PGA restart under scrutiny after Nick Watney tests positive for Covid-19

Intense focus surrounds the status of the PGA Tour’s restart after one of its players, the 39-year-old Nick Watney, tested positive for Covid-19 mid-competition. Watney withdrew from the RBC Heritage in South Carolina before the second round and is now spending at least 10 days in isolation.

This is an obvious blow to the Tour, in the second event of its resumption. As something of a forerunner for the reopening of mainstream US-based sport, golf knows its procedures are firmly in the spotlight.

“On Friday, prior to arriving at the tournament, he indicated he had symptoms consistent with the illness and after consulting with a physician, was administered a test and found to be positive,” said a Tour statement of Watney.

“Nick will have the PGA Tour’s full support throughout his self-isolation and recovery period under CDC guidelines. For the health and well-being of all associated with the tournament and those within the community, the Tour has begun implementing its response plan in consultation with medical experts including working with those who may have had close contact with Nick.”

Luke List and Vaughn Taylor, Watney’s playing partners in South Carolina, continued as a two for the second round.

Last week at the Charles Schwab Challenge, 487 tests were carried out by the Tour, which all returned negative results. Watney missed the cut there, with his exact, subsequent movements for now unclear.

“Watney, who travelled privately to Hilton Head Island for the tournament and was not on the PGA Tour-provided charter flight, tested negative upon arrival,” the Tour added. “He is the first PGA Tour member to test positive for coronavirus. A total of 369 individuals [players, caddies, essential personnel] underwent on-site testing prior to the start of the tournament, with zero positive results.”

In a “return to golf” package issued to competitors and other relevant parties last month, the Tour stipulated that in the case of a positive test any individual “will be required to self-isolate until a minimum of 10 days after the positive test and no subsequent symptoms or two negative test results at least 24 hours apart”.

The same paperwork contained only “strong recommendation” that players and caddies stay in designated hotels. Other guidance stipulated “rental homes will be allowed with proper sanitisation practices approved by Tour”, “local players can stay at their own homes” and “all local constituents on property can stay at their own homes.”

Source link

Summer solstice 2020 heralds changing of Earth’s seasons this weekend

0

Summer will arrive in the Northern Hemisphere on Saturday (June 20) at 5:43:32 p.m. EDT (21:43:32 GMT). The June solstice also marks the beginning of winter for those in the Southern Hemisphere.

It will be a celestial event that will likely get a good deal less attention than April’s so-called “supermoon,” the biggest full moon of the year. After all, you can see the moon, but the solstice is merely a calculation. You can’t even see the change in the span of daylight, which, for those living at mid-northern latitudes is virtually the same on June 20 as the day before and will have diminished by only half an hour by July 23. In short, summer doesn’t arrive with banners and fanfare, and for some places summer heat has already been well established since early May.



Source link

Astronauts and NASA pay homage to Juneteenth

0

Astronauts and NASA have taken to social media to commemorate today’s Juneteenth holiday from Earth and space.

Juneteenth, also known as African American Freedom Day or Emancipation Day, marks the date — June 19, 1865 — when tens of thousands of Africa-Americans in Texas were emancipated. While President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863 freed slaves in U.S., many of the Confederate states ignored it. 



Source link

Chip and Joanna Gaines’s daughter asks Emmanuel Acho if he’s ‘afraid of white people’

Chip and Joanna Gaines brought their whole family along to appear on “Uncomfortable Conversations With a Black Man.”

The first couple of home renovation talked with former NFL star turned sports analyst Emmanuel Acho about what they could do as parents to inform and educate their children about race, Black history in America and the Black Lives Matters movement. Their kids — Drake, 15, Ella, 13, Duke, 12, Emmie, 10, and Crew, 1 — participated, even asking tough questions like: Is Acho is “afraid of white people”?

“If we truly want to bring forth change, it not only starts with you and I, but it’s also about the next generation,” Acho said at the top of the show. So that’s why the sports star was happy to continue the conversation about race along with the “next generation.”

And the kids came prepared. Emmie asked Acho, “Are you afraid of white people?” He replied, “That’s what I love about children,” calling it a “phenomenal question. I’m not afraid of white people. I am cautious of white people.”

He explained, “I think about water and electricity. Water is necessary for life. Electricity is also necessary for life. But I do understand if those two have a negative interaction, it could be lethal. … The beautiful thing of children and about children is that we learn things as kids and it develops us as adults, which is why you all being here with your children is the most powerful thing because this conversation could be life-changing — and not necessarily for their lives, but for the life of someone who looks like me.”

Jo shared that she and Chip have been having a dialogue with their kids amid the death of George Floyd and ongoing Black Lives Matter protests.

“The other day, he was wanting to get a pulse on, ‘What are our kids thinking about all of this?’” she recalled. “And so he asked the kids a question: ‘Pretend like you’re at a gas station and you see a Black man and a white man. Are you more threatened by either of those two men?’ And the kids, really quick, all said, ‘No, why?’ They didn’t even think about that.”

She said she and Chip were patting themselves on the back for raising “color-blind” kids, but “then we started kind of pushing back on that.” She asked Acho what he thought about the concept.

Chip and Joanna Gaines appear with their children in Episode 3 of “Uncomfortable Conversations With a Black Man” with Emmanuel Acho. (Image: “Uncomfortable Conversations With a Black Man”/YouTube)

“I think that it’s best that we raise our kids to see color, because there’s a beauty in color and there’s a beauty in culture,” Acho answered.

He continued, “I think that if we don’t see color — if we don’t expose our children to different colors, to different races — then it’ll be the same thing as a white kid who becomes an adult: You won’t be able to decipher the difference between a Black man that’s a threat and a Black man that’s just Black.”

Similarly, “A Black person won’t be able to decipher between a white person that’s a racist and a white person who’s just white and may happen to be racially ignorant,” Acho added. “I think there’s a strength, a beauty in seeing color. I don’t like the concept of color blindness.”

Chip asked how we can get the people who may not view themselves as racially ignorant to come around to see it.

“History is meant to be remembered, but history isn’t always meant to be celebrated,” Acho said. “I think we have racism so ingrained into our culture, we don’t even realize we are blind to it.”

Acho went on to talk about how his white brothers and sisters need to open their eyes to see things like how having schools named after Confederate generals is disturbing for a Black person — especially one who attends that school.

“Maybe having statues littered across campuses that I have to look at of men who would have oppressed and enslaved and potentially executed me, maybe that’s a problem,” Acho said. “So I think that in America we need to do a better job of properly discussing and placing our heroes.”

During the conversation, Chip revealed that he reached out to his fellow Texan Acho after seeing his poignant debut episode of the YouTube show. Last week’s guest, Matthew McConaughey, was similarly touched by the premiere installment.

Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

Source link

Modi denies Chinese incursion into India before deadly clash

India’s prime minister has said the country is “hurt and angry” at the killing of 20 soldiers by Chinese forces in a disputed Himalayan border region, but appeared to downplay the incident in a public address, denying there had been any incursion into Indian territory.

“Nobody has intruded into our border, neither is anybody there now, nor have our posts been captured,” Narendra Modi said in a televised speech on Friday after he spent the day meeting representatives of parties from across the political spectrum in a bid to build consensus to tackle the rising tensions with China. 

More:

He assured political leaders “that our forces will spare no effort to protect our nation”.

China and India, both nuclear-armed countries, accuse each other of instigating the fight this week in the Galwan Valley. There is little evidence of what led to Chinese and Indian soldiers engage in the brawl on Monday. It was the deadliest incident between the two sides in 45 years, although China has not said whether it suffered any casualties.

Modi’s comments contrasted with his government’s earlier statements on the clash.  

On Wednesday, Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar had told a senior Chinese diplomat that the dispute was triggered after “the Chinese side sought to erect a structure in Galwan valley on our side of the LAC”, according to a ministry statement, referring to the Line of Actual Control, the de facto border.

China on Friday maintained its position that India was to blame. 

“The right and wrong is very clear and the responsibility lies entirely with the Indian side,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said. 

On Friday, a source told Reuters news agency that despite daily meetings between Indian and Chinese military officials at the LAC, “the situation remains as it was, there is no disengagement, but there is also no further build-up of forces”.

Questions over intelligence 

Modi spoke following a three-hour all-party meeting. He held a virtual meeting with the heads of more than a dozen top opposition parties. 

Sonia Gandhi, the chief of main opposition Congress party, questioned whether intelligence failures had allowed China to build up forces in the area.

“Does the government not receive, on a regular basis, satellite pictures of the borders of our country? Did our external intelligence agencies not report any unusual activity along the LAC?” Gandhi asked. 

She added the “entire country” would like assurances that China will move its forces back to the LAC. Other opposition leaders echoed her call. 

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh denied there was an intelligence failure on the part of the army. 

Anti-China sentiment grows

While both sides have said they favour a resolution through dialogue, anti-China protests across India and domestic pressure on Modi may make it difficult to calm the situation without more concrete action.

A movement to boycott products from China, India’s largest trading partner, has gained momentum since the clash.

Authorities have cancelled a railways contract with a Chinese firm and at least four Chinese firms involved in other Indian projects also stand to lose business.

Meanwhile, state-run telecom firms have been told to forego Chinese telecommunications equipment in favour of locally sourced material for upgrading 4G mobile networks, Indian media reported, while a major traders’ body, the Confederation of All India Traders, has called for a boycott of Chinese goods. 

Also on Friday, Indian media reported that China had freed 10 Indian soldiers seized in the clash following several rounds of talks late on Thursday.

Hours later, China denied it had detained any Indian soldiers.

China claims about 90,000 square kilometres (35,000 square miles) of territory in India’s northeast, while India says China occupies 38,000 square kilometres (15,000 square miles) of its territory in the Aksai Chin Plateau in the Himalayas, a contiguous part of the Ladakh region.

India unilaterally declared Ladakh a federal territory while separating it from disputed Kashmir region in August 2019. China was among the countries to condemn the move, raising it at forums including the United Nations Security Council. India was elected to the UNSC this week.


SOURCE:
Al Jazeera and news agencies

Source link

Juneteenth Will Be An Official Holiday In New York City Starting In 2021

0

Juneteenth, which marks the effective end of slavery in the United States, will become an official holiday in the country’s largest city beginning next year, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio declared Friday.

De Blasio called Juneteenth “a day for truth-telling, a day for examination and shining a light.” The day will be an official city and school holiday.

“It’s a celebration of a liberation that never really came. The fact is, it’s also a day of reckoning,” de Blasio, a Democrat, said Friday in his daily news conference. “Every city worker, every student will have an opportunity to reflect on the meaning of our history and the truth and to think about the work that we have to do ahead.”

Juneteenth has added significance and urgency this year, coming amid weeks of large anti-racism and anti-police-brutality protests in cities across the country — including in New York City — in response to the recent killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery and other Black people over the years. The incidents and subsequent protests have also catalyzed reckonings over systemic racism and white supremacy across industries and institutions.

“Our city has long prided itself as being a beacon, and in many ways we are, to the world,” de Blasio said. “But our city also has a very painful history. Slavery was alive and well in New York City for a long time. New York City gained much of its prominence and wealth from slavery. Redlining, discrimination of every form existed here in liberal, progressive New York City for generations. In too many ways, discrimination is alive and well today. Structural racism pervades this city, in ways that are still not acknowledged or recognized, and we have to change that.”



Protesters chant as they march after a Juneteenth rally at the Brooklyn Museum Friday.

In recent weeks, many companies designated the day as a paid holiday. And after years of activism, there is a growing movement in Congress to make Juneteenth a federal holiday. 

At least 60% of Americans now support making it a federal holiday, according to a HuffPost/YouGov survey published Friday.

Earlier this week, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) designated Juneteenth a paid holiday for state government employees and said he plans to make it an official state holiday next year.

Demonstrators in dozens of cities on Friday took part in peaceful marches and rallies to mark Juneteenth.

In New York City, organizers held a range of events, including a march from Harlem to Central Park, a rally at the Brooklyn Museum and a march and bike ride across the Brooklyn Bridge, among many other gatherings planned for the day.



Source by [author_name]

Wirecard, a Payments Firm, Is Rocked by a Report of a Missing $2 Billion

0

Wirecard, a Germany company that soared in value in recent years as it provided a widening array of payment services around the world, was suddenly collapsing on Friday amid questions surrounding missing cash balances amounting to 1.9 billion euros, about $2.1 billion.

The scandal caused an 80 percent plunge in the company’s stock price over the last two days, threats of shareholder lawsuits amid an investigation by prosecutors and the German financial regulator, and a dizzying transition in the company’s leadership.

The company’s longtime chief executive, Markus Braun, stepped down on Friday, succeeded by James Freis, a former compliance officer at Germany’s stock exchange who was hired only the day before to serve on the company’s management board.

Wirecard, a fintech company that was founded in 1999 and is based in Munich, boomed in recent years as a provider of digital payment services. It prospered by making contactless payments seemingly effortless for hundreds of thousands of merchants, with customers like Apple Pay, Google Pay and Visa.

In 2016, it ventured into North America by acquiring Citibank’s prepaid card division for an undisclosed sum. Over all, it was praised in Germany as a homegrown tech success, and in 2018 it was propelled into Frankfurt’s blue chip stock index, the DAX, pushing out an aging bank of a different era, Commerzbank.

The crisis at Wirecard stems from an article in The Financial Times, which reported in October that staff appeared to conspire to fraudulently inflate sales and profit and mislead EY, the company’s auditor.

Wirecard, which has denied any wrongdoing, responded to the reports by delaying EY’s annual report for 2019 and hiring KPMG to provide an independent assessment of the company’s books.

KPMG released its report in April, and said it could not provide sufficient documentation to address all allegations of irregularities.

In the most serious finding, covering 2016-18, KPMG said it had been unable to verify the existence of €1 billion in revenue that Wirecard booked through three obscure third-party acquiring partners. The findings led to calls by some investors for Mr. Braun’s ouster.

The KPMG report appeared to attract the attention of Germany’s financial regulator, BaFin, which had previously suspected short-sellers of manipulating Wirecard’s stock price.

On June 5, prosecutors raided the company’s headquarters and opened proceedings against management as part of the inquiry initiated by BaFin. Prosecutors said in a statement that the company was suspected of releasing misleading information that may have affected Wirecard’s share price.

Wirecard said it would cooperate with the investigation. “The board is optimistic that this matter will be resolved and that the accusations will be shown not to be founded,” it said in a statement.

The scandal came to a focus this week because EY was scheduled on Thursday to publish Wirecard’s 2019 annual report, which had been delayed by the KPMG review.

But EY said it would not be able to issue the report because it could not confirm the existence of €1.9 billion in cash balances on trust accounts, representing around a quarter of its balance sheet. As Wirecard’s stock price tumbled, Mr. Braun appeared in a video with other company executives, where he said the bank had been the victim of fraud, and pointed to irregularities at two unnamed banks.

“At present it cannot be ruled out that Wirecard A.G. has become the aggrieved party in a case of fraud of considerable proportions,” he said.

Investors were not convinced. The company had said it was facing a crisis because failure to provide a certified annual report could cause about €2 billion in loans to be called in as soon as Friday.

“We are stunned,” said Ingo Speich, head of corporate governance at Deka Investment, a $350 billion fund manager that owns Wirecard stock, while calling for a change at the top.

On Friday morning, Mr. Braun resigned, saying that “responsibility for all business transactions lies with the C.E.O.”

The company later said it was in “constructive discussions” with its lending banks. But its stock price, which was about 100 euros a share on Thursday morning, fell to €19.56 on Friday before closing at €25.82.

Source link

Build global pressure on China, keep talks going: ex-diplomats

0

Written by Manraj Grewal Sharma
| Chandigarh |

Published: June 20, 2020 1:42:40 am





In Punjab’s industrial hub, Ludhiana, manufacturers said that for the campaign to really have an impact it needed serious policy intervention from the government.

India must build up international pressure on China, both politically and economically, while working towards a resolution of the Galwan valley standoff, former diplomats have said.

Calling this standoff one of the biggest challenges faced by the NDA government, K C Singh, a former diplomat, said it calls for a complete rethink of India’s China policy. G Parthasarthy, a former diplomat and strategy expert, said China’s occupation of the Galwan valley has geopolitical consequences and we are in for a long haul.

Terming it PM Narendra Modi’s Nehru moment of 1962, Singh said China has been planning this incursion for a while but India seems to have been caught by surprise.

“Last August, China objected to Article 370 abrogation that led to the notification of Ladakh boundaries in September and upset three neighbours, including Nepal. We ignored the first warning signs. In September, the PM attended a ‘Howdy Modi’ in Houston that signalled our growing ties with the US. This was followed by President Donald Trump’s visit to India this March. Then followed the pandemic and the growing global chorus against China led by Trump who called it the Wuhan virus. Should it be a surprise that PLA, despite pandemic in India, intruded at multiple spots across the LAC in Ladakh?” said Singh.

While former military commanders dismissed any comparison with the Kargil incursion, Singh said it is worse than Kargil. “Unlike Kargil where the Pakistanis claimed the intruders were not their soldiers, PLA troops are at Galwan with heavy weaponry. While Pakistani intruders were trying to dominate the Leh heights, here they are trying to seek dominance over India’s new road to Daulat Beg Oldie, besides the critical Karakoram Pass.”

Parthasarthy said the Chinese are very nervous of India getting near Aksai Chin through infrastructure development. “It is through this link that most of the supplies flow to Baltistan,” he pointed out.

Calling China’s claim on Galwan Valley disingenuous, Parthasarthy said it was part of British India and then India. “We established a post there in 1962.”

Singh said President Xi Jinping may have multiple motives behind this move, including the desire to distract from domestic socio-economic distress. He recounted how most of the Chinese agreements with India had coincided with economic downturn. “They hit a wall in 1989 because of sanctions that followed the Tiananmen massacre, subsequently the economy slowed down in 1989-1990 and that is why they were amenable to the 1993 and 1996 agreements.”

Singh said China is also upset with India’s desire to acquire tactical and strategic advantage by upgrading its infrastructure and wants to stop India from doing that.

“China is wary of India’s emerging alliances with other nations as well. Trump said we don’t want a G-7 but a D-10, there is talk of a Quad Plus, to include other democracies of Indo-Pacific, besides the present members Japan, Australia, India and US. I led the first meeting in 2007, as an additional secretary. In 2017, the plan was revived at the ministerial level,” Singh added.

Pointing out that abrogation of Article 370 gave China a chance to consolidate forces against India, Singh said a country’s domestic policy can’t be its own agenda, and there is a link between domestic politics and international relations. The abrogation worked to the advantage of China by getting two neighbours against us, he said. “They managed to exploit Nepalese concerns. So intruding into Ladakh their left flank has an irate Nepal and to their right runs CPEC through Gilgit Baltistan, the northern fringe of an already anti-India Pakistan.”

On the way forward, Parthasarthy said, “We are in for a long haul. There is no easy way out.”

On Punjab CM Capt Amarinder Singh’s call to take a hard line on China, Parthasarthy, who was an Army captain posted at Pathankot during the 1965 war when Amarinder was, said, “I can never fault him. He is speaking out in anguish at the death of so many men.”

Singh, however, said the government must avoid an emotional reaction. “We should not look for instant retribution, real or projected. The government’s dilemma today is how to keep its hyper-nationalist base patient and not baying for Chinese blood, while it devises a mix of military, diplomatic and economic pressure. As for Galwan valley, the status quo is unacceptable and the nation will reject it. Our defence forces have to be prepared for Kargil II if China does not relent.”

“Also, see where China is vulnerable. Plan something where we have an advantage,” he added.

Both the former diplomats underscored the need to build domestic and international consensus on the issue. Parthasarthy said, “We have to express our displeasure to them internationally. They have been bullying a lot of countries in Asia. Given the arrogance of their behaviour, it is time India joined others in telling China about the illegality of its behaviour, be it seizure of territory in Ladakh, Vietnam or in the Philippines.”

Parthasarthy pointed out that China has been very nervous about being blamed for coronavirus. “We should put a squeeze on them. They can’t eat rats, bats and then put the whole humanity to suffering and pretend they have no responsibility.”

Making a strong case for putting economic pressure on China, Singh said, “China may relent if businesses move away, the markets abroad are affected, and they are unable to keep their growth rate high.”

Cautioning that China doesn’t plan for 10 years but for 100, unlike India where the governments only think of the next elections, he stressed the importance of leaving the back door open for orderly retreat by China without losing face.

Both the diplomats called for encouraging dialogue. As Singh put it, “Keep the talks going, calculating whether delay and winter affect us or China more. But time should not allow China to harden defences selectively, as I am sure they have a fallback position i.e. some locations that they really want for strategic dominance.”

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

© The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Source link

The Real Looters Of The Bronx

0

BRONX, N.Y. — Last Friday a few dozen protesters gathered at a busy intersection near the northern tip of New York City for “A People’s Tour of the Real Looters of the Bronx.” There were more cops than attendees, with scores of uniformed police officers stationed on the street corners, watching over this group of mostly young and civically engaged New Yorkers — among them students, teachers, artists and social workers — as if they posed an imminent threat. 

The activists held a banner reading “Abolition, Decolonization, Liberation” and took turns delivering speeches through a megaphone, struggling to get their message heard over the roar of nearby traffic and the hum of a New York Police Department helicopter circling overhead. 

One activist — wearing braces around her wrists because she said cops had zip-tied her so tight during another recent protest that her hands turned blue — approached me and inspected my press pass. “OK,” she said, “just checking because we don’t allow the New York Post in the Bronx.” 

Over a week prior, the New York Post and other media outlets had painted a grim portrait of the borough. “Bronx streets turn chaotic as looters run wild,” screamed one Post headline. “Fires, mayhem in the Bronx,” said the Daily News. “Looters run wild in Bronx,” Fox News declared.

All the articles were brief summaries of a June 1 uprising near this busy intersection of Fordham Road and Grand Concourse, part of the weekslong national demonstrations against police killing Black Americans. The June 1 protest included people, many of them young, starting fires in the streets and taking things from stores. 

The articles included quotes from New York City’s mayor, the police commissioner, police unions and local politicians scolding the alleged looters for their actions. 

But the dedicated activists at the June 12 demonstration were here to tell a much different story — a story about what they say is the real looting going on in the Bronx, and in so many other places across America that Black and brown people call home. The activists were here, they said, to defend their neighbors from racist narratives crafted by multimillion-dollar media companies. 

The American press has a long history of fear-mongering about Black and brown people “rioting” and “looting,” a tactic that academics and activists say is meant to obscure the routine and systemic state-sanctioned violence deployed against marginalized communities. In this current, historic period of mass unrest, which has seen protests against police violence in hundreds of American cities, activists like the ones in the Bronx are working hard to flip that tired media script.

“We want to reclaim the message about who is really looting the Bronx,” said Mustafa Sullivan, a member of FIERCE, an advocacy group for queer New Yorkers of color, which organized last Friday’s protest. “What are the conditions behind everything that has happened?” 

Sullivan’s fellow demonstrators passed out flyers to passersby listing the institutions they say have plundered the Bronx over the decades, making it one of the poorest regions in the U.S. The real looters, the flyers said, “are landlords that overcharge for apartments and never make repairs” and the “elected officials that take money from developers and police unions.” 

The real looters “are not angry Black people in our communities stealing TVs, setting fires, and portraying a stereotype we know too well,” the flyers argued, but rather the banks, slumlords, private hospitals and corporations that own the majority of properties in the Bronx.

‘None Of These Businesses Here Belong To Us’



A demonstrator in the Bronx’s Fordham neighborhood makes the case against the New York borough’s true despoilers during “A People’s Tour of the Real Looters of the Bronx” on June 12, 2020.

The demonstrators started to march on the sidewalk along Fordham Road. They passed a CityMD urgent care clinic, where Bronxites in masks stood in a line stretching down the whole block, waiting for a COVID-19 test. 

The coronavirus pandemic has hit the Bronx, where 90% of residents are people of color, particularly hard, exacerbating the stark inequities here.

The borough has the city’s highest rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths, due in part to the high concentration of “essential workers” — grocery store cashiers, nurses, bus drivers, food delivery drivers — who live here and, by the nature of their lower-paying jobs, have more exposure to the virus. 

Food is a problem too. At least 50% of the Bronx’s emergency food banks were closed earlier this month amid the pandemic, making fresh meals even more scarce in a place with vast food deserts, which already aggravated the high rates of diabetes and high blood pressure in the borough. 

The prevalence of such health conditions here — including asthma, due in part to pollution from industrial facilities like the huge trucking operations of Fresh Direct — have made Bronxites more vulnerable to severe or fatal complications if they’re infected with the coronavirus. 

All told, the virus is killing more people in the Bronx because the people in the Bronx are more likely to be poor and Black and brown. Put another way: They’ve died due to a kind of pervasive state-sanctioned violence. 

Meanwhile, America’s overwhelmingly white billionaires — who have earned their wealth off the backs of working-class people like those in the Bronx — have seen their fortunes rise by $434 billion during the pandemic. 

Protesters chant and march after a Juneteenth rally at the Brooklyn Museum in that New York City borough on June 19.



Protesters chant and march after a Juneteenth rally at the Brooklyn Museum in that New York City borough on June 19.

The demonstrators stopped outside an Old Navy store on Fordham Road. 

An activist with the group Take Back the Bronx stood outside the chain store, its windows covered with plywood, and held up a megaphone. She reminded her fellow demonstrators of when Bronxites took items from shops during the blackout of 1977. 

“We should be enraged that in 2020, our children still feel like that’s the best way to get it all,” said the activist, who declined to give her name. “That the conditions have not changed in 43 years, that that is the way we express our rage.” 

She noted that the vast majority of the businesses in this part of the Bronx are owned by corporations, including the Old Navy behind her. 

“So when Monday popped off, I was celebrating,” she said, referring to the June 1 uprisings here. “Why? Reappropriation. Reappropriation. None of these businesses here belong to us.” 

“These businesses have insurance,” she said, adding: “They’ll be back to sell you a fucking stretch jean sewn by Bangladeshi women for pennies on the dollar.” 

The protesters marched past street vendors selling mangoes and bootleg DVDs. 

They marched by people waiting in another long line, this time outside a Bank of America location. BOA was among the large financial institutions that caused the 2008 financial crisis, which disproportionately diminished the wealth of Black people.

They marched past a man offering a rare opportunity during the pandemic: a new job. “$18 an hour,” he yelled, “no experience necessary!” (Unemployment claims in the Bronx skyrocketed by 2,000% in May. Now thousands of residents here can’t afford to pay rent and are bracing themselves for the end of the governor’s moratorium on evictions this coming Saturday.) 

And the activists marched past men selling T-shirts emblazoned with an illustration of George Floyd, the Black man killed by police in Minneapolis last month, which kicked off weeks of demonstrations against police brutality across the country. 

‘A Late Act In A Long Drama’

During recent cycles of unrest in the U.S. — including the Baltimore uprising after the police killing of Freddie Gray and the protests in Ferguson, Missouri, after the police killing of Michael Brown — the mainstream media has often fixated on acts of property destruction and arson.

Media critics, primarily Black and brown journalists and activists, have long argued that this kind of coverage, in essence, misses the forest fire for a few burning trees. 

“The press largely failed to frame the protests — including vandalism and fires — as a late act in a long drama,” the Columbia Journalism Review noted in an article earlier this month. “These actions came in response not just to the deaths of Floyd, [Breonna] Taylor, [Ahmaud] Arbery, and [Tony] McDade, but to the never-ending list of Black people killed by police over many decades.” 

Raven Rakia, a New York-based journalist and writer, authored the widely read 2013 article “Black Riot” in The New Inquiry, which offered an unflinching look at how the predominantly white American media covers protests led by Black people. The media’s fixation on “riots” and “looting,” she told HuffPost this week, often obscures the systemic violence regularly visited upon Black Americans. 

“There is very little investigation in mainstream media into the oppression and exploitation that is a constant presence in Black working-class people’s lives in this country,” Rakia said. 

And yet the media, she continued, will then depict uprisings against that oppression and exploitation as the real “chaos, anger and violence,” as if it “sprung out of nowhere.” 

“They treat Black-led uprisings as a nuisance and are relieved to go back to their daily routine,” Rakia said.

New York City's police commissioner, Dermot Shea, dismissed the connection between the peaceful and violent aspects of the Br



New York City’s police commissioner, Dermot Shea, dismissed the connection between the peaceful and violent aspects of the Bronx uprising in early June. “This wasn’t again about protests,” he said, “this was about tearing down society.”

Earlier this month, NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea described those participating in the Bronx uprising as solely wanting to “cause mayhem.” 

“This wasn’t again about protests,” Shea said, “this was about tearing down society.”

His comments were published in outlets like the New York Post with no rebuttal from the protesters themselves. 

“The media still assumes people ‘looting’ from stores are ‘apolitical,’ greedy or opportunists instead of interrogating it as a protest against capitalism and exploitation,” Rakia said.

Framing it in this way, she explained, allows the press “to keep their analysis of the uprisings on a surface level” — focusing only on George Floyd’s death, for example — instead of examining the demonstrations as “uprisings against racial capitalism and the violent police state that enforces it.” 

Sullivan, the FIERCE activist who helped organize the June 12 protest in the Bronx, said such media portrayals of young Black New Yorkers also make them vulnerable to police brutality. “Our young people are being set up as being violent and supporting violence,” he said, referring to accounts of the unrest on June 1. 

And that, Sullivan argued, helped the NYPD to justify trapping, pepper-spraying, brutalizing and ultimately arresting some 250 people en masse in the South Bronx a few days later, on June 4. 

New York officers watch for a protest against racial injustice and police brutality at the retail and restaurant heart of the



New York officers watch for a protest against racial injustice and police brutality at the retail and restaurant heart of the South Bronx on June 4. 

“A People’s Tour of the Real Looters of the Bronx” ended last Friday afternoon at Fordham Plaza with demonstrators calling to defund and abolish the police. 

“You about to lose your job!” they chanted at the officers who had followed them all afternoon. 

Many of these protesters no doubt planned to march again against police brutality this Friday on Juneteenth, an annual celebration marking the end of slavery in the U.S.

When they march, they know they are carrying on a long, proud tradition of Black protest and struggle against the systematic looting of Black lives. 

“It is our duty to fight for our freedom,” the protesters shouted together at Fordham Plaza, repeating words made famous by Black activist Assata Shakur. “It is our duty to win.” 

“We must love each other and support each other,” they shouted. “We have nothing to lose but our chains.”



Source link

US Should ‘Immediately Enforce’ Sanctions on Chinese Officials For Abuses in Xinjiang: Religious Freedom Panel

0

U.S. President Donald Trump should “immediately enforce” sanctions against Chinese officials responsible for rights abuses in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) as authorized by an act of Congress he signed into law this week, according to a panel on religious freedom.

On Wednesday, Trump enacted the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 (UHRPA), which passed nearly unanimously through both houses of Congress last month and highlights arbitrary incarceration, forced labor, and other abuses in the XUAR—home to internment camps holding as many as 1.8 million Uyghurs and other Muslims.

In addition to condemning the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for the three-year-old internment camp program, the new law requires regular monitoring of the situation in the region by U.S. government bodies for the application of sanctions to top officials such as XUAR party chief Chen Quanguo. It also addresses Chinese government harassment of Uyghurs living inside the United States.

In a statement issued on Thursday, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) noted that the Trump administration has been “unambiguous in expressing both concern and outrage” over the treatment of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in China and called on the White House to turn its words into action.

“USCIRF urges the Administration to enforce the Act and issue immediate and targeted sanctions against Chinese government officials responsible for the persecution of Uyghurs,” it said.

“The administration must take meaningful action now to condemn China’s crimes against humanity, modern slavery, and cultural genocide.”

Tense relations

Trump’s signing of the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act into law drew applause from the Uyghur exile community and others who have championed the rights of the Uyghur people.

Washington-based Uyghur-American attorney Nury Turkel, who last month was appointed to USCIRF, noted that the new law “is the first bill in the history of the Uyghur people being put in place to protect their political, social, and religious rights.”

Beijing, which has previously warned of retaliation “in proportion” if Chen Quanguo were targeted as part of legislation in support of the Uyghurs, said that the UHRPA “stigmatized Xinjiang’s anti-terrorism, anti-secession, and deradicalization measures,” and warned of “consequences” to come.

The signing follows months of tense relations between the U.S. and China, with the Trump administration taking multiple jabs at Beijing for its lack of transparency in handling the coronavirus pandemic, trade policy, and expansive territorial claims.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo held a seven-hour closed-door meeting with China’s foreign policy chief, Yang Jiechi, in Hawaii on Wednesday, marking the first high-level meeting between the two countries since the beginning of the outbreak.

It also came on the same day that the Washington Post published an excerpt from a forthcoming memoir by former national security adviser John Bolton which claimed that Trump told Chinese President Xi Jinping he approved of China’s construction of its camp network amidst negotiations on a trade agreement.

According to Bolton, Trump even “pleaded” with Xi to help ensure he was re-elected in 2020.

Trump later told the Wall Street Journal that signing the UHRPA proved that he would not back down to China and called Bolton a “liar.”

In the unlikely event that Trump had vetoed the act, Congress could have overridden him because of the near unanimous support it received in both the House and the Senate.

Presidential discretion

Under the UHRPA, Chinese officials such as Chen deemed responsible for persecution in the XUAR could see their assets in the U.S. frozen and be subjected to visa restrictions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, crafted initially to deal with rights abuses in Russia.

However, the act provides significant leeway for Trump to withhold sanctions if he believes doing so would run counter to U.S. interests. His administration already has the ability to sanction Chinese officials over rights abuses and has chosen not to do so, amidst fears that it could derail the implementation of a long-stalled U.S.-China trade deal.

While Trump on Wednesday praised the new law for its ability to “[hold] accountable perpetrators of human rights violations and abuses” in the XUAR, he also noted in a statement after the signing that it “purports to limit my discretion to terminate inadmissibility sanctions.”

The president said such limitations could be inconsistent with his constitutional authorities to receive foreign officials as diplomatic representatives, and therefore would consider the relevant section “advisory and non-binding.” He pledged to make efforts to notify relevant congressional committees before removing inadmissibility sanctions against any officials targeted by the new law.

Last month, Sophie Richardson, the China director at New York-based Human Rights Watch, told the online journal Foreign Policy that the UHRPA is the first piece of legislation to explicitly recognize rights abuses in the XUAR and set out U.S. policy responses to them.

“A lot depends on how enthusiastically this is enforced,” she noted.

When asked by RFA’s Uyghur Service Friday about the likelihood that the administration would take measures against officials such as Chen under the new legislation, Morgan Ortagus, spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, responded, “We do not comment on sanctions.”

“We are working hard to encourage the PRC (People’s Republic of China) government to cease its human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and we are constantly evaluating various measures to do so,” she said.

A senior administration official told RFA Friday that Trump “has a strong, action-oriented record of holding the Chinese government accountable for its atrocities in Xinjiang,” citing restrictions on visas and exports he imposed last year on Chinese entities complicit in the abuses.

“We call on the Chinese government to release the millions of Uyghurs and other minorities arbitrarily detained in their 21st century indoctrination camps and immediately end its forced labor practices for ‘Made in China’ goods being exported around the world.”

Congress may also soon deliberate new legislation which would prohibit imports from the XUAR to the U.S. amid growing evidence that internment camps in the region have increasingly transitioned from political indoctrination to forced labor, with detainees being sent to work in cotton and textile factories.

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, introduced in March, would block imports from the region unless proof can be shown that they are not linked to forced labor.

Reported by Alim Seytoff for RFA’s Uyghur Service. Written in English by Joshua Lipes.



Source link