Lockdowns may have averted 531 million coronavirus infections | Science News

0

Lockdowns implemented in
some countries to reduce transmission of the coronavirus were extremely effective
at controlling its rapid spread and saved millions of lives, two new studies
suggest.

Shutdowns prevented or
delayed an estimated 531 million coronavirus infections across six countries — China, South Korea, Iran, Italy, France and the
United States — researchers from the
University of California, Berkeley report June 8 in Nature.

And shutdowns saved about
3.1 million lives across 11 European countries, scientists at Imperial College
London estimate in a separate study. In Europe, interventions to reduce the
coronavirus’ spread brought infection rates down from pre-intervention levels by an average of 81
percent, the team reports also in Nature
June 8. In all countries, R naught — an estimate for how many people an infected
person might transmit the virus to — was less than one, meaning that each
infected person passed the virus on to less than one person on average. With that
level of viral transmission, the pandemic would eventually die out in lockdown
scenarios.

As the number of
COVID-19 cases in some regions first began to spike in January, February and
March, governments in places like China, the United States and Italy enforced measures such as social distancing, closing schools and
restaurants as well as restricting nonessential travel (SN: 4/1/20). The shutdowns disrupted economies around the globe and
resulted in massive job losses, but, until now, it was unclear how effective
the measures were at curbing the virus’ spread.

The new findings suggest
that “these control measures have worked,” says Alun Lloyd, a mathematical
epidemiologist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, who was not
involved in either study. Lockdowns “have saved or delayed many infections and
deaths.”

But as countries reopen,
residents may face a new surge of infections.

“We’re very far from
herd immunity,” Seth Flaxman, an epidemiologist at Imperial College London, said
in a news briefing on June 8. Herd immunity refers to the number of people who
would need to be immune to the coronavirus — either with a vaccine or by
contracting and recovering from the virus — to protect the population as a
whole. So far, around 5 percent of the population in hard-hit places like Italy
and Spain have been infected, the team estimates. But researchers estimate that around 70 percent of people would need to be immune to achieve herd immunity
(SN: 3/24/20). 

“The risk of a second
wave happening if all interventions and all precautions are abandoned is very
real,” Flaxman says.

In the Berkeley study, researchers
determined how effective various interventions were in different countries by
analyzing data in a manner typically used in economics to assess economic
growth. That “econometric” method allowed the team to estimate the effect of more
than 1,700 local, regional and national policies to restrict travel, close
businesses or keep residents at home on the pandemic’s growth rate. The team analyzed
how fast outbreaks in China, South Korea, Iran, Italy, France and the United
States were growing on a daily basis before and after governments implemented such
policies. The researchers did not estimate the number of lives saved. 

“Without these policies
deployed, we would have lived through a very different April and May,” Solomon
Hsiang, a data scientist at UC Berkeley, said in the June 8 news briefing. 

Overall, the researchers
found that lockdowns prevented — or delayed, as the pandemic is not over yet —
an estimated 62 million confirmed COVID-19
cases in those six countries. But not everyone who gets infected with the
coronavirus gets tested or even shows symptoms, making the true total of
averted infections closer to 530 million people, the team estimates.

In the United States, without
the lockdown there may have been 4.8 million more confirmed cases and 60
million total infections. One caveat, however, is that the estimates rely on
available diagnostic data — and diagnostic testing in the United
States has faced shortages and delays (SN:
4/17/20
).  

Keeping residents home,
closing businesses and social distancing were highly effective at curbing the
pandemic’s growth overall, the researchers conclude.

Surprisingly, closing
schools didn’t appear to curb the outbreak’s growth rate in places like the
United States. But it’s still unclear how much of a role kids have in spreading the disease (SN:
6/3/20
).

What’s more, “in some
contexts, schools were actually closed already during the period when we
started analyzing the data,” Hsiang said. That makes it hard to know if the
results might have been different if schools were open.

In the Imperial College
London study, Flaxman and his colleagues used the number of reported COVID-19
deaths from the beginning of the pandemic up to May 4, when Italy and Spain
relaxed their lockdowns, to estimate how many people had been infected. By May
4, as many as 15 million people in 11 European countries — including
Denmark, Germany, Italy, France and Spain — may have been infected with the
coronavirus without lockdowns, the study suggests. The team then compared the
number of deaths that the analysis predicted without lockdowns with those deaths
actually reported and calculated that around 3.1 million people would have
otherwise died.

Those estimates may be higher than reality, says Julie Swann, a
systems engineer also at North Carolina State University. The study used an
infection fatality rate — a measure of deaths per number of infections, which
includes people who never developed symptoms — that is on the upper end of
current estimates for the coronavirus. A higher infection fatality rate could
result in an overestimation of the actual numbers.

The results are also based on the assumption that things like school
closures or social distancing had the same effect in all countries, which may
not reflect reality. And the estimates rely on the premise that people would
behave the same way throughout the study period. But “people’s behavior changes
in response to what they see is going on around them,” Lloyd says. “If things
don’t seem bad, people might be less likely to comply [with control measures].
But when things are much worse, people are more likely to comply.”

And in the Imperial College London study, it’s still unclear how much individual policies helped in reducing cases. Typically, smaller measures, like social distancing, get implemented first, and the big drop happens when a lockdown is introduced, Lloyd says. But “because [the policies] all happened at a similar time, it’s hard to disentangle,” he says.

Source link

In Mexico, Brazil and other poor countries, relaxing virus lockdowns is even more risky

SAO PAULO — As many countries gingerly start lifting their lockdown measures, experts worry that a further surge of the coronavirus in under-developed regions with shaky health systems could undermine efforts to halt the pandemic, and they say more realistic options are needed.

Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, India and Pakistan are among countries easing tight restrictions, not only before their outbreaks have peaked but also before any detailed surveillance and testing system is in place to keep the virus under control. That could ultimately have devastating consequences, health experts warn.

“Politicians may be desperate to get their economies going again, but that could be at the expense of having huge numbers of people die,” said Dr. Bharat Pankhania, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Exeter in Britain.

He said re-imposing recently lifted lockdown measures was equally dangerous.

“Doing that is extremely worrying because then you will build up a highly resentful and angry population, and it’s unknown how they will react,” Pankhania said. And as nearly every developed country struggles with its own outbreak, there may be fewer resources to help those with long overstretched capacities.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, said Monday the pandemic was “worsening” globally, noting that countries on Sunday reported the biggest-ever one-day total: more than 136,000 cases. Among those, nearly 75 percent of the cases were from 10 countries in the Americas and South Asia.

Wealthy countries in Europe and North America hit first by the pandemic are training armies of contact tracers to hunt down cases, designing tracking apps and planning virus-free air travel corridors.

But in many poor regions where crowded slums and streets mean even basic measures like hand-washing and social distancing are difficult, the coronavirus is exploding now that restrictions are being removed. Last week, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, India and Pakistan all saw one-day records of new infections or deaths as they reopened public spaces and businesses.

Clare Wenham of the London School of Economics described the situation in Brazil as “terrifying,” noting the government’s decision to stop publishing a running total of COVID-19 cases and deaths.

“We’ve seen problems with countries reporting data all over the world, but to not even report data at all is clearly a political decision,” she said. That could complicate efforts to understand how the virus is spreading in the region and how it’s affecting the Brazilian population, Wenham said.

Johns Hopkins University numbers showed Brazil recorded more than 36,000 coronavirus deaths Monday, the third-highest in the world, just ahead of Italy. There were nearly 692,000 cases, putting it second behind the U.S.

Rio de Janeiro allowed surfers and swimmers back in the water and small numbers of beach-goers were defying a still-active ban on gathering on the sand.

Relaxing restrictions “is dangerous because we’re still at the peak, right? So it’s a little dangerous,” said Alessandra Barros, a 46-year-old cashier on the sidewalk next to Ipanema beach. “Today it’s calm, but this weekend will be crowded.”

Bolivia has authorized reopening most of the country, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro also recently unwound restrictions, Ecuador’s airports have resumed flights and shoppers have returned to some of Colombia’s malls.

In Mexico, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador urged the country to stay calm after officials last week reported escalating fatalities that rivaled those in Brazil or the U.S.

“Let there not be psychosis, let there not be fear,” López Obrador said, while accusing the media of fanning concerns of an escalating crisis.

Across Latin America, countries that cracked down early and hard, like El Salvador and Panama, have done relatively well, although some of that has come at the expense of human rights and civil liberties, Wenham said.

“Countries willing to take the short-term hit are the ones coming out better,” she said, adding that poor countries weren’t entirely without options, noting early, pre-emptive actions by Sierra Leone and Liberia.

“They learned from the Ebola outbreak and moved quickly when they decided their economy couldn’t cope with community transmission,” she said. So far, numbers have been relatively low in both West African countries.

Dr. Nathalie MacDermott, a clinical lecturer at King’s College London, warned that some countries might be lulled into a false sense of security, citing South Africa as an example.

“Their response looked quite promising initially, but it seems premature to release the lockdown without a better level of testing in place,” she said.

South Africa’s cases are “rising fast,” according to President Cyril Ramaphosa. More than half of its approximately 48,000 confirmed cases have been recorded in the last two weeks, prompting concerns that Africa’s most developed economy could see a steep rise in infections shortly after restrictions are relaxed.

MacDermott said the surge of COVID-19 in many developing countries suggests “we will potentially struggle more to get on top of it,” and that the virus might persist long after developed countries bring it under control.

“That could result in very stringent travel measures on those parts of the world where the virus is still circulating,” she said.

In Pakistan, the number of infections continued to rise as Prime Minister Imran Khan said the country’s poorest cannot survive a strict lockdown after easing restrictions last month.

After refusing to close mosques and opening up the country even as medical experts pleaded for stricter measures, Pakistan’s caseload soared Monday to 103,671, with 2,067 deaths. Still, authorities shut down thousands of shops and markets nationwide last week in raids of those violating social distancing regulations.

Some experts say lockdowns were always “panic measures” and not designed to be sustainable, particularly in developing countries.

“The strategy has its roots in China, in the desire to eliminate the disease, but that clearly went out the window a couple of months ago,” said Mark Woolhouse, a professor of infectious disease epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh.

“Many countries are now deciding that the cure could turn out to be worse than the disease,” he said. Woolhouse suggested that countries unable to lock down their populations could focus instead on targeted interventions to protect those most at risk, such as people over 60 or those with underlying medical conditions.

“Countries are simply not following World Health Organization advice to lock down and are saying they need another strategy,” Woolhouse said. He noted the relatively younger demographics of many developing countries might help them avoid the high death rates seen in Italy, Spain and Britain.

Even tiny Panama, once Latin America’s fastest-growing economy, is struggling to maintain some of the region’s tightest controls amid simultaneous economic slowdown and disease spread.

“It’s impossible to maintain a quarantine for all of 2020,”′ said Dr. Xavier Sáenz-Llorens, a government adviser on the disease response. “The country would sink.”

Follow NBC Latino on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



Source link

Bernie Sanders Endorses Jamaal Bowman, Five Other Progressive Candidates For Congress

Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed progressive House primary challenger Jamaal Bowman and five other congressional candidates on Tuesday, adding another high-profile boost to Bowman’s effort to unseat Rep. Eliot Engel, a powerful New York Democrat.

Sanders, a two-time presidential contender, has a famously devoted fan base and immense capacity to raise small-dollar donations. The independent from Vermont rarely endorses candidates taking on incumbent Democrats.

His support is the latest coup for Bowman, a Black middle school principal, who has hammered Engel for his absence in the district during the COVID-19 pandemic and leveraged the unrest over racist police practices to call for a change in leadership. New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D) and several other prominent New York elected officials endorsed Bowman last week.

New York’s congressional primary is on June 23. 

“Jamaal understands that low-income families are locked out of opportunity and a decent life due to a system that is rigged to benefit the wealthy,” Sanders wrote in a Medium post announcing the endorsement. “He is someone we can trust to be a powerful advocate for a progressive agenda in Congress.”

We are in an unprecedented moment in American history, and now more than ever we must stand together in the fight for justice.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

The five other candidates Sanders is backing include primary challengers and candidates in open races, Senate and House contenders, and longshots as well as legitimate competitors.

He is supporting Charles Booker, a Black Kentucky state lawmaker competing for the chance to take on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.); Samelys López, a housing rights organizer running for an open, safe Democratic seat in the Bronx; Mondaire Jones, an openly gay Black attorney running for an open, safe Democratic seat in the New York City suburbs; Mike Siegel, a civil rights attorney locked in a Democratic primary runoff race in Texas’ 10th Congressional District, a GOP-held seat; and Cori Bush, a registered nurse seeking to unseat Rep. Lacy Clay, a veteran Democratic congressman in St. Louis, Missouri. Both Bush, who supported Sanders’ presidential bid, and Clay, a 10-term incumbent, are Black.

Sanders is the best-known and most influential left-wing politician in the country. But contrary to his reputation as an independent gadfly, he rarely endorses candidates trying to unseat incumbent Democrats with whom he caucuses. For example, he did not back Ocasio-Cortez, who had volunteered for Sanders’ 2016 White House bid, in her successful 2018 primary run.

Sanders has also largely receded from the national stage since dropping out of the presidential race in early April. Sanders disappointed some progressive activists in May when he did not appear in Washington for a vote on a Senate amendment he supports that would have prohibited warrantless federal government spying on the internet.

But Sanders, who immediately sent a fundraising email for the six congressional candidates, indicated in the Medium post that the urgency of the national crisis over police violence and racism contributed to his decision to get involved in the races.

“In order to continue our struggle for economic justice, social justice, racial justice and environmental justice, we must come together to elect candidates who will fight for a progressive agenda,” he wrote. “We are in an unprecedented moment in American history, and now more than ever we must stand together in the fight for justice.”



Jamaal Bowman distributes food at a food bank in Yonkers, New York. His presence in the district helped win him the backing of an influential union.

In addition to Bowman, Booker, a progressive competing in Kentucky’s Senate Democratic primary, has been gaining traction since the onset of the protest movement sparked by the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota. That movement has been particularly energetic in Louisville, Kentucky, where police shot and killed Black EMT Breonna Taylor in her home in mid-March. During the recent protests, Louisville cops also shot and killed Black barbecue business owner David McAtee.

While he had previously struggled to raise campaign funds, Booker has been bringing in $100,000 a day since the start of June. He is plowing that money into a $400,000 TV ad buy pitching himself as the candidate for the moment and criticizing retired Marine fight pilot Amy McGrath. McGrath, who won the early endorsement of Senate Democrats’ official campaign arm, has attacked McConnell, the Republican Senate leader, for supposedly breaking with President Donald Trump.

But Sanders’ blessing is likely most significant in Bowman’s race to oust Engel, a 16-term incumbent who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Through a combination of Bowman’s dogged campaigning and a series of unforced errors by Engel, Bowman, 44, now stands the chance of becoming just the second progressive challenger this election cycle to unseat a more moderate Democratic incumbent.

Although New York’s 17th Congressional District, a swath of the Bronx and Westchester County that Engel has represented since 1989, is one of the House seats hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, Engel, 73, spent the height of the outbreak in his home in an upscale suburb of Washington. Bowman’s presence in the district, by contrast, helped him win the support of New York’s largest nurses union, an endorsement Engel incorrectly claimed to have received on Monday.

Engel, a domestic policy liberal with a hawkish foreign policy record, is a rare white lawmaker representing a district that now has more Black and Latino residents than white people.

Engel compounded the challenge of a white man representing a diverse district during a moment of national reckoning on race with a gaffe last Tuesday. He was caught on a hot mic asking for a speaking slot at a press conference responding to looting in the Bronx. To explain why he was so insistent on speaking, Engel said, “If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care.”

Engel’s remarks have already become the focus of an advertising campaign financed by the left-wing group Justice Democrats, which recruited Bowman and Ocasio-Cortez, and the Working Families Party.

Referring to Engel’s absence from the district, the narrator of one TV spot says, “Engel only came back to win reelection, to help himself ― to save his job, not our lives.”



Source link

Cynthia Ritchie served second defamation notice for allegations on TV against Rehman Malik

PPP Senator Rehman Malik (left) and Pakistan-based American blogger Cynthia Dawn Ritchie. — Geo.tv/Files/Facebook video

PPP Senator Rehman Malik has couriered  Cynthia Ritchie a second defamation notice worth Rs50 billion, a statement by Malik’s spokesperson said on Tuesday.

A Rs500 million defamation notice was sent a day prior in response to Ritchie’s allegations of rape against the former interior minister.

Today’s notice was sent in connection with the US blogger’s appearance on various news channels on Sunday and “levelling baseless allegations” against the senator on air.

“Cynthia Ritchie’s accusations are a pack of lies. I strongly reject them,” said Malik.

“[She] levelled undue and baseless allegations on television programmes,” he added.

“I will have her answer for her lies in court,” Malik vowed.

Ritchie’s claims on TV regarding Bhutto tweet

The feud seemed to have begun with Ritchie’s “slanderous” remarks against late PPP leader Benazir Bhutto, but what the blogger claims likely stem from “dirt” she has on the party.

Ritchie, in a Geo News interview with “Naya Pakistan” host Shahzad Iqbal said a PPP leader provided her information on Benazir Bhutto based on which she had posted the tweet.

She said that she would prove her allegations against senior PPP leaders in court and would present whatever evidence she had to authorities in Pakistan.

Ritchie said that she was “going nowhere” and was ready to face the consequences if her allegations were proven false.

First notice

In the first legal notice, Malik strongly rejected Ritchie’s allegations, saying that the entire episode was a fight for Benazir Bhutto’s prestige. He paid tribute to Bhutto by saying that the slain former prime minister was considered a leader of impeccable repute by the entire country.

The former interior minister, in the notice, said that he would expose the faces behind Ritchie’s allegations at the appropriate time. Malik claimed that he was constantly receiving threats of being sent to jail or killed.

The PPP leader said that he had never bowed to pressure before and would not do the same now. Malik said that he did not harbour any grievances against Ritchie and said that she was the citizen of a friendly country.

PPP-Ritchie online spat takes dark turn

The ongoing social media spat between Ritchie and various PPP leaders took a dark turn on Friday after Ritchie took to Facebook to level several serious allegations against the party’s senior leadership.

In a video broadcast live on Facebook, Ritchie alleged that then interior minister Malik had raped her while former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gillani and then health minister Makhdoom Shahabuddin had “manhandled” her at separate occasions.

She stated that the incidents occurred in 2011 when the PPP was in power.

Besides Malik, Gillani too, has flatly denied the accusations and said he will pursue legal action against Ritchie.

Source link

Pioneering research urges greater personal responsibility in fitness to drive

0

Groundbreaking new research urges greater awareness on personal responsibility in fitness to drive

Given that the decision about whether or not to drive is taken by individual drivers, findings from research suggest more needs to be done to raise public awareness about personal responsibility in ensuring driving fitness as one way to improve road safety.

The online study involved more than 500 adults, one-third of whom were healthcare professionals, who estimated the risk of crashing for a list of medical conditions that are featured in the Sláinte agus Tiomáint Medical Fitness to Drive Guidelines (Road Safety Authority [RSA]).

When asked who they thought was responsible for ensuring that people with medical conditions were fit to drive, the consensus was that it was “doctors/medical professionals”.

At the same time, personal responsibility was highlighted for alcohol and drug use, fatigue/chronic sleep loss and age-related factors.

Interestingly, where there were significant differences in opinion, for over 70s and drivers with heart conditions, the healthcare professionals perceived significantly less risk than the general public.

The research, on the public perception of crash risk for drivers with medical conditions, was carried out at the National Office for Traffic Medicine at the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland/RSA, assisted by medical students from Trinity College Dublin.

“This study provides new insights into perceptions and attitudes of Irish drivers in relation to medical conditions. Our previous research shows that doctors have good knowledge and awareness of medical fitness to drive guidelines,” said Dr Margaret Ryan, the lead author and Programme Manager of the National Office for Traffic Medicine.

“This groundbreaking study shows that there is a more mixed picture among the public generally, both on risk perception as well as on personal responsibility of all drivers to follow medical advice, maintain their health and adhere to medication and treatment.

“This points to the need for ongoing public education programmes on medical fitness to drive, such as those currently provided by the RSA and the National Office for Traffic Medicine,” she added.

The study showed a mixed picture on awareness of risk associated with medical conditions. Alcohol was perceived as the greatest risk factor.

Over 90 per cent indicated that this would either ‘greatly’ or ‘very much’ increase risk.

Similarly, more than 80 per cent perceived greater risk in relation to fatigue/chronic sleep loss.

Stroke, brain injury, epilepsy and use of non-prescription drugs were also identified as significant risk-increasing factors by most of the participants.

However, less than half of the participants believed that the use of prescription medication, physical disabilities or heart conditions had a major impact on crash risk.

Although the majority said that they would stop driving immediately, if advised by their doctor due to a temporary medical condition, far fewer indicated that they would stop immediately for a long-term condition.

Many who would not stop driving immediately indicated that they would get a second opinion before stopping driving, and this option was twice as popular if the condition were long-term.

valerie.ryan@imt.ie

Source link

Remember When? Ray Bourque ends career as a Stanley Cup champion – Sportsnet.ca

0

With nearly every sports organization on the planet on pause at the moment as the world deals with the COVID-19 pandemic, we feel it’s an opportune time to reminisce about some special moments in sports history.

On this day in 2001, Hall of Fame defenceman Ray Bourque capped his career by lifting the Stanley Cup after the Colorado Avalanche defeated the New Jersey Devils 3-1 in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final.

Bourque, 40, had to wait 22 seasons and 1,826 games to finally win hockey’s ultimate prize. No other player who’s won the Stanley Cup has had to wait longer.

The Montreal native broke into the NHL with the Boston Bruins as a 19-year-old in 1979-80 and hit his stride right away, winning the Calder Trophy after scoring 65 points.

Over his 20 years in Boston — 15 as captain — Bourque would win the Norris Trophy five times and appear in 18 all-star games. But the closest he would get to winning the Cup were two losses to the Edmonton Oilers in the 1988 and 1990 finals.

By the time the 1999-2000 season rolled around, Bourque was 39 and the Bruins were on pace to miss the playoffs. Sensing his window to win was almost closed, Bourque requested a trade and on March 6, 2000, the Bruins sent him and forward Dave Andreychuk to the Avalanche for forward Brian Rolston, defenceman Martin Grenier, centre Sami Pahlsson and a first-round pick.

The Avalanche would lose in seven games to the Dallas Stars in the 2000 Western Conference Final but Bourque opted to return for one more season — and one more chance to win the Cup.

In his final season Bourque scored 59 points, was selected to a 19th all-star game and finished runner-up to Nicklas Lidstrom for the Norris. The Avalanche added another future Hall of Fame defenceman, Rob Blake, in a mid-season trade and the club finished first in the NHL with a 52-16-10 record.

After dispatching the Canucks, Kings and Blues, the Avalanche found themselves facing the defending Cup champion Devils in the Final. The clubs split the first four games, with Bourque’s only goal of the series being the winner in Game 3. The Devils then won Game 5 in Denver and headed home with a chance to win a second-consecutive title.

“The guys were really down on themselves. You could hear a pin drop in the dressing room,” Bob Hartley, then the Avalanche head coach, said of the mood after the Game 5 loss. “Ray, with a tear in his eye, spoke briefly, basically to tell the guys he had one or two games left to play before retiring and all he wanted was to win the Cup. I really had nothing to add. The guys were pumped after that.”

The Avalanche won 4-0 in Game 6 to force the deciding game back home and by that point, anyone who wasn’t a Devils fan was rooting for Bourque to go out a champion. Bourque skated more than any other player in Game 7 — just under 30 minutes — and as the clock counted down in the third period he was overcome with emotion.

“Over the final few minutes, I had trouble breathing. I thought I was going to pass out,” he told NHL.com in 2016.

When the final horn sounded everyone knew who should get the Cup first. But no one knew exactly what captain Joe Sakic had planned.

“There’s one player who’s waited a long time to hoist this,” commissioner Gary Bettman said during the trophy presentation. “Joe Sakic, come get the Cup so he and the rest of your teammates can hoist it.”

Sakic skated over and grabbed the trophy, almost forgetting to pose for a picture with Bettman. Then, instead of lifting it first, the way captains have for decades, Sakic immediately gave the Cup to Bourque.

“Without a doubt the easiest pass I’ve ever made,” Sakic said.

“A lot of things going through your mind at that point,” Bourque said of the moment. “About family, there are a lot of ex-teammates that I played with that you wish you could share it with.”

“A name was missing from that thing,” Patrick Roy, who won his third Conn Smythe Trophy, said in his post-game press conference. “And today it is back to normal.”

Days after winning the Cup, Bourque brought it back to Boston for a rally with thousands of Bruins fans who hadn’t tasted victory since 1972.

“[Last year], we felt there was a move that had to be made and it was a tough one,” Bourque told the crowd, according to the Hartford Courant. “The support that you’re showing today certainly shows me that you guys understand what it’s all about. Over the years, you’ve known me not to be a guy to express my feelings as much as some people… but I am here today to say thank you to all of you.”

Bourque officially retired on June 26, 2001 and was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2004. He remains the only defenceman to score 400 goals (he finished with 410) and also is the all-time defencemen leader in assists (1,169) and points (1,579).

Still, despite all of his accomplishments, Bourque entered that Game 7 on June 9, 2001 with one achievement left to cross off his list. That long wait made finally winning even sweeter.

“When we won, it was a huge relief for me,” he said years later. “Not only that, but I finally knew how it really felt to be a champion.”



Source link

Field hospital to provide intermediate care

The field hospital at the University of Limerick campus has opened this week

A field hospital opened to patients this week in the University of Limerick (UL) Sports Arena is to provide intermediate care and is expected to remain in place until at least September, with an option to extend until November.

A collaboration between University of Limerick and UL Hospitals Group has led to the opening of the Intermediate Care Facility on the grounds of the UL campus in the Sports Arena, which lies idle due to the pandemic.

“This facility will mean that the people of our region can rest assured that contingency capacity is now in place to support UL Hospitals Group, either in the case of the general capacity issues or, indeed, in the case of a second surge of Covid-19,” said Prof Paul Burke, executive lead on the project, Chief Academic Officer at UL Hospitals Group and Vice Dean of Health Sciences at UL.

The facility is to provide care for non-Covid-19 patients who are fit for discharge from any of the acute hospitals in the UL Hospitals Group, but who would benefit from further rehabilitation, or may be waiting to go into long-term care.

It has been developed as a contingency facility, and a solution to the patient flow and crowding challenges experienced in the region’s hospitals during the pandemic.

“Area Crisis Management Teams have devised Intermediate Care Plans in the event of a resurgence of Covid-19,” said UL Hospitals Group CEO, Colette Cowan. “This is especially relevant in the Mid-West where baseline bed capacity is lower and there is limited private hospital capacity. We are working with community colleagues on further increasing intermediate care once we vacate the UL Arena.”

Four new-build projects within the UL Hospitals Group are underway and are to deliver up to 122 new beds for the region.

A 60-bed block at UHL is due for completion before year end.

Two single-room en suite blocks, one 24-bed, and one 14-bed blocks, are scheduled for completion at the UHL site by the late summer.

A separate 24-bed single-room en suite block is being built at Croom Orthopaedic Hospital, and that too is due to be completed by the end of the summer.

The UL Hospitals Group Intermediate Care Facility is headed by Clinical Lead, Prof Mike Watts, Clinical Lead of Unscheduled Care, UL Hospitals Group.

valerie.ryan@imt.ie

Source link

Natura &Co says ‘cyber incident’ partially hit Avon operations; shares fall

0

SAO PAULO (Reuters) – Brazilian cosmetics maker Natura &Co (NTCO3.SA) said on Tuesday its subsidiary Avon has suffered a cyber incident that has halted some of its systems, partially hitting operations.

“Avon is assessing the extent of this incident and working diligently to mitigate its effects, making every effort to normalize its operations,” Natura &Co said in a securities filing without elaborating.

The company did not indicate how Avon operations were affected and when the problem would be solved.

Brazilian brokerage Guide saw the announcement as negative, adding the cyber attack shows “weakness in the company’s digital security system.”

Shares in Natura &Co were trading 1.8% down on Tuesday at 40.46 reais after hitting an intraday low of 39.88 reais earlier.

In May 2019, Natura &Co became the world’s fourth-largest pure-play beauty group after acquiring rival Avon Products.

Almost a year later, the company raised total expected synergies for its takeover to between $300 million and $400 million on an annual recurring basis from $200 million-$300 million in January, when the transaction was concluded.

But costs related to the tie-up dragged down Natura &Co’s bottom line in the first-quarter, overshadowing timid revenue growth during the coronavirus pandemic.

Reporting by Gabriela Mello; Editing by David Gregorio

Source link

Anushka Sharma calls killing of jackal with meat bomb ‘appalling’

Image Source : INSTAGRAM/ANUSHKA SHARMA

Anushka Sharma calls killing of jackal with meat bomb ‘appalling’

Anushka Sharma has reacted to the news of killing a jackal in Tamil Nadu’s Trichy by feeding it a bomb covered with meat. The actress feels the incident is “appalling” and demands stricter laws for animal cruelty. “What sort of trend is this becoming? It is appalling. Cannot stress enough on stricter laws against animal cruelty,” wrote the actress on Instagram Story, reacting to the news.

The Tamil Nadu Forest Department has arrested 12 gypsies for killing the jackal in a Trichy village by packing explosives in meat, which blew up in its mouth when the animal took a bite.

Anushka was among many Bollywood celebrities who recently denounced the murder a pregnant elephant in Kerala, which was fed a pineapple stuffed with explosives. This brutal incident was followed by one in Bilaspur district, Himachal Pradesh, where a person tried to kill a pregnant cow by feeding it explosive mixed with food.

Fight against Coronavirus: Full coverage



Source link

Anxious About Family Mealtimes? Serve a Buffet

[In NYT Cooking: 19 kid-friendly dishes that can be ready in 30 minutes.]

Family-style meals can also help relieve tensions for parents who worry that their children are eating too much, or too much of certain foods. “Letting kids serve themselves gets you away from that underlying motive of, ‘I want to get my kid to eat less of this and more of that,’” said Katja Rowell, M.D., a family physician and childhood feeding specialist.

When kids prone to food fixations are allowed to take as much as they want, they can stop operating from what’s known as a “scarcity mind-set,” where they feel compelled to take as much food as possible anytime they get the chance. Instead, they can start to listen to their internal hunger and fullness cues.

Of course, manners are also a factor, but that would need to come after children with a scarcity mind-set get used to eating their fill. But you can set simple rules, like “everyone gets firsts before anyone takes seconds.” Older kids can learn to say, “Does anyone else want more of X before I finish it?”

The biggest complaints that feeding experts hear about family-style meals are that they are messy and use too many dishes. So, let it be known: When I serve family-style meals to my 6- and 2-year-old, I am not using our good serving bowls. I bring pots straight over from the stove or oven and put them down on trivets or dish towels. When I add a side of fruit or shredded cheese, they are still in their plastic containers.

We end up with roughly the same number of dishes we would have if I plated everything in the kitchen, give or take a few serving spoons. (The one exception may be taco night, which is both perfect for family-style meals, since everyone can customize their own, and a nightmare of additional bowls if you get too carried away with topping options.)

On the subject of mess, you also don’t need to hand a toddler the soup ladle. It’s fine to help small children serve themselves, as long as they give permission for food to go on their plate. Start with smaller portions and then add on if you’re worried about kids taking big piles of food they will likely not finish.

Also, not everyone has a dining table big enough to hold everything. But it’s still family style if you line up the food on a kitchen counter and have kids bring their plates over, or even just holler from the stove, “Do you want peas on your plate?” Supercautious eaters may need the control of being able to point out exactly where on their plate the peas should go, but other kids will benefit from being able to decide.

Source link