Pols Tell Trump To Go Back To The Bunker After His Threat To ‘Take Back’ Seattle

0

President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to “take back” Seattle from protesters, tweeting that “ugly anarchists must be stooped.” In response, state and local politicians told him to go back to his bunker beneath the White House ― and keep out of local business. 

Seattle had been marked by violent clashes with police amid the demonstrations that broke out after a cop killed George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis last month. But earlier this week, Seattle police left the area and demonstrators took over, cordoning off several blocks which they’ve declared the “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone” or “CHAZ,” now the site of peaceful ongoing protests.

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan (D) said the police pullback was done “to proactively de-escalate interactions between protestors and law enforcement.” But Trump was unhappy with the move even though it ― at least temporarily ― worked. He tweeted:

Durkan fired back by referring to the White House bunker Trump was rushed to as demonstrations broke out in D.C.:

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D), who has clashed with Trump repeatedly over the federal government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, also told the president to butt out:



Source by [author_name]

As food banks struggle to keep up, these CNN Heroes are getting meals to those in need

0

To help ensure those in need don’t go hungry, two CNN Heroes have ramped up their efforts the last few months.

Cathryn Couch and her non-profit, Ceres Community Project, prepare and deliver healthy meals for low-income residents facing cancer and other serious illnesses in northern California. They’ve distributed more than 665,000 meals since 2007.

As the pandemic broke out, it became clear that people with underlying medical conditions were at higher risk.

“The Covid epidemic has significantly increased the demand for our services,” said Couch, a 2016 CNN Hero. “It’s really, really important that this population stays home and stays safe.”

To meet the demand, Couch says her organization has more than doubled the number of people it supports. For recipients facing food insecurity, the group has more than tripled the number of weekly meals it provides.

“The clients we serve are very medically fragile, vulnerable, many of them living alone. Many of them have lost caregivers because of the pandemic,” she said. “That population has the potential for the most complications and mortality if they get the illness.”

The non-profit is now also providing meals to people with Covid-19. And the group is coordinating with local counties and health centers to serve patients on Medicaid who need extra nutritional support.

The meals the group prepares are specially tailored to the nutrient requirements of the client’s illness, Couch said.

“Everything is made from scratch. We are committed to 100% organic and sourcing as many things locally as we can.”

In downtown Dallas, 2018 CNN Hero Chad Houser runs Café Momentum. The non-profit restaurant provides employment, educational support and career counseling to young people coming out of juvenile detention facilities.

Due to the pandemic, Houser temporarily closed the restaurant and with the help of his program participants, turned the space into an emergency food distribution center.

“We refocused the mission really, by listening to the community,” Houser said. “We received a lot of calls from folks asking for help in specifically feeding food insecure students that were dependent upon school meals for their basic nutritional needs.”

In the United States, more than 30 million children rely on free or subsidized school lunches. When schools around the country closed amid Covid-19, many were at risk of going hungry.
Chad Houser turned his non-profit restaurant space into an emergency food distribution center.

Since March, Houser’s program participants have been putting together boxes filled with food items. They donate the boxes to a local school district that is distributing them to students in need.

These efforts also allow Houser and his team to continue assisting the young men and women in their program.

“So much that we focus on as an organization is to provide … (a) stable and consistent ecosystem of support,” Houser said. “It has also continued to provide income for them. When we have millions of people filing for unemployment, it’s one less issue that they have to deal with.”

The project also gives these young adults a way to give back to their community.

“They’re doing a tremendous job stepping up to the plate during this time of crisis,” Houser said. “So many of them have gone to the schools that the meals are going to. They’ve lived in the neighborhoods that the meals are going to. And it’s a full circle opportunity for them.”

It’s an opportunity that ultimately furthers the mission.

“Grappling with anything, even a global pandemic, it starts at a community level,” Houser said. “It starts with a community rallying around each other. It starts with a community holding themselves accountable to themselves and one another.”

Source link

Ipswich police sorry for telling black woman she’s ‘jumping on bandwagon’ of Black Lives Matters

0

Suffolk Police have apologised after two officers stopped a black couple and demanded ID because they were “driving a motor vehicle on a road”.

In footage of the incident, which occurred in Ipswich on Tuesday, an officer apparently accuses the couple of “jumping on the bandwagon” of the Black Lives Matter protests.

Ingrid Antoine-Oniyoke, 47, and her husband Falil Oniyoke, 50, were stopped after “glancing” at a police car parked near Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke’s mother’s house.

In the video, a male officer says: “At the end of the day, whether it looks funny or not, you were driving a motor vehicle on a road, so therefore I am requiring you to require proof of driving (licence).”

Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke tells him: “You are kidding us right now. You can see why people get upset.”

The officer replies: “All that I need is proof that you are the driver of that vehicle and you live here, and we are gone.”

The couple, from Watford, had been staying at Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke’s mother’s house while their own house was renovated.

In an apparent reference to the Black Lives Matter movement, the female officer tells them: “You have turned something irate that shouldn’t be. You are just jumping on the bandwagon of the current climate.”

The male officer then tells Mr Oniyoke and Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke “you look suspicious”.

He continued: “You can argue and you can say ‘why, why, why the whole time’.”

Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke tells them “this is disgusting”, with her husband adding that “this is profiling”.

“You can laugh and shake your head as much as you want,” Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke goes on.

The two officers only left after being showed ID.

Part of the incident was filmed by Mrs Antoine-Oniyoke, and outrage followed when the couple’s daughter Maja posted it on Twitter.

This prompted the apology, with the force saying: “Suffolk Constabulary is aware of the video circulating on social media involving two of our officers.

“Having looked at the issues raised by a large number of people, particularly regarding certain comments which were made on the video, we would like to apologise for the offence these have caused.”

It continued: “The constabulary is very aware of the depth of feeling surrounding the events of the last few weeks and the issue of racism in our society.

“We always try to ensure we police all our communities with dignity, respect and fairness. Where those values are not met we will do everything we can to learn from that.”

Maja, a student, told the PA news agency that she found the clip so upsetting it was hard to watch.

“My grandma and my uncle live (in Ipswich) – my uncle and quite a lot of the black community in Ipswich in response to this have said there is an issue with race and the police,” she said.



Source link

Cambodian Opposition Activists Launch Campaign to Suspend Debt Repayment Amid Outbreak

0

Exiled activists with Cambodia’s banned opposition party have launched a campaign to convince villagers to delay loan repayments during the coronavirus outbreak, saying the government has failed to take measures to protect those who have lost their income during the pandemic.

The activists with the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) told RFA’s Khmer Service on Thursday that they are leveraging social media platforms such as Facebook to reach out to Cambodians about the movement, despite threats by Prime Minister Hun Sen to arrest anyone who advocates for nonrepayment of debt to the country’s banks and microfinance lenders.

“We have observed during this difficult time that people cannot afford to pay back their debts because they lost their jobs and are unable to earn the same amount of money they used to,” Rin Roth, a Thailand-based CNRP activist said.

“Calling on people to suspend their payments is not illegal, as alleged by the government. Other countries are not only allowing people to suspend payments but are also providing money to those people who have lost their jobs.”

Another activist named Pov Karuna said that he will be working on the debt campaign until a solution is reached, warning that “Cambodians won’t be able to survive” if the banking sector forces them to pay down their debt during the crisis.

“Cambodia will be hit hard economically because of the coronavirus and the loss of EBA status,” he said, referring to a mid-February announcement that the European Union plans to suspend tariff-free access in August to its market under the “Everything But Arms” (EBA) scheme for around one-fifth of Cambodia’s exports, citing rollbacks on human rights.

“We are urging the people not to repay their debts until there is a suitable solution,” he said, adding that the campaign is not part of a bid by the opposition to undermine the government.

The activists said they are following the lead of acting CNRP chief Sam Rainsy, who also recently urged villagers to stop their loan payments for at least six months in messages posted to social media from Paris, where he has lived since 2015 to avoid a string of what he says are politically motivated charges and convictions.

Sam Rainsy’s calls were met with rage by Hun Sen, who threatened to respond to the attempt to “sabotage” his government by adding to the nearly 20 CNRP opposition officials or activists who authorities have arrested and thrown in prison—most without arrest warrants—since the beginning of the year.

Sector responds

Kaing Tongngy, spokesman for the Cambodia Microfinance Association (CMA), told RFA he was unaware of the CNRP’s platform with regard to the campaign and refused to comment on it.

But he acknowledged that borrowers had been severely impacted by the outbreak, and said microfinance institutions had restructured loans for some 200,000 people and would continue to do so through the end of 2020.

“We will restructure the loans of those in need, but not of those who have been unaffected by the coronavirus, as that is against the law,” he said.

“Cambodians are responsible people and understand their responsibilities to pay their debts.”

Cambodia Bank Association spokesman Heng Koy said the CNRP campaign won’t have any effect because Cambodians believe that repaying loans is an obligation, regardless of the circumstances.

He called on those negatively impacted by the outbreak to request a restructure of their loans and said that no one had boycotted repayments to date.

“We are sending the message that banks and customers are long-term partners,” he said.

A villager in Banteay Meanchey province named Sean Vy told RFA his microfinance lender had agreed to restructure his loan and allow him to pay only interest for six months.

But he said that he supports the CNRP’s campaign to suspend all interest and principle payments for the next half year.

“People have lost their jobs, so it would be best for the banks to suspend collection until the outbreak is over,” he said.

“However, we have no choice because [the bank] won’t agree.”

Sean Vy said he is working as hard as he can to pay off his debts, leaving him with barely enough food on the table.

Attempts by RFA to reach government spokesman Phay Siphan for comment on the CNRP campaign and the issue of loan repayments went unanswered Thursday.

Yong Kim Eng, president of the People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-Center), told RFA that he has urged the government to assist those people in need to prevent them from going broke during the pandemic.

Uptick in harassment

The launch of the CNRP campaign came as party activists still in Cambodia reported an increase of police surveillance and intimidation, which they said followed Hun Sen’s call on authorities to arrest more opposition members on charges of incitement.

Speaking to RFA on Tuesday, Sou Yan, the former CNRP councilor of the commune seat of Tboung Khmum province, said several plainclothes officers took pictures of him and his home a day earlier without providing a reason. He said that a handful of other activists have also faced similar harassment.

“This kind of thing is the same as what they did to me last year—they asked me to defect [to the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP)] and promised to give me a position, but when I refused, they arrested me,” he said.

Sou Yan said that he and other activists have not reported the incidents to local authorities because they have “lost faith” in the police, citing political discrimination.

In September 2017 CNRP President Kem Sokha was arrested over an alleged plot to overthrow the government and his party was dissolved by the Supreme Court in November that year for its supposed role in the scheme.

The move to ban the CNRP was part of a wider crackdown by Hun Sen on the political opposition, NGOs, and the independent media that paved the way for the CPP to win all 125 seats in parliament in the country’s July 2018 general election.

Another activist named Tun Nimol, who is based in Kandal province, said he fled his home amid surveillance by the police and that his family had asked him not to return because they fear he will be arrested.

Tun Nimol urged authorities to stop monitoring him and to publicly state that he will not be arrested so that he can return home.

National Police spokesman Chhay Kim Khoeun denied that police had surveilled the activists, suggesting instead that they “might have done something illegal and are afraid of their own shadows.”

“I wonder why they thought police were spying on them,” he said. “If they’ve done nothing wrong, they shouldn’t have to worry.”

However, Soeung Sen Karuna, spokesman for local rights group Adhoc, told RFA his organization has received information that police are indeed monitoring CNRP activists.

He called such actions a form of “intimidation and restriction of political rights,” noting that authorities have continued to arrest CNRP members while 17 former and active opposition officials and supporters have been the victims of assault by unidentified men since the new year, and no arrests have been made in any of the cases.

“If the threats continue, this will discourage people from participating in politics,” he said.

“The activists are concerned. There should be space for freedom in a democratic country.”

Reported by RFA’s Khmer service. Translated by Samean Yun. Written in English by Joshua Lipes.



Source link

Lawmakers Push to Invest Billions in Semiconductor Industry to Counter China

0

“One of the biggest weaknesses in the American economy is the decline of our scientific and innovation industrial base, and we must invest in academic institutions and industries to rebuild it,” Mr. Schumer said. “There’s bipartisan support to do so and it’s growing each day.”

The shift in Congress mirrors one in the Trump administration, which has rejected traditional Republican support of free trade in favor of a more managed approach to compete with China. Mr. Trump’s advisers have zeroed in on the semiconductor industry, which was born in the United States but has partly migrated to Asia in recent decades, as the test case for their plan to use trade and technology policies to return manufacturing to American shores.

Though the election is fast approaching, officials in the Trump administration have only just begun to implement that plan. Over the last year, they have introduced a variety of measures aimed at cutting Chinese companies off from American technology exports and investment opportunities and crippling the Chinese telecom giant Huawei, which they view as a national security threat. Mr. Trump also waged a prolonged trade war against China — placing tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods, including high-tech ones — as he pressed the country to sign a so-called Phase 1 trade deal.

But the administration has done little to build up other companies that could compete with Huawei and other Chinese technology leaders. As a result, American efforts to get countries around the world to excise Huawei from their telecom networks have been largely unsuccessful.

For many months, officials in the Departments of Defense, State and Commerce have been trying to woo chip makers including Intel, Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to expand their manufacturing footprint in the United States. In May, T.S.M.C. announced plans to build an advanced chip facility in Arizona. That plan is contingent on securing funding from Congress, which would likely come through the bill introduced this week.

Officials from the Department of Commerce and State, who helped negotiate with T.S.M.C., have been in talks with Congress to create a standard package of incentives that could be offered to attract other chip suppliers. In a meeting at the White House last Thursday, senior officials discussed incentives that could bring chip manufacturers onshore.

Besides recent tensions with China, industry executives say the bipartisan support for the bill was also fueled by the coronavirus and its aftermath, which underscored the dangers of relying on a distant electronics supply chain.

Source link

With DACA In Peril, Black Dreamers Are Hoping For Equality And The Ability To Stay

0

Daisy hasn’t watched the video of a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes. She lives just outside Minneapolis and frequently goes to the area where the incident happened, and she doesn’t want to be reminded of it every time she’s nearby. 

But that doesn’t mean she isn’t thinking about it. Daisy, who is Black, has been to three protests against police brutality in the wake of Floyd’s death. But as she opposes racism, she’s also immersed in another harrowing struggle: Daisy is an undocumented immigrant, and she’s waiting to see if the Supreme Court will upend her life. 

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling this month on whether President Donald Trump can cancel the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which allows about 650,0000 undocumented immigrants to live and work in the United States. Those individuals have been waiting for this decision for years ― from when Trump announced an end to the program in September 2017, to when a lower court blocked his action soon after, to when the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in November 2019.

While there are no official statistics on the ethnicity of DACA recipients, there are likely thousands of Black people with that status. About 11,000 DACA recipients came from countries where a majority of the emigrants who leave for the U.S. are Black. Like Daisy, many of them are balancing the agonizing wait for a Supreme Court ruling with a suddenly front-and-center movement against anti-Black racism ― not to mention a global pandemic. 

Daisy, whose last name is being withheld due to privacy and safety concerns, said she keeps an eye on news from the Supreme Court every Monday through DACA advocacy groups. For weeks, there’s been no decision. 

“Then we have six more days to breathe,” she said. “And then when Monday hits again, we will receive more news.”

The Journey To DACA 

Daisy came to the U.S. in May 2001 when she was 5 years old. She only faintly recalls the journey from East Africa to Minnesota. Her family stopped in Europe and then Chicago, finally arriving in Minneapolis, where she remains still after 19 years. 

In 2012, President Barack Obama announced the DACA program. It allows certain undocumented people who came to the U.S. before the age of 16, often referred to as Dreamers, to stay under temporary permits and to work legally. 

Daisy applied and became a DACA recipient at the age of 17 just as she was getting ready to embark on her college career. Along with two siblings who also are DACA recipients, Daisy had security in her future. 

That security was short-lived. 

On Sept. 5, 2017, the first day of the fall semester of her senior year at the University of Minnesota, the Trump administration announced it would be ending DACA. Daisy remembers that day well. She listened to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions make the announcement. She recalls going into a study room on campus and, much to her surprise, starting to cry. 

“I thought I wouldn’t get emotional, but I did get emotional,” Daisy said. “I ended up crying. This is a very emotional thing ― it takes a toll on people when it feels like people are playing with your future essentially.” 

Despite the newly heavy weight of uncertainty and even fear for the future, she went forward. 

“When I thought things through, I gathered myself and I told myself I would not let this bring me down,” she said. “That is what I remember from that day. But everything that has been going on with the DACA has motivated me to continue with my education, and it just reminded me that I am doing everything for a purpose, and that’s for the benefit of my community.” 

The DACA program isn’t perfect, Daisy noted. It applies only to those who came to the U.S. before their 16th birthday, were under the age of 31 when the program was created, and don’t have certain criminal records ― which leaves out many undocumented immigrants. 

“I don’t want to forget those people. They matter just as much as I do, and I am not more important than they are,” Daisy said. 

Still, DACA has allowed Daisy to live her life. Without it, she wouldn’t be able to work legally and could lose her driver’s license. Getting around in Minnesota without a driver’s license ― particularly in the winter ― wouldn’t be feasible. She’s not sure what she’d do. 

It’s not known how the Supreme Court will rule or how that decision will play out. Even if the justices hold that the president can end DACA, it’s likely recipients will be able to keep protections through their latest renewal period, and Congress might step in. Democratic lawmakers, along with some Republicans, have pushed for a path to citizenship for Dreamers for years, without success. Trump has voiced support for helping the Dreamers, but has always tied it to measures like a border wall, restrictions on asylum and other causes that immigrant advocacy groups oppose. 

“There’s been a lot of anxiety around whether or not we are gonna have DACA,” Daisy said. 

Supporting Black Lives Matter

Black undocumented immigrants are often overlooked, Daisy noted, because people think of the issue as being primarily about rights for Latinos. 

“For me being a Black woman, it’s hard because the world sees my blackness first and then they see my immigration status second, so I am oppressed in those two ways: as a Black person and as a DACA recipient,” she said. “To get my voice heard, it is difficult.”

Many undocumented activists have taken up the Black Lives Matter cause. United We Dream, a nationwide network of advocacy groups for undocumented young people, put together a resource guide for people joining protests and posted another guide on how non-Black undocumented young people can be allies to Black people in talking to their own families. Other immigrant rights groups have similarly collected resources to help undocumented protesters support the cause safely.

“We must be unequivocal when we say that Black lives matter,” Cristina Jiménez, executive director and co-founder of United We Dream, said in a statement. “It must mean that we are actively working to combat the White Supremacy that makes Black people plead for their humanity.”

One concern for undocumented immigrants is the presence of law enforcement from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and the Customs and Border Protection agency at some protests. An ICE spokeswoman told Roll Call that the agency was supporting local police and that its policy against enforcement at sensitive locations, including protests, was in effect. Democrats in Congress wrote to the Department of Homeland Security on June 5 to demand more information about the presence of ICE and CBP at protests. They have not received a response, according to the office of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), one of the leaders on the letter.

Daisy herself has been working to support the movement. Along with attending protests, she’s been volunteering in her community to help struggling local business owners and to serve at pop-up locations where people can donate food and clothing for those in need. Being at the protests and seeing how many people are engaged has given her hope for positive change.

“With everything going on, on Chicago and 38th, it really gives me hope that people are out there who do care and who won’t turn a blind eye when there is an injustice,” Daisy said. 

Although she feels exhausted and overwhelmed these days, she said she plans to continue advocating for herself and others.

“I am tired, but I have to be resilient,” Daisy said.



Source by [author_name]

9NEWSLive updates: Wall Street plunges as virus fears return

0

Wall Street has plummeted as investors reacted to renewed fears of a pandemic resurgence and digested dour economic forecasts from the US Federal Reserve.

Shares are expected to drop early in trading on the Australian market when it opens this morning.

All three major US stock indexes lost well over 5.0 per cent, posting their worst one-day percentage drops since March 16, when markets were sent into freefall by the abrupt economic lockdowns put in place to contain the pandemic.

The Nasdaq snapped a three-day streak of record closing highs.

US deaths from COVID-19 could reach 200,000 in September, a grim result of the country’s economic re-opening before getting growth of new cases down to a controllable level, according to a leading health expert.

Source by [author_name]

Qatar’s World Cup organizers accused of not paying migrant workers

Jun 11, 2020

A group of migrant workers building the 2022 World Cup stadium in Qatar worked for as many as seven months without pay, Amnesty International said Wednesday. 

The rights group said roughly 100 employees of subcontractor Qatar Meta Coats are still waiting to be paid for their work on Al Bayt Stadium. The workers experiencing salary delays included nationals of Ghana, Kenya, Nepal and the Philippines, Amnesty International said. 

After Amnesty International took the allegation to the Qatari authorities, World Cup organizers and football’s governing body, FIFA, the organization reports that some employees have since received part of their withheld wages. 

“This case is the latest damning illustration of how easy it still is to exploit workers in Qatar, even when they are building one of the crown jewels of the World Cup. For years we have been urging Qatar to reform the system, but clearly change has not come fast enough,” Steve Cockburn, head of Economic and Social Justice at Amnesty International, said in a statement.  

This isn’t the first time the soccer tournament’s organizers have faced criticism for their treatment of migrant workers, who comprise a majority of Qatar’s population. Rights groups say over 1,000 stadium workers have died on the job due to poor labor conditions. Qatar has acknowledged just 34 deaths since construction began six years ago.

The Gulf state agreed to some labor reforms since winning the contract to host the World Cup in 2010, including removing visa requirements on most migrants that required they obtain permission from their employers before leaving the country. 

But groups like Human Rights Watch say migrant laborers remain vulnerable to abuse due to the “kafala” system, which ties workers to their Qatari sponsors. Workers are still required to give their employees 72 hours advance notice of their departure from the country.  



Source link

‘A Slap in the Face’: Black Veterans on Bases Named for Confederates

0

WASHINGTON — When Timothy Berry was recruiting black students for West Point, where he served as class president in 2013, he often reflected on his senior year, when he lived in the Robert E. Lee barracks. It bothered him then; it bothers him now.

“I was trying to tell black and brown students that they would have a home there,” said Mr. Berry, who served as an Army captain with the 101st Airborne Division from 2013 to 2018. “It sent a very strong mixed message.”

For many black service members, who make up about 17 percent of all active-duty military personnel, the Pentagon’s decision to consider renaming Army bases bearing the names of Confederate officers feels excruciatingly overdue. Generations of black service members signed up for the military to defend the values of their country, only to be assigned to bases named after people who represent its grimmest hour.

“It is really kind of a slap in the face to those African-American soldiers who are on bases named after generals who fought for their cause,” said Jerry Green, a retired noncommissioned officer who trained at Ft. Bragg, N.C., which is named for a Confederate general, Braxton Bragg. “That cause was slavery.”

There are 10 major Army installations named for generals who led Confederate troops — all in the former states of the Confederacy — as well as many streets and buildings on military academy campuses that are among at least 1,500 symbols of the Confederacy in public spaces in the United States.

The push to rename military installations and place names is not new, and it is one that black service members and veterans, as well as groups including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, have largely pursued.

The movement this week seemed to attract a growing consensus, including among former senior military officials of all races, before President Trump declared on Wednesday that he would block any of those 10 bases from being renamed.

The liberal group VoteVets received over 20,000 signatures in 24 hours for a petition urging the military to ban Confederate symbols and rename Army bases, a spokesman for the organization said. In a poll conducted this week and released by the group Thursday, 47 percent of 935 registered voters surveyed said they would support the removal of Confederate imagery across the entire military.

The Marine Corps last week issued a ban on displays of the Confederate battle flag at its installations, and the chief of naval operations, Adm. Michael M. Gilday, wrote on Twitter Tuesday that he had directed his staff to “begin crafting an order” banning displays of the Confederate flag from public spaces and work areas on bases, ships, aircraft and submarines. Army leaders have called for bipartisan commissions to explore changing the names of some Army installations.

“The unique thing about this moment is that white friends and colleagues now see this,” said Mr. Berry, who lives in New York. “After Charlottesville and Ferguson, these were conversations that black officers were having among themselves. It was not an open conversation among their white peers.”

The fights over statues and Confederate flags in public places have bubbled up often over the years, with their defenders repeatedly suggesting that banning or removing those items would be akin to erasing history.

In 2015, shortly after a white supremacist killed black parishioners in a church in Charleston, S.C., a congressional budget bill almost failed amid an ugly floor fight in which Democrats, led by black members from the South, beat back a push by Republicans to allow Confederate symbols at national cemeteries.

This week, Speaker Nancy Pelosi once again called for the removal from the Capitol of 11 statues of Confederate figures, including Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee, the latest salvo in a yearslong battle. On Thursday, two veterans in the House also introduced bipartisan legislation to create a process to rename military installations named for Confederates within a year. The Senate Armed Services Committee separately advanced a similar measure with a three-year timeline.

For black members of the military, seeing confederate names on military barracks delivers a special sting, given that they lionize men who led a treasonous war.

“I have been in every one of those barracks,” said Stephane Manuel, another West Point graduate who served in the Army from 2011 to 2017. “I studied in them and had friends there. I didn’t like it. The military hasn’t wanted to reconcile that the Confederate forces were traitors. I always felt from the mere moral standpoint of what they were fighting for went against what West Point stands for today.”

On his deployments, the topic would come up now and then, Mr. Manuel said, often leaving him uncomfortable as his white colleagues defended the practice.

“I felt it was best not to be political,” he said. “I was often one of the few black officers. I felt it was better to leave my perspective at home. People would ask my opinion and unless it was someone I was close to, I would not engage in those conversations.”

For some middle-age and older veterans, particularly noncommissioned offices like Mr. Green, who retired from the Army in 1998, the realization of their indignities came later.

“It wasn’t anything that stayed on my mind and I think that was because I was young,” he said. “I don’t ever remember ever having a conversation about it when I was on active duty. With my veteran friends, it later came more to light that African-American veterans were upset about it and it kind of enlightened me, too.”

Daniele Anderson, a former Navy officer who graduated from the service’s academy in Annapolis, Md., in 2013 and went on to serve until 2018, recalled how a professor at the school — later removed for other behaviors — wrote an Op-Ed that denigrated students from the military prep schools, who were disproportionately minority. Leadership conferences rarely featured minority speakers. In her junior year, Ms. Anderson said, she was in charge of events for Black History Month, and found that the posters she put up around campus were frequently ripped down. “I was told by fellow classmates that was a regular occurrence during Black History Month,” she said.

“There was always an underlying anxiety and the feeling that you have to always be alert and choosing your words carefully and not wanting to seem like you were playing the race card,” she said. “That really messed with a lot of black and minority students’ confidence. I think this social anxiety we have to navigate all the time really did contribute to lower performance.”

Like others interviewed for this article, Ms. Anderson said the events of the last week made her cautiously optimistic that the military would view the fight over removing Confederate names and symbols as an opportunity to look deeper at its broader culture.

“In the military, we have treated ourselves as if we are separate from society,” she said. “We have to know and understand that the military is part of society, because we draw our people from society, and we look at and listen to the same things as our civilian counterparts do.”

As a black veteran, she said, “I am in a unique position of being able to say, ‘Hey I went to this institution, I made great sacrifices to do so, and we are calling on these institutions so they can be the best versions of themselves.’ ”



Source link

Mel Winkler, ‘Devil in a Blue Dress’ Actor, Dead at 78


Mel Winkler, ‘Devil in a Blue Dress’ Actor, Dead at 78 | Entertainment Tonight


































Source link