BBC to scrap free TV licence for most over-75s in August

0

Most people aged over 75 will have to start paying for their TV licence from 1 August, the BBC has said.

Chairman Sir David Clementi said the decision to start the new scheme next month “has not been easy”.

He added the corporation “could not continue delaying the scheme without impacting on programmes and services”.

Image:
The BBC says most over-75s must start paying from 1 August

“Around 1.5 million households could get free TV licences if someone is over 75 and receives Pension Credit, and 450,000 of them have already applied”, Sir David said in a statement.

“And critically it is not the BBC making that judgment about poverty. It is the government who sets and controls that measure.

“Like most organisations, the BBC is under severe financial pressure due to the pandemic, yet we have continued to put the public first in all our decisions.

“I believe continuing to fund some free TV licences is the fairest decision for the public, as we will be supporting the poorest oldest pensioners without impacting the programmes and services that all audiences love.”

Source link

AAC Kohat visits bazaars, checks SOPs

KOHAT – Additional Assistant Commissioner-III (AAC) Kohat Murad Ahmed Hoti Wednesday checked the implementation of corona SOPs by visiting various bazaars including Marghi Mandi, Charsi Bazaar, Main Bazaar and Miankhel Bazaar to ensure that shopkeepers and customers wear masks, keep social distance and take other precautions.

During his visits, he also checked rates of various food items and checked the price lists issued by the district administration.

He also checked the rates of the masks, gloves and sanitizers, its availability in the medical and general stores and warned the stores owners, shopkeepers and market owners to follow the SOPs issued by the provincial government besides following the price lists, in violation action would be taken.

 



Source link

New EU rule changes would mean bad news for #Smokers and #Vapers alike

0

In its conclusions in June, the European Council approved a new consensus on excise duties on tobacco. The member states suggest rule changes that would increase the price of tobacco, and equally affect non-tobacco products such as e-cigarettes, writes Bill Wirtz. 

Since 2011, the European Union has had a common minimum excise duty on tobacco products, which notably increased the price of cigarettes in those European countries where the prices are comparatively low. Neighbouring countries with higher taxes were claiming that the prevalence of cross-border purchases was subverting their own public health goals. For instance, German commuters buy tobacco in Luxembourg, as the price is lower than in their local shops.

Now that the 2011 directive has not yielded the benefits that some member states expected, or more plausibly, hasn’t produced the number of tax revenues that member states need in the current economic situation, they would like a revision. This revision, however, is not only targeting conventional tobacco products such as cigarettes, snuff, shisha, or cigars and cigarillos. For the first time, the European Council is asking for non-tobacco products also to be included in the… tobacco excise directive. This would make it hard for member states to pretend that the objective is public health and not reducing treasury deficits, as the logical equivalent of this move would be to classify non-alcoholic as an alcoholic beverage.

E-cigarettes or heat-not-burn devices represent viable alternatives for consumers of conventional tobacco products. We know that while not harmless, vaping is 95% less harmful than smoking cigarettes. By every available logic, governments should rejoice in the prevalence of these alternatives. However, the European Council concludes that “it is therefore urgent and necessary to upgrade the EU regulatory framework, to tackle current and future challenges in respect of the functioning of the internal market by harmonising definitions and tax treatment of novel products (such as liquids for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products), including products, whether or not containing nicotine, that substitute tobacco, to avoid legal uncertainty and regulatory disparities in the EU”.

Adding excise taxes to reduced risk products sends the wrong signal to consumers that these products are just as risky as cigarettes. Research from the United States shows that every 10% increase in the price of vaping products results in an 11% increase in cigarettes purchases.

How serious are EU member states about increasing public health if their go-to method of prevention is raising the tax burden on consumers? E-cigarettes are one thing, but we should not disillusion ourselves with the idea that taxing cigarettes more does anyone any good either. The Council conclusions themselves recognize that Europe is facing a wave of the illicit tobacco trade, and asks for more solutions to fight it. Illegal trade correlates with increased tax burdens: by taxing low-income households out of cigarettes, which remain a legal product nonetheless, we are pushing them on the black market, where criminal elements profit off of bad public health management. In France for instance, a 2015 report found the country to be Europe’s largest consumer of fake cigarettes, with 15 per cent of the market share.

With a lack of quality control, these illegal smokes represent are much more endemic threat to consumer health. Adding to that, the revenues from the sale of these cigarettes benefits international terrorism — the French Centre d’analyse du terrorisme (Centre for Terrorism Analysis) even showed that illicit tobacco sales finance 20 per cent of international terrorism. Organizations such as the IRA, Al-Qaida and ISIS fund their activities that way.

The European Council’s suggested changes to the Tobacco Excise Directive is counterproductive to the goals of public health, and are set to reduce consumer choice and health. We need to analyse rule-changes for more than just their intentions, but look at their prospective results.

Bill Wirtz is the senior policy analyst for the Consumer Choice Center. He tweets @wirtzbill

Source by [author_name]

A Mars ‘Hope’: The UAE’s 1st interplanetary spacecraft aims to make history at Red Planet

0

Next week, the United Arab Emirates will launch its first-ever interplanetary mission, a Mars orbiter that the nation hopes will inspire the region and advance Red Planet science.

The mission, called Hope or the Emirates Mars Mission, is designed to spend one Martian year, or about two Earth years, studying the thin Martian atmosphere. Mission personnel hope that the spacecraft’s results will teach scientists something new about the Red Planet’s past and present atmosphere — and perhaps even help humans keep our own planet’s atmosphere from becoming its twin. But the mission is also an ambitious step for a country not yet 50 years old that reached space for the first time only in 2009.



Source link

Top jockey grants funds for next-generation sequencing machine

0

€100k donation provides for a next-generation sequencing machine at National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer

Funding of €100,000 is to provide a next-generation sequencing (NGS) machine at the National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer.

The machine is to enable users to define the genetic sequence of pancreatic cancer patients in Ireland.

Nine-time champion Flat jockey, Pat Smullen, recently presented a cheque from Cancer Trials Ireland to doctors in St Vincent’s University Hospital (SVUH), Dublin as a grant to fund the NGS machine at the National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer.

“The next-generation sequencing machine will enhance the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer in the hospital, and it will also allow the team to participate in more pancreatic research and clinical trials for the benefit of pancreatic cancer patients,” said Prof Ray McDermott, Clinical Lead for Cancer Trials Ireland.

Dr Niall Swan, Consultant Histopathologist and Clinical Director Diagnostics, SVUH, underlined that the 10-year Irish National Cancer Strategy had called for the introduction of precision diagnostics and therapeutics into the frontline of cancer care.

“Next-generation sequencing is the most important advance in terms of clinical cancer diagnostics today,” he said.

“As St Vincent’s University Hospital is the National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, the laboratory will be able to specifically focus on new cancer therapies for these patients, which will allow a broader understanding of the mutational profile of tumour samples to more precisely guide personalised treatment decisions.

“NGS testing on site will enable us to give a detailed report to our oncologists and patients within one week, thereby speeding up the treatment decision process rather than outsourcing requests.”

He added: “The deciphering the genetic code of these tumours will allow the identification of clinically relevant genomic alterations, assist in guiding clinical decision-making and help to enroll more of our Irish patients in international cancer clinical trials,” he added.

The donation is a direct result of the money raised at last September’s Longines Irish Champions Weekend, which culminated in the Pat Smullen Champions Race for Cancer Trials Ireland at the Curragh.

Cancer Trials Ireland CEO, Eibhlín Mulroe, said: “Pat’s vision has made new pancreatic treatment on trials a reality. Patients will benefit from the support he inspired – and continues to inspire. Once again, thank you Pat.”

valerie.ryan@imt.ie

Source link

New map of the universe unveils a stunning X-ray view of the cosmos

0

A map of the universe made using over a million X-ray sources observed by eROSITA.  (Image credit: Jeremy Sanders, Hermann Brunner, eSASS team (MPE); Eugene Churazov, Marat Gilfanov (IKI))

Wish you had X-ray vision? An extraordinary new map showcases the universe in striking, X-ray radiation.

Scientists created this stunning X-ray map of the universe using eROSITA (Extended Roentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array), an instrument on the German-Russian satellite mission Spectrum-Röntgen-Gamma, or Spektr-RG. 

Source link

A developer explains how ‘creative coding’ could heal our relationship with technology

0

Should creativity be an essential part of our learning process? Or does creativity have no other purpose than fun and entertainment? What are the possible benefits of taking a more creative approach to learning programming?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the demand for software engineers is expected to see a 26% increase by the end of 2028. Coding bootcamps have seen a rapid expansion, from producing a mere 2,000 graduates in 2013 to over 20,000 graduates in 2018 .

[Read: How the Dutch government uses data to predict the weather and prepare for natural disasters]

For a passionate technologist like me, these numbers bring little comfort. As we focus more and more on the advantages of learning programming for monetary reasons, the essence of our curiosity towards technology seems to be lost.

To help me answer all these questions and gain some perspective, I met with senior software developer Panos Pandis for a friendly conversation on creative coding and its possible benefits for us as a society.

A personal perspective on the place of technology and creativity in our world today

What do you think about the statement: “the world needs more programmers”?

It might be a fact but I don’t like to just accept facts. Why do we need more programmers? Because more people are trying to make a profit out of computing, and out of technology in general.

That’s not a natural need, it’s a phenomenon that we, as a society, created and that we’re feeding very quickly, at a rate we can’t support. That’s why we “need more programmers.”

If it’s about having the giant tech companies become even bigger then I feel it’s wrong. If the motivation came from a need for research, for finding solutions to bigger problems like alternative energy sources or environmental issues, then I could accept that we need more programmers.

But that’s not where this general need for programmers comes from: it comes from big companies and the whole startup/entrepreneur hype. No one is thinking of the impact on resources all this is creating.

Digitalization brought solutions but also made our lives faster and faster. It’s putting more demand on us instead of realizing the sci-fi dream of solving all our production problems so we can be on a constant holiday.

Reflections on our relationship with technology and creativity

Despite my grief about how we use technology, I don’t believe there’s any turning back. Because of that, I think we should learn to use technology properly, for our own profit. For example: to safeguard our rights, privacy, and democracy.

We shouldn’t just let ourselves be carried away by people and businesses controlling it. We need to remember that even though our reality is different now with the internet, we’re still using the same old business models, only with a different kind of product.

In many ways, it’s still the same story: people in control of power trying to manipulate others by artificial restrictions on knowledge, production, and copyrights.

We need to be more clever, more alert, more informed.

At the same time, we can’t constantly be ready for a revolution to happen. We also need to relax and live our lives… but staying informed is very important. People shouldn’t be lazy when it comes to understanding their devices and understanding their power.

I think we need more people that love programming for what it is. If you love programming, you see it more like a form of magic, you don’t see it only as building blocks. Even though, in its core concept, it’s completely the opposite. There’s no magic in programming, it’s all 1s and 0s.

On the creative side of things, I believe as a society we should reclaim public art. Art should be spread out, people should be craving for beauty and for art.

Beauty is gone, it’s been replaced by advertisement. Everyone recognizes a Coca Cola bottle or an iPhone. I believe these things should be replaced by things we own, popular art that we produce and want to spread out because it means something to all of us, as a community.

Creative coding: understanding the magic behind science and technology

Source link

Planning For End-Of-Life Care Is More Crucial Than Ever. Here’s How

0

With many Americans dying of COVID-19, it's more important than ever to have advance directives – and conversations about your wishes for intensive and end-of-life care.

The coronavirus pandemic has been a stark reminder “that things can change in a minute — and so you’ve got to be prepared,” says Sunita Puri, medical director for palliative care at the Keck Medical Center at USC. One of the ways to do this is to decide what sorts of treatments you would want (or not want) in the case you became critically ill — and then document those wishes and share them with loved ones.

COVID-19 has now killed nearly .04 percent of the U.S.’s entire population – and sent an even higher proportion to the hospital for intensive treatment. But many – some 63% of adults in the U.S. – have not made formal plans for what they would want their critical care and, if it comes to it, their deaths, to look like.

Puri says, working in palliative care, she’s seen numerous examples when careful end-of-life planning, done in advance of a crisis, can make a big difference. For example, the daughter of one COVID-19 patient had already discussed these issues with her mother — before the mother became critically ill — and that helped the daughter and the medical team make decisions and removed some of the strain around deciding whether to continue invasive care.

As a doctor, “you always want your recommendations to be in alignment with what the patient would want, what their values are, what their preferences are,” says Trevor Bibler, a faculty member at Baylor College of Medicine’s Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Lacking that information when loved ones and medical professionals need to make difficult decisions in a time of strain “can be an additional area of distress,” he says.

So preparing some simple paperwork – and having a few important conversations – is more crucial than ever, say experts in palliative medicine and bioethics. Here’s what you need to know.

Find advance directive forms for your state

A first step to take is to complete an advance directive. This is a form that allows you to essentially check boxes about what kind of life-sustaining interventions you want – or do not want – such as being resuscitated or having a feeding tube. These are legally recognized documents and typically require witnesses (and sometimes a notary). These forms and their questions vary for each state; a comprehensive list of state forms created by the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization is available for anyone for free from AARP.

Contemplate your goals and wishes

When filling out your advance directive, take some time for introspection. Remember this form might have to speak for you in a moment when you cannot speak for yourself.

Also be aware that these forms do not always provide an entirely clear path for care, Bibler notes. “People think that, ‘Well, if I fill this out, then it’s going to be completely unambiguous as to what’s going to happen to me at the end of my life,'” he says. “But oftentimes the advanced care planning documents are hard to interpret, or the clinical situation might not be exactly what people think.”

That is in part because the forms try to capture your wishes in the simplest terms (no resuscitation, for example). But life — and particularly critical care and death — is complicated and incredibly varied. What you might have seen a relative endure (perhaps a slow decline through advanced dementia) could be very different from a situation you might face (such as a rapid and severe coronavirus infection).

One way to help others understand your wishes is to think about what your idea of good and bad critical care would look like for you, Bibler says. “Don’t just rely on a couple of check boxes” on the form, he says. “Add additional narrative elements” that illustrate your goals. It could be as simple as noting that, “If I can never interact with my grandchildren again, I would rather be made comfortable,'” he says. “That’s a very helpful narrative element that gives a lot more insight into what the person valued.”

Thinking about clinical decisions, like whether we would want mechanical ventilation and in what situation, can be hard “because we’re not medical experts,” notes Rebecca Sudore, a palliative medicine physician and professor at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. “But what we are experts on is ourselves and our lives. We’re experts about what brings us meaning and quality of life.”

To help people in thinking and talking about these issues, she and her colleagues created a research-based online resource called PREPARE, which is available in English and Spanish and includes state-specific advance directive forms in multiple languages.

It might also help to remember that this planning is not just for you. “It’s really all about helping your family and friends,” Sudore says.

Consider the ventilator question

Even if you have filled out advance directives in the past, now might be a good time to review them to make sure they reflect your current wishes, Bibler notes. Some people might change their minds about whether they would want to go on a ventilator if they got COVID-19, how long they would want to stay on ventilation without signs of improvement, or if they would feel good about offering their ventilator to another patient who had better odds of surviving should there be an equipment shortage.

COVID-19 has made the ventilator question particularly urgent. Ventilators are machines that can help you breathe if you can’t do so on your own, which can happen in severe COVID-19 cases. Mechanical ventilation can sometimes be life-saving but is also highly invasive: a tube is inserted in your throat to force air into your lungs.

Anytime you go on a ventilator, there’s a risk you won’t improve and will spend your last days or weeks unable to speak, and heavily sedated.

Early in the pandemic, it looked like going on a ventilator was a longshot in terms of survival. Studies showed a minority came off the machines alive. But more recent evidence has been somewhat more promising. For example, a study in The Lancet showed that of 203 critically ill COVID-19 patients who were put on ventilators in New York hospitals, less than half (about 41%) had died a month after follow up.

A study conducted in several ICUs in Atlanta, Ga., found that of 165 ventilated patients, 35.7% died, with fewer than 5% still on ventilation at the end of the study.

And as more information comes out about COVID-19 treatment, you might decide to opt for different treatment preferences. Advance directives can also be revised again after the pandemic. “People change their mind about what they want at different times,” Bibler says.

Pick multiple health care agents

Another important element of critical care planning is naming at least one health care agent (also called a proxy or surrogate). These are people (named in your advance directive) who you designate to make medical decisions on your behalf if you are incapacitated and cannot make them yourself. And they will be designated in a particular order so only one person acts as the official agent at any one time.

Bilber recommends naming as many backups as possible, especially during the pandemic. For example, entire families are getting sick, so having additional individuals who can fill that role should a first or even second agent become ill is particularly helpful now.

It is important to clarify that although appointed health care agents are allowed to speak on your behalf, completed advance directives usually take precedence over their words, Bibler says. In fact, even if an agent insists that their loved one would have wanted a different approach than is outlined in a directive, doctors can face liability if they go against the legal document. This is another reason to review advance directives regularly and ensure they still align with your wishes — and to let others know if you have changed anything. Bibler also recommends “letting them know why there has been a change,” which can help everyone make more nuanced decisions later if necessary.

It might also be worth considering if there are people you would not like to have contributing to decisions on your behalf. “There’s always going to be that person that just shows up” when critical decisions need to be made, says Puri who is also author of That Good Night. “There’s not a specific box for this, so I suggest people just write it in.”

Have ‘the talk’

Set up time to tell your appointed health care agents that you’ve named them, and talk through your decisions, says Sudore.

“I can’t tell you how many conferences I’ve had with family and friends who basically didn’t even know their name was written on an advance directive so they can’t even prepare themselves,” she says. “And giving these people even just an inkling of what’s important [to you] can really help.”

Experts say that conversations with your most important loved ones about your care wishes are incredibly helpful. (And the more people you loop in, the better, says Bibler.)

The conversation doesn’t have to be gruesome, says Sudore. If it’s easier to steer clear of resuscitation or ventilation details, some other topics might actually prove to be more useful, ultimately, for making care decisions, she notes.

For example, she says, you can tell people: “These are the things that make my life worth living and give me quality of life – and these are the things that if I didn’t have it would be really hard on me.”

These planning conversations might not be easy, but they are key to giving us more say in care decisions. “We have a semblance of control if we can plan a bit,” Puri says. “There’s a lot more suffering when nobody has planned for anything.”

Katherine Harmon Courage is a freelance science and health journalist and editor, contributor for Scientific American and Vox,and author. You can find her on Twitter at @KHCourage.



Source link

Once You’re Out of the Market, It’s Tricky Getting Back In

“If you panicked and sold, do not second-guess that response,” Mr. Edelman said. “If you do go back into the market, then the next downturn will panic you again.”

During the pandemic, shifting to an asset allocation that emphasizes bonds may make sense. Instead of a classic portfolio of, say, 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds, cut your exposure to 40 percent stocks or even 20 percent, Mr. Edelman suggested.

“Maintain a long-term time horizon, if you can. Become Rip Van Winkle: Wake up in 10 years, and this will all be over,” Mr. Edelman said. “But you need to have a serious conversation with yourself and your spouse to evaluate the likelihood that you can act like Rip Van Winkle. Are you highly confident that you won’t need to touch that money for financial or emotional reasons?”

Investors who have lost their nerve might consider turning to a financial adviser they can trust — one who is a fiduciary and is obligated to put your interest first. While do-it-yourself investing is easy in a bull market, it becomes much more complicated in down markets, especially for people approaching retirement or those with other reasons to start making withdrawals.

When it comes to moving from cash back to stocks, investors have two basic options: Jump back in just as fast as you jumped out, or ease back in with a dollar-cost-averaging strategy — one in which you buy stocks consistently over time.

Because stocks tend to rise more often than they fall — and because no one can accurately predict those movements — it is likely that putting all of your money into the market at once will be the most profitable option, on average, for most investors. But your timing could be off. The market could fall sharply on the day you make your investment and not rise for years. There’s no single, sure answer.

“The mathematically correct option is to invest it all today,” said Mr. Faber of Cambria Investment Management. “Markets go up over time, and you want the most amount of time to benefit from compounding. But from a sense of emotional well-being, it’s completely rational to dollar-cost-average over whatever amount of time you feel is comfortable, whether that’s three months or three years.”

These are individual decisions, he said. “The whole key is to come to some approach that lets you survive this insanity.”

Source link

Netflix’s Mars sci-fi series ‘Away’ gets a launch date. See the 1st teaser trailer

0

Netflix has a new Mars sci-fi show coming out this September, and you can get a (very brief) first look at it now.

“Away,” which stars Hilary Swank as the commander of a Mars-bound mission with an international crew, premieres on Sept. 4, Netflix representatives announced Tuesday (July 7). 

Source link