Signal Downloads Are Way Up Since the Protests Began

0

“I stood in front of a crowd of a few thousand people the other day and told them to wear as nondescript clothing as possible,” said Lilith Sinclair, 25, an Afro-Indigenous organizer who lives in Portland, Ore.

Conversations about privacy and data security have only recently come to the fore. Once, to many Americans, government surveillance felt like something that only happened in other countries. (In reality, the U.S. government has a long history of observing and tracking American citizens.) But after the Patriot Act permitted warrantless wiretapping in 2001 and Edward Snowden leaked information from the National Security Agency in 2013, awareness of mass surveillance has grown.

In recent years, downloads of Signal have spiked during times of national anxiety and unrest. The first few months after the 2016 election were a busy time for Signal, according to data from the tracking firm Apptopia. Downloads were high on Election Day (Nov. 8, 2016), Inauguration Day (Jan. 21, 2017) and the day of the Women’s March (Jan. 22, 2017).

Downloads also rose on Dec. 10, 2016, when information about the Russian hacking of American political parties came to light, and in late March of 2018, as news of the Cambridge Analytica breach of Facebook data dominated the news cycle. (Moxie Marlinspike, who founded Open Whisper Systems, the nonprofit that developed Signal, declined a request for comment.)

Now, wider adoption of encrypted apps seems possible. Ruba Abu-Salma, who recently completed her doctorate in computer science at University College London, studied Telegram, an encrypted messaging app used widely in the Hong Kong protests. She found that the apps people use to communicate are largely determined by their social group.

“If your peers and your colleagues and your family members are using a messaging application, you will end up using that messaging app, even if you perceive it as insecure,” Dr. Abu-Salma said. “The primary goal to use a communication app is to communicate with people.”

Source link

Kareena Kapoor was warned against marrying Saif Ali Khan: ‘He is divorced and has two kids’

0

Many had warned Kareena Kapoor against marrying Saif Ali Khan as he had two kids

Bollywood’s power couple Kareena Kapoor and Saif Ali Khan are one of the most sought-after in the industry at present.

However, there was a time before when many warned the Veere Di Wedding star against marrying Saif because he had been divorced.

In an appearance on Koffee with Karan last year, Kareena had spoken about the negative comments she had received but chose to ignore.

“I’m just glad that people are doing things now and talking more about their love. When I wanted to marry Saif, everyone was like, ‘He has two children, he has been divorced. Are you sure you want to do this?’ They were like, ‘Your career will be over.’ And I was like, ‘Such a big crime to be in love? Such a big crime to get married? Let’s do it, let’s see what happens,’” she said.

Saif Ali Khan had previously been married to Amrita Singh and shares two children with her, Sara and Ibrahim Ali Khan. 

Source link

Humewood police accused of using COVID-19 as an excuse to get off duty

0

By Mkhuseli Sizani for GroundUp

About 16 officers at Humewood police station in Port Elizabeth have been refusing to report for duty since Wednesday. They are demanding to be tested for COVID-19, quarantined, and the entire station shut down for deep cleaning. This is after one of their colleagues tested positive for COVID-19.

However, both the national police department and the Police and Prisons Civil Rights Union (POPCRU) have dismissed the officer’s demands, saying it is unnecessary since the officers did not come into direct contact with the staff member who tested positive.

Management has closed the Community Service Centre (the charge office) where the member had worked.

The 16 officers were expected to resume their duties at the Ski Boat Club opposite the Boardwalk Casino, but by 6:00 on Wednesday, they were standing outside the building in the parking area.

Speaking to GroundUp on condition of anonymity, a police officer said, “Management said the closure was only for decontaminating the office where the member works. This decision shocked us because other police stations were closed and members were tested and some went in isolation. We were then deployed at those stations for two weeks until all those members were cleared.”

POLICE STATIONS SHUT DOWN DUE TO COVID-19

Last month, New Brighton Police Station and Motherwell Police Station were both shut down after members tested positive.

The police officer said the member who is positive was in direct contact with detectives and the human resources departments.

“These departments are still operating as if the member did not visit them. This shows negligence because we are expected back to work at the station on Friday.”

POPCRU provincial secretary Zamikhaya Skade said it was not necessary for the entire station to be shut down. “In this case, I was told [on Tuesday] that the member-only worked in that [charge office]. The situation at New Brighton Police Station was different because that member was in contact with many staff and that resulted in the shutdown,” he said.

“Members like to use the quarantine for leave purposes. Some of them don’t want to wear the mask; they claim it suffocates them. But the masks are for their own safety. This virus is dangerous,” he said.

On Thursday, national police spokesperson Vishnu Naidoo said they had met with officers and addressed some of their concerns.

“All staff who have been in direct contact with the member were advised to go for testing and self-quarantine. Those members who feel that they must also be tested were also advised to go for testing,” he said.

Naidoo said it was important to stress that it is not necessary to close the entire station nor is it necessary to send all the members for testing.



Source link

It’s Time To Defund The Police And Start Funding Social Workers

0

Cries of “defund the police” and “invest in Black communities” have been heard throughout the nation, and most members of the Minneapolis City Council announced plans to defund that city’s police department over the weekend.

Many cities are following suit. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti cut $150 million — a relatively small amount — from the L.A. Police Department’s whopping $1.86 billion budget. The New York City Council is calling for a $1 billion cut to that city’s astronomical $6 billion police department budget. 

But many advocates of the Black Lives Matter movement argue that this is not enough and that the goal is to abolish the police completely.

This raises the question of who would take their place. Activists have called for expanding initiatives to have mental health professionals and social workers respond to emergency calls instead of the police. For those who are completely oblivious to the public mental health system, this might sound like a radical concept. 

But it’s actually not, given that social workers such as me are already doing this kind of work out in the field. We are on the front lines dealing with the homeless population, people suffering from substance abuse, clients who are predisposed to violence because of trauma histories, adolescents and young adults trapped in the criminal justice system, domestic violence victims and perpetrators, veterans with PTSD and more. These vulnerable people are arguably perceived as the most dangerous individuals in America – and social workers do this all without guns.

I only recently began my career as a social worker, but in the past two years, I’ve already worked with some of Los Angeles County’s most marginalized and disadvantaged folks of all ages, ethnicities and races.

In the first year of my field internship for my master’s degree program, I worked in the field and conducted home visits for homebound clients such as seniors and those who are physically or mentally disabled. I visited them in their homes in predominantly Black neighborhoods and investigated abuse allegations from Adult Protective Services by assessing them for signs of abuse and determining the safety of their environment.

I helped them access resources such as food stamps, utilities assistance, rent assistance, employment, housing, mental health help – basically anything they needed to make their difficult lives just a little more comfortable.

I met my homeless clients on the streets or in coffee shops to help link them with housing and resources. 

In California, social workers need 1,000 clinical field internship hours in order to graduate from a two-year master’s program. Then they need to complete 3,000 supervised clinical hours over the course of 104 weeks in order to test for their license.

By contrast, a prospective police officer in California needs just 664 hours of academy training (or roughly 16 40-hour weeks) and 14 weeks of field training.

Barbers, cosmetologists, interior designers, refrigeration technicians, electrical sign specialists and manicurists all require more hours of training than the police, according to CNN.

In my role as a social worker, I’ve done things such as pick up and deliver furniture, clothes and medical supplies to homebound clients; drive clients to necessary appointments; mediate conflict among family members; diagnose and treat clients for mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, gender dysphoria or disruptive behavior; provide individual and family psychotherapy in English and Korean; develop individualized education plans with school administration; and collaborate with an interdisciplinary team of medical professionals, mental health practitioners, law enforcement, lawyers, court officials, schools and community resources. 

Social workers are already using “smart policing” techniques and providing preventive evidence-based interventions in marginalized communities – and all this with a fraction of the budget of the New York Police Department. We conduct regular home visits for homebound or high-needs clients to ensure they have the resources and services they need to survive and become contributing members of society. 

The goal is to address the underlying cause of crime and violence before it becomes a bigger issue. This kind of evidence-based policing combines the science of controlling crime and disorder with the principles of community policing and problem-solving. Based on a social worker’s job description, we’re basically community police officers without guns.

But what if you find yourself in a dangerous situation and fear for your safety? Wouldn’t you want to call the cops? If the person that I’m fearing has a weapon, sure, I would want to call the cops. But if he’s unarmed (as were George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Michael Brown, Eric Garner ― the list goes on), you’d be surprised at how many crises can be de-escalated without the use of guns or violence. 

When it comes to crisis intervention, social workers generally follow the seven-stage crisis intervention model: Plan and conduct a thorough bio-psycho-social and lethality/imminent danger assessment; make psychological contact and rapidly establish a collaborative relationship; identify the major problems, including crisis precipitants; encourage an exploration of feelings and emotions; generate and explore alternatives and new coping strategies; restore functioning through the implementation of an action plan; and plan follow-up and booster sessions. It is crucial to note that some individuals in crisis are often making one last heroic effort to seek help and may, therefore, be highly motivated to try something different.

I had to de-escalate a crisis situation in my first few months as an intern at a community mental health agency. My client was erratic, emotionally unstable and expressed suicidal and homicidal ideation. I was scared, but I didn’t have to call the police. Instead, my supervisor came for back-up, and we calmly helped my client come to the realization that it would be in the client’s and family’s best interests if my client were to go to the hospital that night. My client ended up getting the medication that they needed at the hospital and has been doing great ever since.

In addition, I have colleagues who have experienced physical altercations out in the field, such as being placed in a brief chokehold by a homeless person on substances. I know applied behavior analyst therapists who have grown accustomed to getting objects thrown at them and getting bit by their young autistic clients. CBS ranks social work as No. 20 on its list of the top 20 deadliest jobs in America. 

Despite the daily dangers of the job and the heavy investment in our education and training, social workers do all of this work for significantly less pay than police. That’s because everyone knows you don’t go into social work to make money.

Many of us come from communities of low-income Black, indigenous or people of color and grew up experiencing hardships ourselves. One thing I’ve consistently noticed about my peers and colleagues is that, at the end of the day, our motivation for entering this field boils down to one common desire: We want to help people. 

Social workers are the ones out in the field providing services for the increasing homeless population in Los Angeles County. Social workers connect homeless individuals to resources and help them secure housing, mental health services, employment, substance abuse counseling and much more. Police essentially shuttle the homeless from the streets into hospitals and jails and back onto the streets again.

So far there have been zero deaths at the hands of social workers. According to the numbers, social workers cause fewer deaths than cops, are less likely to exacerbate crisis situations with violence and do all of this work for way less pay than police. 

I’m an immigrant, and a few years ago I officially got naturalized. I raised my right hand and swore an oath that “I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” I’ve been living and breathing this oath in my daily work as a social worker, advocating for America’s most vulnerable and neglected souls. 

But the Constitution and laws of this country were written by old white men, and that’s just not what this country is made up of anymore. In a nation as big and diverse as the United States, we need fewer angry men with guns and more BIPOC out in the community as community police, social workers, teachers, health care professionals and leaders.

We need to change the way we think about mental health so that instead of just seeing a “crazy person” out on the street, we see a fellow American reaching out for help.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch! 



Source by [author_name]

Hong Kong to Prosecute Media Mogul Jimmy Lai, Organizers Over Tiananmen Vigil

0

Authorities in Hong Kong will prosecute four prominent pro-democracy figures including media mogul Jimmy Lai for their involvement in a public commemoration of the Tiananmen massacre anniversary on June 4.

Lai, along with trade unionist Lee Cheuk-yan, rights lawyer Albert Ho, and veteran democracy activist Richard Tsoi will be charged with “incitement to join an illegal assembly” after thousands defied a police ban to gather in Victoria Park for the traditional candlelight vigil marking the 1989 bloodshed in Beijing.

The vigil was organized by the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China, which is run by Lee, Tsoi, and Ho.

Lee said he was informed of the decision to prosecute in a phone call from police on Thursday evening.

“We expected all of this,” he said in a recorded audio statement for journalists. “When you look at the overall situation in Hong Kong, the police are abusing the power to arrest and the department of justice is abusing the power to prosecute.”

Lee said the government is trying threaten the people of Hong Kong, who have thrown their support behind city-wide pro-democracy protests in the past year.

But he dismissed the charges, saying “we are exercising our right to assembly.”

The case will be heard on June 23, the Alliance said on its Facebook page.

The four already face similar charges alongside 11 other activists linked to a mass protest on Aug. 31, 2019.

“The Hong Kong Alliance believe that we have the right to mourn June 4 and have a rally to condemn the massacre,” Lee said of the peaceful vigil.

Subversion and sedition law

The decision to prosecute the four activists came as the U.K. foreign secretary said he was “deeply concerned” at China’s plan to impose a draconian subversion and sedition law on Hong Kong, bypassing the city’s Legislative Council (LegCo).

“The proposed national security law undermines the … framework under which Hong Kong is guaranteed a high degree of autonomy with executive, legislative and judicial powers,” foreign secretary Dominic Raab said in a six-monthly report on the situation in Hong Kong.

“For the Chinese government, rather than Hong Kong’s own institutions, to directly impose national security legislation would lie in direct conflict with Article 23 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law, and with China’s obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration,” he said, in a reference to Hong Kong’s mini-constitution and the 1984 treaty governing the 1997 handover of the city to Chinese rule.

“The law … raises the prospect of prosecution in Hong Kong for political crimes, which would undermine existing commitments to protect the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong,” Raab said in a foreword to the report.

The report said the widespread protest and social unrest of the past six months were political in nature, and should be resolved by political dialogue.

While it said violence and vandalism from protesters was unacceptable, it supported public demands for an independent public enquiry into police violence, saying a recent report was “heavily criticized” because the police complaints body lacked the power to compel witnesses.

“Use of force by the police has been a major political issue, including the treatment of arrested persons,” the report said, adding that the U.K. had stopped issuing licenses for exports of crowd control equipment to Hong Kong.

Raab said his government would move ahead with plans to allow a pathway for British National Overseas (BNO) passport-holders from Hong Kong to settle in the U.K. if the national security law was implemented, and called on Beijing to “step back from the brink.”

He said London “remains deeply concerned” at the arrest of the 15 pro-democracy figures on April 18.

“The U.K. will not look the other way when it comes to the people of Hong Kong, we will stand by them, and we will live up to our responsibilities,” Raab wrote.

Officer summoned

Meanwhile, a judge in Hong Kong on Thursday summoned a traffic officer to appear in court over the shooting of a protester during a Nov. 11 demonstration, marking the first time a police officer has faced charges related to year-long protests in the city.

Pro-democracy leader Ted Hui filed five charges through a rare private prosecution against the officer in January—three of which were approved by the court, including shooting with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. If convicted, the officer faces a maximum penalty of life in prison for that charge alone.

Two other approved charges—dangerous or reckless use of firearms—each carry a maximum punishment of seven years in jail.

The officer, who was granted anonymity by a court in another case and has not been named to comply with the earlier order, had been recorded in a video which showed him drawing his weapon and firing into a crowd that surrounded him during a demonstration, hitting one protester in the abdomen. He later said he believed protesters were trying to take his gun.

According to Hong Kong law, the Department of Justice can now intervene in the case and decide whether to prosecute or terminate it.

To date, no cases have been pursued against officers relating to accusations of abuse during the police response to protests over the past year. A government report recently dismissed claims that police had used excessive force to quell demonstrations, prompting public anger.

Teacher training

Also on Thursday, the Hong Kong education bureau said teachers in the city would now be required to attend an additional 60 hours of professional training over the next three years to improve their “professional values and conduct,” prompting concerns that the authorities will soon start reshaping teaching according to the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s “patriotic education” goals for the city.

The training, which will also include a module on “local, national and international education issues” will be rolled out for newly qualified teachers, in-service teachers, and will form part of requirements for promotion, the bureau said in a June 10 circular.

Reported by Man Hoi-tsan for RFA’s Cantonese Service. Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie.



Source link

A North Carolina professor who sparked outrage with his tweets still has his job. Why? It’s called the First Amendment.

CLOSE

Learn how the First Amendment protects your right to assemble and protest and how the government can hinder that right.

USA TODAY

A professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington has recently sparked outrage with his words on Twitter, the latest educator to draw a rebuke from his own school.

Mike Adams, a professor of criminology at UNCW, said people who wear masks in public look like “fools,” has called North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper a “fascist” (among other criticisms) for Cooper’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, labeled women’s studies a “nonessential major” and pushed for the separation of states from the county. 

That was just in May. 

Of the shutdowns caused by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, Adams tweeted, “This evening I ate pizza and drank beer with six guys at a six seat table top. I almost felt like a free man who was not living in the slave state of North Carolina.”

Adams, who is white, ended the tweet with: “Massa Cooper, let my people go!” 

His tweets sparked severalChange.orgpetitions with thousands of signatures calling for Adams’ removal from the university, and UNCW issued a statement calling Adams’ tweets “vile.”

Still, Adams has his job, UNCW confirmed to USA TODAY. Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The university invoked the First Amendment in its statement, but added, “These comments may be protected, but that is not an excuse for how vile they are. We stand firmly against these and all other expressions of hatred. We cannot and will not ignore them. The university is reviewing all options in terms of addressing the matter.”

Personal opinions, not in the classroom

As it turns out, there aren’t many options for the university, according to First Amendment experts.

Adams isn’t the first professor to generate backlash with tweets, either.

Last year, Indiana University didn’t fire a professor whose tweets were called “vile and stupid” by the university’s provost. Eric Rasmusen is still an IU professor, and he’s still tweeting.

There are a few ways a professor can express his or her own opinions with protection from the First Amendment, Clay Calvert of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project at the University of Florida told USA TODAY. 

“Even though his specific comments are racist and offensive, the larger subject matter is a matter of public concern,” Calvert said, referring to Adams. “Therefore, he is going to have some First Amendment protection, but it’s not unlimited.” 

Because Adams used his personal Twitter account, he has more First Amendment rights, Calvert said.

“The first thing you’d have to ask is, is the public employee speaking in his official job capacity or role? If so, then the First Amendment speech rights are very limited,” Calvert said, adding, “If he had made a comment like that in the classroom, then the only way it would be protected would be if it was ‘germane’ to the subject matter.”

Calvert said the university could fire Adams – a stronger statement than just condemning the tweets, he said.

“But the repercussions would be a lawsuit that (the university) would have to defend,” Calvert said.

The Wilmington Star-News reported Adams has already sued UNCW once. In 2007, Adams filed a lawsuit saying he was denied a promotion when he spoke about his views, violating his First Amendment rights, the newspaper reported. After a court ruled in favor of Adams, UNCW appealed, then eventually settled the case. 

Comments that reflect ‘actual bias’

David Hudson Jr., a fellow for the First Amendment at the Freedom Forum Institute, said a professor’s right to free speech is strong. Citizens, however, have the right to retain their own beliefs, he said. 

“Now, if those comments do reflect actual bias perpetrated against students, or the professor is violating generally applicable principles and discriminating against students specifically, that’s another issue,” Hudson said.

He added, “But, the First Amendment imposes pretty strict limitations on universities attempting to punish professors for controversial speech. After all, that’s the point of the First Amendment — it’s designed to protect offensive, obnoxious or even repugnant speech. The Supreme Court has termed that a bedrock principle of the First Amendment.”

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/06/10/first-amendment-north-carolina-wilmington-professor-tweets/3173332001/



Source link

Walmart Says It Will No Longer Lock Up African-American Beauty Products

0

Walmart will end its practice of locking up African-American beauty care products in glass cases, the retail giant said on Wednesday after a fresh round of criticism that the policy was a form of racial discrimination.

Hair care and beauty products sold predominantly to black people could be accessed at certain stores only by getting a Walmart employee to unlock the cases, some of which featured additional anti-theft measures.

At some stores, the cases were across the aisle from shelves of generic beauty products that were not locked up and included shampoo and conditioner.

Critics of the practice, which had been the subject of a federal discrimination lawsuit that was dropped last year, said that it implied that black people were more likely to shoplift. Walmart had previously said that certain products were locked up because they were more likely to be stolen.

The change came as a host of major corporations re-evaluated their business practices and social responsibility after the death of George Floyd and widespread protests over police brutality and discrimination. It also followed a recent report by the television station CBS 4 in Denver that drew attention to the different treatment of Walmart customers.

“As a retailer serving millions of customers every day from diverse backgrounds, Walmart does not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” Lorenzo Lopez, a Walmart spokesman, wrote in an email on Wednesday night.

Mr. Lopez said that Walmart, like other retailers, locked up certain items at a limited number of locations to “deter shoplifters from some products such as electronics, automotive, cosmetics and other personal care products.”

“We’re sensitive to the issue and understand the concerns raised by our customers and members of the community and have made the decision to discontinue placing multicultural hair care and beauty products — a practice in place in about a dozen of our 4,700 stores nationwide — in locked cases,” Mr. Lopez wrote.

In 2018, a California woman sued Walmart in federal court for discrimination over the policy, saying she felt humiliated having to ask a store employee to unlock the beauty products case on three visits to the store, including to buy a comb that cost $0.48.

The woman, Essie Grundy, said she went to a Walmart in Perris, Calif., in Riverside County to buy body lotion by the beauty brand Cantu when she noticed that all of the products “targeted at African-Americans” were locked in a glass case, “from the middle of the aisle to the end.”

Ms. Grundy, who was represented by the lawyer Gloria Allred, dropped the lawsuit in November, court documents show.

Reached on Wednesday night, Ms. Allred would not say if there was a settlement in the case, which was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice — meaning it cannot be brought back before the court. She said that “the matter was resolved.”

Walmart did not comment on the resolution of the lawsuit.

Ms. Grundy declined to comment on the policy change.

CVS and Walgreens have also faced criticism for locking up beauty products sold to black people. The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday night.



Source link

Borrell has ‘serious concern’ over US sanctions against International Criminal Court

0

Josep Borrell, the EU’s foreign policy chief | Stephanie Lecocq/EPA

Top diplomat says the EU supports the Hague-based institution.

Donald Trump’s decision to authorize sanctions against the International Criminal Court is “a matter of serious concern,” the EU’s top diplomat said.

The U.S. president on Thursday issued an executive order authorizing sanctions against ICC employees involved in an investigation into whether American forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan.

This “is a matter of serious concern, as you can understand, because we as the European Union are steadfast supporters of the International Criminal Court,” Josep Borrell, the EU’s foreign policy chief, said in an online press conference after a virtual meeting with foreign affairs ministers from the Eastern Partnership countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine).

The U.S. decision comes after Trump has withdrawn from a string of international agreements that are important for the EU including the Paris climate accord and the Iran nuclear deal. He’s also ended cooperation with the World Health Organization and pulled out of the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Borrell said that “he learned this very bad news” when the video meeting was coming to an end, adding that, because of this, “my answer has to be cautious because I don’t know exactly the extent of this decision.”

Yet he didn’t hold back. “I think that for sure I can reiterate our support to this institution,” the former Spanish minister said, stressing that the Hague-based tribunal has been playing a key role in addressing “the greatest international crimes.” The ICC, he added, “is a key factor in bringing justice and peace, it must be respected and supported by all nations and we’ll analyze the decision in order to assess its full implications.”

The Foreign Affairs Council, which gathers all EU foreign affairs ministers, will meet on Monday and “will have their say about it, but from my point of view immediately … I just want to reaffirm our support to the court,” Borrell said.



Source by [author_name]

Unilever Decides One Headquarters Is Better Than Two

0

Unilever said on Thursday that it would wind down its dual-headquarters corporate structure, ending nine decades of the consumer products giant keeping bases in Britain and the Netherlands.

The parent company of Dove soap, Lipton tea and Dollar Shave Club said that it would essentially fold its Dutch arm into its British one, a move that it said would simplify its business operations. Having just one corporate entity would make it easier to sell shares to raise money, buy companies using stock or spin off divisions, as it may do with its tea unit.

Not much else would change, the company added. Its stock would still trade in the Amsterdam, London and New York stock exchanges. And it added that no jobs would be lost because of the move.

Thursday’s announcement concludes 18 months of deliberations over what to do — and marks a reversal of Unilever’s last decision to simplify its structure. In 2018, the company planned to consolidate under its Dutch arm, but backed off amid opposition from British shareholders concerned that Unilever’s stock would have fallen out of London’s FTSE 100 stock index.

Unilever has had two bases, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and London, since it was formed in 1930 by the merger of Unie, a Dutch margarine maker, and Lever Brothers, a British soap company.

The corporate consolidation will require approval by shareholders of Unilever’s Dutch and British parts.

Source link

Donald Trump Makes Case For Joe Biden In Crazed All-Caps Tweet

0

On Thursday morning, the president went on a Twitter rampage griping about whatever came to mind.

“THOSE THAT DENY THEIR HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT!”

Trump may have been referring to Confederate artifacts, but many Twitter users noted that his admonition could also be taken as a warning against reelecting him.

And they pounced with glee on the president’s self-own.



Source by [author_name]