Trump launches his salvo against social media — will it land?

0

Donald Trump said he is asking regulators to reinterpret a law that shields internet companies from lawsuits | Pool photo by Doug MIlls/Getty Images

The president’s long-promised executive order targeting social media companies raises alarm, but may not have the bite he wants.

By

Updated

U.S. President Donald Trump’s attempt to punish companies like Twitter, Google and Facebook for alleged anti-conservative bias takes aim at the online industry’s most-cherished legal protections — but the shot could ultimately be a glancing blow.

Trump announced the action Thursday, signing an executive order that he said would “defend free speech from one of the greatest dangers” — tech platforms that have amassed “unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter virtually any form of communication between private citizens or large public audiences.”

“We can’t allow that to happen,” Trump said in the Oval Office, where he was accompanied by Attorney General William Barr.

Under the order, Trump said he is asking regulators to reinterpret a law that shields internet companies from lawsuits over content on their sites, a safeguard that has allowed Silicon Valley’s giants to generate some of the world’s biggest fortunes.

“My executive order calls for new regulations … to make it that social media companies that engage in censoring or any political conduct will not be able to keep their liability shield,” he said,

But any such action depends on independent agencies and state attorneys general agreeing with the administration’s stance, and would certainly provoke a legal fight that would last long past November’s election.

An early draft of the text drew swift condemnation from both internet industry advocates and civil liberties groups, including some who regularly criticize Silicon Valley, after the language began circulating on social media and news reports. Some called it dangerous; some dismissed it as bluster.

“This reads like a stream of consciousness tweetstorm that some poor staffer had to turn into the form of an Executive Order,” said Daphne Keller, a former Google attorney who now leads the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center.

The order nevertheless adds more ammunition to a talking point that resonates with Trump’s online base and will appease some Washington conservatives who are skeptical of the tech industry’s influence over political discourse. And Trump’s escalation of the issue could have a chilling effect on internet companies weighing whether to make rulings on misinformation or other content as Election Day nears.



Source by [author_name]

Boston Marathon Canceled, Will Be A Virtual Event Because Of Coronavirus

Boston police officers ride past the finish line of the Boston Marathon, which was canceled and replaced with a virtual event on Thursday.

Charles Krupa/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charles Krupa/AP

Boston police officers ride past the finish line of the Boston Marathon, which was canceled and replaced with a virtual event on Thursday.

Charles Krupa/AP

The 124th annual Boston Marathon has been canceled because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Boston Athletic Association announced the move in a statement on Thursday, saying that the marathon will instead be held as a virtual event.

All participants who were set to run in the event initially slated for April 20 and later pushed back to Sept. 14 will be offered a full refund of their entry fee and have the opportunity to participate in the alternative.

This is the first time the in-person event has been canceled since the race’s inception in 1897, according to ESPN.

According to the statement, participants will be required to complete the full 26.2 miles in six continuous hours or less with proof of timing. The distance can be run any time between Sept. 7 and Sept. 14.

The Boston Athletic Association added that the virtual race will be supplemented with exclusive events such as panel discussions and interviews with past champions.

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh said the decision “allows all of us to celebrate the meaning this race has.”

“This is a challenge, but meeting tough challenges is what the Boston Marathon is all about,” Walsh wrote in a tweet. “It’s a symbol of our city and Commonwealth’s resilience.”



Source link

A G.O.P. Lawmaker Had the Virus. Nobody Told Democrats Exposed to Him.

Democrats in Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives on Thursday accused Republicans of keeping a lawmaker’s positive coronavirus test a secret to avoid political embarrassment, even at the risk of exposing their Democratic colleagues.

A Republican House member, Andrew Lewis, confirmed on Wednesday that he had received a positive test on May 20 and went into self-isolation. Mr. Lewis said that every lawmaker or staff member he had been in contact with who “met the criteria for exposure” was notified.

But Democrats disputed that, saying none of their own members were alerted even though some were in proximity to Mr. Lewis in committee meetings.

In an emotional and profanity-laced Facebook video recorded in his office at the Capitol, Representative Brian K. Sims, a Democrat from Philadelphia, said Mr. Diamond had “apparently been quarantining himself for weeks” but “didn’t explain that to any of us when he was in committee, talking with us or walking up and down the aisles or bumping into us or letting us hold the door open for him.”

“How dare you put our lives at risk?” Mr. Sims said, noting that he had recently donated a kidney. “How dare you put our families at risk?”

Mr. Lewis said that after experiencing “mild flulike symptoms,” he sought a test on May 18. He kept his positive diagnosis private “out of respect for my family, and those who I may have exposed,” he wrote on Facebook. He also said that May 14 had been his last day in the Capitol and that as of Wednesday, he was fully recovered and ended his quarantine.

Representative Kevin J. Boyle, the Democratic chair of the state government committee, said he had sat near Mr. Lewis about a week before his positive test, and had not been told. “The fact the Republican caucus didn’t inform the Democratic caucus is deeply reckless and immoral,” he said.

He speculated on why they did not do so: “The optics are terrible” for Republicans, he said. “Lewis and Diamond have been high-profile members of the anti-shutdown movement. They’ve been consistently telling everyone we’ve overreacted with shutdown orders and Covid-19 is not the danger it is.” Mr. Boyle asked the Pennsylvania attorney general, Josh Shapiro, to investigate whether Republican leaders broke the law.

On Twitter, Mr. Diamond said he had not gotten tested during his self-isolation and he mocked “lefties” who “whine” about it.

Republican lawmakers, including Mr. Lewis, have introduced bills seeking to weaken the emergency shutdown orders of Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat. As in many states, Pennsylvania has seen a nasty tug of war between Republican lawmakers concerned about the economy, and sometimes mocking mask-wearing and social distancing, and governors seeking to follow the recommendations of health experts.

A spokesman for the House Republicans, Mike Straub, said that state and federal guidelines were followed in determining whom to notify, specifically anyone in close contact with Mr. Lewis in the 48 hours before his symptoms began. “Rep. Lewis was only in the Capitol for a short period of time within that window — so tracing who he was in contact with was easily verified,” Mr. Straub said in a statement.

On Thursday afternoon, Mr. Sims, speaking on the House floor, disputed both that timeline and when Mr. Lewis was infectious, which he said would have been as early as May 4, two weeks before his positive test. Mr. Lewis was present in the Capitol on six days when he could have been infectious, Mr. Sims said.

He accused Republican leaders of knowing of the positive test and not disclosing it as lawmakers returned to their homes for the Memorial Day holiday. “A massive holiday went by before we were notified, but people here interacted with their families,” he said, adding, “That’s unconscionable.”

Representative Ryan Bizzarro, a Democrat who went for a test on Thursday in Harrisburg, the capital, said: “The thing that was just infuriating about this whole situation is that we found out the Republican caucus leadership knew about this and tried to bury it.”

In a party-line vote, Republicans defeated a Democratic motion to adjourn through June 8 to investigate Republicans’ handling of the episode. Late in the day, Democrats proposed new rules to require all lawmakers to wear masks on the House floor and in committees, and to have their temperatures checked before being admitted to the floor or committee rooms.

Some Democrats have called for the House speaker, Mike Turzai, to step down, including Mr. Sims, who ended his floor speech with a flourish, saying, “Mike Turzai, you need to resign immediately.”

Mr. Turzai responded that he had not been informed at the time of Mr. Lewis’s positive test. He pledged that if he tested positive for the virus, he would immediately disclose the results publicly.

“And I do think that all members should follow the same protocol,” he said, an implicit rebuke of Mr. Lewis.



Source link

Hair Product Industry Linked to Uyghur Forced Labor Booming in Xinjiang’s Lop County

0

The U.S. recently sanctioned a hair products company based in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) for its links to forced labor, but a closer investigation by RFA’s Uyghur Service shows that several firms in the area operate similar business models and are likely linked to internment camps.

On May 1, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) placed a withhold release order on hair products made by Hetian Haolin Hair Accessories in order to ensure that products made with forced labor do not reach U.S. stores. The company was registered in an industrial park in Hotan (in Chinese, Hetian) prefecture’s Lop (Luopu) county, in the same location as an internment camp.

In its announcement, CBP said it will “detain imported merchandise made wholly or in part with hair products” manufactured by Hetian, citing “information that reasonably indicates the use of forced labor.” U.S. importers will be required to demonstrate that the merchandise was not produced with forced labor if they want to sell it inside the country.

Haolin is the second company whose products have been banned by CBP on the grounds that they are using Uyghur forced labor in their supply and manufacturing chains. Previously, CBP also banned goods from a company named Hetian Taida.

Uyghur exile groups welcomed the decision and encouraged other nations to take similar steps to address the importation of goods made with forced labor at factories that are increasingly linked to the XUAR’s vast network of internment camps, where authorities are believed to have held up to 1.8 million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities since April 2017.

China is the largest exporter of hair in the world, supplying more than 80 percent of hair-based products, including human-hair wigs and false eyelashes made from human eyelash hair.

While a kilo (2.2 pounds) of raw human hair usually sells for between 80 yuan (U.S. $11) and several hundred yuan (100 yuan = U.S. $14), depending on quality, products manufactured from that hair can command prices of tens of thousands of yuan (10,000 yuan = U.S. $1,400). China exports around U.S. $6 billion worth of hair products each year.

According to the Statista website, the U.S. is the largest importer of human-hair products from China, and in 2018 alone imported more than U.S. $3.15 billion of those products, or 42 percent of China’s total exports.

Booming industry

Haolin, which was founded in January 2018 with an initial investment of 8 million yuan (U.S. $1.1 million) by a private investor, describes its business as primarily engaged in “gathering and treating hair,” as well as exporting products.

A Uyghur employee of the Lop county management office confirmed that Haolin had been registered in an industrial park which, according to a recent report by the Asia Central Times is a 400-mu (65-acre) complex specifically built for companies manufacturing products made from human hair. The park was built close to the Beijing Industrial District in Lop in 2018 and now is home to 24 different companies that employ 4,000 local Uyghurs.

“I issued a license to that factory, but I don’t know very much about what kind of hair they make,” she said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

In December, the official Xinjiang Daily published an article entitled “Listen to the Graduates of Education Centers,” which purported to show, via accompanying photos, “graduates” from the camps who had been assigned to work at factories near their homes, including factories in the Lop industrial park.

The article cited Uyghurs who had been sent to work in the factories, including one Memetjan Mettohti, who is quoted as saying that if he hadn’t been sent to a camp, “it’s possible that I would have gone even further down the wrong path—it saved me and gave me a new life.” Mettohti was reportedly let out and sent to work in a factory in December 2018 after having gone into a camp the previous year.

The increase in hair production in Lop, which has been publicly encouraged by local officials, corresponds to explosive growth in the hair products industry in China.

Between 2009 and 2018, the market for hair products went from 719 million yuan (U.S. $100 million) per year to 5.4 billion yuan (U.S. $755.5 million); in 2019, it was 6.7 billion yuan (U.S. $937.5 million). Statistics show that from January to November of 2019, exports of hair from China to North America totaled 22,200 tons at a value of U.S. $1.8 billion.

RFA was able to determine that many Haolin products are partially processed in Lop factories, after which they are sent to factories in Shandong province’s Qingdao city for further processing before being sent to the U.S. and other countries.

A representative of Emeda Wigs, an export company in Qingdao, confirmed to RFA that the hair the company uses in several of its products originates in the XUAR, but refused to provide further details, citing “company secrets.”

“We have our own manufacturer, we just go [to the XUAR] to source materials,” she said, when asked about the company’s product referred to as “dark brown virgin Xinjiang human hair.”

Sourcing opaque

The source of the hair used in products being manufactured in the XUAR remains unclear, and RFA was able to learn little from those in the industry who were willing to speak on the record.

But Uyghur cultural traditions dictate that women leave their hair long and there is no history of people selling their hair in the region, raising suspicions about whether in addition to using forced labor to manufacture hair products, the raw hair may be coming from detainees in the XUAR’s camp network.

In testimonies shared with RFA and other outlets, at least 10 female former camp detainees have described having their heads shaved immediately upon entering the detention facilities, although they were unsure of what happened to their hair after it was cut.

RFA recently spoke with a Pakistani trader who gave his name as Amir and claimed to have visited a Haolin factory in Lop county four months ago where he said he saw Uyghurs newly released from the camps who had been sent there for work.

Amir, who has since closed his store in Lop and returned to Pakistan, reported that he stopped trading in hair products once he learned from a friend who works in the camps that the raw material was hair “taken from detainees.”

“I visited several firms [in Lop],” he said, adding that “Uyghurs work there—those who were sent for training,” using a euphemism for detention in the camps.

“Some 5,000 people work there. They work 20 to 22 hours [a day]. Some receive 500 yuan (U.S. $70) [per month for their work], and others don’t even get anything.”

Amir cited his friend as saying that the heads of all detainees are shaved when they are sent to the camps.

“That is the hair [that is sent to the companies],” he said.

“I have a friend who works in a camp. He told me that the companies take away all of the hair.”

RFA was unable to independently verify the Pakistani trader’s account.

‘It just grows back’

Teng Biao, a Chinese human rights lawyer and activist who is now living in exile in the U.S., told RFA that the shaving of heads is regulation in Chinese prisons and detention centers, and suggested that local authorities would likely try to profit from the practice.

“There are no rules about how to deal with the hair of people in prisons—it’s very difficult to supervise or place restrictions from above on how to deal with hair that has been forcibly removed,” he said.

“As a result, this has also created an environment in which [officials] are not going to turn down the economic benefits of hair that has been shaved off of people in government camps.”

Ethan Gutmann, a human rights researcher and current China Studies Research Fellow at the Washington-based Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, cited the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners in China as evidence that local authorities could be using other materials from those in detention to make money.

He echoed concerns that the testimonies of Uyghur women who have emerged from the camps suggest the hair of detainees may be getting collected and sold off to local companies for processing.

“What is distinctive about the women’s haircut—and this is really important, I think—is several of them described putting their head through a hole in a window,” he said.

“So, you never even saw the barber, your hair was gone, and they didn’t think the hair was being used somehow … That’s a lot of women [in the camps]: 300,000 approximately, or 350,000. That’s 350,000 heads of hair, full hair. A 78 percent raw increase in production from 2017, and that’s got to be coming from those women.”

In addition, Gutmann said, many detainees have been held in the camps for years, providing authorities with a replenishing supply.

“You’re getting it from everybody, and it just grows back,” he said.

“I can’t imagine the Chinese throwing that out … It’s essentially making a business that isn’t a transplant business, it’s a separate business, but it’s using a byproduct of the body.”

Reported by Gulchehre Hoja for RFA’s Uyghur Service. Translated by Elise Anderson and Alim Seytoff. Written in English by Joshua Lipes.



Source link

‘You Mexicans, get out’: Hammer-wielding woman accused of racist rant against Latina doctor, husband

A woman in Texas is facing charges after being seen using a hammer to threaten a Latina doctor and her husband whom she mistakenly referred to being Mexican during a profanity-laced rant in Houston.

The woman, whom authorities identified as Constance Lynn Bono, 60, was arrested Sunday after “unlawfully, intentionally and knowingly threatening Arturo Cordovez with imminent bodily injury by using and exhibiting a deadly weapon, namely, a hammer,” court documents show.

Cordovez was with his wife, Dr. Lia Franco, at the time of the incident. Both Cordovez and Franco are originally from Ecuador, but live in New Orleans.

Franco has been finishing up her medical residency, which includes treating COVID-19 patients during the coronavirus pandemic, NBC’s affiliate in Houston KPRC-TV reported. To decompress, the couple decided to spend Memorial Day weekend in Houston.

They noticed Bono following them in a car Sunday and decided to stop their car on the side of the road, Franco told KPRC-TV.

Bono also stopped her vehicle, Cordovez said. “After that, she started showing a hammer through the mirror. She was shaking her arm … and cursing at us, I think. I was thinking, what did I do?”

The couple then decided to drive to a gas station and call 911. That’s when Bono pulled up beside them and started screaming.

“She screamed, ‘You Mexicans, get out of my f—ing country. Go back to your f—ing country,” Franco said.

A video captured Bono getting out of her car, wearing a green shirt with an Irish flag, walking toward the direction of the couple as she waved a hammer in her hand.

“Of course, we were scared,” Cordovez told Telemundo in Spanish. “As soon as she heard our accent, she immediately said ‘you f—ing Mexicans go back to your f—ing country.”

Arturo Cordovez with his wife, Dr. Lia Franco.Family photo

According to Franco, it seemed like the woman “needs help, she needs treatment.”

“But that doesn’t justify the fact she needs to follow the laws of her country,” Franco said.

Court documents show that authorities requested Bono be evaluated to determine whether she has a mental illness or any other intellectual disabilities.

Bono has been charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a second-degree felony, according to court documents. If convicted, she could serve up to 20 years in prison. The charge can be elevated to a first-degree felony if prosecutors think this was a racially motivated attack, KPRC-TV reported. The case is expected to go to a grand jury.

Bono was released on bond Wednesday, pending a court appearance in July. Her attorney, Hans Nielsen, told NBC News in a statement that his “client adamantly denies the allegation that has been filed against her.”

“She has two young nephews who are Hispanic that she loves dearly and she is not a racist. The claim that she is a racist is a false allegation and she denies it,” Nielsen said.

Follow NBC Latino on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



Source link

International Concerns Grow Over Rule of Law in Hong Kong

0

The passage through China’s rubber-stamp parliament of plans to impose a draconian subversion and sedition law on Hong Kong sparked further international criticism on Thursday, with the governments of the U.K., U.S., Australia, and Canada expressing “deep concern” over the city’s future.

“China’s decision to impose the new national security law on Hong Kong lies in direct conflict with its international obligations under the principles of the legally-binding, UN-registered Sino-British Joint Declaration,” the statement said, referring to the 1984 treaty governing the 1997 handover of the former British colony to Chinese rule.

“The proposed law … raises the prospect of prosecution in Hong Kong for political crimes, and undermines existing commitments to protect the rights of Hong Kong people,” said the statement, which was signed by British foreign secretary Dominic Raab, Australian foreign minister Marise Payne, Canadian foreign minister François-Philippe Champagne, and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

It said the direct imposition of the law, bypassing the Legislative Council (LegCo), had “dramatically” eroded the city’s autonomy.

The statement came after Pompeo said on Wednesday that Hong Kong was no longer autonomous.

It said the only way to rebuild trust in the wake of months of mass anti-government protests in Hong Kong would be to allow the city’s seven million residents to enjoy the rights and freedoms they were promised,

The statement called on Beijing to work with Hong Kong to find a mutually acceptable outcome.

Expanded visa rights promised

Meanwhile, Britain said it would give greater visa rights to British national overseas (BNO) passport holders from Hong Kong unless China suspended the proposed law, foreign minister Dominic Raab told the BBC.

“In relation to BNO passport holders, as you know currently they only have the right to come to the UK for six months. If China continues down this path and implements this national security legislation, we will change that status,” Raab said, according to a tweet from BBC reporter James Landale.

“And we will remove that six-month limit and allow those BNO passport holders to come to the UK and to apply to work and study for extendable periods of 12 months and that will itself provide a pathway to future citizenship,” he said.

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said in a letter to the EU’s 27 foreign ministers that the bloc needs to discuss at a meeting on Friday how best to respond.

“Beijing’s rise to be an assertive, capable and self-confident global actor will be a test to the EU’s geopolitical ambitions,” Borrell said in his letter.

The letter said the meeting should focus on “China’s increasing assertiveness and attempts to influence and shape global public opinion and perceptions as part of its wider geopolitical strategy.”

One country, one system

Lawmaker Tanya Chan, convenor of the pro-democracy camp within Hong Kong’s Legislative Council (LegCo), said the “one country, two systems” framework under which the city was promised a high degree of autonomy from the rest of China was now officially dead.

“I think we can say that Hong Kong is now officially under ‘one country, one system’,” Chan told journalists after the NPC decision on Thursday.

“During the past few days, a lot of countries have expressed grave concern over the national security law for Hong Kong,” Chan said. “Objectively speaking, we have already seen the impact of this, which is damage to Hong Kong’s reputation as an international city.”

“This has been the clearest marker that we are now in a ‘one country, one system’ model that we have seen in the entire 23 years since the handover,” Chan said.

Chan noted that the NPC had added even stricter wording to the proposed law, which will now ban “any actions or activities harming national security,” compared with the earlier wording, which only referred to “actions.”

She said an even more worrying clause was a requirement that Hong Kong implement a “national security education” program in schools.

A recent survey by the Citizens’ Press Conference of 370,000 online responses found that 98.6 percent of them opposed the national security law, while around 70 percent thought it would have no effect on clashes between protesters and riot police.

‘Rule of law is gone’

Former HSBC Global Markets economist Kelvin Lam told RFA: “The rule of law is gone.”

“Foreign investors will be asking themselves whether they are willing to put their money in Hong Kong any more; whether there will ultimately be any kind of legal protection,” Lam said.

“People find it pretty scary that the NPC standing committee has final right of interpretation [of Hong Kong law],” he said.

Meanwhile, chaotic scenes ensued in Hong Kong’s Legislative Council (LegCo) as pro-democracy lawmakers tried to obstruct the passage of a hugely unpopular National Anthem Law banning any form of “insult” to China’s national anthem.

The bill passed its second reading after they were removed from the chamber at the order of LegCo president Andrew Leung, who then declared that more than half of those present had voted it in.

The law means that anyone judged to have insulted the March of the Volunteers could face a jail sentence of up to three years.

Reported by Lu Xi and Man Hoi-tsan for RFA’s Cantonese and Mandarin Services. Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie.



Source link

Trump Signs Social Media Executive Order

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday that could weaken legal protections for social media companies, days after Twitter labeled two of his misleading missives with a fact-check addendum.

The move, which may expose social media companies to liability for what gets posted on their platforms, dramatically escalates a confrontation between Trump and his favored mode of communication, where the president can address his more than 80 million followers directly without relying on news conferences or the traditional media.

Trump and his backers claimed Twitter was suppressing free speech by labeling his tweets, which falsely claimed mail-in ballots would be “substantially fraudulent.” The president typically uses the platform to brag, attack rivals, bolster allies and spread falsehoods. 

When a reporter asked at the signing why Trump didn’t simply stop using using the platform, the president retorted, “If we had fair press in this country, I would do that in a heartbeat.”

It wasn’t immediately clear how, if at all, the order can be enforced. The president cannot regulate tech companies without congressional approval and any challenge to their autonomy is sure to end up in court.

“Much as he might wish otherwise, Donald Trump is not the president of Twitter. This order, if issued, would be a blatant and unconstitutional threat to punish social media companies that displease the president,” the American Civil Liberties Union noted on Twitter.

“The president has no authority to rewrite a congressional statute with an executive order imposing a flawed interpretation of Section 230,” the ACLU continued, referring to the section of the Communications Decency Act that shields platforms from being held liable for what users publish on them.

“Ironically, Donald Trump is a big beneficiary of Section 230,” the legal nonprofit continued. “If platforms were not immune under the law, then they would not risk the legal liability that could come with hosting Trump’s lies, defamation, and threats.”

But Trump insisted Thursday that he would go as far as shutting down Twitter if his lawyers found a way. “I’d have to go through a legal process,” he said.

Social media companies have enjoyed legal protections for what gets posted on their platforms and have resisted tampering with even vile falsehoods, including Trump’s aspersions that MSNBC host Joe Scarborough committed murder.

Still, Twitter labeled two of Trump’s tweets with a fact-check warning for the first time on Tuesday after the president’s mail-in fraud claim. Many states have moved to expand vote-by-mail during the coronavirus pandemic, including California, which said this month all registered voters would be sent ballots for the general election.

The Twitter addendum tells readers they can “get the facts” about mail-in ballots and directs them to news reports that debunk Trump’s claims.

The move, however, sparked a dramatic outburst from the Oval Office.

Twitter “is now interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election,” Trump wrote. He later said the social media giant was “completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen!”

Trump doubled down on that criticism Thursday afternoon, tagging Twitter’s head of site integrity Yoel Roth in a separate tweet and deriding him as a “hater.” It’s the second time in as many days the White House has specifically targeted Roth. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway spelled out his Twitter handle on Fox News Wednesday, ominously predicting “he’s about to get a lot more followers.”

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he disagreed with Twitter’s policy in an interview with Fox News set to air Thursday.

“I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” Zuckerberg said. “I think in general, private companies probably shouldn’t be — especially these platform companies — shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey fired back at the criticism, saying the company would “continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.”

“This does not make us an ‘arbiter of truth,’” Dorsey said. “Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.”

Lydia O’Connor and Ryan Grenoble contributed reporting.



Source by [author_name]

Cozy up your home, Part 2

Last month we published the first of this series with some ideas for warming up your home space, pre-season change.

This second rendition offers up further ideas as to how to cosy up your living areas with some helpful DIY top tips to add to the at-home to-do list.

Linen upcycle

Let’s face it, winter needs some brightening up but if changing your wall colour or the like, feels a little drastic for you, start small with changing your linen hues from light to slightly darker shades. 

Try to create a new look whilst working with what you already have, there’s no reason to go out and buy all-new bedding for winter if you’ve got a cupboard full of blankets and sheets.

Layering up your bed is not only versatile for all seasons, but also looks extra luxe and who wouldn’t want to recreate the “princess and a pea” scenario! 

Photo: Adobe Stock

Bring the outside in

Look to nature’s perfect palette for all the inspiration you’ll need this season. What a great excuse to go for long walks and conquer that winter circulation by collecting a few treasures from the park/ beach or woods that you can use as part of your winter floral display or table centerpiece.

Another one of our favourite things about winter is adding candles, everywhere. Other than adding a flickering mood of romance and soft lighting to everything you do, candles can also add a colour pop or a flavored scent to the season change and all your corresponding memories.

Cozy up your home, Part 2
Photo: Adobe Stock

From the ground up

Once considered a luxury, but certainly offering a reprieve for your icy winter feet, perhaps it’s time install underfloor heating, for when there is no escaping the cold that creeps in from the ground up.

It’s a great way to warm up your space and it need not be done throughout your whole home. Just prioritize the coziest spot you’d like to lay claims to this winter…and crank up the heat!

If that’s a bit of a stretch in this current economic climate, a great alternative is shaggy, thick rugs to close out the cold and make your home a little extra cosier for winter.

Photo: Adobe Stock

Seal it up

Continuing with the practical advice to banish the winter blues: Windows are one of the main culprits for those pesky breezes creeping in and apart from weatherproofing your windows and doors, your other option to weatherproof yourself this winter is to “wrap your windows” to seal out the cold. 

Layering your home openings with blinds and thicker curtains is a great way to cut through the cold and also adds instant opulence to any room. You can also attempt to DIY a Roman blind yourself, it’s both practical and adds to your aesthetic look without breaking the bank.

Photo: Adobe Stock

DMCA.com Protection Status



Source link

De Blasio Expects New York City To Head Back To Work Next Month

Vehicles move through a nearly empty Times Square earlier this month in New York City. On Thursday, Mayor Bill de Blasio laid out his plans for reopening the city after weeks of sweeping measures to try to contain the coronavirus outbreak.

Frank Franklin II/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Frank Franklin II/AP

Vehicles move through a nearly empty Times Square earlier this month in New York City. On Thursday, Mayor Bill de Blasio laid out his plans for reopening the city after weeks of sweeping measures to try to contain the coronavirus outbreak.

Frank Franklin II/AP

Mayor Bill de Blasio expects up to to 400,000 New York City residents to head back to work in the first half of next month, as the city prepares to begin lifting some of its most stringent coronavirus restrictions. That’s the upshot of the mayor’s news conference Thursday at City Hall, during which he laid out what to expect from a city that emerged weeks ago as the epicenter of the outbreak in the U.S.

“Because we’re in the great unknown — we’ve never been through a pandemic like this, certainly not in the last hundred years — we can only give you a range to begin, but we’re going to know really soon what the truth is,” de Blasio said. “But even if you say 200,000 people, that’s a lot of employees coming back to work. So we want to make sure it’s done the right way, and we want to emphasize safety throughout.”

To date, New York City has reported nearly 200,000 confirmed cases of the coronavirus and a death toll north of 16,600 — more deaths linked to COVID-19 in just New York City, in other words, than all but six countries around the world.

Even as regions throughout the rest of New York — including neighboring Long Island, which officials are treating separately from New York City in this instance — have begun the first phase of the state’s reopening plan, the city of some 8 million people remains behind the starting gate not having hit the necessary benchmarks to open.

But de Blasio doesn’t expect the city to need much more time to satisfy the criteria, such as reduced infection rates and ramped-up testing capacity. He told reporters Thursday that “all indicators suggest it’ll be announced in the first or second week in June.”

After that, four principal sectors of the city’s economy will be able to return to work, de Blasio said: construction, manufacturing, wholesale and retail that to this point has been deemed nonessential. These include sellers of clothing, furniture and other items, provided that sales are done through pickup.

“These sectors, as you can imagine, tend to be the sectors where you need people in person. But on top of that, they were chosen because there are sectors where you can create a lot of physical separation,” he said, noting that social distancing regulations will remain in effect. “You can make sure that people are safe.”

At a separate news conference Thursday in Brooklyn, Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced that he had signed an executive order allowing businesses statewide to refuse entry to people not wearing face masks. And he made clear that ultimately, the decision about when New York City will reopen will be made in Albany.

“We’re on totally the same page, because there’s only one page: There’s state guidelines, period,” Cuomo said of himself and de Blasio, adding: “The mayor has his schedule. I have my schedule. I talk to him all the time. But there’s only one page.”



Source link

George Floyd’s Death Resurfaces Amy Klobuchar’s Tough-On-Crime, Easy-On-Cops Record

The death of George Floyd, a black man who died after a Minneapolis police officer kneeled on his neck earlier this week, has resurrected Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar’s record as a prosecutor in the state ― including her tense relationship with the Black community there ― at the politically sensitive time that she’s being considered by Joe Biden to be his running mate. 

“There is absolutely no way that she is qualified to become Biden’s VP nominee,” said Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer who served as head of the Minneapolis NAACP from 2015 to 2016.

Kenza Hadj-Moussa, a spokeswoman for the progressive group Take Action Minnesota said Klobuchar’s actions as a prosecutor “caused trauma that’s been long lasting.”

“With everything that’s happened in Minneapolis and across the country,” she said, Klobuchar would put Biden at even more of a “disadvantage” politically.

“This does not work in Amy’s favor because she had such a strained relationship with that community for years,” added a prominent Democrat. 

Four Minnesota police officers were fired this week after video emerged showing one of the men, a white officer, kneeling on Floyd’s neck as he pleaded for help, saying ”I can’t breathe.” They detained him Monday evening on suspicion of trying using a fake $20 bill at a convenience store. Floyd was declared dead shortly after arriving at the hospital. 

Two days of protests in Minneapolis have followed, with police using rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse crowds. 

Klobuchar received her start in politics right there, in Hennepin County, where she served as the top prosecutor for eight years, beginning in 1999. She employed a tough-on-crime approach, pushing, among other things, more convictions of minor offenses like graffiti and school truancy.

Klobuchar’s methods were not exceptional for the time period, when cities were struggling to reduce the high crime rates of the 1980s and ’90s. 

But reformers now blame the techniques that she and others adopted for swelling the country’s disproportionately non-white jail and prison populations.

“Minnesota leadership has really supported police and the expansion of policing,” said Isabela Escalona, a spokesperson for the Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha, a worker center that has fought against increases in Minneapolis’ police budget. “She’s a part of the problem and we must find community solutions to safety beyond police.”

During her presidential campaign, Klobuchar faced deep skepticism from many Black voters, in part because of her record in Hennepin County. “As a prosecutor in heavily white Minnesota, Amy Klobuchar declined to go after police involved in fatal encounters with black men,” read the headline of a Washington Post article in March 2019 that examined her record on criminal justice. 



As county attorney in Hennepin County, Amy Klobuchar had a tense relationship with the Black community for her refusal to bring charges against police officers in certain cases.

According to The Washington Post, Klobuchar chose not to bring charges against officers in more than two dozen cases where people were killed in police encounters. 

Throughout her presidential campaign, and as recently as this week, Klobuchar has said she believes prosecutors — and not grand juries — should ultimately decide whether or not to charge police officers. In many of the cases cited in the Post, grand juries ultimately decided not to hand up charges.

“I think it just makes for much more responsibility if you basically make the decision yourself,” she told CNN’s Chris Cuomo in an interview earlier this week. “Back then it was thought, let the community help decide how these cases should be handled.”

As a presidential candidate, and before that as a Senate candidate, Klobuchar cited the prosecution of the alleged perpetrators of a 2002 shooting that killed 11-year-old Tyesha Edwards as evidence that her prosecutorial style came in response to genuine concern from the state’s Black community about gun violence plaguing urban neighborhoods.

But an investigation by The Associated Press in February found that there were many outstanding questions about the evidence that Klobuchar’s office used to convict Myon Burrell, who was 16 at the time of the shooting and is serving a life sentence. His co-defendants now deny that he participated in the shooting. 

Protesters angered by the case stormed the stage ahead of a planned rally in a Minneapolis suburb two nights before Super Tuesday in early March. The demonstration prompted Klobuchar to cancel the rally; she dropped out of the presidential race the next day. 

The Burrell case looms large for activists wary of Biden picking her as a running mate. 

Biden “uses all the language of [Black Lives Matter] and liberal racial justice advocates but you look at what a person does,” said a Minneapolis progressive strategist, who asked for anonymity to speak freely. “Picking Klobuchar, given the record she has, especially in this moment, seems like nothing less than an admission that he doesn’t seriously care about these issues.”

“The Black community in Minnesota has consistently expressed concern about Amy Klobuchar’s prosecutorial record and her involvement in prosecuting Myon Burrell, an innocent Black teenager whose case was used by her for political gain, including during her campaign for President,” Levy Armstrong said. “Another deeply troubling aspect of Klobuchar’s record was her failure to hold a single officer accountable for police shootings, dozens of which happened on her watch.”

Klobuchar has called for an independent investigation into Burrell’s case, a move that drew praise from an attorney for the Burrell family and Leslie Redmond, the head of the Minneapolis NAACP who has protested Klobuchar in the past.

Klobuchar’s office declined to comment on the record for this story.  

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who is Black and a former criminal defense attorney, defended Klobuchar’s prosecutorial record, maintaining that she was “not unusually tough” and has since become a “voice for criminal justice reform in the context of race.” 

Derek Chauvin, the police officer seen kneeling on Floyd, had previously been involved in two other violent incidents with civilians. One happened in late October 2006, when he and five other officers shot and killed a man who they said aimed a shotgun at them. Only days later, Klobuchar was elected to the Senate and remained Hennepin County district attorney for two more months. In 2007, a grand jury declined to bring charges against Chauvin and the other officers.

Klobuchar put out a statement on Floyd’s death, describing it as a ”horrifying and gut wrenching instance of an African-American man dying.” She also called for a “complete and thorough outside investigation into what occurred, and those involved must be held accountable.” 

Her office did not return a request for comment for this piece. 

Biden has publicly said he is going to choose a woman as his running mate and that Klobuchar is someone he is considering. But he has also been under significant pressure to choose a woman of color.

Biden’s campaign looked like it was over, until South Carolina voters ― primarily, Black voters in the state ― delivered him a knock-out victory. In recognition of that support, many Democrats have urged him to choose a woman of color ― or, at the very least, not to pick someone who has had such a strained relationship with the Black community. 

In a recent Washington Post op-ed, a group of six Black female activists specifically named Klobuchar as an unacceptable vice presidential option if he wants to win over Black voters: “Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, does not need help winning white, working-class voters — he serves that function himself. A choice such as [Klobuchar], who failed to prosecute controversial police killings and is responsible for the imprisonment of Myon Burrell, will only alienate black voters.”

Last week, Biden made supporters cringe when he told Charlamagne tha God, a popular Black radio host, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t Black.” He apologized later that day in a call with Black business leaders, saying he was “too cavalier” and did not take the Black vote for granted. 

The prominent Democrat who spoke with HuffPost said the comments underscored why Biden needed to choose a woman of color ― or someone who can help him talk to voters of color.

“There are a couple of things that I think are going to hurt her,” they said of Klobuchar. “One was Biden’s real big gaffe, which now I think forces his hand in more ways than one to pick a woman of color. But two, now this [Floyd killing] is going to raise all the issues, particularly with the Minneapolis NAACP and the African-American community. It’s going to dredge all that back up again.”

Ellison, who supported Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential run, said he does not think Biden should be limited to choosing a woman of color as his running mate. 

Klobuchar would “make a great vice president. She’d be a tireless campaigner too,” he said. “She’ll help us win the upper Midwest.”

Biden released a statement on Floyd on Wednesday, saying it was “not an isolated incident, but a part of an ingrained systemic cycle of justice that still exists in this country.” 

The former vice president is set to deliver a keynote at the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party’s state convention on Sunday, introduced by Klobuchar. His team has not yet released his remarks, but some allies have urged him to address Floyd’s death.

Biden has enjoyed high support among older Black voters, but has struggled with young voters of all races, who typically have more progressive views on a host of issues. Hillary Clinton’s failure to generate higher turnout among Black voters in general, and young Black voters in particular, is widely considered a key reason for her loss to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential race.

Those younger voters are looking for a vice presidential pick who demonstrates that Biden is committed to a world with fewer deaths like George Floyd’s, according to Hadj-Moussa.

“There’s an incredible amount of pain and we have an opportunity to not go back to the way things were, but to create a better future,” she said. “If I was advising Vice President Biden, I would not point to Sen. Klobuchar as a vice presidential pick who could stand next to him and be part of building a new future.” 

Kevin Robillard contributed reporting. 



Source link