award for the 1986 film Hannah And Her Sisters and his second in 1999 for The Cider House Rules. He has starred in over one hundred films, becoming well-known for several critically acclaimed performances including his first major film role in Zulu in 1964, followed by films including The Ipcress Files, Get Carter, Alfie, The Italian Job, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, Educating Rita and more recently The Dark Knight, Is Anybody There? and Harry Brown. He was appointed a CBE in 1992 and knighted in 2000 in recognition of his contribution to cinema. His bestselling memoir, Blowing The Bloody Doors Off: And Other Lessons In Life, was published by Hodder & Stoughton in October 2018.

BOLLYWOOD NEWS

Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood News Today & upcoming movies 2020 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.

Source link

‘STOP GETTING Tested!’ Ohio Politician Tells Constituents

Ohio state Rep. Nino Vitale is urging his constituents not to get tested for the coronavirus, flouting advice from health officials — and from another Republican lawmaker, Gov. Mike DeWine.

“This is what happens when people go crazy and get tested,” Vitale wrote on Facebook this week. “STOP GETTING TESTED!”

Vitale was evidently incensed by an order from DeWine and state health officials that people in seven Ohio counties with severe outbreaks must wear face coverings when out in public. That order took effect Wednesday evening.

Vitale shared an altered graphic about the order — in that version, there is an extra message at the bottom:

“!! NEVER GET TESTED !!”

The sentiment echoes remarks from President Trump, who has reiterated a comment he made in early May. “If we did very little testing, [America] wouldn’t have the most cases,” Trump said. “So, in a way, by doing all of this testing, we make ourselves look bad.”

Vitale is a Republican who is part of a Republican-controlled state government. But he has been a vocal opponent of DeWine’s move to impose an economic shutdown to slow the spread of the coronavirus. In his note on Facebook, Vitale asked, “Are you tired of living in a dictatorship yet?”

The state representative accused “the government” of using the pandemic “to claim something is happening that is not happening at the magnitude they say it is happening” – and apparently, to infringe on people’s rights.

“Stop listening to these frauds,” he wrote.

Ohio currently has around 60,000 coronavirus cases, and around 3,000 people have died from COVID-19, according to the state health department.

Compared to the rest of the state, the pandemic has barely affected the three counties Vitale represents: Champaign, Logan and Shelby. Those counties report six deaths all together, and their case counts are measured in tens, not hundreds of thousands.

Vitale followed up his comments against testing by taking another controversial stance against medical best practices, as he insisted that face masks do not prevent viruses from spreading.

Predictive models recently found that if more Americans covered their faces to prevent spreading the coronavirus, tens of thousands of COVID-19 deaths could be prevented in the coming months.

One of the most popular replies to Vitale’s post about testing came from across the U.S. northern border.

“Thankfully, I live in Canada,” a woman wrote. “Have a good time dying, it appears you all are determined that it is your freedom to do so. Glad our border is closed.”

DeWine’s face mask requirement for seven counties took effect Wednesday night. As member station WOSU reports, it’s uncertain how – or whether – the order will be enforced, if people choose to disobey it.

Face mask mandates have become increasingly common as the coronavirus takes its horrible toll and continues to spread rapidly in the U.S. On Wednesday, the U.S. tally of coronavirus cases crossed the 3 million mark.

Source link

Premier League Golden Boot: Jamie Vardy, Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Mohamed Salah and Danny Ings in race

0

Adam Smith

Data and Analysis @AdamDatasmith

Man Utd duo Marcus Rashford and Anthony Martial outsiders

Last Updated: 09/07/20 3:29pm


The race for this season’s Golden Boot remains wide open – so who is most likely to scoop the award?

Jamie Vardy joined the Premier League’s elite ‘100 club’ with a double during the 3-0 win over Crystal Palace last weekend and still tops the scoring charts with 22 goals to date.

2:59
FREE TO WATCH: Highlights from Leicester’s win over Crystal Palace

FREE TO WATCH: Highlights from Leicester’s win over Crystal Palace

That tally is largely down to a scintillating streak during the first five months or the season, having entered 2020 on 17 goals and only scoring five since – of which three have come in the past week.

Jamie Vardy scored his 100th Premier League goal against Crystal Palace

Jamie Vardy scored his 100th Premier League goal against Crystal Palace

Breathing down the 33-year-old’s neck is Arsenal’s Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang on 20 goals, who has not gone more than four successive league games without scoring this season.

The Gabon international reached his own milestone earlier this month when his two goals in a 4-0 win over Norwich crowned him the club’s fastest player to score 50 Premier League goals – overtaking Thierry Henry.

Aubameyang, Salah and Mane each scored 22 goals last season and shared the Golden Boot

Jurgen Klopp rested Sadio Mane for the opening hour against Brighton on Wednesday, who looks to be too far adrift in the race with 16 goals – but Mohamed Salah started and scored twice to extend his season tally to 19.

Meanwhile, no one can rule out Southampton’s Danny Ings, who is enjoying the season of his career with 18 goals to date from an almost injury-free campaign.

Season on season, Sergio Aguero is consistently there or thereabouts but the Argentine is sidelined with a knee injury and travelled to Barcelona for rehabilitation – so he’s out of the running for his second Golden Boot.

Three players are level on 15 goals: Manchester United duo Marcus Rashford and Anthony Martial, and Wolves’ Raul Jimenez – who has been linked with a move to Old Trafford.

Which players have the easier run-in?

It would seem extremely unlikely either Rashford or Martial could overcome their current seven-goal deficit behind Vardy. But United have one game in hand and are in devastating form, looking to go 17 games unbeaten in all competitions against Aston Villa this Thursday live on Sky Sports.

A Villa vs Man Utd

July 9, 2020, 8:00pm

Live on

United also have the league’s easiest run-in, facing bottom-half opponents Villa, Southampton (with Ings), Crystal Palace and West Ham, before a tricky and potentially crucial season finale against Leicester (with Vardy) at the King Power.

Looking at the graphic below, Vardy, Jimenez and Salah will be up against far tougher opposition in the remaining games, while Southampton face teams averaging at their current level.

Those factors, coupled the clubs’ current form and the players’ goal hauls, would suggest it’s, perhaps, advantage Aubameyang.

Who’s in form right now?

The short answer: all the forerunners are in form.

The interactive graphic below reveals the expected goals by matchday for each of the top four candidates, If you click through all of the players, you will see how Aubameyang has remained consistent throughout the campaign.

Opportunities for Ings have declined since the turn of the year, as they have for Vardy until recently, while Salah has been riding waves of chances in front of goal all term.

Vardy’s two-goal lead certainly places him in the driving seat and his latest flourish of form only strengthens his case, but Leicester face tricky opposition after Sunday’s clash with Bournemouth.

But that cushion is almost mitigated by Aubemyang’s consistent form and his upcoming run against easier opposition, and, who knows which Liverpool will turn up in their remaining games after Salah’s double at Brighton came one week after their capitulation against Manchester City.

It appears to be a four-horse race for the Golden Boot and there are reasons to back each of them.

Who are the bookies backing?

Sky Bet back Vardy as the 4/6 favourite, followed by Aubameyang and Salah at 4/1 and Ings at 12/1.

Outsiders include Mane (40/1), Martial, Rashford (both 66/1) and Jimenez (80/1).

A Super 6 for Newcastle?

Do not miss your chance to land the £250,000 jackpot for a sixth time this season on Wednesday. Play for free, entries by 6pm.



Source link

Supreme Court rules Manhattan district attorney can obtain Trump’s tax returns

In a separate decision, the court blocked for now House subpoenas that might have led to the public release of Trump’s financial records before the election.

Loading

That ruling returns the case to lower courts, with no clear prospect for when the case might ultimately be resolved. The 7-2 outcome is at least a short-term victory for Trump, who has strenuously sought to keep his financial records private.

The cases were perhaps the most far-reaching of Trump’s presidency, testing his claim to broad protections from congressional and state criminal investigations while in the White House.

The clashes forced Chief Justice John Roberts’ court to navigate politically polarising and constitutionally weighty issues months before the presidential election.

Source by [author_name]

6 Takeaways From the Biden-Sanders Joint Policy Proposals

The new policy recommendations for Joseph R. Biden Jr., crafted jointly by allies of Mr. Biden and Senator Bernie Sanders, Democrat of Vermont, are the clearest sign yet that the moderate and progressive wings of the Democratic Party are trying to unite far more than they did in 2016.

But the ideas put forth on Wednesday are also indications that progressives succeeded in pushing some proposals leftward, influencing Mr. Biden’s policy platform as he prepares to accept his party’s nomination for president next month.

The task force’s recommendations stop far short of Mr. Sanders’s signature health care policy initiative, a single-payer “Medicare for all” system that would enroll all Americans in a generous government-run health plan.

Instead, the task force supports a government-run insurance option that would be offered to all Americans on a sliding scale according to income — and automatically provided to low-income Americans free.

A so-called public option has always been a part of Mr. Biden’s health plan, but the recommendations specify new details, such as a requirement that primary care visits and certain prescription medicines be offered without any out-of-pocket spending by patients. Similar to Mr. Biden’s most recent health proposal, this would allow Americans to become eligible for Medicare coverage at 60 instead of the current threshold, 65. Medicare benefits would be expanded to cover treatment for dental care, vision and hearing loss.

The task force also recommends special insurance options for people during the coronavirus pandemic. For those who lost coverage because they became unemployed, the task force suggests that the federal government pay the full cost of continuing that coverage under the federal law known as the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, or COBRA. People without previous coverage would be allowed to buy a new plan with no deductible, at a price determined by their income, or an existing Obamacare plan.

Mr. Biden’s views on criminal justice had already been drastically transformed since he helped pass the 1994 crime bill, and the task force’s recommendations go still further. Most notably, they call for eliminating private prisons — a move that Mr. Sanders has championed but that Mr. Biden had not endorsed.

They do not, however, bridge another notable gap between the Biden and Sanders platforms. The task force called for decriminalizing marijuana and legalizing it at the federal level for medical use, but for letting the states decide whether to legalize it for recreational use. That is the position Mr. Biden held in the primary, in contrast to Mr. Sanders, who supports full legalization.

The task force called for ending cash bail and eliminating mandatory minimum sentences, steps that both candidates supported in the primary. It also suggested a federal standard for the police’s use of force, a national database of police officers who commit misconduct and an end to sentences of life without parole for juvenile offenders.

The climate change task force, led by former Secretary of State John Kerry and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, declared rising planet-warming emissions a nationwide “emergency.” It also directly tied the effort to reduce fossil fuels to a need to address racial injustices that have led low-income communities to bear a disproportionate level of air and water pollution.

The recommendations make no mention of the Green New Deal, an ambitious plan that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and other supporters of Mr. Sanders have championed.

There is also no mention of a national ban on fracking, which Mr. Biden has avoided calling for, despite pressure from young climate activists. But there are other signs that progressives on the task force were able to push Mr. Biden to the left.

Specifically, critics of Mr. Biden’s plan to invest $1.7 trillion in order to achieve net-zero emissions before 2050 had complained that his platform included few details on how it would achieve that faraway goal. The recommendations set a number of specific near-term benchmarks that Democrats would promise to reach. They include moving all electric power off fossil fuels by 2035; achieving carbon-neutrality in all new buildings by 2030; and installing 500 million solar panels in the next five years.

The economics recommendations to Mr. Biden include more expansive and expensive plans than he has embraced in the campaign. They are heavily focus on addressing racial inequality and on getting Americans back to work in the wake of the recession caused by the pandemic.

The task force suggested that Mr. Biden consider several plans that his more liberal rivals had championed during the Democratic primaries, though at times it stopped short of endorsing them.

The recommendations call for “a comprehensive agenda for communities of color with ambition that matches the scale of the challenge and with recognition that race-neutral policies are not a sufficient response to race-based disparities.”

The details include asking Mr. Biden to “explore” a so-called baby bonds proposal to provide every child with a government-funded savings account at birth, a policy favored by Darrick Hamilton, an Ohio State University economist who was one of Mr. Sanders’s appointees.

A section on job creation urges consideration of another plan favored by Mr. Sanders’s appointees: a large-scale federal employment program in areas such as infrastructure development. “In order to ensure that everyone who wants to work has a pathway to employment,” the recommendation says, “the government must enact measures to create jobs and jobs programs like those effectively used during the New Deal.”

On K-12 education, the task force report represents something of a shift away from the policy commitments of the Obama-era Democratic Party.

Instead of emphasizing standardized tests to drive accountability for teachers and students, the document talks about holistic tests of students’ skills and the importance of schools as community centers that provide a broad array of social services, such as health care and meals.

While the Obama administration was strongly supportive of charter schools, the task force promises to subject charters, which are publicly funded but privately managed, to stricter federal scrutiny, echoing policy plans released by Mr. Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat, during the primary.

The document commits to tripling federal aid for low-income schools and to increasing funding for students with disabilities. School desegregation by race and class has emerged in recent years as a major concern for progressives. The task force commits to addressing the problem through strategies like busing and magnet schools, but does not mention a specific amount of funding. (Mr. Biden’s opposition to federally mandated busing was a major campaign issue last year, but he has never opposed voluntary busing.)

While many supporters of Mr. Sanders were excited by his promise of universal free tuition at public four-year colleges, the task force stops short of that commitment. It says instead that public universities should be free for families earning under $125,000 per year, and that community colleges should be free for all.

The report indicated that the immigration agenda of a Biden administration would focus on undoing President Trump’s restrictionist policies, which have been anathema to Democrats.

The task force recommended that Mr. Biden work with Congress to maintain protections for about 700,000 young immigrants known as Dreamers from deportation, a program that Mr. Trump is trying to end. It also recommended ending Mr. Trump’s travel restrictions against 13 countries, most of which have substantial Muslim populations.

The report said Mr. Biden should end a program that forced more than 60,000 migrants to wait in Mexico while their asylum cases wound through immigration courts, and should stop diverting asylum seekers to Central American countries. Mr. Biden should increase the number of refugees who can be allowed into the United States to 125,000 per year, from Mr. Trump’s level of 18,000, and raise that cap over time, the committee said. And it called for ending the national emergency declaration that Mr. Trump has used to siphon billions of dollars in Pentagon funding for a wall along the southwestern border.

The task force stopped short of calling for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be abolished, as some in the party have called for. Instead, the report recommends increasing oversight of immigration enforcement and border agencies with the creation of an ombudsman and a panel. There was also no suggestion that unauthorized border crossings should be decriminalized and made a civil offense, a change Mr. Sanders has supported, although the committee recommended prioritizing prosecutions of human traffickers.

Sydney Ember contributed reporting.

Source link

Christian Summer Camp Shuts Down After Dozens Of Coronavirus Infections

A Christian organization shut down its summer camp for teenagers in Lampe, Missouri, after 82 children and staffers tested positive for the coronavirus.

Kanakuk Ministries closed its K-2 camp for 13 to 18-year-olds last week after the outbreak was discovered, Stone County Health Department announced on Facebook Monday.

Many of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 did so after leaving the camp and returning home, health officials said.

Missouri is among several states nationwide that are seeing record numbers of new infections following the easing of lockdown restrictions.

Camp attendees were asked to self-quarantine for 14 days prior to arrival, according to the Kanakuk website, where it also spelled out in detail the precautions it was taking to help curb the virus.

Parents of campers who were sent home after the camp was closed received emails from the organization last week recommending that their children self-quarantine for two additional weeks, NBC News reported.

The outbreak does not appear to have spread to the organization’s five other camps, health officials said.

Kanakuk Ministries describes the K-2 camp on its website as “a world-class oasis for teenagers” to “play, train, laugh, learn and grow.” The organization did not immediately return HuffPost’s request for comment, nor does it appear to have addressed the closure on any of its social media channels.

A HuffPost Guide To Coronavirus



Source by [author_name]

Supreme Court Sides Against Trump In Key Tax Case — Sort Of

The Supreme Court upheld a subpoena from Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance for President Donald Trump’s financial records, one of two major rulings that rejected Trump’s most strident legal defenses but that nonetheless could shield his records until after the election.

In a 7-2 decision, Justice Roberts wrote that the Constitution does not prevent a grand jury from issuing a subpoena for the private records of the president of the United States as part of a criminal investigation into their activities as a private citizen.

“In our judicial system, ‘the public has a right to every man’s evidence,’” Roberts wrote. “Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States.”

Vance issued a statement calling the court’s ruling a “tremendous victory for our nation’s system of justice.”

The decision means that Mazars USA LLP, Trump’s accounting firm, must comply with the subpoena issued by the grand jury that Vance’s office empaneled, and must hand over the president’s financial records, including his tax returns. However, Vance’s office is not likely to receive them anytime soon. The high court’s ruling gave Trump an opening to raise “further arguments as appropriate” in lower courts against the documents’ release, meaning the case will likely continue.

Soon after, the court released another 7-2 decision on the case of Trump v. Mazars USA, which looked at whether the House could obtain the president’s financial records. The opinion, also written by Roberts, stated that while the House had the authority to obtain the records, the case should go back to lower courts to determine the matter under a narrower interpretation of Congress’ power.

In the Vance case, the district attorney issued the subpoenas as part of his continued investigation into whether the Trump Organization falsified documents concealing Trump’s involvement in hush-money payments to two women who allege they had sexual relationships with the married president. The investigation stems from Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen’s admission that he broke campaign finance laws by making the hush-money payments.

Roberts noted the court took the case as it was the first instance of a state court issuing a subpoena for a president’s records.

The case hinged on whether the president of the United States is temporarily immune from discovery during a criminal investigation due to his constitutional position. Trump’s lawyers argued that the president’s records could not be subpoenaed as part of a private investigation because doing so would enable partisan district attorneys to “harass, distract, and interfere” with his job.



In May, both conservative and liberal justices asked how President Trump’s argument for temporary presidential immunity from subpoenas was any different from President Clinton’s argument of presidential immunity from a civil deposition.

Trump’s argument of “temporary presidential immunity” was complicated by prior Supreme Court precedent.

The court first upheld a subpoena directed at a sitting president in the 1807 United States v. Burr case, when former vice president Aaron Burr subpoenaed documents from President Thomas Jefferson while Burr faced prosecution for treason and fomenting war with Spain.

“In the two centuries since the Burr trial, successive Presidents have accepted Marshall’s ruling that the Chief Executive is subject to subpoena,” Roberts wrote in Thursday’s decision.

Then in the 1974 case United States v. Nixon, the court reaffirmed Marshall’s decision in Burr that the president is not immune from investigation or subpoena.

In 1997, the court ruled in Clinton v. Jones that the president is not immune from civil litigation based on their actions prior to being sworn into office. In that case, then-President Bill Clinton sought to quash a civil lawsuit brought by Paula Jones, who sought damages based on her allegations that the president sexually harassed her when he was the governor of Arkansas. Jones’ lawyers sought a deposition from Clinton at the time. Clinton claimed that he was immune from civil lawsuits due to his constitutional position. 

The court ruled 9-0 that presidents are not temporarily immune from civil lawsuits unrelated to their actions as president, though they could argue that a particular lawsuit is “unduly burdensome” on a case-by-case basis. 

During May 12 oral arguments conducted by teleconference, both conservative and liberal justices asked how Trump’s argument for temporary presidential immunity from subpoenas for his private financial records was any different from Clinton’s argument of presidential immunity from a civil deposition. 

The president’s lawyer, Jay Sekulow, attempted to argue that the request for financial records is different than the question in Clinton v. Jones about whether the president could be deposed.

“How is this more burdensome, though, than what took place in Clinton v. Jones?” Justice Neil Gorsuch parried.

The president’s arguments were never able to clear the bar of the Clinton v. Jones precedent. 



Source by [author_name]

Contempt of court petition filed in IHC against Faisal Vawda

ISLAMABAD – A petition seeking contempt of court proceedings against Federal Minister Faisal Vawda for not submitting his reply despite court orders was filed before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday.

The contempt of court petition was filed by an Islamabad-based lawyer Mian Muhammad Faisal who is also petitioner in a petition seeking disqualification of the Federal Minister for Water Resources for allegedly concealing his US nationality at the time of filing his nomination papers to contest the last general elections.

The petitioner stated that he filed a writ petition against the respondent Vawda while challenging his holding of office as an MNA and Federal Minister. He added that after preliminary arguments on the case on January 29, the court admitted the case for hearing. He adopted that he had annexed strong documentary evidence against him, that he was not qualified to become an MNA on the relevant time of submission of nomination papers for the seat of MNA. He continued that the record showed that the Minister was holding the nationality of USA on June 11, 2018.

Mian Faisal said that in the light of prima facie evidence against Vawda, the court issued an order dated January 29, 2020 saying, “issue notice to the respondent who shall file report and para wise comments/ reply so as to reach this court within a fortnight.”

He contended that despite of passing more than five months, the respondent did not bother to file a report or reply in compliance of the above order of the court. He added that as the respondent is holder of public office and enjoying the status of the Federal Minister in the cabinet and he is part of every decision of the Cabinet.

Therefore, he prayed to the court that petition may be accepted by issuance of an appropriate order taking contempt proceedings against Vawda for flouting and non-complying with the clear directions passed in the petition seeking his disqualification for concealing his US nationality.



Source link

James McAvoy, Riz Ahmed, Michael Sheen, Kat Dennings and more to narrate graphic novel series, The Sandman : Bollywood News – Bollywood Hungama

The star-studded cast of the first-ever, an exclusive audio adaptation of the New York Times best-selling graphic novel series, The Sandman, written by Neil Gaiman and published by DC has been announced. Adapted and directed by Dirk Maggs and narrated by Gaiman, who serves as creative director and executive producer, the powerhouse cast is led by James McAvoy in the title role of Dream and includes Riz Ahmed, Justin Vivian Bond, Arthur Darvill, Kat Dennings as Death, Taron Egerton, William Hope, Josie Lawrence, Miriam Margolyes, Samantha Morton, Bebe Neuwirth, Andy Serkis, and Michael Sheen as Lucifer and an expansive list of additional cast. The first installment of the multi-part original audio drama series is set for release on July 15, 2020, and adapts volumes 1-3 of the graphic novel series (Preludes & Nocturnes, The Doll’s House, and Dream Country).

When an occultist attempts to capture the physical embodiment of Death (Dennings) in a bargain for eternal life, he instead mistakenly traps Death’s younger brother Dream (McAvoy), another of the seven god-like siblings known as The Endless who oversee aspects of human existence, including Desire (Bond) and Despair (Margolyes), Destiny, Destruction, and Delirium. After seventy years of imprisonment Dream finally escapes, embarking on a quest to reclaim his lost objects of power and rebuild his kingdom, the world of sleep and imagination called The Dreaming. So begins one of the most acclaimed and successful series of graphic novels ever written.

David Blum, Editor-in-Chief of Audible Originals, commented: “A truly exceptional cast of artists will be bringing this cultural phenomenon to life. We are honored to be working alongside Neil Gaiman and DC to create a truly immersive adaptation that we know fans and listeners will love.”

Gaiman’s long-time audio collaborator, multi-award winner Dirk Maggs, shares executive producer credit and also serves as the project’s scriptwriter and director. Maggs is best known for his landmark audio adaptations of Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere, Stardust, Good Omens and Anansi Boys, as well as for the renowned Audible Originals Alien: River Of Pain and The X-Files and the celebrated DC audio productions The Trial of Superman, Batman: Knightfall, and Superman: To Doomsday & Beyond. In addition to the rich, cinematic soundscape that has become Maggs’ trademark, The Sandman also features an original score by Academy Award-winning composer and musician James Hannigan.

The Sandman is available for pre-order now and will premiere on July 15, 2020, in English, and will subsequently be released in French, German, Italian, and Castilian Spanish and Latin American Spanish editions.

BOLLYWOOD NEWS

Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood News Today & upcoming movies 2020 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.

Source link

Supreme Court Rules Eastern Oklahoma Land Is Tribal Territory

In a stunning blow to Oklahoma’s state government, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that much of eastern Oklahoma is located on an Indian reservation.

In a 5-4 ruling, the justices declared that Congress never diminished or disestablished the land as a reservation. Major crimes committed by a tribal member on their own reservation, in effect, must be prosecuted by the federal government in accordance with the Major Crimes Act.

“Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion. 

“While there can be no question that Congress established a reservation for the Creek Nation, it’s equally clear that Congress has since broken more than a few of its promises to the Tribe,” he wrote. “Not least, the land described in the parties’ treaties, once undivided and held by the Tribe, is now fractured into pieces.”

The ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma could have major implications for the long-running dispute over who has jurisdiction to prosecute crimes by enrolled tribal members on tribal land, as well as what constitutes tribal land. The state of Oklahoma and tribes in the state have been waiting for a Supreme Court ruling on the matter for years.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the dissenting opinion and was joined by Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas. Thomas also wrote a separate dissent.

Roberts said the court’s ruling will have major consequences for the area’s residents, who are largely not part of any tribe, and state laws, including those pertaining to zoning, taxation, family and environmental law.

“The rediscovered reservations encompass the entire eastern half of the State—19 million acres that are home to 1.8 million people, only 10%–15% of whom are Indians,” he wrote. “Across this vast area, the State’s ability to prosecute serious crimes will be hobbled and decades of past convictions could well be thrown out. On top of that, the Court has profoundly destabilized the overnance of eastern Oklahoma.”

Roberts went on to argue that Congress did disestablish Indian territory by dismantling tribal governments, tribal courts and tribal sovereignty, as well as by making the tribal members U.S. citizens.

“In taking these transformative steps, Congress made no secret of its intentions. It created a commission tasked with extinguishing the Five Tribes’ territory and, in one report after another, explained that it was creating a homogenous population led by a common government,” he wrote.

Forrest Tahdooahnippah, a member of the Comanche Nation of Oklahoma and a lawyer who specializes in businesses in Native American country, said the decision could change how many things operate on tribal lands. 

“In the long term, outside of the criminal context, there may be some minor changes in civil law, the majority opinion points out assistance with homeland security, historical preservation, schools, highways, clinics, housing, and nutrition programs, as possible changes. The Creek Nation will also have greater jurisdiction over child welfare cases involving tribal members,” Tahdooahnippah said in a statement. “The short term implications of McGirt are largely confined to the criminal context in which the case arose.”

He added that individuals convicted by the state may not want to challenge their convictions again. “Federal penalties may be harsher than the state penalties,” he said. 

The Muscogee (Creek), Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole and Chickasaw Nations — which make up the Five Civilized Tribes — were hoping for a ruling that would uphold their sovereignty and the status of their lands as reservations, which currently make up around 19 million acres and nearly the entire eastern half of Oklahoma.

The court punted on the matter last year when it failed to come to a decision in Sharp v. Murphy. That case involved Patrick Murphy, a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation who is on death row for murder. The court sought to establish whether land within the 1866 territorial boundaries of the Creek Nation in eastern Oklahoma, formerly known as Indian Territory, could still be considered an Indian reservation. But the court failed to settle the case, with only eight justices participating in the deliberations. Gorsuch recused himself because of his involvement in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled on the matter previously.   

With its ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court sided with that appeals court by ruling that the Creek Nation’s reservation was never disestablished and remains Indian country.

The federal government promised the Creek a reservation in perpetuity. … Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation.
Justice Neil Gorsuch

The McGirt case gave the court another opportunity to consider tribal boundaries and sovereignty. More than two decades ago, Jimcy McGirt was convicted in Oklahoma’s Wagoner County District Court of lewd molestation, first-degree rape and forcible sodomy. He was sentenced to 500 years each for the rape and molestation counts and to life without parole for the forcible sodomy charge. 

McGirt argued that as an enrolled member of the federally recognized Seminole and Muscogee (Creek) Nations, the state of Oklahoma could not prosecute him, according to the Major Crimes Act of 1885. That law states that the federal government alone has the authority to prosecute any major crime committed by an enrolled member of a tribe on their own reservation. 

McGirt’s legal team argued that the Major Crimes Act of 1885 qualified McGirt for an appeal because the state government had no jurisdiction to prosecute him in the first place. Instead, his lawyers argued, McGirt should have been prosecuted in federal court. 

Eventually, the case made its way to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments on May 11 via teleconference due to the coronavirus pandemic.  

The oral arguments centered around whether the Creek Nation ever had a reservation and, if so, if it was ever disestablished. Federal Indian reservations are usually exempt from state jurisdiction since Native American tribes have the right to govern their own internal affairs. The Constitution gives the federal government, not state governments, the authority to deal with tribes as governments.

As white colonizers moved West, they forced Indigenous people from their lands and onto reservations across the U.S. Eventually, Native Americans were even forced off their original reservations as colonizers continued to settle and did not want to live among Indigenous people. 

In both the Murphy and McGirt cases, petitioners argued that Congress never disestablished their tribal reservations or changed their boundaries and that those lands are still reservation land. That means that the men in question should be prosecuted by federal courts and not the state. 

The state of Oklahoma, meanwhile, argued that those lands were “Dependent Indian communities” and not reservations. This would disqualify them from being considered a reservation and mean that the state had the authority to prosecute the men’s cases. 

“The federal government promised the Creek a reservation in perpetuity,” Gorsuch wrote. “Over time, Congress has diminished that reservation. It has sometimes restricted and other times expanded the Tribe’s authority. But Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation.” 

Much of Eastern Oklahoma will now remain classified as a reservation. 



Source by [author_name]