Coronavirus: Europeans say EU was ‘irrelevant’ during pandemic

0

Deep public disappointment in the EU’s fragmented coronavirus response and European governments’ handling of the pandemic is revealed by newly released polling across the continent. An overwhelming majority nevertheless say the pandemic has convinced them that EU governments should cooperate more closely in the face of future external threats.

In Italy, one of the countries hit first by the virus, 63% said the EU failed its citizens as the pandemic tore through southern Europe and, asked who their most useful ally had been during the darkest days of the crisis, only 4% of Italians cited the EU while 25% said China.

The numbers who perceived the EU’s performance as poor (more than half in France) are exceeded by those who said the bloc was “irrelevant” as soaring death tolls left some communities struggling to bury their dead. Large majorities in all the nations surveyed felt that either their country was left to cope alone or they simply did not know who their most helpful ally was.

Europeans in nine countries that make up roughly two-thirds of the EU population were surveyed for the European Council on Foreign Relations thinktank as their governments began to plan for loosening lockdowns. The resulting report, by Ivan Krastev and Mark Leonard, describes the levels of public disillusionment as “disturbing” as EU leaders debate a recovery plan that will involve raising trillions of euros in public funding.

EU relevance during crisis – graphic

They say the findings also challenge the view that the pandemic fuelled a surge in support for expanding the role of the state. Across the nine survey countries, 33% say they have lost confidence in the capacity of governments to act based on their handling of the pandemic, and only 29% think that the crisis proves the need for a bigger role for the state.

While approval ratings for national leaders soared in March, as anxious citizens sought reassurance and governments stepped in to save livelihoods, by the end of April, 61% in France said the Macron government had under-performed and felt more disillusioned about the role of governments since the arrival of Covid-19. In Spain, 54% expressed dissatisfaction with Pedro Sanchez’s government’s management of the crisis. By contrast, in Germany, 58% of those polled remained positive about Angela Merkel’s leadership

However, widespread disappointment with the EU response has not so far translated into a boost for Eurosceptic populism. A convincing majority, 63%, including 55% in Germany, 80% in Spain and 91% in Portugal, believed the pandemic showed the need for EU governments to act more cohesively.

Polling on EU cooperation

In Italy, 76% wanted a recovery led by the EU and only 16% said the pandemic had shown Matteo Salvini’s anti-EU populist Lega party in an improved light. Nor has the crisis boosted support for Spain’s populists – 54% said the far right Vox party had gone down in their estimation since the arrival of the coronavirus. Marine Le Pen’s party in France flat-lined while in Germany just 6% reported an “improved” view of the far-right AfD as a result of the crisis.

But as politicians’ focus shifts from health to confronting the worst recession since the second world war, the report warns EU leaders against assuming that the demand for greater cohesion represents a vote of confidence in EU structures, or a public willingness to share the costs. Only in southern and eastern Europe does this polling show strong support for financial burden-sharing.

Some commentators have hailed the Franco-German initiative to rescue the European economy as a “Hamilton” moment, a pandemic-inspired move towards fiscal union, which mirrors the foundational steps of the US under its first treasury secretary, Alexander Hamilton.

The driving force for more EU cooperation appears to be the way the coronavirus crisis dramatically altered how fearfully the world beyond Europe is seen: 60% of Europeans said their view of the US had worsened, while 48% said they thought more negatively of China.

Perceptions of the US

The authors identify the biggest constituency of opinion in Europe as those who believe EU nations must act cohesively in the pandemic era for self-protection. “For them, Europe is no longer mainly a project motivated by ideas and values, it is a community of fate that must cling together to take back control over its future.” the report says.

There is widespread backing for tightening the EU’s external borders and pushing European businesses to produce more of the supplies needed in emergencies. Support is highest in France and Germany, with Europe also seen as a progressive force in the world capable of pushing for such things as carbon and digital taxes

The research also knocks hopes that the pandemic had restored the standing of experts in the public mind. Greta Thunberg has spoken of her relief at how coronavirus elevated the role of science in society. But while most Danes and Swedes have confidence in expertise – 64% and 61% respectively – 65% of Europeans on average said they have low trust in experts and fear they collude to keep information secret. Even in Germany, where the rates of infection have been low, 56% are wary about relying on expertise, the European council on foreign relations survey shows.

Confidence in experts graphic

The survey of 10,000 people was conducted at the end of April by Datapraxis and YouGov in France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Bulgaria, Denmark and Sweden, with pan-European figures aggregated to reflect relative population size.

Source link

More emergency beds crucial before second wave hits — IAEM

IAEM is recommending measures to ensure only people who really need emergency treatment are admitted

There is a serious risk Covid-19 clusters will surface in hospital admission areas when a second wave of the virus arrives unless more beds and waiting rooms are introduced as a matter of urgency, the Irish Association of Emergency Medicine (IAEM) has warned.

IAEM President Dr Emily O’Connor said now was the ideal time to increase bed capacity in hospital emergency departments (EDs), with the rate of transmission of the virus in the community declining.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Morning Ireland today (June 24), Dr O’Connor said: “There is much less Covd-19 circulating. We are still getting cases of Covid-19 into our hospitals, some of them still requiring intensive care but they are much smaller in number.

“What we are juggling with at the moment is restarting all of the rest of healthcare while trying to continue segregation for any potential Covid-19 cases that might come in.

“We don’t want emergency department waiting rooms to become clusters of Covid-19.

“We urgently need capacity both in space and infrastructure in our emergency departments so that when the second wave arrives, we haven’t discovered that before we knew it was back, patients were sitting in crowded waiting rooms in emergency departments, or patients were sitting on trolleys in corridors in emergency departments.”

Dr O’Connor, a consultant in emergency medicine, added that the IAEM was also recommending that measures should be put in place to ensure that only people who really need emergency treatment were admitted to hospital and that their stay in an ED be kept as short as possible.

“We have this gap now to try and improve things,” she said.

Responding to latest figures from the Health Protection Surveillance Centre which revealed that 8,172 healthcare workers have been diagnosed with Covid-19, Dr O’Connor said several emergency medicine doctors were currently battling the disease.

“There is no filter between the emergency department and what is happening in the community because we see all-comers,” she said.

peter.doyle@imt.ie

Source link

Man blows up at workers mowing down WWI memorial hedge

0

An irate township is demanding answers after a 99-year-old hedge was mowed down at the local war memorial.

Video shot by Greg Hopgood shows his confrontation with council workers tearing up the venerable shrubbery at Milang, south-east of Adelaide.

Locals are outraged after council workers tore down a 99-year-old hedge at a war memorial. (9News)

The hedge was initially planted as part of a World War I memorial.

“Do you understand, did you feel anything when you were ripping that up?” Mr Hopgood says in the footage.

“Us veterans have been looking after this, these f——- have just been cutting the f——- lawn.”

Council workers claimed the hedge was obstructing road users. (9News)

Council workers told him the hedges were obstructing motorists.

But the RSL is standing with Mr Hopgood, claiming there had been no consultation.

Mayor Keith Parkes said the move was not endorsed by councillors.

Mayor Keith Parkes said it was a mistake. (9News)

He said the removal of the hedge was a mistake and has vowed the council will review what went wrong.

The council is to meet with angered residents to discuss what can be salvaged.

Source by [author_name]

HIQA: ‘Children not spreading Covid-19’

HIQA reviewed evidence from around the world to help inform Ireland’s response to the pandemic

The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) has advised the National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET) that children were not contributing to the spread of Covid-19 in families.

HIQA has been gathering guidance from around the world to help inform Ireland’s response to the pandemic.

In response to a request by NPHET, the health watchdog has now published a summary of 13 studies which focused on children and Covid-19, or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

NPHET’s original query asked: “What evidence is available to indicate that children spread SARS-CoV2?”

HIQA has since published a reply on its website, stating that there was limited information on the contribution of children to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

“Very few definitive cases of virus transmission from children have been published to date,” the document added.

“From the small number of published studies identified, it appears that children are not, to date, substantially contributing to the household transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

“From two school-based studies investigating transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in children, it appears that rates in this setting are also very low.”

HIQA said it had analysed findings from papers published in numerous countries, including China, Switzerland, Australia, France, Italy, Vietnam, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and Iran.

It also looked at a study carried out in Ireland.

Heavy et al had examined notifications of SARS-CoV-2 in the school setting before school closures in Ireland on March 12, 2020.

They had analysed the spread of SARS-CoV-2 from six confirmed cases (three students and three staff) to 1,155 close contacts in Ireland (1,025 school contacts, 130 other settings) and reported no confirmed transmission from children.

“This adds to current evidence that children do not appear to be drivers of transmission, and we argue that reopening schools should be considered safe accompanied by certain measures,” they noted in their paper, ‘No evidence of secondary transmission of Covid-19 from children attending school in Ireland, 2020’, was recently published in the infectious disease surveillance journal Eurosurveillance.

HIQA added that their evidence summary included studies on transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children to others (child or adult) and did not “address the risk of infection to children or their disease severity”.

Ten studies had investigated intrafamilial and close contact transmission, two examined transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools and one was a mathematical modelling study estimating age-specific transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2.

Five of the 10 studies on intrafamilial and close contact transmission reported child-to-adult or child-to-family member transmission, HIQA added, although at very low rates.

For more information, visit hiqa.ie.

peter.doyle@imt.ie

Source link

Digging Into The Times’s 2020 Poll

0


Good morning and welcome to On Politics, a daily political analysis of the 2020 elections based on reporting by New York Times journalists.

Sign up here to get On Politics in your inbox every weekday.


Trump trails by 14, while Fauci issues a virus warning. It’s Wednesday, and this is your tip sheet.

  • Joe Biden leads President Trump by 14 percentage points, according to a New York Times/Siena College poll released this morning. Our first national survey of this election season shows just how steeply Trump will have to climb on his path to re-election.

  • The president has been generally unpopular throughout almost his entire term, and his handling of the coronavirus pandemic has only deepened voters’ distrust. Fifty-eight percent of registered voters said in the poll that they disapproved of his handling of the outbreak, while just 38 percent approved. His marks were even worse on the question of how he was handling race relations.

  • In the presidential matchup, Biden either leads or runs even with the president in nearly every major subgroup, and he has opened up a wide advantage among various groups of voters that were more evenly split in 2016, such as independents and college-educated white women. Even among men and white voters overall, demographics usually at the center of any Republican victory, Biden is about even with Trump.

  • While most voters tend to either strongly like or dislike the president — and by about two to one, it’s usually the latter — views of Biden are much less extreme.

  • Looking to go a bit deeper into the polling process? The Upshot’s Nate Cohn has this rundown of how the poll was conducted.

  • A major Senate primary took place in Kentucky yesterday, but we probably won’t have complete results for another week. Amy McGrath, a centrist Democrat who has fund-raised prodigiously on the promise that she could unseat Mitch McConnell, is facing off against Charles Booker, a progressive state legislator who has channeled the grass-roots spirit of the moment into an 11th-hour surge.

  • Some precincts have reported preliminary results, but an outsize share of primary voters cast absentee ballots because of fears of the pandemic. Kentucky’s Democratic Party chair issued a statement saying, “We won’t fully know the results of today’s primary until June 30.”

  • Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez easily won a Democratic primary in New York, while Representative Eliot Engel, a 30-year incumbent, sought to beat back a challenge from Jamaal Bowman, a middle school principal whose progressive campaign had the backing of many leaders on the left. In that race and many others across the state, final results were not yet available.

  • Dr. Anthony Fauci said he was bothered by the “disturbing surge” in coronavirus cases, telling Congress on Tuesday that more action was needed to control its spread. Though he was characteristically careful not to assign blame, Fauci again warned about the dangers of reopening too quickly and relaxing social-distancing practices.

  • “The virus is not going to disappear,” Fauci told the House Energy and Commerce Committee, in a tacit rebuke of Trump’s suggestion that the virus could “fade away” in the summer. He also reaffirmed that the federal government plans to increase virus testing, despite the president’s complaints that tests are helping to drive up the number of reported cases. “To my knowledge, none of us have ever been told to slow down on testing,” Fauci said. “In fact, we will be doing more testing.”

  • The assistant secretary for public health, Adm. Brett P. Giroir, echoed Fauci’s concern. “I am very cautious and I don’t — still don’t sleep well at night,” he said.

  • The Senate has a test vote planned for today on criminal-justice legislation put forth by its Republican leaders — but Senate Democrats plan to block it. They called the bill “woefully inadequate” yesterday, arguing it was a weak alternative to the more ambitious bill currently headed to a vote in the House.

  • A failure in the Senate vote could fatally slow the bill’s momentum, as the chamber will adjourn for the summer ahead of the July 4 holiday. Democrats appear willing to bet that voters prefer no deal to a weakened compromise. “The Republican majority has given the Senate a bad bill and proposed no credible way to sufficiently improve it,” Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, said on Tuesday, with an air of finality.

A voter looked for an empty station at the single polling place in Louisville, Ky.


Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, established an advisory panel at the State Department last year charged with reworking the United States’ approach to human rights.

To run it, he tapped Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard professor and former ambassador to the Vatican known for her conservative views. And in public statements, he made clear that he was confident the panel would produce a document centered on the idea of safeguarding religious freedom — which is often used as a cudgel against calls for L.G.B.T.Q. and women’s rights.

The panel is set to release its report next month. Pranshu Verma took a look into what human-rights advocates are expecting. Then he answered a few questions specifically for us.

Hi, Pranshu. First of all, set the stage for us. What role has the State Department historically played in promoting human rights around the world? Are there certain core principles that have tended to guide it in this pursuit through the years?

The State Department has been active in every major human-rights conversation since the late 1940s. The core principle it has adhered to for decades has been that all human rights are created equal. Scholars call this a “universalist” approach. It differs from a “relativist” approach, which argues some rights should be valued more than others. Proponents of a universalist approach argue there cannot be competition among human rights. The right to vote must be equally valued as the right to speech.

Last year, Mike Pompeo announced that he would create a first-of-its-kind advisory panel to re-evaluate how the department defines human rights. What’s this all about, and how has he gone about it?

It’s no secret Pompeo is religious. This panel he created is tasked with creating a new vision for human-rights policy. In a number of speeches, he has praised the commission and assured his allies it will uphold religious freedom as America’s most important value.

Academics who have tracked the public commission meetings have spoken out about them. Many of the panel’s members, handpicked by Pompeo’s staff, have strong views against same-sex marriage and reproductive rights. In these meetings they have discussed the importance of “family values,” “natural law,” and other coded terms used in fights to roll back rights for women and L.G.B.T.Q. people.

Many diplomats, advocates and human-rights experts think this report is a tool Pompeo can use to court the Christian conservative vote if he seeks public office in the future.

Pompeo had already taken other steps as secretary of state to limit how much the United States advocates for L.G.B.T.Q. rights — often arguing that promoting these rights goes against notions of “religious liberty.” How does this fit into that pattern?

This panel fits right into Pompeo’s wheelhouse. Say a Christian doctor refuses to perform an abortion for religious reasons, who wins out? The doctor, or the woman? Pompeo’s “relativist” approach to human rights, where religion is America’s most fundamental freedom, would provide strength to the doctor’s position. It’s scenarios like that which have human-rights scholars, former diplomats and State Department officials worried.

There’s no shortage of repressive governments across the world looking to use the “relativist” human-rights approach to narrowly define the concept to their benefit. If America produces a document doing that, it’s harder to persuade a country like Iran, China or Saudi Arabia to do any different.

A report from the advisory panel is expected as early as next week. Do human-rights advocates have a sense of what they’re expecting — both in terms of its contents, and its broader implications for U.S. foreign policy?

Many think the report’s outcome is preordained, though now that the commission is getting significant attention from the press, critics wouldn’t be surprised if the document is watered down slightly. But if it does prioritize religious liberty as America’s most fundamental freedom, it could upend diplomatic efforts to stop countries who persecute same-sex couples or deny women access to reproductive health care on the basis of religion.


NEW YORK TIMES EVENTS

With race, equality and empowerment dominating the national conversation, helping kids navigate today’s complex world can be a formidable challenge. How can parents teach why diversity, equity and critical thinking matter? How should privilege be addressed? And how do you use childhood curiosity to develop empathy?

Join us today at 3 p.m. Eastern time to hear the perspective of Amber Coleman-Mortley, director of social engagement for iCivics, a nonprofit focused on improving civics education for children. She will be in conversation with our own Tara Parker-Pope, the founding editor of Well.

On Politics is also available as a newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Source link

Dr. Fauci Discusses Recent COVID-19 Spikes In Several States

0

NPR’s Rachel Martin talks to Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of infectious diseases at the National Institutes of Health. Fauci told Congress yesterday he’s worried about the recent coronavirus surge.



Source link

Georgia Lawmakers Pass Hate Crimes Legislation, More Police Protections

0

ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia’s legislature on Tuesday passed hate crimes legislation deemed essential by business and many political leaders, sending the measure to Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk.

The price Republicans exacted for moving that legislation forward was simultaneous passage of a separate bill that would mandate penalties for crimes targeting police and other first responders.

The action comes after Senate Republicans had added police as a protected class to the hate crimes legislation last week in committee, but then later moved those protections to a separate bill in a deal between the parties.

Democrats on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly against House Bill 838, which includes the increased protections for first responders. The hate crimes legislation, House Bill 426, had bipartisan support, though some conservatives voted against it.

Kemp’s office said in a statement that the Republican will sign the hate crimes bill, pending a legal review.

“Victims need protection against any attack motivated by hatred due to bias or prejudice,” said Sen. Donzella James, a Democrat from Atlanta, who spoke about her own experiences facing discrimination as a Black woman. “House Bill 426 is a measured approach at doing all of the things that we need to do to treat this injustice. It’s time that Georgia rise up and show that we will not stand for crimes done out of hate.”

A push for passage of the hate crimes bill has gained momentum after the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, as well as nationwide protests of racial injustice and police brutality. Arbery, a Black man, was pursued and fatally shot near Brunswick, Georgia, in February. Three white men, including a father and son, are charged in his death.

The hate crimes bill would impose additional penalties for crimes motivated by a victim’s race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender or disability. Georgia’s Supreme Court overturned an earlier state law in 2004, leaving the state as one of four without specific anti-bias protections.

House Speaker David Ralston, who had heavily pressured the Senate to act on the measure, congratulated lawmakers after the House agreed 127-38 to the Senate changes on the hate crimes legislation.

“Today we can all stand together. Today we have said that we will not be defined by a senseless act of evil, and by the murder of Ahmaud Arbery, but that our Georgia is better than this,” said Ralston, a Blue Ridge Republican.

Bipartisan support for the hate crimes measure was thrown in doubt after Senate Republicans added “status of being or having been a first responder” as a protected class in a committee last week. The ACLU, NAACP and House and Senate Democratic caucuses are among groups that came out against the bill with the first responder provision added. But the language protecting police and other emergency responders was removed Monday in a deal that saw police protections split off into a separate bill.

Ralston told reporters that he had “rejected” the Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote along party lines to add police and emergency personnel and that he “communicated” that to Senate leaders.

“Frankly that disturbed me because I thought it was extremely important that this be a bipartisan bill,” Ralston said. “You don’t pass a hate crimes bill, which is a piece of legislation with this kind of historic nature and consequence, along party lines.”

But the speaker said he told senators that they could bring the language in a separate bill if they wanted.

Some of the groups seeking hate crimes protections said they were more concerned with keeping police protections out of the hate crimes law than blocking them entirely.

“Having it not in the hate crimes bill is acceptable,” said Allison Padilla-Goodman, the southern division vice president of the Anti-Defamation League.

Most of the ‘no’ votes on the hate crimes bill came from Republicans. Some have a philosophical disagreement with the measure, like Rep. Matt Gurtler, a Republican from Tiger who is seeking the GOP nomination in a congressional race.

“We should not be lowering and highering the standard of justice based on immutable factors such as race, ethnicity and gender,” Gurtler said.

Many critics of the legislation containing enhanced police protections say that the law isn’t needed because Georgia already has strong protections for law enforcement.

Marissa McCall Dodson, public policy director for the Southern Center for Human Rights, urged lawmakers to vote down the bill providing increased protection for police, saying in a statement that it “creates a hate crime for cops and other first responders.”

Dodson added, “There is no need to increase punishments for people who commit crimes against first responders because Georgia law already provides adequate protection as well as enhanced penalties when first responders are the victims of crime.”



Source link

CPG consumption surges as coronavirus restrictions ease

0

Dive Brief:

  • Packaged food consumption rose 20% for the week ended June 20 compared to 2019, doubling the increase of 10% the prior week, Credit Suisse said in a research note that cited data from Catalina.
  • The report said the increase “demonstrates that consumers continue to eat more of their meals at home,” even though state governments have been lifting restrictions, allowing restaurant dining rooms and other establishments to reopen.
  • Credit Suisse said companies with brands skewed to home cooking, such as B&G Foods and McCormick & Co., are best positioned to win, as consumers have been able to improve their cooking skills during the pandemic. Kraft Heinz also could be a winner with its cheese and sliced meat offerings, since people now make more lunches at home. The financial services firm said General Mills could be negatively impacted, with its portfolio heavy on pet food and yogurt. 

Dive Insight:

Even as more states reopen, there is growing evidence consumer eating habits established during the pandemic are going to be hard to dislodge. As coronavirus swept across the U.S. this spring, restaurants closed their dining rooms and consumers spent more time cooking in their kitchens rather than going out, using the time to experiment with new foods and flavorings. 

While nearly every food company has benefited from increased time at home, especially early on as shoppers stockpiled items in their pantries, the report from Credit Suisse shows there has been a re-acceleration of at-home food consumption. As states including Florida and South Carolina are now posting daily records of new coronavirus cases, consumers may be retreating to the comfort of their own homes after briefly starting to venture out. At the same time, people who have grown accustomed to cooking at home and experimenting with their own recipes may find it becoming a long-term fixture in their everyday lives.

The Credit Suisse research note predicted while it expects grocery trends to be “quite volatile” in the coming weeks, it forecast above-normal growth rates in the packaged foods group to continue in the second half of the year.

To be sure, the note said some food companies are better positioned to benefit from this uptick “because their portfolios are indexed to cooking-at-home categories.” Credit Suisse specifically highlighted recent growth in categories of flour, canned vegetables, salts/seasonings and condiments and sauces as reasons B&G and McCormick should post strong results.

For McCormick, this should provide a tailwind for many of its seasonings as well as its French’s mustard and Frank’s RedHot brands. At B&G, strong sales could continue for items in its diverse portfolio, including Green Giant vegetables, Dash and Emeril’s seasonings and Skinnygirl dressings.

At the same time, companies that had problems before the outbreak could find themselves facing more of the same. General Mills has struggled for years with its Yoplait brand in the face of plant-based competitors and offerings from Greek yogurt giant Chobani. General Mills introduced a French-style variety in glass jars called Oui by Yoplait, and its YQ by Yoplait made with ultra-filtered milk and featuring less sugar. Those and other rollouts have not been enough to revive General Mills’ fortunes. The company also has a large cereal portfolio, which remains one recent bright spot for the Minnesota-based manufacturer, Credit Suisse said.

For many large CPG companies that have been struggling to rejuvenate sales and fend off trendier competitors, the recent surge in demand has been a welcome change. Now the challenge becomes sustaining that growth in the face of changing food consumption habits, which are still being shaped by the ongoing pandemic.

Source link

Streamers call for a Twitch blackout

0

Image copyright
Getty Images

#Twitchblackout is trending today as streamers across the world ask people to avoid the site for a day.

They’re calling for a blackout because they think the streaming site can do more to recognise victims of sexual and racial abuse.

Dozens of women have recently claimed they have been sexually assaulted by people in the gaming industry.

Twitch says it takes accusations of sexual harassment seriously.

Streamers are arguing Twitch has not acted quickly enough when there have been sexual assault claims made against some of its content creators.

Some also think the site has been too lenient when others have been accused of using racist or homophobic language.

Encouraging people to stay off the platform for a day could deprive Twitch of viewers and income.

Those supporting the blackout think it will lead to Twitch taking these issues more seriously as they feel like the site has not talked to them enough about their concerns.

After many claims of sexual harassment in the gaming industry were reported, Twitch posted to say it was actively looking into cases linked to their affiliated streamers.

It also praised the bravery of the women who spoke out.

The CEO of the company Emmet Shear sent an internal email saying he’s looking at banning accounts based on their historical behaviour.

He also said he wants Twitch to become the safest place for people to create content on the internet.

The calls for a blackout haven’t been universally supported.

Some content creators are arguing not streaming for a day is counterproductive.

They say it’s an opportunity lost to discuss issues of harassment, consent and racism with their communities.

Some content creators have contacted Newsbeat to say they’re worried the campaign was rushed and as a result many streamers are carrying on as normal today.

For many of those following the blackout, the hope is this is the beginning of a much wider discussion about people’s behaviour on Twitch and in the gaming industry.

Follow Newsbeat on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

Listen to Newsbeat live at 12:45 and 17:45 weekdays – or listen back here.



Source link

IMPPA writes to CM Uddhav Thackeray to permit workers to join sets only after testing negative for COVID-19 : Bollywood News – Bollywood Hungama

0

CM Uddhav Thackeray has been handling the Coronavirus outbreak crisis really well and has made sure to increase the number of tests done in the state. While there have been a few leniencies applied to the lockdown, the Indian Motion Pictures’ Production Association (IMPPA) wrote to the CM to let workers join the sets only after they have been tested negative for COVID-19. Writing a letter to the Chief Minister of Maharashta, the association thanked the CM for amending the guidelines according to their suggestion.

The letter reads, “Dear Sir,

 

Sub: Grateful Thanks for amending impractical guidelines for starting shooting

 

We are indeed very grateful and indebted to your kind self for kindly considering and implementing the suggestions made by us in our email letter dated 2-6-2020 for relaxation in the guidelines prescribed for starting of shooting in Maharashtra. We are indeed highly obliged that you have considered our suggestion’s worthy of incorporation and have advised the authorities to issue fresh GR dated 23-6-2020   in which the demands made by us have been majorly incorporated like the mandatory requirement of a doctor and a nurse to be available on the set throughout the shooting which was  impossible to comply with in view of the serious shortage of doctors and ambulances in the city of Bombay where cases of Corona virus are  rising in thousands and all these medical professionals were required to treat the patients and not wait on set watching if anybody falls ill.

As suggested by us you have very kindly amended the guideline regarding provision of hotel accommodation to all unit members and have stated that this is only recommendatory and shall not be mandatory as proposed.

You have kindly also accepted our demand that it is not possible to cast real family members as family members in the shows/films because every person is not an actor as acting is a specialized profession and therefore we appreciate the fact that you have made this guideline also recommended only.

The fact that the entire custody and possession of the set has been left in the hands of the Producer without any external interference or inspector to ensure safety and security of all unit members is another step which is very welcome as when the producer is himself going to bear all the risk if anything untoward happens he will definitely ensure that there are no lapses of any nature in the safety and precaution to ensure safety and health of all the unit members.

We also recommend to your kindself that before starting work all unit members wanting to work in the shooting should submit negative Covid reports  because when so many unit members are involved in the shooting it is necessary to ensure that the people working should not be Covid positive and hence the report should be insisted upon.

We are obliged to you for having accepted our request and doing the needful and would request you to also declare that these are only contingency measures which have been made without taking into account the shows/ films waiting to be launched because if all the producer, artists, technicians and workers have to survive  Film and TV production has to go beyond what was held up and new work has to start because 24-hour entertainment needs more and more content and we need to fulfil this requirement of entertainment with new material being produced for which these guidelines after removal of Lock down should not apply and every producer should be permitted to shoot as per his desire after obtaining the required permissions and present Guidelines to be limited to Lock down period.

We are sure your kindself will kindly do the needful in the matter and oblige.

 

For Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association

T.P. Aggarwal

President

CC to

  1. Mr. Anil Deshmukh (Home Minister of Maharashtra)
  2. Mr. Amit Deshmukh (Minister of Cultural Affairs)”

Also Read: IMPPA writes to CM Uddhav Thackeray to modify shooting guidelines as they find it impractical

BOLLYWOOD NEWS

Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Bollywood News Today & upcoming movies 2020 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.

Source link